The Schweitzer effect: The fundamental relationship between experience and medical students' opinions on professional behaviours.

PURPOSE: We examined whether medical students' opinions on the acceptability of a behaviour were influenced by previously encountering a similar professionally challenging situation, assessed the magnitude of effect of 'experience' compared to other demographic factors which influence medical students' opinions, and evaluated whether opinions regarding some situations/behaviours were more susceptible to 'experience' bias? METHODS: Confidential, on-line survey for medical students distributed to Australian and New Zealand (AUS/NZ) medical schools. Students submitted de-identified demographic information, provided opinions on the acceptability of a wide range of student behaviours in professionally challenging situations, and whether they had encountered similar situations. RESULTS: 3171 students participated from all 21 Aus/NZ medical schools (16% of registered students). Medical students reported encountering many of the professionally challenging situations, with varying opinions on what was acceptable behaviour. The most significant factor influencing acceptability towards a behaviour was whether the student reported encountering a similar situation. The professional dilemmas most significantly influenced by previous experience typically related to behaviours that students could witness in clinical environments, and often involved breaches of trust. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the relationship between experience and medical students' opinions on professional behaviour- the 'Schweitzer effect'. When students encounter poor examples of professional behaviour, especially concerning trust breaches, it significantly influences their perception of the behaviour. These results highlight the importance of placing students in healthcare settings with positive professional role modelling/work cultures.

Medical students report encountering a wide range of professionally challenging situations, and have varying opinions on acceptable professional behavioursAlthough medical students' opinions on professional behaviours are influenced by their demography, the most significant factor influencing the acceptability towards a behaviour was whether the student reported encountering a similar professional dilemmaStudents appear to be susceptible to normalising counter productive work behaviours, particularly those related to breaches of trustBy placing students in toxic work culture environments with poor role models, we may inadvertently enable healthcare systems to perpetuate poor professional behaviour.

Opinions towards Medical Students' Self-Care and Substance Use Dilemmas-A Future Concern despite a Positive Generational Effect?

This study examines demographic factors which may influence opinions concerning medical students' self-care and substance use behaviors as a means of providing insights into how future doctors view these issues compared to Australian doctors and members of the public. We conducted national, multicenter, prospective, on-line cross-sectional surveys using hypothetical scenarios to three cohorts- Australian medical students, medical doctors, and the public. Participants' responses were compared for the different contextual variables within the scenarios and the participants' demographic characteristics. In total 2602 medical students, 809 doctors and 503 members of the public participated. Compared with doctors and the public, medical students were least tolerant of alcohol intoxication, and most tolerant of using stimulants to assist with study, and cannabis for anxiety. Doctor respondents more often aligned with the public's opinions on the acceptability of the medical students' behaviors. Although opinions are not equivalent to behaviour, Australian students' views on the acceptability for cannabis to help manage anxiety, and inappropriate use of prescription-only drugs are concerning; these future doctors will be responsible for prescribing drugs and managing patients with substance abuse problems. However, if current Australian medical student's opinions on alcohol misuse persist, one of the commonest substance addictions amongst doctors may decrease in future.

A qualitative analysis of adding kindness into the ISBAR handover tool.

BACKGROUND: The COVID pandemic has highlighted the stresses experienced by our medical workforce, with worldwide publications attesting to high rates of depression, anxiety and burnout, particularly in junior doctors. Many studies focus on reporting on the prevalence of mental health issues, but not many report on interventional strategies. One of the most stressful interactions in the day of a junior doctor is the medical handover. The incorporation of kindness into clinical handover has coined the term 'KISBAR' to underline the importance of delivering handover in a kind manner. AIM: The aim is to analyse the efficacy of a novel intervention by introducing an emotional support representative to participate in the morning labour ward handover. METHODS: We undertook an ethnographic constructivist qualitative research project in a tertiary hospital in Perth, Western Australia, using focus groups to explore the views of junior medical staff on the KISBAR handover tool in the specific context of labour ward handover. Fifty per cent of the total junior doctors from the hospital participated in this study. RESULTS: Four dominant themes arose from analysis of the focus group discussions: (i) inherent stress experienced by junior doctors during the labour ward handover process, (ii) support strategies for junior doctors during labour ward handover; (iii) role modelling and the hidden curriculum aspects of communication from senior doctors at labour ward handover; and (iv) benefit of having an emotional support person present for labour ward handover. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the benefit of having an emotional support person present at labour ward handover: improved perception of safety and an environment that junior doctors found to be supportive. This is a novel and reproducible interventional strategy which is applicable to various obstetric units around Australia.

Why Is Patient Safety a Challenge? Insights From the Professionalism Opinions of Medical Students' Research.

