Optimal [18F]FDG PET/CT Cutoff for Pathologic Complete Response in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab in the PHERGain Trial.

The PHERGain trial investigated the potential of metabolic imaging to identify candidates for chemotherapy deescalation in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, invasive, operable breast cancer with at least 1 breast lesion evaluable by [18F]FDG PET/CT. [18F]FDG PET/CT responders were defined as patients with an SUVmax reduction (ΔSUVmax) of at least 40% in all of their target lesions after 2 cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab (HP) (with or without endocrine therapy). In total, 227 of 285 patients (80%) included in the HP arm showed a predefined metabolic response and received a total of 8 cycles of HP (with or without endocrine therapy). Pathologic complete response (pCR), defined as ypT0/isN0, was achieved in 37.9% of the patients. Here, we describe the secondary preplanned analysis of the best cutoff of ΔSUVmax for pCR prediction. Methods: Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was applied to look for the most appropriate ΔSUVmax cutoff in HER2-positive early breast cancer patients treated exclusively with neoadjuvant HP (with or without endocrine therapy). Results: The ΔSUVmax capability of predicting pCR in terms of the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was 72.1% (95% CI, 65.1-79.2%). The optimal ΔSUVmax cutoff was found to be 77.0%, with a 51.2% sensitivity and a 78.7% specificity. With this cutoff, 74 of 285 patients (26%) would be classified as metabolic responders, increasing the pCR rate from 37.9% (cutoff ≥ 40%) to 59.5% (44/74 patients) (P < 0.01). With this optimized cutoff, 44 of 285 patients (15.4%) would avoid chemotherapy in either the neoadjuvant or the adjuvant setting compared with 86 of 285 patients (30.2%) using the original cutoff (P < 0.001). Conclusion: In the PHERGain trial, an increased SUVmax cutoff (≥77%) after 2 cycles of exclusive HP (with or without endocrine therapy) achieves a pCR in the range of the control arm with chemotherapy plus HP (59.5% vs. 57.7%, respectively), further identifying a subgroup of patients with HER2-addicted tumors. However, the original cutoff (≥40%) maximizes the number of patients who could avoid chemotherapy.

3-year invasive disease-free survival with chemotherapy de-escalation using an 18F-FDG-PET-based, pathological complete response-adapted strategy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHERGain): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: PHERGain was designed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a chemotherapy-free treatment based on a dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). It used an 18fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET-based, pathological complete response (pCR)-adapted strategy. METHODS: PHERGain was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial that took place in 45 hospitals in seven European countries. It randomly allocated patients in a 1:4 ratio with centrally confirmed, HER2-positive, stage I-IIIA invasive, operable breast cancer with at least one PET-evaluable lesion to either group A, where patients received docetaxel (75 mg/m2, intravenous), carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/mL per min, intravenous), trastuzumab (600 mg fixed dose, subcutaneous), and pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose followed by 420 mg maintenance doses, intravenous; TCHP), or group B, where patients received trastuzumab and pertuzumab with or without endocrine therapy, every 3 weeks. Random allocation was stratified by hormone receptor status. Centrally reviewed PET was conducted at baseline and after two treatment cycles. Patients in group B were treated according to on-treatment PET results. Patients in group B who were PET-responders continued with trastuzumab and pertuzumab with or without endocrine therapy for six cycles, while PET-non-responders were switched to receive six cycles of TCHP. After surgery, patients in group B who were PET-responders who did not achieve a pCR received six cycles of TCHP, and all patients completed up to 18 cycles of trastuzumab and pertuzumab. The primary endpoints were pCR in patients who were group B PET-responders after two treatment cycles (the results for which have been reported previously) and 3-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) in patients in group B. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161353) and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between June 26, 2017, and April 24, 2019, a total of 356 patients were randomly allocated (71 patients in group A and 285 patients in group B), and 63 (89%) and 267 (94%) patients proceeded to surgery in groups A and B, respectively. At this second analysis (data cutoff: Nov 4, 2022), the median duration of follow-up was 43·3 months (range 0·0-63·0). In group B, the 3-year iDFS rate was 94·8% (95% CI 91·4-97·1; p=0·001), meeting the primary endpoint. No new safety signals were identified. Treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events (SAEs) were numerically higher in patients allocated to group A than to group B (grade ≥3 62% vs 33%; SAEs 28% vs 14%). Group B PET-responders with pCR presented the lowest incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events (1%) without any SAEs. INTERPRETATION: Among HER2-positive EBC patients, a PET-based, pCR-adapted strategy was associated with an excellent 3-year iDFS. This strategy identified about a third of patients who had HER2-positive EBC who could safely omit chemotherapy. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Recaídas locorregionales tras mastectomías preservadoras y reconstrucción inmediata en mujeres con cáncer de mama / Locoregional relapse after sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction in women with breast cancer

