Outcomes of a Provincial Myocardial Infarction Reperfusion Strategy: A Population-Based, Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinolysis is an acceptable treatment for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) when primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cannot be performed within 120 minutes. The American Heart Association has recommended Emergency Medical Services (EMS) interventions such as prehospital fibrinolysis (PHF), prehospital electrocardiogram (ECG), and hospital bypass direct to PCI center. Nova Scotia, Canada has incorporated these interventions into a unique province-wide approach to STEMI care. A retrospective cohort analysis comparing the primary outcome of 30-day mortality for patients receiving either prehospital or emergency department (ED) fibrinolysis (EDF) to patients transported directly by EMS from community or regional ED for primary PCI was conducted. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based cohort study included all STEMI patients in Nova Scotia who survived to hospital admission from July 2011 through July 2013. Three provincial databases were used to collect demographic, 30-day mortality, hospital readmission, and rescue PCI data. The results were grouped and compared according to reperfusion strategy received: PHF, EDF, patients brought by ambulance via EMS direct to PCI (EMS to PCI), and ED to PCI (ED to PCI). RESULTS: There were 1,071 STEMI patients included with 145 PHF, 606 EDF, 98 EMS to PCI, and 222 ED to PCI. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality across groups (n, %): PHF 5(3); EDF 36(6); EHS to PCI <5(2); and ED to PCI 10(4); P = .28. There was no significant difference in patients receiving fibrinolysis who underwent rescue PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital fibrinolysis incorporated into a province-wide approach to STEMI treatment is feasible with no observed difference in patient 30-day mortality outcomes observed.

State of the Evidence for Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Care: The Evolution and Current Methodology of the Prehospital Evidence-Based Practice (PEP) Program.

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) leaders and clinicians need to incorporate evidence into safe and effective clinical practice. Access to high-quality evidence, and the time to synthesize it, can be barriers to evidence-based practice. The Prehospital Evidence-Based Practice (PEP) program is an online, freely accessible, repository of critically appraised evidence specific to EMS. This paper describes the evolution and current methodology of the PEP program. Methods|design: The purpose of PEP is to identify, catalog and critically appraise relevant studies. Following regular systematic searches, two trained appraisers critically appraise included studies and assign a score on three-point level of evidence (LOE) and direction of evidence (DOE) scales. Each clinical intervention is plotted on a 3 × 3 (LOE × DOE) evidence matrix, which provides a summary recommendation. Discussion: The PEP program is a unique knowledge translation tool, specific to EMS. End-users can easily identify which clinical interventions are, or are not, supported by evidence.

Insights into the implementation and operation of a novel paramedic long-term care program.

OBJECTIVE: An extended-care paramedic (ECP) program was implemented to provide emergency assessment and care on site to long-term care (LTC) residents suffering acute illness or injury. A single paramedic works collaboratively with physicians, LTC staff, patient, and family to develop care plans to address acute situations, often avoiding the need to transport the resident to hospital. We sought to identify insights gained and lessons learned during implementation and operation of this novel program. METHODS: The perceptions and experiences of various stakeholders were explored in focus groups, using a semi-structured interview guide. Two investigators independently conducted thematic analysis and identified emerging themes and related codes. Congruence and differences were discussed to achieve consensus. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants took part in four homogeneous focus groups: paramedics and dispatchers, ECPs, ECP oversight physicians, and decision-makers. The key themes identified were (1) program implementation, (2) ECP process of care, (3) communications, and (4) end-of-life care. CONCLUSION: The ECP program has positive implications for the relationship between EMS and LTC, requires additional paramedic training, and can positively affect LTC patient experiences during acute medical events. ECPs have a novel role to play in end-of-life care and find this new role rewarding.

Transport outcomes and dispatch determinants in a paramedic long-term care program: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care (LTC) patients are often sent to emergency departments (EDs) by ambulance. In this novel extended care paramedic (ECP) program, specially trained paramedics manage LTC patients on site. The objective of this pilot study was to describe the dispatch and disposition of LTC patients treated by ECPs and emergency paramedics. METHODS: Data were collected from consecutive calls to 15 participating LTC facilities for 3 months. Dispatch determinants, transport rates, and relapse rates were described for LTC patients attended by ECPs or emergency paramedics. ECP involvement in end-of-life care was identified. RESULTS: Of 238 eligible calls, 140 (59%) were attended by an ECP and 98 (41%) by emergency paramedics. Although the top three determinants were the same in each group, the overall distribution of dispatch determinants and acuity differed. In the ECP cohort, 98 of 140 (70%) were treated and released, 33 of 140 (24%) had "facilitated transfer" arranged by an ECP, and 9 of 140 (6%) were immediately transported to the ED by ambulance. In the emergency paramedic cohort, 77 of 98 (79%) were immediately transported to the ED and 21 of 98 (21%) were not transported. In the ECP group, 6 of 98 (6%) patients not transported triggered a 911 call within 48 hours for a related clinical reason, although none of the patients not transported by emergency paramedics relapsed. CONCLUSION: ECP involvement in LTC calls was found to reduce transports to the ED with a low rate of relapse. These pilot data generated hypotheses for future study, including determination of appropriate populations for ECP care and analysis of appropriate and safe nontransport.

