Shoulder dystocia in deliveries of neonates <3500 grams.

OBJECTIVES: To study risk factors for shoulder dystocia (ShD) among women delivering <3500 g newborn. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of all term live-singleton deliveries during 2011-2019. Women with neonatal birthweight <3500 g were included. We compared cases of ShD to other deliveries by univariate and multivariable regression. RESULTS: There were 79/41 092 (0.19%) cases of ShD among neonates <3500 g. In multivariable regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with ShD; operative vaginal delivery (odds ratio [OR] 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.28-6.02, P = 0.009), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC, OR 2.74; 1.22-6.13, P = 0.010), sonographic abdominal circumference to biparietal diameter ratio (3.73 among ShD vs. 3.62, OR 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12-1.63, P = 0.001) and sonographic abdominal circumference to head circumference ratio (1.036 among ShD vs. 1.011, OR 3.04; 95% CI: 1.006-9.23, P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: There is an association between operative vaginal delivery and ShD also in deliveries <3500 g. Importantly, the proportions between the fetal head and abdominal circumference are a better predictor of ShD than the newborn fetal weight and VBAC is associated with ShD.

Risk factors for a negative birth experience using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk factors for a negative birth experience using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) questionnaire. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including women who gave birth at a single tertiary hospital between February 2021 and January 1, 2022. Birth satisfaction was measured using the BSS-R questionnaire. Maternal, pregnancy, and delivery characteristics were collected. Negative birth experience was defined as a BSS-R score lower than the median. Multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the association between birth characteristics and negative birth experience. RESULTS: A total of 1495 women answered the questionnaire and were included in the analysis; 779 women comprised the positive birth experience group and 716 women comprised the negative birth experience group. Prior deliveries, prior abortions, and smoking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.41-0.66]; aOR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.62-0.99]; aOR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.27-0.99], respectively) were independently associated with lower risk of negative birth experience. Immigration, answering the questionnaires in person, and cesarean delivery were independently associated with increased negative birth experience risk (aOR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.01-1.86]; aOR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.04-1.79]; aOR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.52-2.41], respectively). CONCLUSION: Parity, prior abortions, and smoking were associated with a lower risk of negative birth experience, while immigration, answering questionnaires in person, and cesarean delivery were associated with a higher risk of negative birth experience.

Fetal Micro and Macroglossia: Defining Normal Fetal Tongue Size.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal fetal tongue size is a phenotypic feature of various syndromes including Beckwith-Wiedemann, Pierre-Robin, oromandibular limb hypoplasia, chromosomal aberrations, etc. Current data regarding normal fetal tongue size are limited. Hence, micro/macroglossia are subjectively determined. The aim of the study was to construct a contemporary fetal tongue nomogram and to assess its clinical contribution. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed in well dated, low risk, singleton pregnancies. Fetal tongues were measured by 5 trained sonographers. Highest quality images were selected. Intra- and interobserver variability was assessed. Tongue length, width, area, and circumference 1st to 99th centiles were calculated for each gestational week. Based on the normal tongue size charts, we created a Tongue Centile Calculator. RESULTS: Over 18 months, 664 tongue measurements were performed. A cubic polynomial regression model best described the correlation between tongue size and gestational age. The correlation coefficient (r2 ) was 0.934, 0.932, 0.925, and 0.953 for tongue length, width, area, and circumference, respectively (P < .001). Intra- and interobserver variability had high interclass correlation coefficients (>0.9). Using the new charts, we were able to identify 2 cases of macroglossia, subsequently diagnosed with Beckwith-Wiedemann, and 4 cases of microglossia, 3 associated with Pierre-Robin sequence, and 1 associated with persistent buccopharyngeal membrane. CONCLUSIONS: We present novel fetal tongue size charts from 13 to 40 weeks of gestation. Clinical application of these nomograms may be beneficial in the prenatal diagnosis of syndromes or malformations associated with abnormal fetal tongue size.

