Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Updates Surg ; 2024 Mar 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502424

ABSTRACT

The clinical characteristics of open hernia repair under local nerve block guided by ultrasound and epidural anesthesia under daytime surgery mode were compared and analyzed, and the safety, rationality and effectiveness of tension-free repair of inguinal hernia in elderly patients under local nerve block guided by ultrasound were discussed. The clinical data of 200 patients who underwent inguinal hernia day surgery in Liaocheng People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from January 2022 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 150 patients who underwent local anesthesia block surgery and 50 patients who underwent epidural surgery. The visual analog score of the ultrasound local anesthesia group was lower than that of the epidural surgery group at 4 h after operation. The time of getting out of bed and postoperative exhaust were shorter than those of epidural operation group. The recovery rate of unrestricted activity 2 weeks after surgery was higher than that in epidural surgery group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative acute urinary retention between the two groups was lower in local ultrasound anesthesia group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The median follow-up time was 4(1-6) months, and the follow-up rate was 100%. Postoperative complications were seroma, wound infection, chronic pain and recurrence, and there was no statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). No serious complications occurred in both groups. Compared with open epidural surgery, ultrasound-guided local nerve block tension-free day surgery in the elderly has the advantages of less pain, faster recovery, and is safe and feasible.

2.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 15(1): 110, 2020 Mar 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of intrathecal morphine (ITM) analgesia and local infiltration analgesia (LIA) for pain control in total joint arthroplasty (TJA). METHODS: Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All RCTs were comparing intrathecal analgesia and local infiltration analgesia in TJA. Primary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) score with rest or mobilization up to 72 h. Secondary outcomes were the total morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, and morphine-related complications. RESULTS: Compared with the intrathecal analgesia group, the LIA group was associated with a reduction in VAS score with rest up to 72 h. Moreover, LIA was associated with a decrease in VAS score with mobilization at 6 h, 12 h, 48 h, and 72 h. Moreover, LIA significantly reduced total morphine consumption (weighted mean difference (WMD)  = - 15.37, 95% CI - 22.64 to - 8.83, P  = 0.000), length of hospital stay (WMD  =  - 1.39, 95% CI - 1.67 to - 1.11, P  = 0.000), and morphine-related complications (nausea and pruritus). CONCLUSIONS: Local infiltration provided superior analgesia and morphine-sparing effects within the first 72 h compared with ITM following TJA.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement/methods , Injections, Spinal/methods , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Arthroplasty, Replacement/adverse effects , Humans , Length of Stay/trends , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(21): e15709, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31124948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain if dexmedetomidine has more favorable pharmacokinetic profile than the traditional sedative drug propofol in patients who undergo endovascular therapy for acute stroke. We conducted a prospective randomized control trial to compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine with propofol for patients undergoing endovascular therapy for acute stroke. METHODS: A total of 80 patients who met study inclusion criteria were received either propofol (n = 45) or dexmedetomidine (n = 35) between January 2016 and August 2018. We recorded the favorable neurologic outcome (modified Rankin score <3) both at discharge and 3 months after stroke, National Institute of Health Stroke scale (NIHSS) at 48 hours post intervention, modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction score on digital subtraction angiography, intraprocedural hemodynamics, recovery time, relevant time intervals, satisfaction score of the surgeon, mortality, and complications. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P > .05) with respect to heart rate, respiratory rate, and SPO2 during the procedure. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was significantly low in the propofol group until 15 minutes after anesthesia was induced. No difference was recorded between the groups at the incidence of fall in MAP >20%, MAP >40% and time spent with MAP fall >20% from baseline MAP. In the propofol group, the time spent with MAP fall >40% from baseline MAP was significantly long (P < .05). Midazolam and fentanyl were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05) that used vasoactive drugs. The time interval from stroke onset to CT room, from stroke onset to groin puncture, and from stroke onset to recanalization/end of the procedure, was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P > .05). The recovery time was longer in the dexmedetomidine group (P < .05). There was no difference between the groups with respect to complications, favorable neurological outcome, and mortality both at hospital discharge and 3 months later, successful recanalization and NIHSS score after 48 hours (P > .05). However, the satisfaction score of the surgeon was higher in the dexmedetomidine group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine was undesirable than propofol as a sedative agent during endovascular therapy in patients with acute stroke for a long-term functional outcome, though the satisfaction score of the surgeon was higher in the dexmedetomidine group.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Propofol/therapeutic use , Stroke/surgery , Aged , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Female , Fibrinolytic Agents/administration & dosage , Hemodynamics , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Propofol/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Stroke/drug therapy , Vasoconstrictor Agents/administration & dosage
4.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol ; 41(5): 583-6, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25864266

ABSTRACT

The incidence of Takayasu arteritis (TA) is approximately one in 200,000. The prevalence of this disease is higher among Asian women under the age of 30. Most pregnant women with mild TA receive spinal anesthesia for cesarean sections. Despite difficulties in measuring blood pressure, the entire surgical process, including the administering of anesthesia, is generally stable. Studies in this area are rare. The authors report a case of a pregnant woman with TA who received anesthesia for a cesarean section and then suffered for heart failure, metabolic acidosis, and postoperative multiple organ failure. The authors hope to contribute to the clinical studies on the subject of anesthesia for pregnant women with TA.


Subject(s)
Acidosis/etiology , Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Cesarean Section/methods , Heart Failure/etiology , Multiple Organ Failure/etiology , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular , Takayasu Arteritis/complications , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...