ABSTRACT
Objetivo Valorar la efectividad de un programa sociomotriz en la mejora de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de pacientes mayores de 65años con riesgo social. Material y métodos Ensayo clínico aleatorizado. Ámbito: comunitario; atención primaria y centro educativo público. Sujetos: mayores de 65años con riesgo social que acudieron al centro de salud durante el período de estudio y cumplieron los criterios de inclusión, n=102. Intervenciones: los sujetos se aleatorizaron en dos grupos; el grupo de intervención realizó dos sesiones semanales de una hora de ejercicio físico durante 4meses, sesiones mensuales sobre hábitos saludables y tres jornadas de actividades sociales; el grupo control recibió los consejos habituales. Se evaluó la calidad de vida mediante el cuestionario SF-36, previamente y al finalizar el programa. Resultados Completaron el estudio 80 sujetos (edad media 71,5±5 años; 91,3% mujeres). Basalmente no existieron diferencias significativas entre grupos y sus componentes sumarios estandarizados físico y mental del SF-36 estuvieron por debajo de los valores de referencia poblacionales (p<0,01). Tras el programa, el grupo de intervención mejoró significativamente respecto al grupo control en las 8 escalas del SF-36 y en los componentes sumarios, con un incremento mayor de 4puntos (p<0,01) en el componente físico y de 10 puntos en el mental (p<0,01). Conclusiones El programa comunitario de intervención sociomotriz mejora la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de los mayores con riesgo social (AU)
Objective To assess the effectiveness of a social-physical activity program to improve the health-related quality of life of patients over 65years old with social risk. Material and methods Randomized clinical trial. Setting: Community; primary care and public schools. Subjects: patients over 65years old with social risk, who went to the health center during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, n=102. Interventions: Subjects were randomized into two groups. The intervention group conducted two weekly sessions of 1hour of physical exercise, for 4months; monthly sessions on healthy habits and three days of social activities. The control group received the usual advice. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire; previously and at the end of the program. Results The study was completed by 80 subjects (mean age 71.5±5 years; 91.3% women). Baseline, there were no significant differences between groups, and their standardized physical and mental summary components of the SF-36 were below the population reference values (P<.01). After the program, the intervention group improved significantly, compared to the control group, in the 8 scales of the SF-36 and in the summary components, with a greater increase of 4points (P<.01) in the physical component, and 10 points in the mental component (p<0.01). Conclusion The community program of social-physical activity intervention improves the health-related quality of life in older people at social risk (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Health Education , Exercise , Quality of Life , Case-Control Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , 34658ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a social-physical activity program to improve the health-related quality of life of patients over 65years old with social risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Community; primary care and public schools. SUBJECTS: patients over 65years old with social risk, who went to the health center during the study period and met the inclusion criteria, n=102. INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomized into two groups. The intervention group conducted two weekly sessions of 1hour of physical exercise, for 4months; monthly sessions on healthy habits and three days of social activities. The control group received the usual advice. Quality of life was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire; previously and at the end of the program. RESULTS: The study was completed by 80 subjects (mean age 71.5±5 years; 91.3% women). Baseline, there were no significant differences between groups, and their standardized physical and mental summary components of the SF-36 were below the population reference values (P<.01). After the program, the intervention group improved significantly, compared to the control group, in the 8 scales of the SF-36 and in the summary components, with a greater increase of 4points (P<.01) in the physical component, and 10 points in the mental component (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The community program of social-physical activity intervention improves the health-related quality of life in older people at social risk.
Subject(s)
Exercise , Quality of Life , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective is to assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent program of active aging in the improvement of the functional physical condition of patients older than 65years old with social risk. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pragmatic clinical trial non-blinded. SETTING: Community activity; primary care and public education center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients older than 65years and diagnosed with social risk. The patients who attended at the health center and fulfilled the inclusion criteria were selected consecutively (n=102). INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomized into the intervention group or to the control group. The intervention included two weekly sessions of 1h of exercise during 4months, monthly health education sessions, and three days of social activities. The control group received the regular tips. The physical conditions were evaluated before and at the end the study. RESULTS: Eighty of the patients completed the study. Their middle age was 71.5±5 years old, and 91.3% of them were women. There was no significant differences between both groups. After the intervention, all the test for physical qualities improved in the intervention group; in the 6-minutes walk test the patients improved their mark in a 98% from the baseline marks, with an average increase of 65±35m. Flexibility improved in the 60% of the patients (95%CI: 50-70); strength increased an 84% (95%CI: 76-92), and dynamic balance increased a 79% (95%CI: 70-88). In control group improve some test marks but it had no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The socio-motor intervention program coordinated between health services and educational centers improves the functional physical condition of the elderly with social risk.