Predictive value of new onset versus primary meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

BACKGROUND: Transition of clear amniotic fluid to meconium-stained fluid is a relatively common occurrence during labor. However, data regarding the clinical significance and the prognostic value of the presence of meconium-stained amnionic fluid (MSAF) are scarce. This study aimed to investigate delivery and neonatal outcomes according to the presence of MSAF and the timing of the meconium passage. METHODS: We used an historical cohort study at a single tertiary medical center in Israel between the years 2011 and 2018. Women were divided into two groups according to timing of meconium passage: primary MSAF (MSAF present at membrane rupture) and secondary MSAF (clear amnionic fluid that transitioned to MSAF during labor). Neonatal complication rates were compared between groups. Composite adverse neonatal outcome was defined as arterial cord blood pH <7.1, 5 min Apgar score ≤7, and/or neonatal intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: The study cohort included 56 863 singleton term births. Of these, 9043 (15.9%) were to women who had primary MSAF, and 1484 (2.6%) to those with secondary MSAF. Secondary MSAF compared with primary MSAF increased the risks of cesarean birth and operative vaginal delivery, increased the risks of low one- and five-minute Apgar scores and low arterial cord blood pH, and increased hospital stay duration. Multivariate analysis revealed that secondary MSAF was independently associated with an increased risk of composite adverse neonatal outcome (OR1.68, 95% CI 1.25-2.24, p < 0.001) compared with primary MSAF. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, secondary MSAF was associated with more adverse neonatal outcomes than primary MSAF. Closer monitoring of fetal well-being may be prudent in these cases.

Ritodrine versus salbutamol for external cephalic version.

BACKGROUND: Treatment with beta-agonist tocolytics preceding external cephalic version (ECV) attempt increases success rates. Most studies have focused on intravenously and orally administered beta-agonists, while other administration routes including intramuscularly (IM) and subcutaneously (SC) are understudied. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of IM ritodrine to SC salbutamol given prior to ECV. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients who underwent ECV between 1/2012 and 12/2019 at two medical centers. We compared patients undergoing ECV following IM ritodrine versus SC salbutamol. We matched the two groups by parity and placental location. Maternal, pregnancy, ECV procedure and neonatal characteristics were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 601 women were included in each group. Median maternal age and amniotic fluid index (AFI) were lower in the Ritodrine group (27 vs. 32 years, P<0.001, 11 vs. 15 AFI cm, P<0.001, respectively). The median gestational age at ECV was higher in the Ritodrine group (380/7 vs. 370/7 weeks gestation). Success rate was higher in the Ritodrine group (71.7% vs. 63.8%, P=0.003). Vaginal delivery rate was higher in the Ritodrine group (70.7% vs. 60.1%, P<0.001). The number needed to treat to benefit was 10. In a multivariate analysis, Ritodrine was independently associated with higher ECV success rates as compared with Salbutamol (aOR 2.1, 95%CI 1.52-2.89). CONCLUSIONS: Intramuscular ritodrine significantly improved the success rate of ECV compared to SC salbutamol, and both drugs were safe and acceptable before ECV.

Isolated oligohydramnios - should induction be offered after 36 weeks?