OBJECTIVES: Despite increased emphasis on education and training for patient safety in medical schools, there is little known about factors influencing decision making regarding patient safety behaviors. This study examined the nature and magnitude of factors that may influence opinions around patient safety-related behaviors as a means of providing insights into how Australian doctors and medical students view these issues relative to members of the public. METHODS: A national, multicenter, prospective, cross-sectional survey was conducted using responses to hypothetical patient safety scenarios involving the following: fabricating results, personal protective equipment, presenteeism, and reporting concerns.Australian enrolled medical students, medical doctors, and members of the public were surveyed.Participant responses were compared for the different contextual variables within the scenarios and the participants' demographic characteristics. RESULTS: In total, 2602 medical student, 809 doctors, and 503 members of the Australian public participated. The 3 demographic groups had significantly differing opinions on many of the patient safety dilemmas. Doctors were more tolerant of medical students not reporting concerning behaviors and attending placements despite recent illness. Medical students' opinions frequently demonstrated a "transition effect," bridging between the doctors and publics' attitudes, consistent with professional identity formation. CONCLUSIONS: Opinions on the acceptability of medical students' patient safety-related behaviors were influenced by the demographics of the cohort and the contextual complexity of the scenario. Although the survey used hypothetical scenarios, doctors and medical students' opinions seem to be influenced by cognitive dissonances, biases, and heuristics, which may negatively affect patient safety.

Time to make some noise about a quiet revolution.

'Tomorrow belongs to those who can hear it coming' David Bowie. Language is a living entity that moves and changes. Use of gender-neutral language in medical literature is increasingly common. It is time for obstetricians and gynaecologists in Australia and New Zealand to interrogate their own bias and desire to maintain the status quo, and to consider reasons for change.

Couvelaire uterus resulting in haemoperitoneum.

First described by Dr Alexandre Couvelaire in 1911, a Couvelaire uterus is a rare complication of severe placental abruption (PA), which is diagnosed by the direct visualization of the uterus. There has been only one case report thus far that reported of an intraperitoneal bleed due to PA resulting in a poor outcome. We present a rare and serious case of Couvelaire uterus resulting in haemoperitoneum with a good outcome (live healthy infant, uterus preservation and total blood loss of 800 ml) in a primigravida with no prior risk factors and low-risk pregnancy other than a complete placenta praevia diagnosed during anatomy scan, which subsequently was reported as clear of cervix in third trimester ultrasound scan. She was diagnosed with placenta abruption and pre-eclampsia post-partum. Most cases of PA cannot be predicted or prevented. However, in some cases, close monitoring and timely decision-making can prevent adverse maternal and foetal outcomes.

Validating the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) in obstetric and gynaecologic resuscitation teams.

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is an effective method of enhancing the knowledge, skill, and technical abilities of individuals and teams encountering obstetric and gynaecologic emergencies. Simulation may also enhance the non-technical performance of teams resulting in improved patient outcomes. Although simulation-based training is widely recognised as an effective educational approach, issues around feasibility - the lack of simulation experts and malleable outcome measures of team performance - remain critical barriers to their implementation. AIM: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) when used by medical professionals in simulated obstetric and gynaecological emergencies. METHODS: There were 151 participants (63% female; 60% consultants; 69% no previous simulation-based training) who observed three live high-fidelity obstetric and gynaecological resuscitation simulations and completed the TEAM. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated the construct validity of the TEAM, yielding a second-order structure identified by 'leadership', 'teamwork', and 'team management'. Convergent validity was supported by the average item-to-scale total correlation which was 0.75, P < 0.001 and the average analysis of variance extracted (AVE) 0.88. The individual factors also yielded high factor-to-scale total correlations (mean [M] = 0.87), and AVE (M = 0.89). The internal reliability was high for the whole scale (average alpha = 0.92) and across the sub-factors (average alpha = 0.80). The inter-rater reliability was excellent (inter-class correlation coefficient 1 = 0.98). Participants with differing levels of simulation training experience did not significantly differ. CONCLUSION: The TEAM is a viable instrument for the assessment of non-technical performance during simulated obstetric and gynaecologic emergencies, thus enhancing the feasibility of simulation-based training.

A retrospective cohort study of the impact of In Time obstetric simulation training on management of vaginal breech deliveries.

