The use of actigraphy to objectively define motion and function before and after shoulder arthroplasty.

Introduction: Actigraphy is a quantitative means of measuring activity data that has proven viable in post-surgery recovery analysis for arthroplasties in lower extremities, but scant literature has been published on the utilization actigraphy to evaluate shoulder motion and function before and after shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to identify if actigraphy can serve as a valid means for objective evaluation of shoulder function and motion before and after shoulder arthroplasty. Secondarily, the data collected by the actigraphy can be analyzed with standard patient-reported outcomes to report correlations between the subjective and objective methods used in this study. Materials and methods: Sixty-four subjects wore an actigraphy device for one day at pre-op, six, twelve and twenty-four weeks. In addition, subjects completed three patient-reported outcome surveys at each time-point. Student t-tests were used to compare percent activity preoperatively with 24-weeks and to compare PROs preoperatively with 24-week results; categorical variables were compared with one-way ANOVAs. Results: All Patient reported outcome scores significantly improved following arthroplasty (p-value<0.001). The percent of physical activity was highly correlated with vector magnitude (p-value<0.001), but neither percent activity or the vector magnitude were correlated with any of the PROs: UCLA Pain p-value = 0.656, SANE p-value = 0.328, UCLA Function p-value = 0.532. Conclusions: Actigraphy results from this study mirror findings in previous literature utilizing the technology in similar manners and demonstrate its potential for motion and function analysis before and after total shoulder arthroplasties. Despite both being suitable methods independently for the evaluation of shoulder function, there was no significant correlation between standard actigraphy measurements and PROs at 24-weeks. Future research to determine clinical utility and an overall broader scope for actigraphy monitoring could benefit from improved technology, such as increased battery life for prolonged durations of data collection during observation periods.

Blood Flow Restriction Using a Pneumatic Tourniquet Is Not Associated With a Cellular Systemic Response.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) using a pneumatic tourniquet on CD34+ cells, platelets, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, lactate, and glucose compared with standard exercise. Methods: Fifteen healthy volunteers (8 males and 7 females, 28.6 ± 3.6 years old) who were able to perform the exercise sessions on a VersaClimber participated. Participants were randomized to undergo an experimental (EXP) occluded testing session using the pneumatic tourniquets on all 4 extremities and a control (CON) session. The exercise protocol concluded after 9 minutes or when participants reached a rating of perceived exertion of 20. Blood draws were performed before testing and immediately after the exercise session. Blood analysis consisted of complete blood counts as well as flow cytometry to measure peripheral CD34+ counts as a marker for hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). Results: A significant increase from before to after exercise values was observed in both the EXP and CON groups with CD34+, WBC counts, platelets, and lymphocytes; however, no differences existed between EXP and CON groups for any variable. CD34+ increased in the EXP (3.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.3 ± 1.8 cells · L-1; P < .001) and CON (3.3 ± 1.9 vs. 4.4 ± 1.4 cells · L-1; P < .001) sessions. White blood cells also significantly increased in both the EXP (7.8 ± 1.4 vs. 11.8 ± 2.5 K · L-1 K · L-1; P < .001) and CON (7.5 ± 1.8 vs. 11.3 ± 3.0 K · L-1; P < .001) sessions. Platelets also increased in both the EXP (258.6 ± 52.5 vs. 309.9 ± 52.7 K · L-1; P < .001) and CON (263.1 ± 44.7 vs. 316.1 ± 43.9 K · L-1; P < .001) sessions, and conversely, a significant decrease in the average neutrophil counts in the EXP (mean difference = -13.7%; P < .001) and CON (mean difference = -13.2%; P < .001) sessions was observed. Lymphocyte counts in the EXP (mean difference = 22.8%; P < .001) and CON (mean difference = 19.3%; P < .001) sessions increased significantly. Conclusions: There were no significant differences in systemic cellular responses when undergoing aerobic-based exercise with and without a pneumatic tourniquet system. Level of Evidence: 2, prospective comparative study.