OBJECTIVE: Isolated oligohydramnios (IO) - oligohydramnios in the absence of maternal or gestational comorbidity is debated as an indication for induction of labor. Previous meta-analyses regarding perinatal outcomes of IO at term have yielded conflicting results. We aimed to investigate the neonatal outcomes among gestations with IO delivered at 36°/7-396/7. METHODS: The study cohort included all women undergoing a trial of labor between during 2011 and 2019 of a singleton gestation with cephalic presentation between 36°/7 and 40°/7. We allocated the study groups into women with IO and those with normal amniotic fluid volume. Neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups and in relation to gestational age and induction of labor. RESULTS: Overall, there were 529/17,709 (3.0%) IO cases. IO was associated with maternal age <25 years (OR [95% CI] 1.62 (1.20-2.20), p = .001). Induction of labor was more common with IO (OR [95% CI] 1.33 (1.05-1.69) p = .01. IO was associated with preterm delivery (OR [95% CI] 1.81 (1.36-2.40), p < .001). The rate of neonatal adverse outcome did not differ between study groups. Overall composite adverse neonatal outcome occurred among 1,399/17,709 (7.9%) deliveries. Adverse neonatal outcome was associated with induction of labor (OR [95% CI] 1.61 (1.40-1.86), p < .001) and low birth weight (OR [95% CI] 7.41 (6.27-8.75), p < .001). When Stratified by gestational age, neonatal adverse outcome did not differ between IO and no IO groups. When examining cases of induction of labor per gestational age, induction of labor at 36 weeks among IO gestations, was associated with adverse neonatal outcome as compared to no IO group (OR [95% CI] 5.7 (1.23-26.3), p = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labor in gestations complicated by IO at 36 weeks gestational age is associated with an increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome. Our study results adds to the current literature regarding outcomes of IO and time of delivery. SYNOPSIS: Induction of labor in gestations complicated by IO at 36 weeks gestational age is associated with an increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome.

The effect of fetal weight on the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation among women with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: The assessment of sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) enables identification of fetuses in the extremes of weight, thus aiding in the planning and management of peripartum care. There are conflicting reports regarding the accuracy of EFW in diabetic mothers. We aimed to study the factors associated with the accuracy of EFW at term, specifically the role of gestational and pre-gestational diabetes in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective study including all women carrying singleton term gestations who delivered within a week following a sonographic fetal weight estimation between 2011 and 2019. Accurate EFW was defined as within 10% of the actual birthweight. We allocated the study cohort into two groups: (1) Accurate EFW (2) inaccurate EFW. Both groups were compared in order to identify factors associated with the inaccuracy of EFW. RESULTS: Overall, 41,263 deliveries were available for evaluation, including 412 (1.0%) deliveries among women with pre-gestational diabetes and 4,735 (11.5%) among women with gestational diabetes. Of them, 7,280 (17.6%) had inaccurate EFW. Inaccurate EFW was associated with nulliparity, OR 0.82 [95% CI] (0.78-0.87), oligohydramnios, OR 0.81 [95% CI] (0.71-0.93), pregestational diabetes, OR [95% CI] 0.61 (0.50-0.79), and extremity of fetal weight; <2,500 grams-OR [95% CI] 0.37 (0.33-0.41) and >4,000 grams OR [95% CI] 0.52 (0.48-0.57). On multiple regression analysis, the following factors were independently associated with inaccurate EFW: pregestational diabetes, OR [95% CI] 0.58 (0.46-0.73), p < .001, nulliparity, OR [95% CI] 0.86 (0.82-0.91), p < .001 and higher fetal weight (for each 500 grams), OR [95% CI [1.25 (1.21-1.30), p < .001. On analysis of different weight categories, pregestational diabetes was associated with inaccurate EFW only in those with birthweight >3,500 grams, OR [95% CI] 0.37 (0.24-0.56) (p < .001). CONCLUSION: Among pregestational diabetic women, the accuracy of sonographic EFW when assessed to be >3,500 grams is questionable. This should be taken into consideration when consulting women and planning delivery management. SYNOPSIS: Among pregestational diabetic women, the accuracy of estimated sonographic fetal weight higher than 3,500 grams is of limited accuracy.

Neonatal and maternal outcome of small-for-gestational-age neonates delivered by vacuum-assisted delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between neonatal weight centile and neonatal and maternal morbidity following vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) among term nulliparous women. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all nulliparous women who delivered at term by VAD between 2011 and 2019. Deliveries were allocated into two groups and compared: (1) delivery of an small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate, and (2) delivery of an appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) neonate. RESULTS: Overall, 3116 women were included in the study; 2878 (92.4%) were AGA and 163 (5.2%) were SGA and comprised the study groups. Neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes did not vary between groups. Rates of composite neonatal adverse outcome for SGA and AGA neonates were 26 (16.0%) versus 462 (16.1%), respectively (P = 0.972). Duration of the second stage of labor and rate of prolonged second stage were significantly lower among the SGA group compared with the AGA group (P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Maternal rates of anal sphincter injury and postpartum hemorrhage did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Neonatal outcomes among SGA neonates delivered by VAD at term did not differ from those of AGA neonates. Maternal outcome did not differ. These data provide reassurance for practitioners to perform VAD in SGA neonates at term.

