Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neurology ; 101(14): e1448-e1454, 2023 10 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37604662

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dexamethasone decreases the frequency of migraine recurrence after emergency department (ED) discharge. However, the optimal dose of dexamethasone is unknown. We hypothesized that dexamethasone 16 mg IV would allow greater rates of sustained headache relief than 4 mg when coadministered with metoclopramide 10 mg IV. METHODS: This was a randomized double-blind study. Adults who presented with a headache meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, migraine criteria were eligible if they rated the headache as moderate or severe in intensity. Pain intensity was assessed for up to 2 hours in the ED and through telephone 48 hours and 7 days later. The primary outcome was sustained headache relief. Secondary outcomes included headache relief within 2 hours and the number of headache days during the subsequent week. Relying on a priori criteria, the data safety monitoring committee recommended halting the study early for futility. RESULTS: A total of 1,823 patients were screened, and 209 patients were randomized. The mean age was 38 years (SD 11). One hundred seventy-nine of 209 (86%) identified as women. One hundred fifty-one of 209 (72%) of the population reported severe intensity; the rest reported moderate. Thirty-five of 102 (34%) participants in the metoclopramide +4 mg arm achieved sustained headache relief as did 42/102 (41%) participants in the metoclopramide +16 mg arm (absolute difference 7%, 95% CI -6% to 20%). Headache relief within 2 hours occurred in 77/104 (74%) low-dose and 82/105 (78%) high-dose participants (absolute difference 4%, 95% CI -8% to 16%). During the week after ED discharge, low-dose participants reported a median of 2 headache days (25th, 75th percentile 1, 5); in the high-dose arm, this was also 2 (25th, 75th percentile 0, 4) (mean difference 0.4, 95% CI -0.3 to 1.2). DISCUSSION: When added to 10 mg IV metoclopramide, doses of dexamethasone greater than 4 mg are unlikely to benefit patients in the ED with migraine. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on October 2, 2019 (NCT04112823). The first patient was enrolled on December 22, 2019. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that 16 mg of IV dexamethasone is unlikely to provide greater rates of sustained headache relief than 4 mg of IV dexamethasone among patients in the ED with migraine treated concurrently with IV metoclopramide.


Subject(s)
Metoclopramide , Migraine Disorders , Adult , Humans , Female , Metoclopramide/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Headache/drug therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method
2.
Neurology ; 96(18): e2323-e2331, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762421

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether IV metoclopramide 20 mg + diphenhydramine 25 mg (M + D) was more efficacious than IV placebo for acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache in the emergency room. METHODS: We conducted this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 2 urban emergency departments (EDs). Participants who experienced head trauma and presented to our EDs within 10 days with a headache fulfilling criteria for acute posttraumatic headache were included. We randomized participants in a 1:1 ratio to M + D or placebo. Participants, caregivers, and outcome assessors were blinded to assignment. The primary outcome was improvement in pain on a scale of 0 to 10 between baseline and 1 hour after treatment. RESULTS: This study was completed between August 2017 and March 2020. We screened 414 patients for participation and randomized 160: 81 to M + D and 79 to placebo. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. All enrolled participants provided primary outcome data. Patients receiving placebo reported mean improvement of 3.8 (SD 2.6), while those receiving M + D improved by 5.2 (SD 2.3), for a difference favoring metoclopramide of 1.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7-2.2, p < 0.01). Adverse events were reported by 35 of 81 (43%) patients who received metoclopramide and 22 of 79 (28%) of patients who received placebo (95% CI 1-30 for difference of 15%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: M + D was more efficacious than placebo with regard to relief of posttraumatic headache in the ED. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03220958. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with acute moderate or severe posttraumatic headache, IV M + D significantly improved pain compared to placebo.


Subject(s)
Acute Pain/drug therapy , Diphenhydramine/administration & dosage , Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonists/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Metoclopramide/administration & dosage , Post-Traumatic Headache/drug therapy , Acute Pain/diagnosis , Administration, Intravenous , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Pain Measurement/methods , Post-Traumatic Headache/diagnosis
3.
J Emerg Med ; 57(2): 173-176, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health information found on open access Internet platforms is often unscrutinized, unreliable, and can lead to considerable morbidity for patients and their presentation to the emergency department. Currently, home treatments for constipation and other gastrointestinal ailments featuring the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) enemas are readily available. CASE REPORT: We present a case of a 48-year-old female with a history of fibroids who presented to the emergency department with acute abdominal pain after self-administering a 3% H2O2 enema, which she learned about on the Internet as a treatment for constipation. She subsequently developed a severe colitis with evidence of pneumatosis and focal perforation. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although toxicity from oral ingestions of H2O2 is well described in the literature, there are few reports of the sequelae related to rectal administration. Due to its significant morbidity and the public health concerns related to this mechanism of toxicity, emergency physicians are at the frontlines for diagnosing and properly managing these patients. This case report reviews the patient's presentation, findings, and management.


Subject(s)
Colitis/drug therapy , Enema/adverse effects , Hydrogen Peroxide/adverse effects , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Colitis/physiopathology , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Enema/methods , Female , Humans , Hydrogen Peroxide/therapeutic use , Hydrogen Peroxide/toxicity , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Radiography/methods , Self Care/adverse effects , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...