Impaired driving charges in injured impaired drivers requiring treatment in an emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of injured impaired drivers brought to the only trauma centre in Nova Scotia who were charged with impaired driving. METHODS: This retrospective observational study identified alcohol impaired drivers involved in a motor vehicle crash (MVC) brought to the emergency department (ED). Patients were selected based on blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) found to be above the legal limit. Medical records were examined to determine if the patient was the driver in an MVC. Patient records were then cross-referenced with a police database to determine the percentage of injured impaired drivers who were charged with impaired driving. RESULTS: Between April 1, 2006, and April 1, 2008, 1,102 patients brought to the QEII Health Sciences Centre (QEII HSC) ED were found to have BACs over the legal limit. Of these patients, only 57 (5.2%) were found to have been the driver in an MVC. The majority of patients were male (49; 86%), with an average age of 32 years. Most injuries (51; 89.5%) were the result of a single-vehicle crash. The mean Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.6, and the mean Injury Severity Score was 14.4. Cross-referencing with police records showed that only 22.8% (13 of 57) of injured drivers were charged with impaired driving. Those drivers not charged with impaired driving had a significantly lower median BAC and median age. CONCLUSION: During the study, the majority of alcohol-impaired drivers injured in an MVC who were brought to the QEII HSC ED for assessment of their injuries were not charged with impaired driving.

Methodology for the development of a Canadian national EMS research agenda.

BACKGROUND: Many health care disciplines use evidence-based decision making to improve patient care and system performance. While the amount and quality of emergency medical services (EMS) research in Canada has increased over the past two decades, there has not been a unified national plan to enable research, ensure efficient use of research resources, guide funding decisions and build capacity in EMS research. Other countries have used research agendas to identify barriers and opportunities in EMS research and define national research priorities. The objective of this project is to develop a national EMS research agenda for Canada that will: 1) explore what barriers to EMS research currently exist, 2) identify current strengths and opportunities that may be of benefit to advancing EMS research, 3) make recommendations to overcome barriers and capitalize on opportunities, and 4) identify national EMS research priorities. METHODS/DESIGN: Paramedics, educators, EMS managers, medical directors, researchers and other key stakeholders from across Canada will be purposefully recruited to participate in this mixed methods study, which consists of three phases: 1) qualitative interviews with a selection of the study participants, who will be asked about their experience and opinions about the four study objectives, 2) a facilitated roundtable discussion, in which all participants will explore and discuss the study objectives, and 3) an online Delphi consensus survey, in which all participants will be asked to score the importance of each topic discovered during the interviews and roundtable as they relate to the study objectives. Results will be analyzed to determine the level of consensus achieved for each topic. DISCUSSION: A mixed methods approach will be used to address the four study objectives. We anticipate that the keys to success will be: 1) ensuring a representative sample of EMS stakeholders, 2) fostering an open and collaborative roundtable discussion, and 3) adhering to a predefined approach to measure consensus on each topic. Steps have been taken in the methodology to address each of these a priori concerns.

The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We designed the Canadian C-Spine Rule for the clinical clearance of the cervical spine, without need for diagnostic imaging, in alert and stable trauma patients. Emergency physicians previously validated the Canadian C-Spine Rule in 8,283 patients. This study prospectively evaluates the performance characteristics, reliability, and clinical sensibility of the Canadian C-Spine Rule when used by paramedics in the out-of-hospital setting. METHODS: We conducted this prospective cohort study in 7 Canadian regions and involved alert (Glasgow Coma Scale score 15) and stable adult trauma patients at risk for neck injury. Advanced and basic care paramedics interpreted the Canadian C-Spine Rule status for all patients, who then underwent immobilization and assessment in the emergency department to determine the outcome, clinically important cervical spine injury. RESULTS: The 1,949 patients enrolled had these characteristics: median age 39.0 years (interquartile range 26 to 52 years), female patients 50.8%, motor vehicle crash 62.5%, fall 19.9%, admitted to the hospital 10.8%, clinically important cervical spine injury 0.6%, unimportant injury 0.3%, and internal fixation 0.3%. The paramedics classified patients for 12 important injuries with sensitivity 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74% to 100%) and specificity 37.7% (95% CI 36% to 40%). The kappa value for paramedic interpretation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule (n=155) was 0.93 (95% CI 0.87 to 0.99). Paramedics conservatively misinterpreted the rule in 320 (16.4%) patients and were comfortable applying the rule in 1,594 (81.7%). Seven hundred thirty-one (37.7%) out-of-hospital immobilizations could have been avoided with the Canadian C-Spine Rule. CONCLUSION: This study found that paramedics can apply the Canadian C-Spine Rule reliably, without missing any important cervical spine injuries. The adoption of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics could significantly reduce the number of out-of-hospital cervical spine immobilizations.

