ABSTRACT
Background Intermittent fasting is becoming more popular as health benefits are described in recent literature. Various forms of fasting exist, one of them involving a zero-calorie diet and drinking only water. However, the safety of water-only fasting is still not well established. We report a case of a man who developed a lower limb deep vein thrombosis at the end of a 2-week water-only fasting and characterized by an initial period of 5 days of no food and no water intake. We reviewed literature regarding potential links between fasting and venous thromboembolism (VTE). Clinical Approach We believe that fasting can induce important dehydration, leading to hypercoagulability and then contribute to the development of a venous thrombosis. The patient was treated with apixaban for 3 months as is recommended in patients with a provoked event caused by a transient risk factor. No thrombotic recurrence was observed during the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion The public needs to be aware of the potential life-threatening complications associated with important dehydration in the setting of medically unsupervised fasting, and these might include VTE. Whether a VTE with dehydration as the only identified risk factor should be approached as a low recurrence risk situation or not still needs to be clarified.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AstraZeneca) and Ad26COV2.S (Johnson & Johnson/Janssen) adenoviral vector vaccines have been associated with vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia have been described in a minority of patients with VITT. These patients usually need a revascularization, but they potentially are at a higher risk of complications. Optimal perioperative care of patients undergoing vascular surgery in acute VITT is unknown and important considerations in such context need to be described. CASES PRESENTATIONS: We report 2 cases of VITT presenting with acute limb ischemia who needed vascular surgery and we describe the multidisciplinary team decisions for specific treatment surrounding the interventions. Both patients' platelet counts initially increased after either intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) or therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). None received platelet transfusion. They both received argatroban as an alternative to heparin for their surgery. Despite persistent positivity of anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibodies and serotonin-release assay with added PF4 (PF4-SRA) in both patients, only one received a repeated dose of IVIG before the intervention. Per- and post-operative courses were both unremarkable. CONCLUSION: In spite of persistent anti-PF4 and PF4-SRA positivity in the setting of VITT, after platelet count improvement using either IVIG or TPE, vascular interventions using argatroban can show favorable courses. Use of repeated IVIG or TPE before such interventions still needs to be defined.