Introducción: Durante los últimos años, los cambios culturales de la sociedad actual y la mejora en la valoración del riesgo han incrementado la indicación de las mastectomías en mujeres con cáncer de mama. Diversos estudios han confirmado la seguridad oncológica de la mastectomías preservadoras y reconstrucción inmediata. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar la incidencia de recaídas locorregionales de este procedimiento y su impacto en la reconstrucción y la supervivencia global. Pacientes y métodos: Estudio prospectivo de pacientes con un carcinoma de mama que realizaron una mastectomía preservadora y reconstrucción inmediata. Se analizaron las recaídas locorregionales, el tratamiento de las mismas y la capacidad de preservar la reconstrucción, así como su impacto en la supervivencia. Resultados: El grupo a estudio lo constituyen 271 mujeres con carcinoma mamario tratadas mediante una mastectomía ahorradora de piel y reconstrucción inmediata. El seguimiento medio fue de 7,98 años y durante el mismo se diagnosticaron 18 recaídas locorregionales (6,6%): 72,2% en el colgajo de la mastectomía y 27,8% ganglionares. No se evidenciaron diferencias significativas en las características patológicas del tumor primario entre las pacientes con y sin una recaída locorregional, aunque el porcentaje de mujeres con tumores hormonosensibles fue superior en el grupo sin recaída. Las pacientes con recaída ganglionar presentaban tumores de mayor tamaño (el 80% T2-T3) y el 60% tenían metástasis axilares al diagnóstico vs. 7,7% de las mujeres con recaída en piel (p = 0,047). Todas las pacientes intervenidas de una recaída locorregional preservaron su reconstrucción. La incidencia de metástasis y muertes fue significativamente mayor en las pacientes con una recaída, causando una disminución no significativa de la supervivencia global. (AU)

Introduction: In recent years, cultural changes in today's society and improved risk assessment have increased the indication for mastectomies in women with breast cancer. Various studies have confirmed the oncological safety of sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. The objective of this study is to analyze the incidence of locoregional relapses of this procedure and its impact on reconstruction and overall survival. Patients and methods: Prospective study of patients with breast carcinoma who underwent a sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Locoregional relapses and their treatment and their impact on survival were analyzed. Results: The study group is made up of 271 women with breast carcinoma treated with a skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 7.98 years and during the same 18 locoregional relapses (6.6%) were diagnosed: 72.2% in the mastectomy flap and 27.8% lymph node. There were no significant differences in the pathological characteristics of the primary tumor between patients with and without locoregional relapse, although the percentage of women with hormone-sensitive tumors was higher in the group without relapse. Patients with lymph node relapse had larger tumors (80% T2–T3) and 60% had axillary metastases at diagnosis, compared to 7.7% of women with skin relapse (p = 0.047). All patients operated on for locoregional relapse preserved their reconstruction. The incidence of metastases and deaths was significantly higher in patients with a relapse, causing a non-significant decrease in overall survival. (AU)

