Effect of oxamisole on immune parameters of mice infected with murine hepatitis.

The effects of Oxamisole, 2,3,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-2-phenyl-8,8- dimethoxyimidazo[1,2a]pyridine on immune parameters of mice infected with murine hepatitis were investigated. Young Swiss Webster mice were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with the Friend-Braunsteiner strain of murine hepatitis virus and with various doses of Oxamisole at 48 h pre- 24 h pre-, and 4 h post-virus exposure. Antiviral activity was seen in the drug-treated mice which was approximated on the basis of 21-day survival frequency and hepatic discoloration, SGOT and SGPT levels and amount of infectious virus recoverable from the liver. On day 4 post-viral exposure, splenic cells from some of the drug- and placebo-treated cells of infected mice injected with Oxamisole, 25 mg/kg/day, produced significantly more interleukin-1 and interleukin-2 than cells of infected mice treated with saline only. Similarly, mice treated with 25 mg/kg/day of this compound had cells with significantly increased antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity as compared with placebo treated animals. However, cells from mice treated with Oxamisole did not demonstrate altered natural killer cell activity. It is concluded that Oxamisole, when administered to mice infected with murine hepatitis virus, has antiviral properties which possibly are mediated through the immunomodulatory effects of this compound on the immune system.

Inhibition of murine hepatitis virus infections by the immunomodulator 2,3,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-2-phenyl-8,8-dimethoxy-imidazo[1,2a]pyridine (PR-879-317A).

PR-879-317A (2,3,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-2-phenyl-8,8-dimethoxy-imidazo [1,2a]pyridine) has been found to be a T-cell-selective immunomodulating agent. In the current studies, a series of experiments was designed to determine the potential antiviral activity of this compound in mice infected with murine hepatitis virus. In a comparative antiviral experiment, the activity seen was superior to that of levamisole, a known immunorestorative agent. This activity was characterized by an increase in the 21-day survival frequency, a decrease in hepatic discoloration, a decrease in the amount of infectious virus recoverable from the liver, and normalization of serum glutamic oxalacetate and pyruvate transaminase levels. A comparison of treatment routes indicated the relative efficacies as intraperitoneal greater than per os greater than intramuscular greater than or equal to subcutaneous. Alteration of the treatment schedule markedly affected the antiviral effect; prophylactic or therapeutic treatments once or twice daily for 3 days were usually effective. Single treatments begun 4 h before or 24 h after virus inoculation were highly efficacious. Three treatments administered on alternate days, beginning 48 h before virus inoculation, proved moderately effective. Thrice-daily treatments were ineffective, as were treatments with durations of greater than 3 days. The optimal dosage varied according to the treatment route and dosage schedule. When assessed for direct antiviral activity in vitro, PR-879-317A failed to demonstrate any significant activity against murine hepatitis virus. The positive in vivo activity noted might therefore be the result of immune modulation rather than a direct antiviral effect.

Effect of selenazofurin on influenza A and B virus infections of mice.

The inhibitory effects of selenazofurin and ribavirin on influenza A and B virus infections in mice were compared. Both compounds, when administered intraperitoneally (i.p.), reduced lung consolidation and prolonged mean day of death, but ribavirin more effectively increased survivor number and lowered lung viral hemagglutinin (HA) titers. Lung HA titers often increased in selenazofurin-treated animals. To determine the most appropriate i.p. treatment schedule, influenza A virus-infected mice were treated once, twice or thrice daily for 7-9 days, or once only. Treatment once daily for 9 days beginning 4 h pre-virus exposure, for 3 days beginning 24 h post-virus exposure, or once only 48 h post-virus exposure was most effective. Body temperature, which usually declined during infection, increased to near-normal levels in animals treated with selenazofurin, especially in animals treated a single time or for 3 days with high dose levels. Selenazofurin was well tolerated at a dose of 50 mg/kg administered twice daily, and at 400 mg/kg administered once only. Rectal temperatures temporarily declined following every other day treatment with 400 mg/kg.

Activity of selenazofurin against influenza A and B viruses in vitro.

Activity of the new antiviral compound selenazofurin was compared with the known active compounds ribavirin and amantadine against influenza A and B viruses. In experiments with Madin Darby canine kidney cells, selenazofurin inhibited the cytopathic effect and yield of influenza A/NWS/33 virus, with 50% effective dose ranges of 0.7 to 1.4 micrograms/ml (virus rating [VR], 1.3 to 1.4). The 50% effective dose range for ribavirin was 1.2 to 1.6 micrograms/ml (VR, 1.0 to 1.3), and for amantadine it was 9 micrograms/ml (VR, 0.9). Selenazofurin and ribavirin were similarly inhibitory to influenza B/Lee/40 virus, whereas amantadine was inactive. Selenazofurin appeared somewhat cytotoxic in these studies at concentrations as low as 1 micrograms/ml.