Neonatal outcome of second-stage cesarean delivery versus vacuum extraction among neonates <34 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: Among deliveries <34 weeks, there is inconclusive evidence regarding the preferred route of delivery when there is a need to expedite delivery during the second stage of labor. As it is unreasonable that future randomized controlled trials will be conducted to settle this query, every clinical data concerning this topic, may be helpful. We aim to compare neonatal outcomes among women undergoing emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) versus vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) during the second stage of labor among singleton gestations <34 weeks. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all women who underwent either ECD or VAD at the second stage of labor between 30°/7 and 336/7 weeks, during 2011-2019. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse neonatal outcomes, defined as intrapartum death, mechanical ventilation, asphyxia, respiratory distress syndrome, subgaleal hemorrhage, intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and phototherapy. RESULTS: Of the 153,672 live singleton deliveries during the study period, 2871 (1.9%) delivered before 34°/7. Of those 1674 (58.3%) delivered vaginally unassisted and 1137 (39.6%) delivered by a CD during the first stage of labor. A total of 60 deliveries were analyzed, with a median gestational age of 32 weeks, interquartile range (IQR) 31-33. Median birth weight at delivery was 1845 g, IQR 1574-2095. Overall 25 (42%) of women were delivered by VAD and 35 by CD (58%). Indications for expeditious delivery did not differ between the study groups. Neonates delivered by VAD had a higher median birth weight (1940 vs. 1620 g, p = .02). Second stage of labor was longer in the ECD group as compared to the VAD group (median 200 vs. 52 min, p = .01). The rate of Apgar score at 1 min <7 was higher among the CD group (10 (40%) vs. 5 (14%), OR [95% CI]: 4.0 (1.1-13.8), p = .03). Longer length of stay was evident in the CD group as compared to the VAD group (median 30 vs. 21 days, p = .001). The rate of composite neonatal adverse outcome was comparable between the study groups. Adverse outcomes were associated with lower body mass index (median 27.7 vs. 34.9, p = .04), higher rate of premature preterm rupture of membranes (40 (91%) vs. 5 (31%), OR [95% CI]: 22.0 (5.0-91.1), p < .001) and labor dystocia as the indication for expedited delivery (38 (86%) vs. 7 (44%), OR [95% CI]: 8.1 (2.1-30.1), p = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean delivery during the second stage of labor of gestations <34 weeks was associated with a higher rate of lower Apgar scores and longer length of stay. SYNOPSIS: Delivery by second stage CD of premature neonates <34 weeks is associated with a higher rate of lower Apgar score.

Neonatal morbidity in a low volume forceps practice.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the use of FE is decreasing and neonatal adverse outcomes following FE are underreported. We aimed to evaluate the rate of neonatal adverse outcomes in current obstetric practice at two university hospitals with a low FE volume. METHODS: A multicentre retrospective study. All singleton pregnancies delivered by forceps extraction between 2011 and 2020 were analyzed. The characteristics of the deliveries with a composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO) were analyzed and compared with those without. RESULTS: The study cohort included 861 neonates delivered by FE. The CNAO was recorded in 131 (15.2%). Women in the CNAO group gained less weight during pregnancy (mean 13 kg vs. 15 kg, p = .014). Factors found to be associated with CNAO were preterm delivery (gestational age < 37°/7) (26 (19.8%) vs. 44 (6.0%), OR [95% CI]: 3.86 (2.28-6.52), p < .001), low birth weight (23 (17.6%) vs. 44 (6.0%), OR [95% CI] 3.32 (1.92-5.71), p < .001), and smaller head circumference (329 vs. 331 mm, OR [95% CI] 0.79 (0.67-0.93), p = .035). In a multivariate analysis, gestational age (adjusted OR [95% CI] 0.672 (0.546-0.826), p < .001) and maternal weight gain during pregnancy (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.950 (0.904-0.998), p = .042), were both negatively associated with CNAO. Among term deliveries, the only factor found to be independently associated with CNAO was maternal weight gain during pregnancy (adjusted OR [95% CI]: 0.951 (0.910-0.994), p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of low volume FE, this mode of delivery is associated with a relatively low rate of neonatal morbidity. SYNOPSIS: Performance of forceps extraction in the setting of low volume practice is associated with a relatively low rate of neonatal morbidity.