Locoregional relapse after sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction in women with breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, cultural changes in today's society and improved risk assessment have increased the indication for mastectomies in women with breast cancer. Various studies have confirmed the oncological safety of sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction. The objective of this study is to analyze the incidence of locoregional relapses of this procedure and its impact on reconstruction and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective study of patients with breast carcinoma who underwent a sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Locoregional relapses and their treatment and their impact on survival were analyzed. RESULTS: The study group is made up of 271 women with breast carcinoma treated with a skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 7.98 years and during the same 18 locoregional relapses (6.6%) were diagnosed: 72.2% in the mastectomy flap and 27.8% lymph node. There were no significant differences in the pathological characteristics of the primary tumor between patients with and without locoregional relapse, although the percentage of women with hormone-sensitive tumors was higher in the group without relapse. Patients with lymph node relapse had larger tumors (80% T2-T3) and 60% had axillary metastases at diagnosis, compared to 7.7% of women with skin relapse (p = 0.047). All patients operated on for locoregional relapse preserved their reconstruction. The incidence of metastases and deaths was significantly higher in patients with a relapse, causing a non-significant decrease in overall survival. CONCLUSION: Locoregional relapses are a rare event in women with a sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Most patients with locoregional relapse can preserve their initial reconstruction through local resection of the tumor and adjuvant and / or neoadjuvant therapies.

Results of the implementation of a pharmacogenomics platform based on NGS technologies. Combining clinical and research approaches.

OBJECTIVE: As more genes are incorporated into pharmacogenomic care  processes and more importance is given to rare variants, the use of targeted  capture sequencing panels has been proposed as a very efficient alternative  due to their affordability, high throughput, and deep coverage, all of them  characteristics of high-quality next-generation sequencing data. The purpose of  this study is to describe the prevalence of clinically actionable  pharmacogenetic variants previously described in the scientific literature, as  well as that of new variants identified by next-generation sequencing  technologies, and to evaluate the drugs potentially affected by such variants. METHOD: A panel of 18 clinically actionable pharmacogenomics-related genes  was evaluated in 41 subjects diagnosed with breast cancer undergoing  neoadjuvant treatment. The prevalence of previously descri- bed clinically  actionable variants as well as of phenotypes classified according to current  interpretation standards was studied. The pharmacological treatments  potentially affected by the identified variants were also evaluated. An  estimation was made of the prevalence of not previously described, possibly  deleterious, variants selected using bioinformatics criteria. RESULTS: All subjects carried clinically actionable variants, with a mean of 4.02  genes affected by each variant per individual. VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP2C19,  CYP2D6 and CYP2B6 were the most polymorphic genes and were present with  actionable phenotypes in more than 50% of patients; 15-50% had actionable  phonotypes in UGT1A1, SLCO1B1, CYP2C9 and TPMT and 2-15% in HLA-B,  CYP3A5, HLA-A and DPYD. No actionable variants were identified in RYR1,  CACNA1S, G6PD, F5 and NUDT15. These variants had the potential to affect  response to 84% of the drugs described in the leading pharmacogenetic  guidelines. Possibly deleterious variants not previously described accounted for  11.4% of all clinically actionable variants and were present in 12.2% of  patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show a high prevalence of clinically actionable variants, both common, i.e., previously described in the  literature, and rare, i.e., not previously studied with conventional technological  approaches. The latter are candidates for a more exhaustive  molecular and/or clinical characterization.

OBJETIVO: A medida que se incorporan más genes a los procesos  farmacogenómicos asistenciales y se otorga más importancia a las variantes raras, el uso de paneles de secuenciación dirigida por captura se ha  propuesto como una alternativa muy eficiente atendiendo a sus costes, su  rendimiento y la cobertura profunda, característica de los datos de  secuenciación de nueva generación de alta calidad. El objeto de este trabajo es  describir la prevalencia de variantes farmacogenéticas clínicamente  procesables descritas previamente en la literatura científica, así como de  nuevas variantes identificadas mediante tecnologías de secuenciación de nueva  generación y evaluar los fármacos potencialmente afectados por estas  variantes.Método: Se evaluó un panel de 18 genes relacionados con la  farmacogenómica clínicamente procesables en 41 individuos con diagnóstico de  cáncer de mama que van a recibir tratamiento adyuvante y neoadyuvante.  Se estudió  la literatura científica, así como de los fenotipos farmacogenéticos  clasificados según los estándares de interpretación actuales. Asimismo, se  evaluaron los tratamientos farmacológicos potencialmente afectados por las  variantes identificadas. Se estimó la prevalencia de variantes posiblemente  deletéreas no descritas previamente seleccionadas con criterios  bioinformáticos. RESULTADOS: Todos los individuos fueron portadores de variantes clínicamente procesables, con una media de 4,02 genes afectados por alguna variante por individuo. Los genes VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 y CYP2B6 fueron los más polimórficos, con más de un 50% de  pacientes con fenotipos procesables; un 15-50% en UGT1A1, SLCO1B1,  CYP2C9 y TPMT y un 2-15% HLA-B, CYP3A5, HLA-A y DPYD. No se  identificaron variantes procesables en RYR1, CACNA1S, G6PD, F5 y NUDT15.  Estas variantes afectarían a la respuesta de un 84% de los fármacos descritos  en las principales guías de farmacogenética. Las variantes posiblemente  deletéreas no descritas previamente supusieron un 11,4% del total de  variantes clínicamente procesables y están presentes en un 12,2% de los  pacientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los resultados obtenidos constatan una alta prevalencia de  variantes clínicamente procesables tanto comunes, previamente descritas en la  literatura, como raras, no estudiadas con abordajes tecnológicos convencionales y candidatas a una caracterización molecular y/o  clínica más exhaustiva.

