The motivation to obtain nicotine-conditioned reinforcers depends on nicotine dose.

Stimuli associated with nicotine (NIC) can acquire new meaning via Pavlovian conditioning. If a stimulus is associated with the primary reinforcing effects of NIC, the new conditional properties of the stimulus should make it a more valuable reinforcer (i.e., increase the motivation to obtain the stimulus), and this value should be based, in part, on the strength or intensity of the primary reinforcer (i.e., NIC dose). The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether NIC-conditioned reinforcement increased motivation to obtain non-NIC stimuli, as reflected by performance on a progressive ratio (PR) reinforcement schedule, and whether this increased motivation was systematically related to NIC dose. Two Paired groups were allowed to nose-poke for NIC (0.03 or 0.09mg/kg/infusion, IV) accompanied by 15-s illumination of a stimulus light (conditional stimulus or CS). Two Unpaired groups (0.03 or 0.09mg/kg/infusion) could also make a nose-poke response for the CS; however their NIC infusions were controlled by the Paired group (i.e., yoked design). A fifth group (CS-Only) was allowed to nose-poke for CS presentations and saline infusions. After 29 conditioning sessions the nose-poke operant was prevented by obscuring the receptacle and the CS (accompanied by saline infusion for all groups) was made contingent upon a novel operant response (lever press). During the acquisition of this novel response, each CS/saline infusion earned increased the number of responses required to earn the next CS/saline infusion. Pairings with the primary reinforcing effects of NIC resulted the acquisition of a novel response for the CS. Motivation to obtain the CS depended on salience (dose) of the primary reinforcement (NIC).

Cue dependency of nicotine self-administration and smoking.

A paradox exists regarding the reinforcing properties of nicotine. The abuse liability associated with smoking equals or exceeds that of other addictive drugs, yet the euphoric, reinforcing and other psychological effects of nicotine, compared to these other drugs, are more subtle, are manifest under more restricted conditions, and do not readily predict the difficulty most smokers experience in achieving abstinence. One possible resolution to this apparent inconsistency is that environmental cues associated with drug delivery become conditioned reinforcers and take on powerful incentive properties that are critically important for sustaining smoking in humans and nicotine self-administration in animals. We tested this hypothesis by using a widely employed self-administration paradigm in which rats press a lever at high rates for 1 h/day to obtain intravenous infusions of nicotine that are paired with two types of visual stimuli: a chamber light that when turned on signals drug availability and a 1-s cue light that signals drug delivery. We show that these visual cues are at least as important as nicotine in sustaining a high rate of responding once self-administration has been established, in the degree to which withdrawing nicotine extinguishes the behavior, and in the reinstatement of lever pressing after extinction. Additional studies demonstrated that the importance of these cues was manifest under both fixed ratio and progressive ratio (PR) schedules of reinforcement. The possibility that nicotine-paired cues are as important as nicotine in smoking behavior should refocus our attention on the psychology and neurobiology of conditioned reinforcers in order to stimulate the development of more effective treatment programs for smoking cessation.

Nicotine self-administration in rats: estrous cycle effects, sex differences and nicotinic receptor binding.

RATIONALE: Research on smoking behavior and responsiveness to nicotine suggests that nicotine's effects may depend on the sex of the organism. OBJECTIVE: The present study addressed four questions: 1) Will female rats self-administer nicotine? 2) Does self-administration by females vary as a function of estrous cycle? 3) Does self-administration by females differ from that of males? 4) Does self-administration of nicotine result in up-regulation of nicotinic receptor binding and are these changes similar in males and females? METHODS: Male and female Sprague-Dawley rats were allowed to self-administer nicotine at one of four doses (0.02-0.09 mg/kg, free base) on both fixed and progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement. RESULTS: Females acquired nicotine self-administration across the entire range of doses. Acquisition of self-administration at the lowest dose was faster in females than males. However, few sex differences were found in the number of active responses, number of infusions, or total intake of nicotine during stable fixed ratio self-administration. In contrast, females reached higher break points on a progressive ratio. For both schedules, females had shorter latencies to earn their first infusion of each session and demonstrated higher rates of both inactive and timeout responding. There was no effect of estrous cycle on self-administration during either fixed or progressive ratio sessions. Self-administered nicotine resulted in average arterial plasma nicotine levels between 53 and 193 ng/ml and left hemi-brain levels between 174 and 655 ng/g, depending on dose. Nicotine self-administration produced similar up-regulation of nicotinic receptor binding sites in males and females, as reflected by increased right hemi-brain binding of [3H]-epibatidine, when compared to the brains of untreated control rats. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that while males and females may regulate their intake of nicotine similarly under limited access conditions, the motivation to obtain nicotine is higher in females.