Anesthesia in Parturients Presenting with Marfan Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women with Marfan syndrome (MS) have a high risk of aortic dissection around delivery and their optimal management requires a multi-disciplinary approach, including proper cardio-obstetric care and adequate pain management during labor, which may be difficult due to the high prevalence of dural ectasia (DE) in these patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the multidisciplinary management of MS patients during labor. METHODS: Nineteen pregnant women (31 pregnancies) with MS were followed by a multi-disciplinary team (cardiologist, obstetrician, anesthesiologist) prior to delivery. RESULTS: Two patients had kyphoscoliosis; none had previous spine surgery nor complaints compatible with DE. In eight pregnancies (7 patients), aortic root diameter (ARd) before pregnancy was 40 to 46 mm. In this high-risk group, one patient underwent elective termination, two underwent an urgent cesarean section (CS) under general anesthesia, and five had elective CS; two under general anesthesia (GA), and three under spinal anesthesia. In 23 pregnancies (12 patients), ARd was < 40 mm. In this non-high-risk group three pregnancies (1 patient) were electively terminated. Of the remaining 20 deliveries (11 patients), 14 were vaginal deliveries, 9 with epidural analgesia and 5 without. Six patients had a CS; four under GA and two2 under spinal anesthesia. There were no epidural placement failures and no failed responses. There were 2 cases of aortic dissection, unrelated to the anesthetic management. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal anesthetic strategy during labor in MS patients should be decided by a multi-disciplinary team. Anesthetic complications due to DE were not encountered during neuraxial block.

Second stage expedite delivery of low birth weight neonates: Emergent cesarean delivery versus vacuum assisted delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine maternal and neonatal outcomes among women undergoing second stage emergent cesarean delivery (ECD) versus vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD) of low birthweight neonates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from two tertiary medical centers. We included women who underwent either ECD or VAD during the second stage of labor, and delivered neonates with a birthweight of <2500 g during 2011-2019. Characteristics and outcomes were compared between the groups. The primary outcome was the rate of a composite adverse neonatal outcome, defined as the presence of ≥1 of the following: Apgar 5 min < 7, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation and intrapartum fetal death. RESULTS: The study cohort included 611 patients, of whom 46 had ECD and 565 had VAD. Baseline characteristics did not differ between the groups. The rate of Apgar score < 7 at 1 min was higher among the ECD group]10 (22%) vs. 29 (5%), OR (95% CI) 5.1 (2.3-11.3), p < 0.001[. Other neonatal and maternal outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal and maternal outcomes do not differ substantially between ECD and VAD of neonates weighing <2500 g. This information may be useful when contemplating the preferred mode of delivery in this setting.

Amniotic fluid embolism - implementation of international diagnosis criteria and subsequent pregnancy recurrence risk.

