Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Surg Technol Int ; 15: 227-33, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17029181

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Optimized pulsed electrical stimulation (PES) regulates chondrocyte genes, enhances production of cartilage matrix materials, and inhibits production of matrix catabolic factors. METHODS: This prospective, cohort study examined the use of a PES device in treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients who had failed non-operative therapy. Primary outcome measures were patient and physician global evaluation, and patient assessment of knee pain. RESULTS: This study included 288 (95 men, 193 women) patients who used the device from 16 to more than 600 days (mean: 889 hours). Improvement in all efficacy variables (p < 0.001) occurred. A dose-response relationship between effect size and hours of usage was observed as cumulative time increased to more than 750 hours. Improvement in patient or physician global occurred in 59.0% of patients who used it less than 750 hours, and for 73.0% of those who used it more than 750 hours. An economic analysis of a sub-group of patients showed that 45.3% reduced nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use by 50.0% or more. CONCLUSIONS: A highly optimized PES device successfully attenuated knee OA symptoms in patients who had failed non-surgical therapy. Less than 250 hours of therapy provided relief, but improvement increased in a dose-response manner after 750 hours of cumulative use.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/epidemiology , Arthralgia/prevention & control , Electric Stimulation Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Osteoarthritis, Knee/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Treatment Outcome
3.
Arthritis Rheum ; 54(2): 607-12, 2006 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16447238

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Methotrexate (MTX) is an antifolate agent that is often associated with toxicity. This study investigated whether risk genotypes for folate-dependent enzymes are associated with the toxicity of MTX in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Blood was collected for analysis in a muticenter, cross-sectional study of RA patients who had been receiving MTX for at least 1 month prior to enrollment, and side effects occurring at the time of a single study visit were recorded. Low-penetrance risk genotypes in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677TT, thymidylate synthase (TSER) *2/*2 (variable number of tandem repeats), amino imidazole ribonucleotide transformylase (ATIC) 347GG, and serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) 1420CC were measured and summed to constitute the toxicogenetic index specific to each patient. Statistical analyses consisted of logistic regression models with clustered-center effects, and associations with risk genotypes were expressed as adjusted odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Among 214 patients enrolled at 4 study sites, a total of 67 patients (31%) presented with a side effect (gastrointestinal event, headache, lethargy, alopecia, cough, or dyspnea). Risk genotypes associated with side effects in the central nervous system were MTHFR 677TT (OR 3.3, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 2.4, P < 0.05). ATIC 347GG was associated with gastrointestinal side effects (OR 3.0, P < 0.01), while TSER*2/*2 (OR 5.4, P < 0.01) and SHMT1 1420CC (OR 3.2, P < 0.01) were associated with alopecia. The toxicogenetic index ranged from 0 to 3 (median 1). An index of 3 was associated with an approximately 7-fold higher likelihood of having a side effect compared with an index of 0 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a composite index of the cumulative risk genotypes in folate-dependent enzymes may be an effective means of profiling RA patients who develop side effects to MTX.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/enzymology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/genetics , Enzymes/genetics , Folic Acid/metabolism , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)/genetics , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enzymes/metabolism , Female , Genetic Markers , Genotype , Glycine Hydroxymethyltransferase/genetics , Glycine Hydroxymethyltransferase/metabolism , Humans , Hydroxymethyl and Formyl Transferases/genetics , Hydroxymethyl and Formyl Transferases/metabolism , Male , Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)/metabolism , Middle Aged , Multienzyme Complexes/genetics , Multienzyme Complexes/metabolism , Nucleotide Deaminases/genetics , Nucleotide Deaminases/metabolism , Odds Ratio , Thymidylate Synthase/genetics , Thymidylate Synthase/metabolism
4.
Arthritis Rheum ; 50(9): 2858-68, 2004 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15452837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prasterone administration results in improvement or stabilization of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and its symptoms. METHODS: Women with active SLE were treated with prasterone 200 mg/day plus standard SLE treatments or with placebo plus standard SLE treatments for up to 12 months in this randomized, double-blind investigation conducted at 27 centers. Standard SLE treatments included prednisone (/=6 weeks prior to enrollment and remain unchanged during protocol treatment. Responders were patients who experienced no clinical deterioration and had improvement or stabilization over the duration of the study in 2 disease activity measures (the SLE Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI] and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) and 2 quality of life measures (patient's global assessment and the Krupp Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: A total of 381 women with SLE were enrolled. Among patients with clinically active disease at baseline (SLEDAI score >2), 86 of 147 in the prasterone group (58.5%) demonstrated improvement or stabilization without clinical deterioration, as compared with 65 of 146 in the placebo group (44.5%) (P = 0.017). Acne and hirsutism were reported in 33% and 16%, respectively, of the prasterone group and in 14% and 2%, respectively, of the placebo group (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, most cases of acne and hirsutism were mild and did not require withdrawal from therapy. Myalgias and oral stomatitis were reported less frequently in the prasterone group (22% and 15%, respectively) than in the placebo group (36% and 23%, respectively) (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). Serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and C3 complement significantly decreased, while levels of testosterone and, to a lesser extent, estradiol increased in the prasterone group. CONCLUSION: In adult women with active SLE, administration of prasterone at a dosage of 200 mg/day improved or stabilized signs and symptoms of disease and was generally well tolerated.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Dehydroepiandrosterone/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
5.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 5(2): 469-72, 2004 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14996642

