A case report: A new promising treatment for pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma - Tislelizumab and Anlotinib combined with local radiotherapy.

Background: Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare pathological type of non-small cell lung cancer, only occurs in 0.1%-0.4 % of lung cancer patients. It has a poor prognosis and shows low response to conventional chemotherapy. Target therapy, immunotherapy, and other new approaches are worth exploring in PSC. Recently, patients with MET ex14 skipping mutation can obtain good therapeutic efficacy through target therapy. But there was no definitive treatment for patients without this special mutation. Case description: Now, we report a female PSC patient without MET ex14 skipping mutation in the cT4N2M1 stage treated with Tislelizumab and Anlotinib obtained remarkable effect for more than 2 years. Significantly, in this case, immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy continued to prolong the survival time of more than 10 months for the patient after being treated by local radiotherapy. This is the first case that reported the effectiveness of immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy combined with local radiotherapy in treating PSC and achieved more long-term clinical efficacy than other treatments. Conclusions: Thus, immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy combined with local radiotherapy may bring new hope to advanced PSC patients and is worth conducting further research. It provided an effective reference for the treatment of advanced PSC patients without METex14 skipping mutation. Moreover, this case also demonstrated the synergistic effect of radiotherapy and immunotherapy.

Complete pathological remission and tertiary lymphoid structures are associated with the efficacy of resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy: A double-center retrospective study.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between complete pathological remission (PCR), tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) maturation and expression and clinical outcomes of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy. Totally 80 patients with resectable NSCLC (stage IB-IIIB) receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy were analyzed. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to plot survival curves and the log-rank test to compare differences. Among all patients included, 45 patients (56.25%) achieved major pathological response (MPR), including 30 patients (37.50%) with PCR. The proportion of patients diagnosed with stage IB, II, IIIA and IIIB was 1.25%, 10.00%, 52.50% and 36.25%, respectively. We divided patients into PCR group and non-PCR group respectively according to whether they achieved PCR. We found that patients achieving PCR had significantly improved disease-free survival (DFS) (mDFS: NR vs. 20.24 months, P = .020). TLS expression was low in 43 cases (53.75%) and high in 37 cases (46.25%). TLS maturation was low in 55 cases (68.75%) and high in 25 cases (31.25%). The DFS of patients with TLS high-maturation (34.07 vs. 22.30 months, P = .024) and TLS high-expression (34.07 vs. 22.30 months, P = .041) was significantly longer. In most subgroups, the PCR, TLS high-maturation and TLS high-expression group respectively achieved a better clinical outcome relative to the non-PCR, TLS low-maturation and TLS low-expression group. In patients with resectable NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, the acquirement of PCR may predict better DFS. In addition, high expression and maturation of TLS may be prognostic factors.

A retrospective real-world study: the efficacy of immune-related combination therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer after resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

BACKGROUND: Whether patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) should choose an immune-combination therapy regimen after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) resistance is currently unclear. METHODS: We evaluated 118 NSCLC patients treated by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) + chemotherapy (I + C), ICIs + chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (I + C + A), chemotherapy + antiangiogenic therapy (C + A) after inefficacy of EGFR-TKIs. We assessed the objective remission rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of these treatments. RESULTS: The ORR was 26.1% vs 38.2% vs 16.3% in the three groups (P = 0.093). The divergence in DCR was also statistically significant (65.2% vs 85.3% vs 74.4%, P = 0.209). The median PFS was no statistically significant difference in PFS (3.09 vs 6.31 vs 5.91 months, P = 0.809), but the Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 12-month-PFS indicated an apparent survival advantage in the I + C + A group (P = 0.001). In addition, the I + C/I + C + A group showed higher median PFS than the C + A group in patients with brain metastases (median PFS, 6.44 vs 4.21 months, P = 0.022). The divergence in ORR of patients in the brain group was also statistically significant (P = 0.045). The I + C + A group showed superior efficacy in patients with liver metastases (median PFS, 0.95 vs 6.44 vs 3.48 months, P < 0.0001). The Cox proportional hazard modeling analysis suggested that the age, brain metastases, and liver metastases were all connected with the prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that advanced NSCLC patients after resistance to EGFR-TKIs may achieve better outcomes from triple therapy. Patients with brain metastases favor ICIs-related combination therapies and patients with liver metastases prefer I + C + A therapy.

[Recent Progress of Tertiary Lymphoid Structure in Prognosis and Immunotherapy of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 85%. Immunotherapy has significantly improved the clinical prognosis of patients with NSCLC. However, because of the complexity and heterogeneousness of the tumor microenvironment, only a subset of individuals can benefit from immunotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to explore effective predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy of NSCLC. Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) is an ectopic lymphoid organ that is highly similar to secondary lymphoid organs (SLO), and the presence of TLS has been found to be closely associated with a good prognosis in immunotherapy for a variety of solid tumors, including NSCLC. This article provides a review of the prognostic role of tertiary lymphoid structures in immunotherapy of NSCLC, in order to offer references for screening suitable candidates for immunotherapy of NSCLC and develop personalized and precise treatment plans.
.

To be, or not to be: the dilemma of immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer harboring various driver mutations.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer is one of primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cncer. For advanced lung cancer, traditional chemotherapy and targeted therapy become difficult to solve the dilemma of further progress. In recent years, with the clinical application of immunotherapy, the therapeutic strategy of lung cancer has changed dramatically. At present, immunotherapy has shown conspicuous efficacy in NSCLC patients with high expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and high tumor mutational burden (TMB). The discovery of driver mutations brings delightful hope for targeted cancer therapy. However, it remains controversial whether immunotherapy can be used in NSCLC patients with these specific driver mutations. METHOD: This article summarized the latest research progresses of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC. We paid close attention to the relevance of various driver mutations and immunotherapy in NSCLC patients, and summarized the predictive effects of several driver mutations and immunotherapy. RESULTS: The mutations of KRAS, KRAS+TP53, EPHA (especially EPHA5), ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, NOTCH, BRAF and LRP1B+FAT3 have potential to be used as biomarkers to predict the positive effectiveness of immunotherapy. ZFHX3, ZFHX3+TP53, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1 mutations in LUAD patients get more positive effect in immunotherapy. While the mutations of EGFR, KEAP1, STKII/LKB1+KRAS, EML4-ALK, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, PBRM1, STKII/LKB1+KEAP1+SMARCA4+PBRM1, ERBB2, PIK3CA and RET often indicate poor benefit from immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Many gene mutations have been shown to be associated with immunotherapy efficacy. Gene mutations should be combined with PD-L1, TMB, etc. to predict the effect of immunotherapy.