Elevation of Peripheral Blood CD34+ and Platelet Levels After Exercise With Cooling and Compression.

PURPOSE: To analyze the cellular response and chemokine profiles following exercise using cooling and blood flow restriction on the Vasper system. METHODS: Healthy male patients between the ages of 20 and 39 years were recruited. Testing was performed on the Vasper system, a NuStep cross-trainer with concomitant 4-limb venous compression with proximal arm cuffs at 40 mm Hg and proximal leg cuffs at 65 mm Hg. A cooling vest and cooling mat (8.3°C) were used. A 7-minute warm-up followed by alternating 30- and 60-second sprints with 1.5 and 2 minutes of active recovery, respectively, between each sprint. Peripheral blood was drawn before exercise, immediately following exercise (T20), 10 minutes after the first post-exercise blood draw (T30), and then every 30 minutes (T60, T90, T120, T150, T180). A blood draw occurred at 24 hours' postexercise. Complete blood count, monoclonal flow cytometry for CD34+, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were used to analyze the samples. RESULTS: Sixteen healthy male patients (29.5 ± 4.5years, 1.78 ± 0.05m, 83.7 ± 11.4 kg) were enrolled. There was an immediate, temporary increase in white blood cell counts, marked by an increase in lymphocyte differential (38.3 ± 6.5 to 44.3 ± 9.0%, P = .001), decrease in neutrophil differential (47.8 ± 6.6 to 42.0 ± 9.1%, P < .001), and platelets (239.5 ± 57.2 to 268.6 ± 86.3 K⋅µL-1, P = .01). Monocytes significantly decreased from PRE to T90 (9.8 ± 1.1 to 8.9 ± 1.1K/µL, P < .001) and T120 (8.9 ± 1.1 K/µL, P < .0001). There was a significant increase in CD34+ cells (3.9 ± 2.0 to 5.3 ± 2.8 cells⋅µL-1, P < .001). No detectable differences in measured cytokine levels of interleukin (IL)-10, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor , IL-1ra, tumor necrosis factor-α, or IL-2 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A significant elevation of peripheral blood CD34+ and platelet levels immediately following the exercise session was observed; however, there was no effect on peripheral circulation of IL-10, IL-6, IL-1ra, tumor necrosis factor-α, or IL-2. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Exercise can be considered as a way to manipulate point-of-care blood products like platelet-rich plasma and may increase product yield.

Blood Flow Restriction Training Using the Delfi System Is Associated With a Cellular Systemic Response.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise on CD34+ cells, platelets, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes, lactate, and glucose. METHODS: Healthy participants aged 20 to 39 years who were able to perform the exercise sessions were recruited. Participants underwent an experimental (EXP) occluded testing session and a control (CON) session using the Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System. Blood draws were performed prior to testing and immediately after the exercise session. Blood analysis consisted of a complete blood count as well as flow cytometry to measure peripheral CD34+ counts as a marker for hematopoietic progenitor cells. RESULTS: Fourteen men (aged 30.8 ± 3.9 years) volunteered. There was a significant increase in average CD34+ counts immediately after the EXP session only (3.1 ± 1.2 cells ⋅ µL-1 vs 5.2 ± 2.9 cells ⋅ µL-1, P = .012). Platelet counts were significantly elevated after both sessions, with the average increase being higher after the EXP session (mean difference [MD], 34,200/µL; P < .002) than after the CON session (MD, 11,600/µL; P < .002). White blood cell counts significantly increased after both the EXP (8,400 ± 2,200/µL vs 6,300 ± 1,600/µL; P < .001) and CON (MD, 900/µL; P < .001) sessions. There was a significant increase from baseline to immediately after exercise in the average number of lymphocytes (MD, 6.3%; P < .001) and, conversely, a significant decrease in the average neutrophil count (MD, 6.5%; P < .001) in the EXP session only. Lactate levels significantly increased in the EXP (MD, 6.1 mmol ⋅ L-1; P = .001) and CON (MD, 3.6 mmol ⋅ L-1; P = .001) groups. No changes in glucose levels were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise with BFR causes a significant post-exercise increase in peripheral hematopoietic progenitor cells and platelets, beyond that of standard resistance training. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: BFR can be considered a way to manipulate point-of-care blood products such as platelet-rich plasma to increase product yield.