Combining Wire Localization of Clipped Nodes with Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The ideal technique for lymph node staging for patients with pathologically confirmed node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the feasibility of wire/clip localization and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for the axillary staging of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which lymph node staging was performed using wire localization of positive lymph nodes and an SLNB with dual tracer. All patients who presented no metastatic involvement of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) or clip/wire-marked lymph node were spared an axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The multidisciplinary committee agreed on axillary treatment for patients with lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Forty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. We identified and extirpated the clip/wire-marked node in all patients (100%), with SLNB performed successfully in 95.3% of patients. The SLN and wire-marked node matched in 80% of patients; 73.8% of patients did not undergo ALND. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Several studies have evaluated the efficacy of various procedures for lymph node marking for women with prechemotherapy lymph node involvement. Most of the studies reported high identification rates (> 94.8%), with false negative rates of < 7%. Similarly, our study allows us to conclude that combined axillary marking (clip and SLNB) in patients with metastatic lymph node at diagnosis and NAC offers a high identification rate (100%) and a high correlation between the wire-marked lymph node and the SLN (80%). This procedure has enabled the suppression of ALND for a significant number of patients (73%).

Resultados de implementación de una plataforma farmacogenómica basada en tecnologías NGS. Combinación de abordajes asistencial y de investigación / Results of the implementation of a pharmacogenomics platform based on NGS technologies. Combining clinical and research approaches

Objetivo: A medida que se incorporan más genes a los procesos farmacogenómicos asistenciales y se otorga más importancia a las variantesraras, el uso de paneles de secuenciación dirigida por captura se ha propuesto como una alternativa muy eficiente atendiendo a sus costes, su rendimiento y la cobertura profunda, característica de los datos de secuenciaciónde nueva generación de alta calidad. El objeto de este trabajo es describirla prevalencia de variantes farmacogenéticas clínicamente procesables descritas previamente en la literatura científica, así como de nuevas variantesidentificadas mediante tecnologías de secuenciación de nueva generacióny evaluar los fármacos potencialmente afectados por estas variantes.Método: Se evaluó un panel de 18 genes relacionados con la farmacogenómica clínicamente procesables en 41 individuos con diagnóstico de cáncerde mama que van a recibir tratamiento adyuvante y neoadyuvante. Se estudió la prevalencia de variantes clínicamente procesables previamente descritas enla literatura científica, así como de los fenotipos farmacogenéticos clasificadossegún los estándares de interpretación actuales. Asimismo, se evaluaron lostratamientos farmacológicos potencialmente afectados por las variantes identificadas. Se estimó la prevalencia de variantes posiblemente deletéreas nodescritas previamente seleccionadas con criterios bioinformáticos. (AU)

Objective: As more genes are incorporated into pharmacogenomiccare processes and more importance is given to rare variants, the use oftargeted capture sequencing panels has been proposed as a very efficient alternative due to their affordability, high throughput, and deep coverage, all of them characteristics of high-quality next-generation sequencingdata. The purpose of this study is to describe the prevalence of clinicallyactionable pharmacogenetic variants previously described in the scientificliterature, as well as that of new variants identified by next-generationsequencing technologies, and to evaluate the drugs potentially affectedby such variants.Method: A panel of 18 clinically actionable pharmacogenomics-related genes was evaluated in 41 subjects diagnosed with breast cancerundergoing neoadjuvant treatment. The prevalence of previously described clinically actionable variants as well as of phenotypes classifiedaccording to current interpretation standards was studied. The pharmacological treatments potentially affected by the identified variants were alsoevaluated. An estimation was made of the prevalence of not previouslydescribed, possibly deleterious, variants selected using bioinformaticscriteria. (AU)

