Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 121(1): 19-26, 1997 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9111088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and reasons for rejection of chemistry specimens. DESIGN AND SETTING: College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement study prospectively recording rejected chemistry specimens in 453 laboratories. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of submitted specimens rejected for testing. RESULTS: Of 10,709,701 chemistry specimens submitted to the participating laboratories during the data collection period, 37,208 (0.35%) were rejected prior to testing. The institutional 10th, 50th (median), and 90th percentiles were 1.35%, 0.31%, and 0.06%, respectively. The most frequent reason for rejection was hemolysis, which occurred five times more frequently than the second most cited reason, insufficient specimen quantity to perform the test. When examined with their respective frequency of use, a higher percentage of rejected specimens were collected in microcollection tubes than in other containers. When compared with the respective frequency with which they collect specimens, laboratory personnel submitted significantly fewer rejected specimens than other in-hospital personnel groups and slightly more than out-of-hospital nonlaboratory personnel. The poorest performance was demonstrated by other in-hospital nonlaboratory personnel. Serum and plasma oxalate/fluoride specimens exhibited significantly lower rejection rates when compared with the other specimen types. Relative rejection rates were higher for nongel tubes and lower for syringes when compared with gel tubes. CONCLUSION: Specimen rejection should be monitored on a regular basis. Institution-specific factors that are associated with rejection should be identified and targeted for improvement efforts. Action thresholds should be set sufficiently low to assure that continuous improvement is effected.


Subject(s)
Blood Preservation/methods , Blood Specimen Collection/methods , Chemistry, Clinical/standards , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Quality Control , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prospective Studies , Societies, Medical , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...