Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Urology ; 134: 2-23, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31415778

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study reports the re-operation and symptom resolution rates of different techniques used in surgical excision of genitourinary mesh erosions. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was completed after searching electronic databases for studies involving outcomes of mesh erosion in humans that were managed surgically using a transvaginal, cystoscopic, or abdominal approach. Surgical outcomes were reported in percentages, ranges, and simple pooling to generate trends in management techniques. RESULTS: There were 177 cases that met our inclusion criteria. Forty-one patients underwent cystoscopic removal of eroded urethral mesh while 40 cases underwent transvaginal removal of urethral mesh. CONCLUSIONS: For mesh eroded into the urethra, a transvaginal vs. cystoscopic approach showed a trend toward resolution of symptoms and fewer interventions. For mesh eroded into the bladder, abdominal and cystoscopic approaches had similar symptom resolution, but abdominal approach required fewer interventions.


Subject(s)
Prosthesis Failure , Reoperation , Surgical Mesh/adverse effects , Urogenital Surgical Procedures , Comparative Effectiveness Research , Humans , Prosthesis Failure/adverse effects , Prosthesis Failure/etiology , Reoperation/adverse effects , Reoperation/methods , Urogenital Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Urogenital Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Urogenital Surgical Procedures/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...