Effects of a microbial muramidase on the growth performance, intestinal permeability, nutrient digestibility, and welfare of broiler chickens.

The objective of these studies was to evaluate the inclusion of a microbial muramidase (MUR) in the diets of broiler chickens on the growth performance, intestinal permeability (IP), total blood carotenoid content, apparent ileal digestibility (AID), and foot pad dermatitis (FPD). In Experiment 1, a total of 1,000 one-day-old chicks were placed in floor-pens with reused litter, and randomly distributed into 4 treatments with 10 replicates each. Treatments were a basal diet (control), or basal diet supplemented with 15,000; 25,000 or 35,000 LSU (F)/kg of MUR. Feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were evaluated at d 21 and 43. Intestinal permeability was evaluated on d 35 by FITC-d, and FPD and AID on d 43. In Experiment 2, a total of 800 one-day-old chicks were placed in floor-pens with fresh litter, and randomly distributed into 4 treatments with 8 replicates each. Treatments were a basal diet (control), or basal diet supplemented with 25,000 or 35,000 LSU (F)/kg of MUR, and a fourth group where the basal diet was supplemented with enramycin. The birds were induced to a mild intestinal challenge. Feed intake, BWG, and FCR were evaluated on d 21 and d 42, and total blood concentration of carotenoids was evaluated on d 28. In experiment 1, 35,000 LSU (F)/kg of MUR promoted the best FCR (P < 0.05). Muramidase supplementation linearly increased the AID of dry matter, ash, and fat (P < 0.01), and regardless of the dose, MUR decreased the IP (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, the supplementation of 35,000 LSU (F)/kg of MUR improved BWG and FCR in the entire cycle (1-42 d) and increased the concentration of carotenoids in the blood on d 28 compared to the control group (P < 0.05). These studies show that MUR improves growth performance of broilers by improving intestinal permeability, digestibility of dry matter, ash and fat, absorption of carotenoids, and reducing FPD.

The effect of benzoic acid with or without a direct-fed microbial on the nutrient metabolism and gas emissions of growing pigs.

Twenty-four gilts (PIC 337 × 1050, PIC Genus, Hendersonville, TN) with an initial body weight (BW) of 33.09 ± 1.33 kg were used to investigate the effects of benzoic acid (BA) and a Bacillus-based direct-fed microbial (DFM) on the nutrient metabolism and manure gas emissions of growing pigs. Pigs were blocked by BW, placed into metabolism stalls, and randomly assigned to one of four dietary treatments: basal control (PC), low nitrogen (NC), PC plus 0.3% BA (PC+BA; VevoVitall, DSM Nutritional Products), and PC plus 0.3% BA and 0.025% DFM (PC+BA+DFM; PureGro, DSM Nutritional Products). Pigs were fed a common diet from day 0 to 14, and the experimental diets were fed in two phases (day 14 to 28 and day 28 to 53). The experiment consisted of four collection periods, with each period subdivided into two subperiods to collect samples for gas emissions and nutrient balance. Firstly, manure samples were collected for 72 h. Twice daily, urine and feces were weighed, and urine pH was measured. After each period, manure was subsampled and taken to the lab to measure gas emissions. Secondly, urine and feces were quantitatively collected for 96 h to allow for measurement of nutrient digestibility (ATTD) and retention. Data were analyzed as repeated measures in SAS 9.4 (SAS Inst., Cary, NC) with fixed effects of treatment, collection period, and block. Pig was the experimental unit, and results were considered significant at P ≤ 0.05 and a tendency at 0.05 < P ≤ 0.10. Pigs fed PC+BA had the greatest ADG compared to pigs fed NC (P = 0.016), with intermediate ADG for pigs fed PC or PC+BA+DFM (P ≥ 0.148). The ATTD of dry matter, gross energy, P, and N did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.093). However, the ATTD of Ca was reduced in pigs fed PC+BA+DFM compared to pigs fed PC+BA (P = 0.012). Pigs fed PC+BA or NC excreted less urinary N compared to PC and PC+BA+DFM (P ≤ 0.034), which contributed to greater nitrogen retention in PC+BA compared to PC (P = 0.016). Furthermore, decreased manure pH from pigs fed PC+BA or NC resulted in lower ammonia (NH3) emissions compared to pigs fed PC+BA+DFM or PC. There was no effect of dietary treatment on manure hydrogen sulfide, methane, or carbon dioxide emissions. In conclusion, supplementing 0.3% BA improved N retention and reduced manure pH and NH3 emissions, similar to feeding pigs low N, but improved the ADG of pigs when compared to feeding a low N diet.

Diet formulation as a strategy to improve economic and nutritional efficiency may be combined with nonnutritive feed additives, such as organic acids, specifically benzoic acid, and direct-fed microbials, to further improve nutrient utilization in pigs. Therefore, the objective of this trial was to investigate the effect of supplementing benzoic acid with or without a direct-fed microbial on the nutrient metabolism and emissions of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, and methane from the manure of growing pigs. Feeding a diet containing 0.3% benzoic acid did not affect nutrient digestibility but reduced urinary nitrogen excretion, which resulted in improved nitrogen retention compared to the basal diet. Furthermore, benzoic acid reduced urine and manure pH, contributing to reduced manure ammonia emissions. However, supplementing the direct-fed microbial alongside benzoic acid attenuated these effects.