Predicting Conversion to Insulin Sensitivity With Metformin: A Promising Tool for Clinicians in Addressing Insulin Resistance and Improving Outcomes in Patients With Treatment Resistant Bipolar Depression.

BACKGROUND: Insulin resistance (IR) changes the trajectory of responsive bipolar disorder to a treatment-resistant course. A clinical trial conducted by our group demonstrated that IR reversal by metformin improved clinical and functional outcomes in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD). To aid clinicians identify which metformin-treated TRBD patients might reverse IR, and given strong external evidence for their association with IR, we developed a predictive tool using body mass index (BMI) and homeostatic model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). METHODS: The predictive performance of baseline BMI and HOMA-IR was tested with a logistic regression model using known metrics: area under the receiver operating curve, sensitivity, and specificity. In view of the high benefit to low risk of metformin in reversing IR, high sensitivity was favored over specificity. RESULTS: In this BMI and HOMA-IR model for IR reversal, the area under the receiver operating curve is 0.79. At a cutoff probability of conversion of 0.17, the model's sensitivity is 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 57%-99%), and the specificity is 56% (95% CI, 36%-73%). For each unit increase in BMI or HOMA-IR, there is a 15% (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99) or 43% (OR, 0.57; CI, 0.18-1.36) decrease in the odds of conversion, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In individuals with TRBD, this tool using BMI and HOMA-IR predicts IR reversal with metformin with high sensitivity. Furthermore, these data suggest early intervention with metformin at lower BMI, and HOMA-IR would likely reverse IR in TRBD.

Access and adherence to the most recent recommendations regarding resumption of activities after a mild traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To examine access and adherence to the Berlin (2016) recommendations for resuming physical and intellectual activities after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) (including an exploration of barriers and facilitators). 2) To assess post-mTBI symptoms in relation to recommendation adherence. METHOD: 73 participants who sustained a mTBI completed an online survey with questions about access and adherence to recommendations and validated measures of symptoms. RESULTS: Almost all participants had received recommendations from a health professional after their mTBI. Two thirds of recommendations reported had at least moderate correspondence with the Berlin (2016) recommendations. The vast majority of participants reported weak or partial adherence to these recommendations and only 15.7% reported complete adherence. Overall, adherence to recommendations explained a significant portion of the variance in the severity and number of unresolved post-mTBI symptoms. The most common barriers were: being in a critical period for school or work, pressure to return to work or school, screen use, and presence of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Sustained efforts are required to disseminate appropriate recommendations after mTBI. Clinicians should support patients in eliminating barriers to recommendation adherence, as greater adherence may facilitate recovery.

Treating Insulin Resistance With Metformin as a Strategy to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Treatment-Resistant Bipolar Depression (the TRIO-BD Study): A Randomized, Quadruple-Masked, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Objective: Therapeutic options are limited for treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD). Insulin resistance (IR) confers increased risk for TRBD. We investigated metformin, an insulin sensitizer, to reverse IR and improve clinical outcomes in TRBD.Methods: Using a random-assignment (1:1), intent-to-treat, 2-site, quadruple-masked, parallel-group (metformin to 2,000 mg/d or placebo) clinical trial design, patients with DSM-5 bipolar disorder (BD) type I or II and IR received study medication for 26 weeks (February 2016 to October 2019). The primary outcome was the change in depression rating scores (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS]) at 14 weeks between those who no longer met IR criteria (converters) and those who still did (non-converters). Additional outcomes included scores on the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF); the Clinical Global Impressions Scale, Bipolar Disorders version (CGI-BP); and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and maintenance of improved outcomes up to 26 weeks.Results: Forty-five BD patients were randomized to metformin (n = 20) or placebo (n = 25), and at 14 weeks or later, 11 subjects no longer met IR criteria (n = 10 with metformin, n = 1 with placebo; P = .0009). These converters experienced significant improvements in MADRS (P values ranged from .031 to .008) and GAF (P values ranged from .045 to .008) scores compared to non-converters beginning at week 6, sustained to week 26. HAM-A (P = .022 at week 14 and .019 at week 26) and CGI-BP change scores (P = .046 at 26 weeks) significantly favored converters over non-converters. Effect sizes were large for the MADRS and GAF (Cohen d > 1 at 14 and 26 weeks) and large for the HAM-A and CGI-BP at 26 weeks. Transient gastrointestinal side effects occurred under both treatment conditions.Conclusions: Pending replication, this early study suggests that reversal of IR by metformin offers a path out of TRBD. Further characterization of metformin converters with TRBD will prove informative.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02519543.