Differential effects of response-contingent and response-independent nicotine in rats.

Passive administration of nicotine activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis and sympathetic nervous system. However, little is known about the effects of self-administered nicotine. Drug-naive rats were trained to respond for food reinforcement and then tested in one, 1-h session in which they received response-contingent i.v. nicotine or response-independent i.v. nicotine or saline. Blood draws were taken immediately prior to the session, 15 min after the first infusion and immediately after the session. Both response-contingent and response-independent nicotine (RI/N) increased corticosterone within 15 min, however, corticosterone levels returned to baseline in animals receiving response-contingent nicotine (RC/N) by the end of the session while remaining elevated in those receiving RI/N. Furthermore, only RI/N increased plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels; RC/N produced no effect. These differences indicate that nicotine's acute effects are powerfully modified by the presence of a contingency relationship between drug administration and the animal's behavior and that this relationship develops very rapidly.

Mecamylamine prevents tolerance but enhances whole brain [3H]epibatidine binding in response to repeated nicotine administration in rats.

RATIONALE: Chronic administration of nicotine in rats results in upregulation of neuronal nicotinic receptors. Upregulation has been proposed to reflect receptor desensitization, which may underlie functional tolerance to nicotine's effects. However, evidence indicates that tolerance and upregulation do not always parallel each other, suggesting that either upregulation does not always reflect desensitization, or mechanisms other than receptor desensitization account for tolerance to nicotine. OBJECTIVES: The present studies examined tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception and changes in receptor binding after two regimens of intermittent nicotine injections in rats. The role of receptor activation in upregulation and tolerance was also examined by co-administering nicotine with the non-competitive antagonist, mecamylamine. METHODS: Sprague-Dawley rats were administered a short (once-daily, s.c. for 6 days (0.35 mg/kg)) or long (twice-daily for 11 days (0.66 mg/kg)) series of injections and tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception and [3H]epibatidine binding in whole brain were measured. RESULTS: The short series of injections resulted in tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception, but failed to increase [3H]epibatidine binding. In contrast, the long series of injections resulted in both tolerance and increased receptor binding. Once-daily pairings of mecamylamine (1 mg/kg, s.c.) with nicotine (0.35 mg/kg) for 6 days blocked the development of tolerance, indicating receptor activation is necessary for tolerance to occur. Pairing mecamylamine with nicotine (0.66 mg/kg) twice daily for 11 days blocked tolerance but produced a greater increase in [3H]epibatidine binding than nicotine alone. CONCLUSIONS: A dissociation of tolerance from receptor upregulation was observed in the present study. The finding that receptor activation may be necessary for tolerance but not upregulation is discussed within the context of possible mechanisms controlling tolerance to nicotine.

Long-term oscillation of corticosterone following intermittent cocaine.

We have shown that repeated administration of cocaine, as well as other drugs and nondrug stressors, can induce alternating increases and decreases in several neurotransmitter and endocrine endpoints, which we call oscillation. Oscillation studies have typically used 3-4 pretreatments with cocaine or other agents, raising the question of whether oscillation lasts beyond this point. Using plasma corticosterone as our endpoint measure, we therefore inquired whether oscillation would persist across eight administrations of cocaine over a 28-day period. We report oscillation of corticosterone levels persisting across all eight cocaine groups. Our data also indicate that the degree of oscillation increases with the intertreatment interval.

