Efficacy and safety of bifid triple viable plus aminosalicylic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Ulcerative colitis (UC), one of the most stubborn diseases, is mainly treated by aminosalicylic acid (ASA). However, the side effects of ASA include vomiting, nausea, rash, diarrhea, headache, etc, which seriously affect life-quality of UC patients. Probiotics such as bifid triple viable (BTV) could reduce drug-induced adverse reactions and has a good clinical effect on UC. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of BTV plus ASA in treating UC. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases were searched from the inception dates to October 12, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included by comparing BTV plus ASA programs with ASA alone in patients with UC. Methodological quality was assessed by 2 independent researchers according to the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis was performed by using the Review Manager 5.3 Software. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence interval (CI), and standardized mean difference were calculated. RESULTS: Sixty RCTs involving 4954 participants were selected for final review. Compared with ASA, BTV plus ASA significantly improved the clinical effect rate [RR = 1.23, 95% CI (1.20, 1.26), P < .00001]; reduced the relapse rate [RR = 0.34, 95% CI (0.18, 0.62), P = .0005]; and adverse effect rate [RR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.53, 0.82), P = .0002]. Compared with the controls, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, C-reactive protein (CRP), hypersensitive CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and malondialdehyde were reduced; levels of IL-10, CD3+, CD4+, and superoxide dismutase were increased in BTV plus ASA group. CONCLUSIONS: BTV plus ASA has positive therapeutic effects on UC, and it might be a safe way to treat UC. However, comprehensive clinical trials are needed to obtain high level of clinical evidence.

Efficacy and safety of Kangfuxin liquid combined with aminosalicylic acid for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Kangfuxin liquid (KFXL) combined with aminosalicylic acid (ASA) in treating ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CBM, Wan fang, the Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials of KFXL combined with ASA for UC from the inception dates to March 3, 2017. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality according to the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software (RevMan, Version 5.3, Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014), and the risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. RESULTS: A total of 39 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 3204 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Compared with ASA alone, KFXL combined with ASA significantly improved the clinical effectiveness rate [RR = 1.19, 95% CI: (1.16, 1.23), P < .00001], reduced the relapse rate [RR = 0.26, 95% CI: (0.18, 0.38), P < .00001], reduced the inflammation factor levels of TNF-a, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and C-reactive protein, reduced the coagulation index of fibrinogen, increased the coagulation index of prothrombin time, and mean platelet volume, and reduced the clinical symptoms of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, pus and bloody stool, and tenesmus. However, KFXL combined with ASA did not increase the adverse event incidence [RR = 0.74, 95% CI (0.42, 1.32), P = .31], and no severe adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: KFXL combined with ASA has good therapeutic effect for UC and might be a safe approach in managing UC. More high-quality, multicenter randomized, double-blind trials with a large sample size are required to generate a high level of clinical evidence.