OBJECTIVES: An international diagnostic criterion for amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) diagnosis has recently been published. Data regarding subsequent pregnancies is scarce. We sought to implement recent diagnostic criteria and detail subsequent pregnancies in survivors. METHODS: A case series of all suspected AFE cases at a tertiary medical center between 2003 and 2018 is presented. Cases meeting the diagnostic criteria for AFE were included. Clinical presentation, treatment, and outcomes described. Pregnancy outcomes in subsequent pregnancies in AFE survivors detailed. RESULTS: Between 2003 and 2018 14 women were clinically suspected with AFE and 12 of them (85.71%) met the diagnostic criteria for AFE. Three cases occurred during midtrimester dilation and evacuation procedures, and the remaining occurred in the antepartum period. Of the antepartum cases, mode of delivery was cesarean delivery or vacuum extraction for expedited delivery due to presentation of AFE in 8/9 cases (88.88%). Clinical presentation included cardiovascular collapse, respiratory distress and disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC). Heart failure of varying severity was diagnosed in 75% (9/12) cases. Composite maternal morbidity was 5/12 (41.66%), without cases of maternal mortality. 11 subsequent pregnancies occurred in four AFE survivors. Pregnant women were followed by a high-risk pregnancy specialist and multidisciplinary team if pregnancy continued beyond the early second trimester. Six pregnancies resulted in a term delivery. No recurrences of AFE were documented. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a diagnostic criterion for diagnosis of AFE results in a more precise diagnosis of AFE. Nevertheless, the accuracy of clinical diagnosis is still high. Subsequent pregnancies were not associated with AFE recurrence.

The association of vacuum-assisted delivery and shoulder dystocia among macrosomic newborns: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: Although shoulder dystocia (ShD) is associated with fetal macrosomia and vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD), the independent role of the latter in the occurrence of ShD is yet to be completely elucidated, as it is difficult to study its true independent contribution to ShD formation in the presence of many confounding factors. Therefore, we aimed to study whether VAD is independently associated with an increased risk for ShD among macrosomic newborns. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study from a single tertiary medical center including all women who delivered vaginally a macrosomic infant during 2011-2020. We allocated the study cohort into two groups: (1) VAD (2) spontaneous vaginal deliverys, and analyzed risk factors for ShD. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify determinants independently associated with ShD occurrence. RESULTS: Of 2,664 deliveries who met the study inclusion criteria, 118 (4.4%) were VAD. The rate of ShD in the entire cohort was 108/2664 (4.1%). The following factors were more frequent among the VAD group: no previous vaginal delivery [odds ratio (OR) 2.4 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-4.0, p < 0.001)], prolonged second stage (OR 11.9; 95% CI 8.1-17.6, p < 0.01), induction of labor (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5-3.8, p < 0.01) and ShD (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.0-4.1, p = 0.04). ShD was associated with higher rates of maternal height < 160 cm (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3-3.1, p < 0.01), pregestational diabetes (OR 7.2; 95% CI 2.0-26.8, p = 0.01), hypertensive disorder (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.1-6.2, p = 0.02) and higher birthweight (mean 4,124 vs. 4,167 g, p < 0.01). On multivariate regression analysis, the following factors remained independently associated with ShD occurrence: increased birthweight (aOR 1.0; 95% CI 1.0-1.0, p < 0.01), pregestational diabetes (aOR 5.3; 95% CI 1.1-25.0, p = 0.03), while maternal height was negatively associated with ShD (aOR 0.9; 95% CI 0.9-0.9, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In deliveries of neonates above 4000 g, VAD did not independently increase the risk of ShD occurrence. Therefore, when expeditious delivery of a macrosomic infant is required, VAD is a viable option.

Prediction of adverse neonatal outcome among newborns born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid.

OBJECTIVE: To study maternal and intrapartum factors associated with adverse neonatal outcome in deliveries complicated by meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton gestations undergoing trial of labor with MSAF during 2011-2020. Deliveries with adverse neonatal outcome were compared with deliveries without. RESULTS: Overall, 11 329 were included; 376 (3.3%) neonates were diagnosed with adverse neonatal outcomes. Multivariable regression analysis underlined the following factors as independently associated with composite adverse neonatal outcome: pregestational diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 3.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-9.43, P = 0.031), polyhydramnios (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.33-3.44, P = 0.002), fever (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.67-3.80, P < 0.001), and amnioinfusion (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.24-2.2438, P = 0.003). When 0, 1, 2, and 3 of the independent risk factors identified were present, the rates of adverse neonatal outcome were 2.9%, 5.5%, 10.0%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current study's results suggest that special attention should be payed to deliveries complicated by MSAF and with any of the following factors-polyhydramnios, intrapartum fever, amnioinfusion, and pregestational diabetes.