Nicotine self-administration in rats on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement.

RATIONALE: Robust intravenous (i.v.) nicotine self-administration (SA) in rats has been reported by several laboratories, including our own, using fixed ratio (FR) schedules of reinforcement. Studies on other drugs of abuse, however, suggest that progressive ratio (PR) schedules may provide additional information not gained using FR schedules. OBJECTIVE: Here, we attempt to establish and characterize nicotine SA on a PR. METHODS: One study allowed animals to acquire SA on a FR at four doses of nicotine (0.02, 0.03, 0.06, 0. 09 mg/kg) before being switched to a PR. A second study examined extinction by saline substitution or pretreatment with the nicotinic antagonist, mecamylamine, including a preliminary analysis into the role of secondary reinforcers in the extinction process. RESULTS: SA of nicotine on a PR was stable across repeated sessions. The number of infusions earned on a PR correlated with infusion rate on a FR; however, a large portion of the variance in SA on a PR could not be accounted for by infusion rate on a FR. Infusions on a PR increased across the same range of doses that produced a decrease in the infusion rate on a FR. Extinction of responding occurred after saline substitution or pretreatment with mecamylamine, and animals re-acquired when nicotine was again available without pretreatment. The presence of drug-paired stimuli appeared to lengthen the extinction process. CONCLUSIONS: Nicotine supports stable SA on a PR. Since PR and FR schedules may measure different aspects of nicotine reinforcement, PR schedules may be valuable in further characterizing group and individual differences in nicotine reinforcement.

Cocaine-induced oscillation is conditionable.

We have recently shown that under some circumstances, sensitization produced by a stimulant such as cocaine (COC) can give way, with successive drug administrations, to alternating attenuations and reinstatements of the effect, an outcome that we have termed oscillation. Because sensitization to COC can be conditioned, we inquired whether COC-induced oscillation also was conditionable. The end point used was shock-induced hypoalgesia (paw withdrawal from a hot plate), as we have previously shown that oscillation follows initial sensitization of this measure with one to five pretreatments of 12 mg/kg (IP) of COC spaced at 1-week intervals, with the last COC injection occurring 30 min prior to the footshock. Experiment 1 indicated that a conditioned stimulus (CS)--a distinctive environment--which repeatedly had been paired with COC, would substitute for the last COC injection in sustaining the oscillatory effect. Experiment 2 showed that a previously established CS successfully substituted for all COC injections in first inducing sensitization that was then followed by oscillation. These findings strongly suggest that COC-induced oscillation shares with COC-induced sensitization, the property that both can be conditioned.

Mecamylamine blocks the development of tolerance to nicotine in rats: implications for the mechanisms of tolerance.

Chronic injections of nicotine in rats produce upregulation of nicotinic cholinergic receptors. It has been proposed that this upregulation is a reflection of receptor desensitization and is the basis of functional tolerance. Mecamylamine, a non-competitive antagonist that blocks activation of nicotinic receptors, does not prevent upregulation produced by nicotine injections. This suggests that receptor activation is not a prerequisite for nicotine-induced receptor upregulation. Therefore, the present experiments tested whether mecamylamine would also fail to prevent the development of tolerance to nicotine. Six daily pairings of mecamylamine (1 mg/kg SC) with nicotine did block the development of tolerance to nicotine-induced antinociception (0.35 mg/kg) and to the ability of nicotine to suppress milk intake (0.66 mg/kg). In another experiment, six daily injections of mecamylamine, when given alone, did not alter the effects of a subsequent, acute injection of nicotine (0.35 mg/kg) in inducing antinociception in rats. There was no evidence that after six pairings of mecamylamine with nicotine, the cues associated with mecamylamine delivery took on conditioned antagonistic properties. These findings suggest that, unlike the receptor upregulation that results from either continuous or repeated nicotine administration, the tolerance following a short series of intermittent nicotine injections is dependent on receptor activation.

Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence.