ABSTRACT

Avinza is a once-daily, extended-release oral morphine preparation. It has a pharmacokinetic profile that exhibits less peak-to-trough fluctuations in plasma concentration whilst providing analgesia statistically identical to that produced by MS Contin (controlled-release morphine sulfate), Oxycontin (oxycodone HCl controlled-release) and six doses of oral morphine sulfate administered every 4 h. Avinza improves quality of sleep by several measures but interestingly gives the best sleep improvement when given in the morning rather than at night. It causes the same side effects of other opioids: constipation, nausea, vomiting, somnolence and mood swings. Doses of 30 - 60 mg/day have been shown to be well tolerated by patients with osteoarthritis (even in the elderly), who have failed other medications.


Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Delayed-Action Preparations/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials as Topic , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Morphine/pharmacokinetics , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Pain/drug therapy
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 137(9): 726-33, 2002 Nov 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12416946

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs may confer greater benefits when combined with the antimetabolite methotrexate. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide versus placebo when added to ongoing, stable-dose methotrexate therapy in patients with persistently active rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: 20 centers in the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: Patients with persistent rheumatoid arthritis, as defined by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, despite receiving methotrexate for at least 6 months. INTERVENTION: Leflunomide or matching placebo added to existing methotrexate therapy. MEASUREMENTS: The primary efficacy variable was the rate of achievement of 20% improvement in ACR criteria (ACR20) at the end of the study. The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index was assessed at each visit, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form was completed as an end point analysis. RESULTS: In the leflunomide and placebo groups, 46.2% and 19.5% of patients, respectively, met ACR20 criteria at 24 weeks (P < 0.001). Clinical improvement was demonstrated by statistically significant mean changes in individual components of the ACR20 response criteria. Discontinuation rates were similar in both treatment groups (23.1% in the leflunomide group and 24.8% in the placebo group), as were the overall incidences of adverse events (89.2% vs. 89.5%, respectively). Adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with leflunomide and methotrexate provides statistically significant clinical benefit in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who are receiving methotrexate therapy. Leflunomide plus methotrexate is generally well tolerated and can be used safely with appropriate liver enzyme and hematologic monitoring.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Isoxazoles/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Antimetabolites/adverse effects , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Disability Evaluation , Double-Blind Method , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Humans , Leflunomide , Liver Function Tests , Male , Methotrexate/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Placebos , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 23(4): 278-91, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11997197

ABSTRACT

A randomized, 4-week, double-blind trial followed by an open-label extension trial assessed the efficacy and safety of a once-daily, extended-release morphine formulation (Avinza (previously referred to as Morphelan)) in 295 patients with chronic, moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis pain who had failed to obtain adequate pain relief with NSAIDs and acetaminophen. Participants received one of four treatments: Avinza 30 mg once daily (QAM or QPM), MS Contin(R) 15 mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily. Patients (n =181) received Avinza QAM or QPM during the 26-week open-label extension trial and could increase their dose to optimize pain control. Avinza and MS Contin reduced pain and improved several sleep measures versus placebo. Analgesic efficacy was comparable between Avinza and MS Contin; however, Avinza QAM demonstrated greater improvements in overall quality of sleep. The most common adverse events were constipation and nausea. The majority of AEs occurred at a similar incidence among the active treatment groups.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis/complications , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/administration & dosage , Morphine/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Sleep/drug effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...