The effects of sevoflurane on serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen concentrations: a retrospective, twenty-two-center, comparative evaluation of renal function in adult surgical patients.

UNLABELLED: Despite mounting clinical evidence that supports its safety, the question of the potential adverse effects of sevoflurane on renal function continues to generate some controversy. This study retrospectively evaluated pooled renal laboratory data from 22 different clinical trials that compared sevoflurane with three widely used anesthetics. The trials examined postoperative changes in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels from a total of 3, 436 ASA physical status I-IV adult surgical patients administered either sevoflurane (n = 1941) or a control drug (isoflurane, enflurane, or propofol; n = 1495) as the maintenance anesthetic. The incidences of increased serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen concentrations were similar among patients administered sevoflurane and those administered control drugs. Additionally, no trends specific to sevoflurane were observed with respect to postoperative serum creatinine concentration and fresh gas flow rate, concurrent treatment with nephrotoxic antibiotics, or type of carbon dioxide absorbent. IMPLICATIONS: Our data for changes in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen indicate that, for exposures of less than 4 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration/h, sevoflurane is not associated with an increased risk of renal toxicity compared with other commonly used anesthetics. For clinical purposes, the pre- to postoperative changes in serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen are appropriate measures of renal function in surgical patients.

Comparison of emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in pediatric ambulatory patients.

This study compares the emergence and recovery characteristics of sevoflurane, desflurane, and halothane in children undergoing adenoidectomy with bilateral myringotomy and the insertion of tubes. Eighty children 1-7 yr of age were studied. Thirty minutes prior to the induction of anesthesia, all patients received 0.5 mg/kg midazolam orally. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups: Group 1, sevoflurane induction and maintenance (S:S); Group 2, halothane induction and sevoflurane maintenance (H:S); Group 3, halothane induction and maintenance (H:H); or Group 4, halothane induction and desflurane maintenance (H:D). Tracheal intubation was facilitated with the use of a single dose of 0.2 mg/kg mivacurium. A Mapelson D circuit was used, and all patients received N2O:O2 60:40 for induction and maintenance at standardized appropriate fresh gas flow. Ventilation was controlled to maintain normocapnia. End-tidal concentration of anesthetics was maintained at approximately 1.3 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) (halothane: 0.56; sevoflurane: 2.6; desflurane: 8.3) until the end of surgery when all anesthetics were discontinued. Emergence (extubation), recovery (Steward score 6), and discharge times were compared among patients in the four groups using analysis of variance and Newman-Keuls tests P < 0.05 was considered significant. There were no significant differences among the four groups with respect to age, weight, duration of surgery, or duration of anesthesia. Emergence and recovery from anesthesia were significantly faster in the desflurane group (Group 4) compared with the sevoflurane and halothane groups (Groups 1, 2, and 3) (5 +/- 1.6 min vs 11 +/- 3.7, 11 +/- 4.0, 10 +/- 4.0 min and 11 +/- 3.9 min vs 17 +/- 5.5, 19 +/- 7.1, 21 +/- 8.5 min, respectively). There was a significantly greater incidence of postoperative agitation and excitement in patients who received desflurane (55%) versus sevoflurane (10%) and halothane (25%). There were no significant differences among the four groups with respect to the time to meet home discharge criteria (134 +/- 36.9, 129 +/- 53.3, 117 +/- 64.6, 137 +/- 22.6 in Groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively), in the time to drink oral fluids (139 +/- 31.6, 136 +/- 53.8, 123 +/- 65.0, 142 +/- 29.4 min, respectively), or in the incidence of postoperative vomiting. It is concluded that, although desflurane resulted in the fastest early emergence from anesthesia, it was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative agitation. Sevoflurane resulted in similar emergence and recovery compared with halothane. Desflurane and sevoflurane did not result in faster discharge times than halothane in this patient population.

Infusion of large particles of thiopental sodium during anesthesia induction.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the potential clinical significance of admixtures of thiopental sodium and acidic drugs, which are used during induction of general anesthesia and can cause the formation of particles of thiopental. DESIGN: Using an infusion setup similar to that used for a rapid-sequence induction of general anesthesia, injection of either pancuronium bromide or vecuronium bromide caused formation of particles of thiopental that were measured using a particle analyzer. The effects of delaying the injection of the muscle relaxant on particle formation and the effects of plasma on particle dissolution were studied. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The thiopental particles had a diameter of 17 to 39 microns, with a concentration of 15,000 to 20,000 particles/ml. Particle formation was prevented when a 30-second delay preceded administration of pancuronium or vecuronium following injection of thiopental. No particle formation was detected when succinylcholine was injected. Human plasma was far more effective than a crystalloid solution in dissolving thiopental particles. CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that clinically significant particles of thiopental will remain intact upon entering the bloodstream. However, mixing thiopental with pancuronium or vecuronium has the potential of disrupting intravenous access due to occlusion with particles.

Parliamentary procedure: an easy primer.

Parliamentary procedure is the greatest ally a committee chair or presiding officer can have. It is also an ally for the knowledgeable committee member. The key procedures are the rules governing motions. As long as the correct order of business is observed, every meeting should have a successful outcome. Every participant shares the responsibility for ensuring that the correct outcome is reached. Being knowledgeable about parliamentary procedure is a tremendous asset for any member to have and can be acquired with a little time and effort.