Although both the human and animal literatures are notable for the general lack of attention paid to possible sex differences in drug self-administration behavior, evidence is accumulating to suggest that males and females may differ in factors that maintain tobacco smoking or nicotine self-administration. Self-administration of nicotine per se may be less robust in women, and women are less sensitive than men to some effects of nicotine that may be reinforcing. Compared to men, smoking behavior of women may be influenced more by non-nicotine stimuli associated with smoking, suggesting greater conditioned reinforcement of smoking in women. Moreover, nicotine replacement, the current standard treatment for smoking cessation, is sometimes less effective in women, further suggesting the need for greater consideration of non-nicotine factors that may maintain women's smoking. Very recent research on rats also indicates sex differences in nicotine self-administration. However, these differences are complex and suggest that nicotine-seeking behavior is composed of several components, including hedonic, incentive-motivational, and conditioning effects; males and females may differ in one or more of these components. Menstrual or estrous cycle phase effects on the maintenance of nicotine self-administration are not particularly apparent in humans or animals, although cycle phase may influence other stages of dependence (e.g., withdrawal symptoms during cessation). Future research should evaluate further the consistency of results across human and non-human species, identify the conditions and procedures under which sex differences are observed, and elucidate the specific components of reinforcement that may differ between males and females. Studies also should examine the possible generalizability of these sex differences to other drugs of abuse. Identification of specific factors responsible for these sex differences may lead to improved interventions for smoking cessation and other substance abuse in women.

Oscillatory effects of repeated morphine on shock-induced hypoalgesia and beta-endorphin.

Recent research indicates that the sensitization that results from repeated drug or non-drug stress exposure may develop into a pattern of alternating increases and decreases (i.e., oscillation) in response to each subsequent stressor exposure. Oscillation, with or without prior sensitization, has been observed for a number of drug and non-drug stressors, and for various neurochemical and endocrine endpoints. The present studies investigated whether oscillation also occurs in the behavioral and endocrine effects of repeated morphine treatment and if a drug that normalizes the mood swings of bipolar disorder in humans will also attenuate drug oscillation in this animal model. In the first experiment, rats were given 1-5 pretreatments with morphine (15 mg/kg, i.p.), separated by 1-week intervals with the last injection occurring 1 hour prior to being tested for stressor-induced (i.e., 5 seconds, 2-mA electric footshock) hypoalgesia, as measured by latency to paw-lift or jump from a hot-plate. Plasma beta-endorphin also was measured. The second experiment replicated the behavioral findings of the first study and, in addition, assessed the effect of continuous lithium chloride, in the drinking water, on morphine-induced oscillation. Caffeine was used as a partial control for the lithium. The results were that one injection of morphine enhanced stress-induced hypoalgesia and subsequent morphine administrations resulted in oscillation. Beta-endorphin exhibited sensitization but not oscillation, suggesting that it did not mediate oscillation of the behavioral response. In addition, lithium, but not caffeine, eliminated oscillations of the behavioral response without affecting its initial enhancement.

The effects of lithium on a potential cycling model of bipolar disorder.

1. Although bipolar disorder constitutes a major public health problem, with a high risk of suicide and an economic cost exceeding that of unipolar depression, it has received comparatively little attention, particularly at the basic science level. Perhaps as a result of this neglect, there is currently no animal model able to simulate the cyclicity which is its defining characteristic. 2. Consequently, drug development in this area is meager and has proceeded serendipitously rather than empirically. 3. The authors have recently reported that repeated exposure to cocaine and other stressors can induce an oscillation or cycling in a host of neurochemical and physiological systems. 4. In order to test whether such cycling might be of potential relevance to bipolar disorder, the authors examined whether cocaine-induced cyclicity of amphetamine-evoked efflux of dopamine from slices of rat nucleus accumbens and striatum and/or cocaine induced oscillation of a behavior, stress-induced hypoalgesia, could be prevented by lithium, the agent of choice in treating this disease. 5. The authors report that prophylactic treatment with lithium, completely and specifically prevented oscillations in each instance. This may represent an important initial step toward the development of the first cycling model of bipolar disorder.