Suture Versus Screw Fixation of Tibial Spine Fractures in Children and Adolescents: A Comparative Study.

BACKGROUND: Tibial spine fractures involve an avulsion injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) at the intercondylar eminence, typically in children and adolescents. Displaced fractures are commonly treated with either suture or screw fixation. PURPOSE: To investigate differences in various outcomes between patients treated with arthroscopic suture versus screw fixation for tibial spine avulsion fractures in one of the largest patient cohorts in the literature. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A search of medical records was performed with the goal of identifying all type 2 and type 3 tibial spine avulsion fractures surgically treated between 2000 and 2014 at a pediatric hospital. All patients had a minimum of 12 months clinical follow-up, suture or screw fixation only, and no major concomitant injury. RESULTS: There were 68 knees in 67 patients meeting criteria for analysis. There were no differences with regard to postsurgical arthrofibrosis (P = .59), ACL reconstruction (P = .44), meniscal procedures (P = .85), instability (P = .49), range of motion (P = .51), return to sport (P >.999), or time to return to sport (P = .11). Elevation of the repaired fragment on postoperative imaging was significantly greater in the suture group (5.4 vs 3.5 mm; P = .005). Postoperative fragment elevation did not influence surgical outcomes. The screw fixation group had more reoperations (13 vs 23; P = .03), a larger number of reoperations for implant removal (3 vs 22; P < .001), and nearly 3 times the odds of undergoing reoperation compared with suture patients (odds ratio, 2.9; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes between suture and screw fixation were largely equivalent in our patients. Postoperative fragment elevation does not influence surgical outcomes. Consideration should be given for the greater likelihood of needing a second operation, planned or unplanned, after screw fixation.

Assessment of scapular morphology and surgical technique as predictors of notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

There has been increased focus on understanding risk factors for scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). We conducted a study to evaluate the scapular notching index and other factors associated with the occurrence of scapular notching. Ninety-one patients treated with primary RSA were followed for a minimum of 24 months. Patients' radiographic assessments were grouped by Nerot grade of scapular notching (group 1, grades 0 and 1; group 2, grades 2, 3, 4). Group mean differences were compared for preoperative scapular neck angle (SNA), prosthesis-scapular neck angle (PSNA), peg glenoid rim distance (PGRD), notching index, and clinical outcomes. There was no significant difference in mean (SD) notching index between group 1, 31.8 (4.4), and group 2, 33.1 (7.3), and there were no significant differences in SNA (102.8° vs 105.4°; P=.3), PSNA (125.8° vs 125.4°; P=.82), PGRD (15.4 vs 16.8 mm; P=.47), or clinical outcomes between the groups. Our results suggest that Grammont-style prostheses have a higher rate of notching regardless of optimal PGRD and variations in PSNA. Perhaps with certain scapular morphology, prosthetic design may be a more significant contributor to notching.

