ABSTRACT
La inercia clínica se define como los fallos del médico en el inicio o la intensificación del tratamiento cuando están indicados. Nuestro objetivo es reflexionar sobre este concepto aplicado en enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica y asma, y el papel del profesional sanitario y del sistema de salud como actores implicados. Dejamos aparte la inercia del paciente para otro ámbito de estudio e intervención. Proponemos definir la inercia clínica para procesos durante el diagnóstico y el tratamiento cuando no se inicia o modifica (intensifica o disminuye) una terapia. También se identifican los factores que contribuyen a la inercia clínica o terapéutica y se plantean estrategias de mejora. (AU)
Clinical inertia is defined as the physicians failure to initiate or intensify treatment when it is indicated. Our objective is to reflect on this concept applied to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma, and the role of health professional and health system as stakeholders. We leave patient inertia aside for another area of study and intervention. We propose to define clinical inertia for diagnosis and therapeutic processes when a treatment is not started or modified (intensifies or decreases). Factors that contribute to clinical and/or therapeutic inertia are also identified and improvement strategies are proposed. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Asthma , Clinical Competence/standards , Pulmonary Medicine , Professional RoleABSTRACT
La prevalencia de tabaquismo activo en adultos con asma es similar ala de la población general. El tabaquismo se asocia con un peor control clínico de la enfermedad, una disminución acelerada de la función pulmonar y una respuesta irregular a la terapia con glucocorticoides. El consumo de tabaco impacta negativamente en la calidad devida de los pacientes asmáticos y provoca un incremento en el númerode visitas y de hospitalizaciones por exacerbaciones. Además, el tabaquismo aumenta el riesgo de cáncer de pulmón, comorbilidades cardiovasculares y muerte en pacientes asmáticos. A pesar de todo ello,las guías actuales del manejo del asma no incluyen recomendacionesespecíficas para el manejo de los pacientes asmáticos fumadores. Poreste motivo, se procedió a una revisión narrativa de la literatura paraun consenso mediante metodología de grupo nominal desarrolladaa lo largo del año 2019 para extraer recomendaciones prácticas quepermitieran mejorar el diagnóstico y el tratamiento del asma en fumadores, así como el tratamiento del tabaquismo en asmáticos. Lasconclusiones y recomendaciones fueron validadas en el congreso nacional de la SEPAR del mismo año. Entre las más relevantes, se incidió en la necesidad de abordar el tabaquismo en las personas conasma mediante consejo sanitario, tratamiento farmacológico y terapiaconductual, al ser un factor que impacta negativamente en la sintomatología, el pronóstico y la respuesta al tratamiento del asma. En elfumador con sospecha de asma, se debe evaluar la presencia de enfisema y el diagnóstico diferencial de otras enfermedades y considerarel impacto del tabaquismo en el resultado de las pruebas diagnósticas.También se concluye que el hábito tabáquico reduce la respuesta altratamiento con corticoides inhalados, por lo que se recomienda terapia combinada con broncodilatadores. (AU)
The prevalence of active smoking in adults with asthma is similar inthe total population. Smoking is associated with worse clinical control of the disease, a rapid reduction of lung function and a variableresponse to corticoids. Tobacco consumption negatively affects thequality of life of asthmatic patients as well as increasing the numberof medical visits and hospital admissions due to exacerbations. Moreover, smoking entails a higher risk of developing lung cancer, cardiovascular comorbidities and death in asthmatic patients. Nevertheless,current asthma guidelines do not include specific recommendationson the management of smoking asthmatic patients and the treatmentof the smoking habit in this subpopulation. For this reason, a narrativereview of the literature was carried out for consensus using a nominalgroup methodology developed throughout 2019 to extract practicalrecommendations that would allow the diagnosis and treatment ofasthma in smokers, as well as the treatment of smoking in asthmatics,to be improved. The conclusions and recommendations were validated at the SEPAR national congress of the same year. Among the mostrelevant, the need to address smoking in people with asthma throughhealth advice, pharmacological treatment and behavioral therapy wasemphasized, as this is a factor that negatively impacts the symptoms,prognosis and response to asthma treatment. In smokers with suspected asthma, the presence of emphysema and the differential diagnosisof other diseases should be evaluated and the impact of smoking onthe result of diagnostic tests should be considered. It is also concluded that smoking reduces the response to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, which is why combined therapy with bronchodilators isrecommended (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Tobacco Use Disorder/diagnosis , Tobacco Use Disorder/prevention & control , Tobacco Use Disorder/therapy , Asthma/diagnosis , Asthma/prevention & control , Asthma/therapy , Consensus Development Conferences as Topic , SpainABSTRACT
Los objetivos del estudio son estimar la prevalencia del hábito tabáquico entre los socios y las actitudes e intervenciones sobre tabaquismo que realizan los miembros SEPAR ante sus pacientes. Se realizó una encuesta on line, a la que respondieron 640 socios (496 neumólogos, 45 enfermeras, 34 cirujanos torácicos, 37 fisioterapeutas y 28 profesionales de otras especialidades). El 5% de los socios encuestados confiesan ser fumadores: neumólogos 3,4%; enfermería 8,9%; cirujanos torácicos 8,8%; fisioterapeutas 13,5%. El 96% de los socios dan mucha o bastante importancia a la función modélica. El 98% de los socios preguntan siempre o a menudo a sus pacientes sobre el consumo de tabaco. La intervención más eficaz para tratar el tabaquismo para un 77% de los socios es el uso de fármacos, combinado con soporte psicológico. Estos resultados son un exponente de la firme sensibilización e implicación que los miembros SEPAR tienen frente al tabaquismo
The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of smoking among SEPAR members, and their approach to smoking cessation in their patients. An online survey was completed by 640 members (496 pulmonologists, 45 nurses, 34 thoracic surgeons, 37 physiotherapists, and 28 other specialists). Of the members interviewed, 5% confessed that they were smokers: 3.5% pulmonologists; 8.9% nurses; 8.8% thoracic surgeons, and 13.5% physiotherapists. A total of 96% of members assign a lot or quite a lot of importance to setting an example; 98% of members always or often ask their patients about their smoking habit. The most effective anti-smoking intervention, according to 77% of members, is a combination of drugs and psychological support. These results are an indicator of the awareness and commitment of SEPAR members to smoking and its cessation
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/prevention & control , Tobacco Smoke Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Smoking/epidemiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Social Support , Analysis of Variance , Surveys and Questionnaires , Public Health/methodsABSTRACT
The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of smoking among SEPAR members, and their approach to smoking cessation in their patients. An online survey was completed by 640 members (496 pulmonologists, 45 nurses, 34 thoracic surgeons, 37 physiotherapists, and 28 other specialists). Of the members interviewed, 5% confessed that they were smokers: 3.5% pulmonologists; 8.9% nurses; 8.8% thoracic surgeons, and 13.5% physiotherapists. A total of 96% of members assign a lot or quite a lot of importance to setting an example; 98% of members always or often ask their patients about their smoking habit. The most effective anti-smoking intervention, according to 77% of members, is a combination of drugs and psychological support. These results are an indicator of the awareness and commitment of SEPAR members to smoking and its cessation.