Oscillatory-sensitization model of repeated drug exposure: cocaine's effects on shock-induced hypoalgesia.

1. The authors have recently proposed that the sensitization produced by repeated exposure to drugs or stress may give way to an alternating pattern of increases and decreases in the response to each subsequent exposure (i.e., oscillate), as the limits of the physiological system are approached. 2. Evidence for oscillation has been obtained for 6 drug/non-drug stressors and 9 neurochemical or endocrine endpoints. This paper extends the model to a behavioral outcome. 3. In the first experiment, rats were given 0, 1, 2 or 3 pretreatments with cocaine hydrochloride (COC; 12 mg/kg i.p.), separated by 1-week intervals, and then were tested for footshock-induced hypoalgesia (5-sec, 2-mA), as measured by withdrawal latencies from a hot-plate. 4. The second experiment replicated the first and extended the pretreatment sequence to 5 COC injections. 5. In both experiments, shock significantly increased latencies over the no-shock controls. COC enhanced shock-induced hypoalgesia and this sensitization reached its maximum after 2 COC pretreatments. Thereafter, oscillation developed such that the sensitization was attenuated by 3 as compared to 2 COC injections, enhanced by 4 injections, and reattenuated after 5 COC pretreatments. 6. These data complement other findings by demonstrating that the oscillation model extends to a stress-induced behavioral outcome.

The role of corticosteroids in nicotine's physiological and behavioral effects.

This paper reviews evidence indicating that adrenal corticosteroids modulate the responsiveness of mice and rats to nicotine. Adrenalectomy increases, and both acute and chronic corticosteroid administration decrease, some of the physiological and behavioral effects of nicotine. One function of adrenal steroids may be to regulate stress-induced changes in nicotine sensitivity. Another is to mediate the development of chronic tolerance when nicotine is given intermittently, and when the resulting tolerance has a learned component. A role of glucocorticoids in the development of tolerance to nicotine is suggested by the findings that a conditioned elevation of plasma corticosterone, which anticipates nicotine delivery, accompanies the development of chronic tolerance and that environmental cues evoke a conditioned corticosterone response, but only after they have become associated with nicotine delivery. The mechanisms by which adrenal steroids modulate nicotine sensitivity are not known, although recent in vitro evidence suggests that steroids can rapidly and reversibly reduce nicotinic receptor function. While most of the data are consistent with the hypothesis that corticosteroids reduce nicotine responsiveness, and thus promote a learned form of tolerance, there are new findings that corticosteroids increase the development of sensitization to the locomotor-activating effects of nicotine. These data suggest that formulations postulating a unidirectional effect of corticosteroids on nicotine's actions (e.g. decreased sensitivity) must be revised to take into account interacting variables such as the specific nicotine effect being studied and whether that effect normally exhibits tolerance or sensitization. Finally, research is presented which indicates that the corticosterone-elevating effects of nicotine, previously reported for experimenter-administered drug, are also produced when nicotine administration is contingent on an operant response, and at a dose which sustains the development of nicotine self-administration in rats. These findings highlight the feasibility of using self-administration models in future explorations of the relationship between adrenal steroids and nicotine function.

The effects of nicotine on the immune system.

Although considerable work has been done on the potential health effects of smoking, little is known about the contribution of nicotine to those effects. This paper presents an overview of the immune system, and a discussion of the existing literature on the effects of tobacco smoke and nicotine on immunity. Treatment with nicotine has been shown to influence all aspects of the immune system, including alterations in humoral and cellular immunity. In addition, preliminary data suggest that gender and genetic factors impact on the immunological effects of nicotine. Finally, the possible mechanisms that might mediate the effects of nicotine are discussed.

Acquisition of nicotine self-administration in rats: the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and drug contingency.