3D CT assessment of the relationship between humeral head alignment and glenoid retroversion in glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid bone loss associated with advanced glenohumeral arthritis is frequently accompanied by subluxation of the humeral head with subsequent inferior outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty. We hypothesized that the relationship between the center of the humeral head and the perpendicular to the glenoid fossa plane differs from, and is independent of, the relationship between the center of the humeral head and the plane of the scapula. METHODS: Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) imaging was performed on sixty patients with advanced osteoarthritis and fifteen controls with no osteoarthritis to define the baseline relationship between the center of the humeral head and the perpendicular to the glenoid fossa plane and the plane of the scapula. Correlations between these variables and the amount of bone loss and glenoid version were assessed. RESULTS: There was a strong linear relationship (p < 0.001) between glenoid retroversion and the center of the humeral head in relation to the center line of the scapula (humeral-scapular alignment). Humeral head alignment in relation to the glenoid plane (humeral-glenoid alignment) was variable and not strongly correlated with the amount of glenoid retroversion. The average glenoid retroversion for the normal shoulders was -3.5°, and the average humeral-scapular alignment offset percentage was -2.3%. The average humeral-glenoid alignment offset for the normal shoulders was 0.5 mm with an average humeral-glenoid alignment offset percentage of 0.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The location of the humeral head in relation to the glenoid can be defined as displacement from the plane of the scapula and from the perpendicular of the glenoid plane. These two measures are independent of one another. The data suggest that each measurement may represent a different effect on glenoid loading. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The importance of this study is that it presents quantitative data and clear guidelines to define two measurements of glenohumeral alignment as separate and important variables. The clinical relevance of these methods will be further defined when they are correlated with clinical outcomes.

Guidelines for the selection of optimal glenoid augment size for moderate to severe glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty is technically demanding in regard to implantation of the glenoid component, especially in the setting of increased glenoid deformity and posterior glenoid wear. Augmented glenoid implants are an important and innovative option; however, there is little evidence accessible to surgeons to guide in the selection of the appropriate size augmented glenoid. METHODS: Solid computer models of commercially available augmented glenoid components (+3, +5, +7) contained within the software allowed placement of the best fit glenoid component within the three-dimensional reconstruct of each patient's scapula. Peg perforation, amount of bone reamed, and amount of medialization were recorded for each augment size. RESULTS: There was strong correlation between the medialization of the joint line and the glenoid retroversion for each augmented component at neutral correction and correction to 6° of retroversion. At neutral, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -3° to -17° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -5° to -24° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -31° with the +7 augmented glenoid. At 6° of retroversion, the range of retroversion that restored the anatomic joint line was -4° to -21° with use of the +3 augmented glenoid, -7° to -27° with the +5 augmented glenoid, and -9° to -34° with the +7 augmented glenoid. CONCLUSIONS: There was a strong correlation between glenoid retroversion and medialization for all augment sizes, supporting the recommendation for glenoid retroversion as the primary guide in selecting the amount of augmentation.

Correction of acquired glenoid bone loss in osteoarthritis with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component.

BACKGROUND: The magnitude and anatomic consequences of pathologic acquired glenoid retroversion and posterior bone loss that can be surgically corrected with a standard versus an augmented glenoid component have not been studied extensively in a surgical patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis, acquired posterior bone loss, and increased retroversion were studied by use of a three-dimensional computer surgical simulation. For each case, amount of medialization was measured as the linear distance from the lateral aspect of the glenoid vault model to the center of the articular implant surface. Simulation of implant placement at 0° or 6° was performed with use of a standard glenoid having a uniform thickness and an asymmetric thickness augmented component. RESULTS: An increased amount of medialization was seen with the standard glenoid, 8.3 ± 4.1 mm, compared with 3.8 ± 3.3 mm with use of the augmented glenoid implant (P < .001). When glenoid retroversion was corrected to 0°, pathologic version was shown to have strong and significant relationship to the amount of medialization for both the standard (R(2) = 0.825) and augmented (R(2) = -0.68) glenoid implant. There was an increased ability to correct greater amounts of pathologic version with less medialization by use of an augmented step glenoid compared with a standard anchor peg glenoid. DISCUSSION: Correction of moderate to severe glenoid retroversion by asymmetric reaming cannot always be done with use of a standard component, and if it is done, it will result in greater medialization of the joint line. Use of an augmented component can allow complete correction of retroversion and minimize the effect of medialization.

Step-Cut Bone-Graft Technique for Osteoarthritis with Severe Glenoid Bone Loss.