BACKGROUND: Following the Term Breech Trial, vaginal breech deliveries are rarely undertaken in Australia. Some women choose to have a breech delivery following counselling, while others will present in labour with an undiagnosed breech. Clinicians need to be skilled in vaginal breech delivery despite this being a rare clinical situation. Simulation training provides a means by which uncommon clinical situations can be practised. AIM: This study aims to determine if the introduction of a simulation-based training course is associated with an improvement in the management of vaginal breech delivery and neonatal outcomes. METHODS: Cases of term vaginal breech delivery five years prior to introduction of In Time training (2001-2005) and five years after In Time training (2007-2011) were identified in a tertiary obstetric hospital (King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth). There were 136 women identified in the pre-training (2001-2005, n = 56) and post-training (2007-2011, n = 80) groups. Case note review was undertaken to gather information. RESULTS: Apgar scores of <7 at five minutes were higher in the post-training cohort (8.8% vs 0%, P = 0.041). Arterial and venous pH readings were similar between cohorts, with a non-significant trend toward improvement in the post-training cohort. Special care nursery admissions and length of hospital stay were unchanged. The primary accoucheur was more likely to be a consultant (35.0% vs 16.4%) in the post-training cohort. Appropriate manoeuvres were more likely to be used in the post-training cohort (52.5% vs 44.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Obstetric In Time simulation training improved seniority of accoucheur and documented appropriate manoeuvres in the management of term vaginal breech delivery.

Keeping in time: Issues affecting the sustainability of obstetric emergency simulation training in outer metropolitan, rural and remote centres in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric emergency simulation training is an evidence-based intervention for the reduction of perinatal and maternal morbidity. In Western Australia, obstetric emergency training has been run using the In Time course since 2006. AIMS: The study aimed to determine if the provision of In Time train the trainer courses to outer metro, rural and remote units in Western Australia had led to sustained ongoing training in those units. Ten years following the introduction of the course, we performed a survey to examine which units are continuing to run In Time, what are the perceived benefits in units still utilising In Time, and what were the barriers to training in units that had discontinued. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A link to an online survey was sent to the units where In Time training had occurred. Telephone enquiries were additionally used to ensure a good response rate. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 100%. Six of the 11 units where training had been provided continue to run In Time. Units where training had discontinued had done so in order to take up alternatives, or as a result of trainers leaving. Of the units who had discontinued training, one wished to recommence In Time. CONCLUSIONS: Local in situ training in obstetric emergencies as exemplified by the In Time course remains a popular and valued training intervention across Western Australia. This training may be of particular benefit to small and remote units, but these are the areas in which training is hardest to sustain.

The effect of a multidisciplinary obstetric emergency team training program, the In Time course, on diagnosis to delivery interval following umbilical cord prolapse - A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cord prolapse is an uncommon obstetric emergency, with potentially fatal consequences for the baby if prompt action is not taken. Simulation training provides a means by which uncommon emergencies can be practised, with the aim of improving teamwork and clinical outcomes. AIMS: This study aimed to determine if the introduction of a simulation-based training course was associated with an improvement in the management of cord prolapse, in particular the diagnosis to delivery interval. We also aimed to investigate if an improvement in perinatal outcomes could be demonstrated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. All cases of cord prolapse in the designated time period were identified and reviewed and a comparison of outcome measures pre- and post-training was undertaken. RESULTS: Thirty-one cases were identified in the pre-training period, and compared to 64 cases post-training. Documentation improved significantly post-training. There were non-significant improvements in use of spinal anaesthetic, and in the length of stay in the special care neonatal unit. There was a significant increase in the number of babies with Apgar scores less than seven at 5 min. There were no differences in the diagnosis to delivery interval, or in perinatal mortality rates. CONCLUSION: Obstetric emergency training was associated with improved teamwork, as evidenced by the improved documentation post-training in this study, but not with improved diagnosis to delivery interval. Long-term follow-up studies are required to ascertain whether training has an impact on longer-term paediatric outcomes, such as cerebral palsy rates.

Emergency obstetric simulation training: how do we know where we are going, if we don't know where we have been?

BACKGROUND: Obstetric emergencies contribute significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality. Current training in the management of obstetric emergencies in Australia and internationally focusses on utilising a multidisciplinary simulation-based model. Arguments for and against this type of training exist, using both economic and clinical reasoning. AIMS: To identify the evidence base for the clinical impact of simulation training in obstetric emergencies and to address some of the concerns regarding appropriate delivery of obstetric emergency training in the Australian setting. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify research undertaken in the area of obstetric emergency training. The initial literature search using broad search terms identified 887 articles which were then reviewed and considered for inclusion if they provided original research with a specific emphasis on the impact of training on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Ninety-two articles were identified, comprising evidence in the following clinical situations: eclampsia, shoulder dystocia, postpartum haemorrhage, maternal collapse, cord prolapse and teamwork training. Evidence exists for a benefit in knowledge or skills gained from simulation training and for the benefit of training in small units without access to high-fidelity equipment or facilities. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence exists for a positive impact of training in obstetric emergencies, although the majority of the available evidence applies to evaluation at the level of participants' confidence, knowledge or skills rather than at the level of impact on clinical outcomes. The model of simulation-based training is an appropriate one for the Australian setting and should be further utilised in rural and remote settings.