Does intra-operative verapamil administration in kidney transplantation improve graft function.

The role of the calcium channel blocker (verapamil) in kidney transplant is controversial. Verapamil has been hypothesized to mitigate ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) to the allograft. Herein, we evaluated the effect of intra-operative verapamil administration in a large cohort of kidney transplants. Total 684 transplants were performed during 2007-2017. Of these, 348 (50.9%) transplants received verapamil (2.5 mg) Ver (+), and 336 (49.1%) did not, Ver (-). Based on the donor type, the study was divided into three groups; living donor (LD) (N = 270), neurological determination of death (NDD) (N = 394), and donation after cardiac death (DCD) (N = 20). Ver (-) subgroup had more diabetic recipients as compared to Ver (+) subgroup in LD and NDD groups (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found for delayed graft function in any of the group (P > 0.05). Cold ischemia time and dialysis requirement were significantly higher in Ver (+) LD and NDD groups, respectively. Except for DCD group, there was no significant difference in eGFR (mL/min) immediately and 6 months after kidney transplant in any of the groups. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to account for potential confounders, but verapamil administration did not improve graft function in any of the groups (P > 0.05) after transplant.

Renal transplant anastomotic pseudoaneurysms: Case report of open repair and endovascular management.

INTRODUCTION: Anastomotic pseudoaneurysm is one of the rarest vascular complications after renal transplant surgery. Therapeutic options include open surgical repair or endovascular stenting. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1 had pseudoaneurysm involving external iliac artery and was managed by jump graft to allograft using cadaveric donor iliac arteries and patch angioplasty repair of external iliac artery after excising pseudoaneurysm. Case 2 had undergone orthotopic renal transplant with spleno-renal arterial anastomosis and developed a massive pseudoaneurysm proximal to spleno-renal arterial anastomosis. This patient underwent endovascular stenting preserving allograft vascularity and graft function. Outcome in both patients was successful with normalization of renal function to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: Treatment of renal transplant anastomotic pseudoaneurysms is difficult and associated with high rates of graft loss. Open surgery is the gold standard providing several possibilities for arterial reconstruction preserving graft and limb circulation. Endovascular treatment should be considered in high-risk surgical patients with favorable anatomy.