ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Cardiomyopathy (CM) at delivery is increasing in prevalance. The objective of this study was to determine which medical conditions are attributable to this increasing prevalance. DESIGN: Population prevalence study from 2000 to 2009. SETTING: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS). SAMPLE: Pregnant women admitted for delivery were identified in the NIS for the years 2000-2009. METHODS: Temporal trends in pre-existing medical conditions and in medical and obstetric complications at delivery admissions were determined by linear regression. The change in the prevalence of CM among all pregnant women was compared with the change in the prevalance of CM among pregnant women without pre-existing conditions or complications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Prevalence of CM. RESULTS: The prevalence of CM increased from 0.25 per 1000 deliveries in 2000 to 0.43 per 1000 deliveries in 2009 (P < 0.0001). Women with chronic hypertension had increased odds of developing CM compared with women without chronic hypertension (odds ratio, OR, 13.2; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI, 12.5-13.7). The linear increase in chronic hypertension over the 10-year period was the single identified pre-existing medical condition that explained the increasing prevalence of CM at delivery (P = 0.005 for the differences in slopes for linear trends). CONCLUSIONS: Pregnant women with chronic hypertenion are at an increased risk for CM at delivery, and the increasing prevalence of chronic hypertension is an important factor associated with the increasing prevalence of CM at the time of delivery. Among women without chronic hypertension, the prevalence of CM at delivery did not change during the time period.
Subject(s)
Cardiomyopathies/epidemiology , Hypertension/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Cardiomyopathies/complications , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Humans , Hypertension/complications , Infant, Newborn , Odds Ratio , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/etiology , PrevalenceSubject(s)
Birth Weight , Delivery, Obstetric/statistics & numerical data , Dystocia/epidemiology , Gestational Age , Shoulder , Female , Humans , PregnancyABSTRACT
Despite numerous studies reporting an increased risk of cesarean delivery among overweight or obese compared with normal weight women, the magnitude of the association remains uncertain. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis of the current literature to provide a quantitative estimate of this association. We identified studies from three sources: (i) a PubMed search of relevant articles published between January 1980 and September 2005; (ii) reference lists of publications selected from the search; and (iii) reference lists of review articles published between 2000 and 2005. We included cohort designed studies that reported obesity measures reflecting pregnancy body mass, had a normal weight comparison group, and presented data allowing a quantitative measurement of risk. We used a Bayesian random effects model to perform the meta-analysis and meta-regression. Thirty-three studies were included. The unadjusted odd ratios of a cesarean delivery were 1.46 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-1.60], 2.05 (95% CI: 1.86-2.27) and 2.89 (95% CI: 2.28-3.79) among overweight, obese and severely obese women, respectively, compared with normal weight pregnant women. The meta-regression found no evidence that these estimates were affected by selected study characteristics. Our findings provide a quantitative estimate of the risk of cesarean delivery associated with high maternal body mass.