INTRODUCTION: We describe a bone-graft technique, for shoulder arthroplasty in patients with severe glenoid bone loss, that utilizes a "step cut," a trapezoidal bone wedge from the resected humeral head, and graft fixation with screws placed from posterior to anterior through the graft. STEP 1 PREOPERATIVE PLANNING: Carry out preoperative planning for the step-cut procedure. STEP 2 SURGICAL APPROACH AND PREPARATION OF THE GLENOID: Expose the glenoid for bone graft insertion, taking care to avoid excessive reaming. STEP 3 PREPARE THE GLENOID BONE GRAFT: Cut the appropriately sized glenoid bone graft from the resected humeral head. STEP 4 INSERT AND FIX THE GLENOID BONE GRAFT: Position the bone graft in the glenoid defect and stabilize it with screws. STEP 5 PREPARE THE GLENOID SURFACE: Create an even concave surface between the anterior aspect of the glenoid and the posterior aspect of the graft. STEP 6 PLACE THE GLENOID IMPLANT: Position the glenoid component following step-cut graft implantation. POSTOPERATIVE REHABILITATION: Postoperative rehabilitation is mostly the same as that for standard total shoulder replacement without bone-grafting. RESULTS: The range of motion improved significantly in our study of twelve patients (p < 0.001).IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty with bone graft for osteoarthritis with severe glenoid bone loss.

BACKGROUND: Glenohumeral osteoarthritis may be associated with severe posterior glenoid bone loss and glenoid retroversion. Treatment with total shoulder arthroplasty and autologous bone graft obtained from the humeral head has been infrequently reported in the peer-reviewed literature. METHODS: The clinical and radiographic results of primary total shoulder replacement with an all-polyethylene glenoid component and autologous humeral head graft augmentation performed by a single surgeon in thirteen consecutive patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Twelve of the thirteen patients were followed for a minimum of two years (average, fifty-three months; range, twenty-six to 110 months). The average glenoid retroversion on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans was 44° (range, 20° to 65°). Based on the Walch classification of pathologic glenoid morphology, nine glenoids were B2 and three were type C. All patients had an intact cuff at the time of surgery. At the time of the last follow up, ten of the twelve patients had graft incorporation without any resorbtion and two had minor bone graft resorption. Broken screws occurred in two of these ten cases. Two patients, both of whom required revision surgery, had failure of fixation and of graft incorporation; one of these failures was due to early postoperative trauma and the other, to Propionibacterium acnes infection. CONCLUSIONS: The early and midterm results of total shoulder arthroplasty with autogenous bone graft demonstrated substantial clinical and radiographic improvement in most cases.

The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined factors that affect acetabular cup positioning. Since cup positioning has been linked to dislocation and increased bearing surface wear, these factors affecting cup position are important considerations. QUESTION/PURPOSES: We determined the percent of optimally positioned acetabular cups and whether patient and surgical factors affected acetabular component position. METHODS: We obtained postoperative AP pelvis and cross-table lateral radiographs on 2061 consecutive patients who received a THA or hip resurfacing from 2004 to 2008. One thousand nine hundred and fifty-two hips had AP pelvic radiographs with correct position of the hip center, and 1823 had both version and abduction angles measured. The AP radiograph was measured using Hip Analysis Suite™ to calculate the cup inclination and version angles, using the lateral film to determine version direction. Acceptable ranges were defined for abduction (30°-45°) and version (5°-25°). RESULTS: From the 1823 hips, 1144 (63%) acetabular cups were within the abduction range, 1441 (79%) were within the version range, and 917 (50%) were within the range for both. Surgical approach, surgeon volume, and obesity (body mass index > 30) independently predicted malpositioned cups. Comparison of low versus high volume surgeons, minimally invasive surgical versus posterolateral approach, and obesity versus all other body mass index groups showed a twofold (1.5-2.8), sixfold (3.5-10.7), and 1.3-fold (1.1-1.7) increased risk for malpositioned cups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Factors correlated to malpositioned cups included surgical approach, surgeon volume, and body mass index with increased risk of malpositioning for minimally invasive surgical approach, low volume surgeons, and obese patients. Further analyses on patient and surgical factors' influence on cup position at a lower volume medical center would provide a valuable comparison. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.