The gut microbiota in adults with cystic fibrosis compared to colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Gut dysbiosis is implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. Cystic fibrosis (CF) is associated with both gut dysbiosis and increased CRC risk. We therefore compared the faecal microbiota from individuals with CF to CRC and screening samples. We also assessed changes in CRC-associated taxa before and after triple CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy. METHODS: Bacterial DNA amplification comprising V4 16S rRNA analysis was conducted on 84 baseline and 53 matched follow-up stool samples from adults with CF. These data were compared to an existing cohort of 430 CRC and 491 control gFOBT samples from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Data were also compared to 26 previously identified CRC-associated taxa from a published meta-analysis. RESULTS: Faecal CF samples had a lower alpha diversity and clustered distinctly from both CRC and control samples, with no clear clinical variables explaining the variation. Compared to controls, CF samples had an increased relative abundance in 6 of the 20 enriched CRC-associated taxa and depletion of 2 of the 6 taxa which have been reported as reduced in CRC. Commencing triple modulator therapy had subtle influence on the relative abundance of CRC-associated microbiota (n = 23 paired CF samples). CONCLUSIONS: CF stool samples were clearly dysbiotic, clustering distinctly from both CRC and control samples. Several bacterial shifts in CF samples resembled those observed in CRC. Studies assessing the impact of dietary or other interventions and the longer-term use of CFTR modulators on reducing this potentially pro-oncogenic milieu are needed.

Body mass index and nutritional intake following Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor modulator therapy in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor (ETI) modulator therapy is often associated with increased body mass index (BMI) in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). This is thought to reflect improved clinical stability and increased appetite and nutritional intake. We explored the change in BMI and nutritional intake following ETI modulator therapy in adults with CF. METHODS: Dietary intake, measured with myfood24®, and BMI were collected from adults with CF at baseline and follow-up as part of an observational study. Changes in BMI and nutritional intake in participants who commenced ETI therapy between time points were assessed. To contextualize findings, we also assessed changes in BMI and nutritional intake between study points in a group on no modulators. RESULTS: In the pre and post ETI threapy group (n = 40), BMI significantly increased from 23.0 kg/m2 (IQR 21.4, 25.3) at baseline to 24.6 kg/m2 (IQR 23.0, 26.7) at follow-up (p<0.001), with a median of 68 weeks between time points (range 20-94 weeks) and median duration of ETI therapy was 23 weeks (range 7-72 weeks). There was a significant decrease in energy intake from 2551 kcal/day (IQR 2107, 3115) to 2153 kcal/day (IQR 1648, 2606), p<0.001. In the no modulator group (n = 10), BMI and energy intake did not significantly change between time points (p>0.05), a median of 28 weeks apart (range 20-76 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: These findings tentatively suggest that the increase in BMI with ETI therapy may not simply be attributable to an increase in oral intake. Further exploration into the underlying aetiology of weight gain with ETI therapy is needed.

Diabetes is associated with increased burden of gastrointestinal symptoms in adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) are known to frequently experience gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms. In contrast, the impact of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) on accentuating GI symptoms in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) is unknown. We sought to examine this. METHODS: Abdominal symptoms were measured using the validated CF-specific GI symptom questionnaire - CFAbd-Score© - as part of a multicentre cohort study in pancreatic insufficient adults with CF, not on cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators. The CFAbd-Score total score (0-100pts), its 5 domains, alongside nine specific GI symptoms associated with DM, were compared between the CFRD and non-CFRD groups. RESULTS: 27 (31%) and 61 (69%) participants with CF were recruited in the CFRD and non-CFRD groups respectively. Total CFAbd-Score and the two domains: gastroesophageal reflux disease and disorders of appetite were significantly higher in the CFRD group compared to the non-CFRD group (p<0.05), with the mean total CFAbd-Score being 25.4 ± 2.5 and 18.4 ± 1.5 in the CFRD and non-CFRD groups respectively. Among the nine GI symptoms commonly reported as elevated in DM, bloating and nausea were significantly more common in individuals with CFRD compared to those without (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CFRD overall, have a higher GI symptom burden, according to CFAbd-Scores. Specifically, they experience significantly more bloating and nausea. Close monitoring and further research is needed to better understand and manage GI symptoms in this group.

Cystic Fibrosis-Related Gut Dysbiosis: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is associated with gut dysbiosis, local and systemic inflammation, and impaired immune function. Gut microbiota dysbiosis results from changes in the complex gut milieu in response to CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) dysfunction, pancreatic malabsorption, diet, medications, and environmental influences. In several diseases, alteration of the gut microbiota influences local and systemic inflammation and disease outcomes. We conducted a systematic review of the gut microbiota in CF and explored factors influencing dysbiosis. METHODS: An electronic search of three databases was conducted in January 2019, and re-run in June 2021. Human, animal, and in vitro studies were included. The primary outcome was differences in the gut microbiota between people with CF (pwCF) and healthy controls. Secondary outcomes included the relationship between the gut microbiota and other factors, including diet, medication, inflammation, and pulmonary function in pwCF. RESULTS: Thirty-eight studies were identified. The literature confirmed the presence of CF-related gut dysbiosis, characterized by reduced diversity and several taxonomic changes. There was a relative increase of bacteria associated with a pro-inflammatory response coupled with a reduction of those considered anti-inflammatory. However, studies linking gut dysbiosis to systemic and lung inflammation were limited. Causes of gut dysbiosis were multifactorial, and findings were variable. Data on the impact of CFTR modulators on the gut microbiota were limited. CONCLUSIONS: CF-related gut dysbiosis is evident in pwCF. Whether this influences local and systemic disease and is amenable to interventions with diet and drugs, such as CFTR modulators, requires further investigation.