The studies presented here were designed to further clarify the nature of nicotine self-administration (SA) based on a limited access model in which rats are food restricted, receive operant training using food reinforcement, and are then tested in daily 1-h drug sessions. We examined the effects of dose, feeding schedule, and contingency of drug delivery on acquisition of nicotine SA. Two doses of nicotine bitartrate, 0.03 and 0.06 mg/kg per infusion (free base), supported the transition from food-reinforced to drug-reinforced responding, although the pattern of behavior differed between these doses. In contrast, 0.01 mg/kg per infusion failed to maintain nicotine SA. In a second study, animals were divided into three groups according to feeding schedule. Rats that were both weight restricted and food deprived showed the highest level of SA behavior, although neither food deprivation nor weight restriction was necessary to establish SA. In the third experiment, rats that were switched from food to nicotine as the response-dependent reinforcer maintained higher response rates throughout a 9-day period than animals switched to response-independent (i.e., yoked) nicotine which showed minimal responding after day 1. Furthermore, the differences between self-administering and yoked animals emerged during the first session, suggesting that nicotine may serve as a reinforcer during the first drug exposure in naive animals. These results indicate that acquisition of nicotine SA can be influenced by both dose of nicotine and feeding schedule and that, in animals previously trained on a food-reinforced operant, active lever pressing is maintained only when nicotine delivery is contingent upon responding.

The analgesia-enhancing component of ingested amniotic fluid does not affect nicotine-induced antinociception in naltrexone-treated rats.

Ingestion of amniotic fluid and placenta by rats has been shown to enhance opioid-mediated antinociception but not affect the nonopioid-mediated antinociception produced by aspirin, suggesting specificity for opioid-mediated processes. However, enhancement by the active substance(s) in amniotic fluid and placenta (POEF, for placental opioid-enhancing factor) of antinociception produced by other nonopioid mechanisms has yet to be examined. The present experiments tested whether ingestion of amniotic fluid enhances the antinociception produced by nicotine injection. In Experiment 1A, enhancement of morphine-mediated antinociception by ingestion of amniotic fluid was demonstrated in a hot-plate assay. In Experiment 1B, rats pretreated with naltrexone were given an orogastric infusion of amniotic fluid or control (0.25 ml), then injected with nicotine (0, 0.075, 0.125, or 0.225 mg/kg subcutaneously), then tested for antinociception in a hot-plate assay. Amniotic fluid ingestion did not enhance the antinociception produced by various doses of nicotine. In Experiment 2, rats pretreated with naltrexone were given an orogastric infusion of amniotic fluid (0, 0.125, 0.25, or 0.50 ml) and then injected with 0.125 mg/kg nicotine. None of the doses of amniotic fluid enhanced the nicotine-induced antinociception. The findings of these experiments lend support to our contention that the enhancement by POEF of antinociception is specific to opioid-mediated processes.

The effects of ethanol on striatal dopamine and frontal cortical D-[3H]aspartate efflux oscillate with repeated treatment. Relevance to individual differences in drug responsiveness.

Numerous inconsistencies in the reported effects of drugs that can be found in both the human clinical and animal experimental literatures have prompted attempts to identify the basis of this variability. Our data suggest that one source may derive from the tendency of many systems to oscillate in their response to repeated drug or stress exposure. In the first experiment a single administration of ethanol to male rats, either 2 or 30 minutes or 2 weeks before sacrifice suppressed amphetamine-induced dopamine efflux from striatal slices. However, when ethanol was given both 2 weeks and 30 minutes before sacrifice, the two treatments significantly attenuate each other's effects. In Experiment 2, the stress of a novel environment (black box) 30 minutes before sacrifice decreased fractional D-[3H]aspartate efflux from the medial frontal cortex. When a single injection of ethanol 1 week earlier was added to black box exposure, it depressed efflux still further. However, adding a third treatment (ethanol at 2 weeks and 1 week + black box at 30 minutes) significantly reversed the effects of the two treatments (ethanol + black box). When a four-treatment chain was used (ethanol at 3, 2, and 1 week + black box at 30 minutes), the attenuation of efflux was reinstated. These data complement other findings from this laboratory showing that repeated stress or drug exposure can lead to an oscillatory pattern of change in the effects of future exposures and, in this way, contribute to variability in drug responsiveness.