Diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative neuromonitoring in transcarotid artery revascularization.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative to carotid artery stenting. While intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) techniques such as electroencephalogram (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are often employed during TCAR, there is limited research on their diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed a multi-institutional IONM database of TCAR procedures performed with EEG and SSEP monitoring. A total of 516 TCAR procedures were included in this study. Significant changes in EEG and/or SSEPs, surgeon's interventions, resolution of significant changes, and immediate postoperative neurological outcome were documented. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated. RESULTS: The incidence of intraoperative onset new neurologic deficit was 0.4%. Significant changes in EEG and/or SSEPs occurred in 5.4% of the cases. Of the cases with IONM alerts, 78.5% returned to baseline with a surgical or hemodynamic intervention. From the cases with unresolved IONM alerts, 33.3% woke up with a new neurological deficit. The overall sensitivity and specificity for IONM was 100% and 99.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 33.3% and the negative predictive value was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: IONM during TCAR offers high sensitivity and specificity in predicting postoperative outcome. Patients with resolved IONM alerts had immediate neurological outcomes that were comparable to those who had no IONM alerts.

Effects of anode position on pedicle screw testing during lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery.

OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screws are commonly placed with lumbar/lumbosacral fusions. Triggered electromyography (tEMG), which employs the application of electrical current between the screw and a complementary anode to determine thresholds of conduction, may be utilized to confirm the safe placement of such implants. While previous research has established clinical thresholds associated with safe screw placement, there is variability in clinical practice of anode placement which could lead to unreliable measurements. PURPOSE: To determine the variance in pedicle screw stimulation thresholds when using four unique anode locations (ipsilateral/contralateral and paraspinal/gluteal relative to tested pedicle screws). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. Tertiary medical center. PATIENT SAMPLE: Twenty patients undergoing lumbar/lumbosacral fusion with pedicle screws using tEMG OUTCOME MEASURES: tEMG stimulation return values are used to assess varied anode locations and reproducibility based on anode placement. METHODS: Measurements were assessed across node placement in ipsilateral/contralateral and paraspinal/gluteal locations relative to the screw being assessed. R2 coefficients of correlation were determined, and variances were compared with F-tests. RESULTS: A total of 94 lumbosacral pedicle screws from 20 patients were assessed. Repeatability was verified using two stimulations at each location for a subset of the screws with an R2 of 0.96. Comparisons between the four anode locations demonstrated R2 values ranging from 0.76 to 0.87. F-tests comparing thresholds between each anode site demonstrated all groups not to be statistically different. CONCLUSION: The current study, a first-of-its-kind formal evaluation of anode location for pedicle screw tEMG testing, demonstrated very strong repeatability and strong correlation with different locations of anode placement. These results suggest that there is no need to change the side of the anode for testing of left versus right screws, further supporting that placing an anode electrode into gluteal muscle is sufficient and will avoid a sharp ground needle in the surgical field.

Pollen wall degradation in the Brassicaceae permits cell emergence after pollination.

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Despite attempts to degrade the sporopollenin in pollen walls, this material has withstood a hundred years of experimental treatments and thousands of years of environmental attack in insects and soil. We present evidence that sporopollenin, nonetheless, locally degrades only minutes after pollination in Arabidopsis thaliana flowers, and describe here a two-part pollen germination mechanism in A. thaliana involving both chemical weakening of the exine wall and swelling of the underlying intine. METHODS: We explored naturally occurring components from pollen and stigma surfaces and found a tripartite mix of hydrogen peroxide, peroxidase and catalase enzymes (all at high levels at the pollination interface) to be experimentally sufficient to degrade the sporopollenin of some Brassicaceae family members. KEY RESULTS: At pollination, factors carried on the pollen surface may mix with factors on the stigma surface in a reaction that locally oxidizes the exine pollen wall. Hydrogen peroxide, catalases, and peroxidases are biologically present at the right time and place and, when mixed experimentally, are sufficient to degrade the walls of susceptible pollen. CONCLUSIONS: Our work on native biochemistry for breaching sporopollenin suggests new research directions in pollen aperture evolution and could aid efforts to analyze sporopollenin's composition, needed for application of this corrosion-resistant, but long-intractable material.

Neuromonitoring Using Motor and Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Aortic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Motor evoked potentials (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) are established methods of neuromonitoring aimed at preventing paraplegia after descending or thoracoabdominal aortic repair. However, their predictive impact remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate our single-center experience using this monitoring technique. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2014, 78 patients (mean age 66 ± 12, 53% male) underwent either descending or thoracoabdominal aortic repairs. Of these, 60% had an aortic aneurysm, 30% dissection, and 10% other etiologies. Intraoperatively, MEPs and SSEPs were monitored and, if necessary, clinical parameters (blood pressure, hematocrit, oxygenation) were adjusted in response to neuromonitoring signals. This analysis is focused on the neurological outcome (paraplegia, stroke) after the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 10 (12.8%). All patients with continuously stable signals or signals that returned after signal loss developed no spinal cord injury, whereas two out of six of the evaluable patients with signal loss (without return) during the procedure suffered from postoperative paraplegia (one transient and one permanent). Sensitivity and specificity of use of MEP and SSEP were 100% and 94.20% regarding paraplegia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Preservation of signals or return of signals is an excellent prognostic indicator for spinal cord function. (2) Intraoperative modifications in direct response to the signal change may have averted permanent paralysis in the patients with signal loss without neurologic injury. We have found MEP and SSEP neuromonitoring to be instrumental in the prevention of paraplegia. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12739 (J Card Surg 2016;31:383-389).