ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) as an adjunct to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in ischemic stroke, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. METHODS: Searches were performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies that compared EVT to EVT with adjunctive IAT (EVT+IAT). Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality at three months. Efficacy outcomes included successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b to 3), and functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 at three months. RESULTS: Five studies were identified that compared combined EVT+IAT (IA alteplase or urokinase) to EVT-only, and were included in the random effects meta-analysis. There were 1693 EVT patients, including 269 patients treated with combined EVT+IAT and 1424 patients receiving EVT-only. Pooled analysis did not demonstrate any differences between EVT+IAT and EVT-only in rates of sICH (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.20-1.85; P=0.78), mortality (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.54-1.10; P=0.15), or successful reperfusion (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.52-2.15; P=0.89). There was a higher rate of functional independence in patients treated with EVT+IAT, although this was not statistically significant (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.00-1.80; P=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive IAT appears to be safe. In specific situations, neurointerventionists may be justified in administering small doses of intraarterial alteplase or urokinase as rescue therapy during EVT.
ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose- In ischemic stroke, body temperature is associated with functional outcome. However, the relationship between temperature and outcome may differ in the intraischemic and postischemic phases of stroke. We aimed to determine whether body temperature before or after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion stroke is associated with clinical outcomes. Methods- Consecutive EVT patients were identified from a prospective registry. Temperature measurements within 24 hours of admission were stratified into pre-EVT (preprocedural and intraprocedural) and post-EVT measurements, which served as surrogates for the intraischemic and postischemic phases of large vessel occlusion stroke, respectively. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0, 1, or 2 at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included the ordinal shift of modified Rankin Scale scores at 3 months, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality at 3 months. Results- Four hundred thirty-two participants were included (59% men, mean±SD age 65.6±15.7 years). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that higher median pre-EVT temperature (per 1°C increase) was an independent predictor of reduced functional independence (odds ratio [OR], 0.66 [95% CI, 0.46-0.94]; P=0.02), poorer modified Rankin Scale scores (common OR, 1.42 [95% CI, 1.08-1.85]; P=0.01), and increased mortality (OR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.02-2.69]; P=0.04). Peak post-EVT temperature (per 1°C increase) was a significant predictor of elevated modified Rankin Scale scores (common OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.03-1.90]; P=0.03) and higher mortality (OR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.04-2.67]; P=0.03). Conclusions- In patients with large vessel occlusion stroke treated with EVT, higher body temperatures during both the intraischemic and postischemic phases were associated with poorer clinical outcomes. Future research investigating the maintenance of normothermia or therapeutic hypothermia in patients needing to be transferred from primary to EVT-capable stroke centers could be considered.