The development of a national emergency medical services curriculum framework for physicians in Canada.

BACKGROUND: As the role of emergency medical services (EMS) continues to expand, EMS physicians and medical directors require special skills and training to keep pace with the rapidly evolving subspecialty of EMS. In Canada, subspecialty training in EMS is still relatively new, and a standard national curriculum for physician EMS training does not exist. OBJECTIVE: To develop a national EMS curriculum for emergency medicine (EM) residents and fellows and an abbreviated curriculum for non-EM trainees and community physicians. METHODS: The authors obtained EMS curricula and opportunities from Canadian EM and EMS training programs and a sample of U.S. programs to determine existing curricula, and developed a framework for a national EMS curriculum using an expert working group of EMS medical directors and EMS leaders in Canada. RESULTS: Canadian EM residency training programs included an EMS rotation, but their content and depth of training were not uniform. The expert working group proposed a comprehensive set of training objectives, grouped into 16 categories, stratified by level of training. CONCLUSION: The proposed framework and objectives are suitable for training medical students, family medicine trainees, community physicians, EM residents, and EMS fellows in Canada. The authors hope this article will serve as a guideline for residency and fellowship directors to develop their EMS training programs in a consistent manner, promote formal training for physicians involved in EMS, and help define the specific knowledge and expertise required of physicians who provide EMS medical direction in Canada.

Medically appropriate use of helicopter EMS: the mission acceptance/triage process.

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate use of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) ensures the maximum impact of a limited resource on improved health outcomes. Overtriage increases real and opportunity costs and may unjustifiably expose the program to small but inherent safety risks. The purpose of this study is to describe the mission acceptance process for an integrated, provincially based HEMS program and determine its utilization patterns. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patient care and administrative databases. All missions were reviewed to determine whether they were medically appropriate. "Appropriateness" was defined a priori as requiring admission to a critical care unit, death during transportation or in first 24 hours, or in the case of trauma, an injury severity scale (ISS) score > or = 12. Overtriage was defined as not meeting these a priori definitions. RESULTS: Five hundred eighty-four missions were reviewed from March 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004. Our mission acceptance process consists of three distinct but complementary phases: ongoing outreach education, scanning by dispatchers in an integrated dispatch center, and a clinician to online physician discussion about each case. The overall overtriage rate was 13.1%. CONCLUSION: The rate of medically appropriate missions in this system is relatively high. Prospective research is required to improve HEMS triage systems.

Prehospital hypoglycemia: the safety of not transporting treated patients.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel frequently encounter patients who refuse transport after being treated for a hypoglycemic episode. The outcomes of most of these patients are unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients treated and not transported for hypoglycemia and identify criteria that could be used to identify patients who did not require transport to hospital. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study involving all adult (>15 years) hypoglycemic patients (blood glucose less than 4 mmol/L by glucometer) attended to by the EMS system in the Halifax Metropolitan area in the province of Nova Scotia during a ten-month interval. RESULTS: There were 220 calls for adult patients with hypoglycemia. Of the 75 calls that resulted in transport, there were 17 further hypoglycemic episodes requiring a repeat call for an ambulance (22.7%) and three recurrences (4%). Of the 145 calls that did not result in transport, 40 further episodes of hypoglycemia (27.6%) and three recurrences (2%) were reported. These differences were not statistically significant (p=0.43 and 0.33, respectively). There was also no statistically significant difference in the intervals between hypoglycemic episodes for patients transported (51.1 days +/-65) compared with patients not transported for their previous hypogylcemic episode (40.7 days +/-53.5) (p=0.6). Of the 47 calls entered in the study, there were seven repeat calls for hypoglycemia (15%) and one recurrence (2.1%). The majority of patients did not follow up with their physician. CONCLUSIONS: Repeat episodes of hypoglycemia are common; however, recurrences within 48 hours are not. Admission to hospital is rarely required. There appears to be no difference in the incidence of recurrences and repeat episodes of hypoglycemia between transported and nontransported insulin-dependent patients, regardless of age. Given the high incidence of repeat episodes, paramedics and physicians need to emphasize the importance of follow-up.