ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to review the results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a novel sac-anchoring endoprosthesis in patients with favourable and adverse anatomy. DESIGN: This is a prospective, multicentre, clinical trial. MATERIALS: The Nellix endoprosthesis consists of dual, balloon-expandable endoframes, surrounded by polymer-filled endobags, which obliterate the aneurysm sac and maintain endograft position. METHODS: The study reviewed worldwide clinical experience and Core Lab evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scans. RESULTS: From 2008 to 2010, 34 patients (age 71 ± 8 years, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter 5.8 ± 0.8 cm) were treated at four clinical sites. Seventeen patients (50%) met the inclusion criteria for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved endografts (favourable anatomy); 17 (50%) had one or more adverse anatomic feature: neck length <10 mm (24%), neck angle >60° (9%) and iliac diameter >23 mm (38%). Device deployment was successful in all patients; iliac aneurysm treatment preserved hypogastric patency. Perioperative mortality was 1/34 (2.9%); one patient died at 10 months of congestive heart failure (CHF); one patient had a secondary procedure at 15 months. During 15 ± 6 months follow-up, there were no differences in outcome between favourable and adverse anatomy patients. Follow-up CT extending up to 2 years revealed no change in aneurysm size or endograft position and no new endoleaks. CONCLUSIONS: Favourable and adverse anatomy patients can be successfully treated using the Nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis. Early results are promising but longer-term studies are needed.
Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Blood Vessel Prosthesis , Endovascular Procedures/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/mortality , Aortography/methods , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Colombia , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Endovascular Procedures/mortality , Female , Humans , Latvia , Male , Middle Aged , New Zealand , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Registries , Reoperation , Time Factors , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Treatment Outcome , VenezuelaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neointimal hyperplasia and unfavorable remodeling have been demonstrated to be the major limitation to endovascular revascularization procedures. Intracoronary gamma radiation therapy has been shown to reduce the restenosis index. However, the late effects of these novel procedures are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To evaluate the long-term effects on clinical and angiographic outcome of endovascular gamma radiation therapy following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), serial angiography over a 2-year period was performed in 21 patients (22 lesions) who were treated with 192Ir in doses of 20-25 Gy after PTCA. Angiograms were analyzed using quantitative methods (QCA). RESULTS: The mean late loss between PTCA and 6 months was 0.20 +/- 0.59 and 0.13 +/- 0.84 between 6 months and 2 years. At 6 months, angiographic binary restenosis was present in six arteries (27.2%). At 2 years, binary restenosis was observed in six arteries (27.2%), including one patient who had developed restenosis and excluding one patient with spontaneous regression. Two early pseudoaneurysms and two late aneurysms were observed at 6 months, with little increase at 2 years. No other angiographic complication was observed. None of the patients or medical staff developed complications or illnesses that could be related to the effects of the radiation procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma radiation therapy decreases late luminal loss, is safe and free of unexpected complications at 6 months follow-up, with no significant changes or late complications at 2-years' follow-up.