Predictors of adverse neonatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by placenta previa.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to underline the determinants of adverse neonatal outcome in gestations complicated by placenta previa (PP). METHODS: A retrospective study including all women diagnosed with placenta previa carrying a singleton gestation who delivered between 2011 and June 2019. Gestations with adverse neonatal outcomes were compared to those without. In a secondary analysis, we further studied the rate of Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in relation to number of previous cesarean deliveries. RESULTS: Overall, 548/84,558 (0.6%) singleton deliveries were complicated by PP (0.6%). PAS was noted in 105 (19.2%) cases. After exclusion of PAS cases, adverse neonatal outcome occurred in 149/443 (33.6%), median gestational age of delivery was 37 0/7 with a median birthweight of 2780 g. In a univariate analysis, adverse neonatal outcome was associated with emergent delivery and general anesthesia [56.8% vs. 20.8%, OR 5.00 (95% CI) 3.24-7.72, p < 0.001 and 54.4% vs. 24.8%, OR 3.60 (95% CI) 2.37-5.47, p < 0.001, respectively]. Gestational age at delivery was lower in the adverse outcome group (mean 35 1/7 vs. 37 3/7, p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, general anesthesia and gestational age at delivery were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.26 (95% CI) 1.18-4.31, p = 0.01, aOR 1.10 (95% CI) 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001. Analysis of the rate of PAS among women with previous cesarean delivery and PP revealed that no cases of PAS were noted when no prior cesarean delivery was present. The rate of PAS for previous 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 cesarean deliveries was 26.7%, 43.5%, 65.5%, 55.6% and 66.7% respectively. DISCUSSION: Efforts should be made to avoid general anesthesia in deliveries of PP.

Questionnaire-based vs universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that women admitted for delivery should have universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2. Yet, the considerable difference in the incidence of COVID-19 between different geographic regions may affect screening strategies. Therefore, we aimed to compare questionnaire-based testing versus universal PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 in women admitted for delivery. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of women admitted for delivery at a single center during a four-week period (April 22-May 25, 2020). All women completed a questionnaire about COVID-19 signs, symptoms, or risk factors, and a nasopharyngeal swab for PCR for SARS-CoV-2. Women who were flagged as suspected COVID-19 by the questionnaire (questionnaire-positive) were compared with women who were not flagged by the questionnaire (questionnaire-negative). RESULTS: Overall, 446 women were eligible for analysis, of which 54 (12.1%) were questionnaire-positive. PCR swab detected SARS-CoV-2 in four (0.9%) women: 3 of 392 (0.8%) in the questionnaire-negative group, and 1 of 54 (1.9%) in the questionnaire-positive group (P = .43), yielding a number needed to screen of 92 (95% CI 62-177). In 96% of the cases, the PCR results were obtained only in the postpartum period. No positive PCR results were obtained from neonatal testing for SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of the questionnaire was 75.0%, and the negative predictive value was 99.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Although the rate of positive PCR results was not significantly different between the groups, the number needed to screen is considerably high. The use of questionnaire-based PCR testing in areas with low incidence of COVID-19 allows for a reasonable allocation of resources and is easy to implement.

The Late Effects of Pregnancy on Aortic Dimensions in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.