Insulin Resistance and Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction Underlie Neuroprogression in Bipolar Disorder.

Bipolar disorder (BD) often progresses to a more chronic and treatment resistant (neuroprogressive) course. Identifying which patients are at risk could allow for early intervention and prevention. Bipolar disorder is highly comorbid with metabolic disorders including type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM), hypertension, obesity, and dyslipidemia. Our studies have shown that insulin resistance (IR) is present in over 50% of patients with BD and that IR might underlie the progression of BD. While no confirmed predictors exist for identifying which patients with BD are likely to develop a more chronic course, emerging evidence including our own studies suggest that IR and related inflammatory pathways lead to impairments in blood-brain barrier (BBB) functioning. For the first time in living psychiatric patients, we have shown that the severity of BBB leakage is proportional to BD severity and is associated with IR. In this hypothesis paper we (i) highlight the evidence for a key role of IR in BD, (ii) show how IR in BD relates to shared inflammatory pathways, and (iii) hypothesize that these modulations result in BBB leakage and worse outcomes in BD. We further hypothesize that (iv) reversing IR through lifestyle changes or the actions of insulin sensitizing medications such as metformin, or optimizing BBB function using vascular protective drugs, such as losartan, could provide novel strategies for the prevention or treatment of neuroprogressive BD.

Blood-brain barrier imaging as a potential biomarker for bipolar disorder progression.

Bipolar disorder affects approximately 2% of the population and is typically characterized by recurrent episodes of mania and depression. While some patients achieve remission using mood-stabilizing treatments, a significant proportion of patients show progressive changes in symptomatology over time. Bipolar progression is diverse in nature and may include a treatment-resistant increase in the frequency and severity of episodes, worse psychiatric and functional outcomes, and a greater risk of suicide. The mechanisms underlying bipolar disorder progression remain poorly understood and there are currently no biomarkers for identifying patients at risk. The objective of this study was to explore the potential of blood-brain barrier (BBB) imaging as such a biomarker, by acquiring the first imaging data of BBB leakage in bipolar patients, and evaluating the potential association between BBB dysfunction and bipolar symptoms. To this end, a cohort of 36 bipolar patients was recruited through the Mood Disorders Clinic (Nova Scotia Health Authority, Canada). All patients, along with 14 control subjects (matched for sex, age and metabolic status), underwent contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI scanning for quantitative assessment of BBB leakage as well as clinical and psychiatric evaluations. Outlier analysis has identified a group of 10 subjects with significantly higher percentages of brain volume with BBB leakage (labeled the "extensive BBB leakage" group). This group consisted exclusively of bipolar patients, while the "normal BBB leakage" group included the entire control cohort and the remaining 26 bipolar subjects. Among the bipolar cohort, patients with extensive BBB leakage were found to have more severe depression and anxiety, and a more chronic course of illness. Furthermore, all bipolar patients within this group were also found to have co-morbid insulin resistance, suggesting that insulin resistance may increase the risk of BBB dysfunction in bipolar patients. Our findings demonstrate a clear link between BBB leakage and greater psychiatric morbidity in bipolar patients and highlight the potential of BBB imaging as a mechanism-based biomarker for bipolar disorder progression.

Course of bipolar illness worsens after onset of insulin resistance.

Cross-sectional studies indicate that comorbid insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes are associated with a more severe course of bipolar disorder (BD); however, this relationship has not previously been assessed longitudinally. To address this, we reviewed health records of a case series of six patients with BD and comorbid IR. Severity and length of affective episodes (both mania and depression) over the lifetime were recorded using the Affective Morbidity Index; these data were obtained from ongoing prospective follow-up and from detailed retrospective chart reviews. All six patients with a previously episodic, relapsing-remitting course of illness experienced a worsening of morbidity after the onset of laboratory-demonstrated IR. These results suggest that IR may be a potential testable, modifiable factor in the progression of BD from a treatment responsive (episodic) to a non-responsive (chronic) course of illness.