ABSTRACT
In this paper, we studied the aggregation of amphiphilic polymer epoxy-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS-E) grafted gelatin (PGG) in water induced by methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, acetone, tetrahydrofuran (THF), and 1,4-dioxane. The aggregation pattern of the polymer was monitored by infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. It was revealed that the aggregate morphology showed clear dependence on the solvent polarity. The PGG aggregates had regular spherical morphology in polar solvents, including water, methanol, ethanol, 2-propanol, and acetone. The coating performance was evaluated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and friction experiment, and PGG and acetone coating exhibited excellent coating performance on the surface of pigskin. Gel was formed in acetone and tetrahydrofuran (THF) with the slow evaporation of solvent, and this property can possibly be applied to industrial sewage treatment. White precipitate and soft film were formed in non-polar 1,4-dioxane.
Subject(s)
Epoxy Resins/chemistry , Gelatin/chemistry , Siloxanes/chemistry , Solvents/chemistry , Chemistry Techniques, Synthetic , Gelatin/ultrastructure , Polymers/chemistry , Spectrum Analysis , Surface-Active Agents/chemistryABSTRACT
In this work, interfacial reaction kinetics between α-[3-(2,3-epoxypropoxy)propyl]-ω-butyl-polydimethylsiloxane emulsion droplets with different sizes and gelatin was studied. The results of amino conversion rate determination show that the reaction proceeded in two steps. Fluorescence spectra analysis indicates that step 1 (0-2 h) should be the adsorption of gelatin on droplet surface. In step 2 (2-13 h), amino conversion rate increased rapidly. The reaction rate in step 2 ( k2) was obtained by using the 2nd-order approach to model the grafting reaction kinetics. The quantitative relationships among amino conversion rate, droplet size, the concentration of surfactant, reaction temperature, and time were described by linear regression models in given ranges of conditions in step 2. Thermodynamic analysis indicates that the interfacial reaction is an endothermic reaction. After 13 h, the reaction was almost stopped.