While the immediate effects of pregnancy on aortic dimension in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) have been evaluated, the late effects of subsequent pregnancies in these patients are less known. For this purpose, we evaluated 2 groups of women with MFS who were under specialized care in our institution. Group A included 23 women with MFS who experienced 55 pregnancies; group B included 12 nulliparous MFS patients. Patients in group A were similar in age (36.13 ± 5.6 years vs. 34.25 ± 6.54 years, p = 0.41) and follow-up time (group A 6.05 ± 3.56 years and group B 4.92 ± 3.37 years, p = 0.37). Baseline aortic root diameters as well as the aortic root diameters at follow-up visits were similar between groups (35.60 ± 4.42 vs. 35.08 ± 3.82 mm, p = 0.73, and 37.57 ± 4.66 vs. 37.33 ± 4.83 mm, p = 0.89, respectively). The aortic root diameter increased by 0.5 (0, 2) mm in group A and 1 (0, 4.5) mm in group B (p = 0.54). The rate of aortic dilation per year of follow-up was similar between the groups (0.34 ± 0.52 mm/year in group A vs. 0.55 ± 0.75 mm/year in group B [p = 0.52]). Chronic medical treatment was similar in both groups. Patients in both groups were treated similarly with ß-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin II receptor blockers. In summary, subsequent pregnancies in patients with MFS were not associated with an increase in the rate of aortic root dilation in these patients.

Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury among parous women.

PURPOSE: Nulliparity and operative vaginal delivery are established risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI). However, risk factors for OASIS occurrence among parous women delivering vaginally are not well-established. We aimed to study the risk factors for OASI occurrence among parous women. METHODS: A retrospective study including all parous women who delivered vaginally at term during 2011-2019 at a university hospital. Deliveries of parous women with OASI were compared to deliveries without OASI. The risk factors associated with OASI were investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 35,397 women were included in the study with an OASI rate of 0.4% (n = 144). A higher rate of only one previous vaginal delivery was noted in the OASI group (78.5% vs. 46.4%, OR [95% CI] 4.20, 2.82-6.25, p < 0.001). The rate of vacuum-assisted deliveries was comparable between the study groups. The median birth weight was higher among the OASI group (3566 vs. 3300 g, p < 0.001), as was the rate of macrosomic neonates (19.4% vs. 5.5%, OR [95% CI] 4.15, 2.74-6.29, p < 0.001). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, only two factors were independently positively associated with the occurrence of OASI: a history of only one previous vaginal delivery (adjusted OR [95% CI] 4.34, 2.90-6.49, p = 0.001), and neonatal birth-weight (for each 500 g increment) (adjusted OR [95% CI] 2.51, 1.84-3.44, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among parous women, the only factors found to be independently positively associated with OASI were the order of parity and neonatal birth-weight. Vacuum-assisted delivery was not associated with an increased risk of OASI among parous women.

Risk factors for third stage placental complications among primigravid women.

INTRODUCTION: Third stage placental complications (TSPC) including partially or complete retained placenta, are a common obstetric complication. Previous studies have underlined risk factors for TSPC in heterogenous populations of women, whereas data regarding primigravid term women are scarce. We aimed to identify the factors associated with TSPC in this subset of parturients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all primigravid women who delivered vaginally a term, live-singleton neonate between 2011 and 2019. Women who underwent revision of the uterine cavity due to TSPC were compared with those who did not. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in order to identify the risk factors for TSPC. RESULTS: Overall, 16,867 deliveries met the study inclusion criteria. Of those, 1097 (6.5%) deliveries were complicated by TSPC. Women with TSPC were older (p < 0.001) and with a higher proportion of lateral and fundal placental location (p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, the following factors were positively independently associated with TSPC: maternal age (aOR [95% CI] 1.26 (1.17-1.36), p < 0.001), the use of assisted reproduction technologies (aOR [95% CI] 1.26 (1.06-1.49), p = 0.007), preeclampsia (aOR [95% CI] 3.39 (1.89-6.10), p < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (aOR [95% CI] 1.83 (1.34-2.48), p < 0.001), oxytocin administration (aOR [95% CI] 1.29 (1.12-1.48), p < 0.001) and longer second stage duration (aOR [95% CI] 1.03 (1.003-1.05), p = 0.02). Fetal male gender was negatively associated with TSPC (aOR [95% CI] 0.80 (0.70-0.92), p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: We have identified multiple independent risk factors for TSPC among primigravid women. This information can aid in patient counseling and delivery management in these subset of parturients.