Modality-specific target definition for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on FDG-PET, CT and MRI.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to improve target definition by deriving modality-specific margins for clinical target volumes (CTV) for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer on CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients with T3/T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent CT, MRI and 18-FDG-PET scans before laryngectomy. HE-sections were obtained from the surgical specimen and tumor was delineated (tumorHE). The GTVs on CT and MRI were delineated in consensus. PET-based GTVs were automatically segmented. The three-dimensionally reconstructed specimen was registered to the various images. Modality-specific CTV margins were derived and added to the GTVs to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The resulting CTVs were compared with each other, to tumorHE, and to CTVCT10 constructed on CT with the clinical margin of 10mm. RESULTS: CTV margins of 4.3mm (CT), 6.1mm (MRI) and 5.2mm (PET) were needed to achieve adequate tumor coverage. The median volumes of the resulting modality-specific CTVs were 44ml (CT), 48ml (MRI) and 39ml (PET), while the CTV10mm was 80ml. CONCLUSION: For laryngohypopharyngeal tumors, 45-52% target volume reduction compared with CTV10mm is achievable when modality-specific CTV margins are used. PET-based CTVs were significantly smaller compared to CT- and MRI-based CTVs.

Validated guidelines for tumor delineation on magnetic resonance imaging for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Validation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and development of guidelines for the delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) is of utmost importance to benefit from the visibility of anatomical details on MR images and to achieve an accurate GTV delineation. In the ideal situation, the GTV delineation corresponds to the histopathologically determined 'true tumor volume'. Consequently, we developed guidelines for GTV delineation of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal tumors on MRI and determined the accuracy of the resulting delineation of the tumor outline on histopathology as gold standard. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a MRI scan before laryngectomy. Hematoxylin and eosin sections were obtained from surgical specimens and tumor was delineated by one pathologist. GTV was delineated on MR images by three independent observers in two sessions. The first session (del1) was performed according to clinical practice. In the second session (del2) guidelines were used. The reconstructed specimen was registered to the MR images for comparison of the delineated GTVs to the tumor on histopathology. Volumes and overlap parameters were analyzed. A target margin needed to assure tumor coverage was determined. RESULTS: The median GTVs (del1: 19.4 cm3, del2: 15.8 cm3) were larger than the tumor volume on pathology (10.5 cm3). Comparable target margins were needed for both delineation sessions to assure tumor coverage. By adding these margins to the GTVs, the target volumes for del1 (median: 81.3 cm3) were significantly larger than for del2 (median: 64.2 cm3) (p ≤ 0.0001) with similar tumor coverage. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical radiotherapy practice, the delineated GTV on MRI is twice as large as the tumor volume. Validated delineation guidelines lead to a significant decrease in the overestimation of the tumor volume.

The accuracy of target delineation in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the spatial correspondence between the gross tumor volume (GTV) delineated on computer tomography (CT) and the actual tumor on histopathology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with T3 or T4 laryngeal or hypopharyngeal cancer underwent a CT scan before total laryngectomy. The GTV was delineated on CT by three independent observers and by consensus between the three observers. After surgery, whole-mount hematoxylin-eosin stained (H&E) sections were obtained. One pathologist delineated the tumor in the H&E sections (tumorH&E). The reconstructed specimen was registered to the CT scan in order to compare the GTV to the tumorH&E in three dimensions. The overlap between the GTV and the tumorH&E was calculated and the distance between the volumes was determined. RESULTS: Tumor tissue was delineated in 203 of 516 H&E sections. For 14 patients a detailed analysis could be performed. The GTV volume was on average 1.7 times larger than the volume of the tumorH&E. The mean coverage of the tumorH&E by the consensus GTV was 88%. tumorH&E tissue was found at 1.6 mm to 12.9 mm distance outside the GTV depending on observer and patient. CONCLUSIONS: GTVs delineated on CT for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer were 1.7 times larger than the tumor. Complete coverage of the tumor by the GTV was, however, not obtained.

GTV delineation in supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: interobserver agreement of CT versus CT-MR delineation.

BACKGROUND: GTV delineation is the first crucial step in radiotherapy and requires high accuracy, especially with the growing use of highly conformal and adaptive radiotherapy techniques. If GTV delineations of observers concord, they are considered to be of high accuracy. The aim of the study is to determine the interobserver agreement for GTV delineations of supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma on CT and on CT combined with MR-images and to determine the effect of adding MR images to CT-based delineation on the delineated volume and the interobserver agreement. METHODS: Twenty patients with biopsy proven T1-T4 supraglottic laryngeal cancer, treated with curative intent were included. For all patients a contrast enhanced planning CT and a 1.5-T MRI with gadolinium were acquired in the same head-and-shoulder mask for fixation as used during treatment. For MRI, a two element surface coil was used as a receiver coil. Three dedicated observers independently delineated the GTV on CT. After an interval of 2 weeks, a set of co-registered CT and MR-images was provided to delineate the GTV on CT. Common volumes (C) and encompassing volumes (E) were calculated and C/E ratios were determined for each pair of observers. The conformity index general (CIgen) was used to quantify the interobserver agreement. RESULTS: In general, a large variation in interobserver agreement was found for CT (range: 0.29-0.77) as well as for CT-MR delineations (range: 0.17-0.80). The mean CIgen for CT (0.61) was larger compared to CT-MR (0.57) (p = 0.032). Mean GTV volume delineated on CT-MR (6.6 cm(3)) was larger compared to CT (5.6 cm(3)) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Delineation on CT with co-registered MR-images resulted in a larger mean GTV volume and in a decrease in interobserver agreement compared to CT only delineation for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma.

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma: association between apparent diffusion coefficient and histologic findings.

PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between the histologic characteristics of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics committee approved this study and waived informed consent. In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, local failure after chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy correlates with pretreatment ADC. However, the histopathologic basis of this correlation remains unclear. In this study, 16 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were enrolled (median age, 60 years; range, 49-78 years). Before undergoing total laryngectomy, patients underwent 1.5-T diffusion-weighted MR imaging. After resection, whole-mount hematoxylin-eosin-stained sections were registered to the MR images. Cellular density; nuclear, cytoplasmic, and stromal area; and nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio within the tumor were calculated by using image-based segmentation on four consecutive slices. Mean ADC of the corresponding tumor region was calculated. Spearman correlations between ADC and histologic characteristics were calculated. RESULTS: ADC was significantly and inversely correlated with cell density (n = 16, r = -0.57, P = .02), nuclear area (n = 12, r = -0.64, P = .03), and nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio (n = 12, r = -0.77, P ≤ .01). ADC was significantly and positively correlated with percentage area of stroma (n = 12, r = 0.69, P = .01). Additionally, the percentage area of stroma was strongly interdependent with the percentage area of nuclei (n = 12, r = -0.97, P ≤ .01). CONCLUSION: ADC was significantly correlated with cellularity, stromal component, and nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio. The positive correlation of ADC and stromal component suggests that the poor prognostic value of high pretreatment ADC might partly be attributed to the tumor-stroma component, a known predictor of local failure.

Validation of imaging with pathology in laryngeal cancer: accuracy of the registration methodology.

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and accuracy of an automated method to validate gross tumor volume (GTV) delineations with pathology in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: High-resolution computed tomography (CT(HR)), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) scans were obtained from 10 patients before total laryngectomy. The GTV was delineated separately in each imaging modality. The laryngectomy specimen was sliced transversely in 3-mm-thick slices, and whole-mount hematoxylin-eosin stained (H&E) sections were obtained. A pathologist delineated tumor tissue in the H&E sections (GTV(PATH)). An automatic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the specimen was performed, and the CT(HR), MRI, and PET were semiautomatically and rigidly registered to the 3D specimen. The accuracy of the pathology-imaging registration and the specimen deformation and shrinkage were assessed. The tumor delineation inaccuracies were compared with the registration errors. RESULTS: Good agreement was observed between anatomical landmarks in the 3D specimen and in the in vivo images. Limited deformations and shrinkage (3% ± 1%) were found inside the cartilage skeleton. The root mean squared error of the registration between the 3D specimen and the CT, MRI, and PET was on average 1.5, 3.0, and 3.3 mm, respectively, in the cartilage skeleton. The GTV(PATH) volume was 7.2 mL, on average. The GTVs based on CT, MRI, and PET generated a mean volume of 14.9, 18.3, and 9.8 mL and covered the GTV(PATH) by 85%, 88%, and 77%, respectively. The tumor delineation inaccuracies exceeded the registration error in all the imaging modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of GTV delineations with pathology is feasible with an average overall accuracy below 3.5 mm inside the laryngeal skeleton. The tumor delineation inaccuracies were larger than the registration error. Therefore, an accurate histological validation of anatomical and functional imaging techniques for GTV delineation is possible in laryngeal cancer patients.