Repercusión de los criterios ACOSOG Z0011 sobre la indicación de la linfadenectomía axilar y el control locorregional en mujeres con ganglio centinela metastásico. Resultados preliminares tras cuatro años de aplicación clínica / Repercussion of the ACOSOG-Z0011 criteria for the indication of axillary lymph node dissection and locoregional control in women with metastatic sentinel lymph node. Preliminary results after four years of clinical application

Objetivo. Evaluar los cambios en la indicación de la linfadenectomía axilar (LA), su eficacia para eliminar enfermedad residual y control locorregional, tras la adopción de los criterios del estudio ACOSOG Z0011. Pacientes y método. Estudio observacional retrospectivo en mujeres con carcinoma infiltrante de mama tratadas quirúrgicamente, entre febrero 2010 y mayo de 2014. Todas las pacientes fueron valoradas según los criterios del ensayo clínico ACOSOG Z0011 para el manejo del ganglio centinela (GC) metastatizado. Resultados. Un total de 118 enfermas presentaron afectación del GC, y de ellas 53 (44,92% de las pacientes con GC metastásico) evitaron la LA por la aplicación de los criterios ACOSOG Z0011. La mayoría de estas mujeres (73,58%) presentaron afectación micrometastásica del GC. El grupo de enfermas con mayor beneficio fueron las pacientes con conservación mamaria, ya que el 58,23% de estas enfermas evitaron la LA. Se realizaron un total de 65 LA por afectación metastásica del GC sin que se evidenciase metástasis en la grasa axilar en 37 (55,2%) pacientes. Conclusiones. La adopción de los criterios ACOSOG Z0011 permite disminuir la indicación de la LA, especialmente en aquellas mujeres sometidas a un procedimiento conservador. A pesar de la introducción de estos criterios, existe un grupo significativo de mujeres (55%) en quienes la LA no demuestra afectación ganglionar de la grasa axilar y no obtienen ningún beneficio con la misma (AU)

Objective. To evaluate changes in the indication of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), its effectiveness in eliminating residual disease, and locoregional control after the adoption of the ACOSOG Z0011 study criteria. Patients and methods. Retrospective study in women with invasive breast cancer treated surgically from February 2010 to May 2014. All women were evaluated according to the ACOSOG-Z0011 trial criteria for the management of metastasized sentinel lymph node (SLN). Results. A total of 118 women had SLN involvement. Application of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria avoided ALND in 53 of the 118 patients (44.92% of the patients with metastatic SLN), most of them (73.58%) with micrometastases. The benefit was greater in women undergoing conservative surgery, because 58.23% of these women avoided ALND. A total of 65 ALND were performed for metastatic SLN, of which 37 (55.2%) showed no involvement of axillary fat. Conclusions. Adoption of the ACOSOG Z0011 criteria decreases the indication of ALND, especially in women undergoing conservative surgery. Despite the introduction of these criteria, there is a significant percentage of women (55%) in whom ALND shows no lymph node involvement in axillary fat and produces no benefit (AU)

Evaluación de un programa de reconstrucción mamaria inmediata mediante expansión-prótesis en mujeres con cáncer de mama / Evaluation of an immediate tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction program in women with breast cancer

Introducción. La reconstrucción mamaria inmediata mediante expansor-prótesis constituye una alternativa en la cirugía del cáncer de mama que precisa mastectomía. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el impacto asistencial de este procedimiento y su eficacia para la reconstrucción mamaria. Pacientes y método. El grupo a estudio fueron pacientes intervenidas quirúrgicamente de cáncer de mama, por un mismo cirujano, entre enero de 2009 y diciembre de 2012, y a quienes se realizó mastectomía y reconstrucción inmediata con expansor-prótesis. Se excluyeron todas aquellas pacientes con reconstrucción diferida o autóloga, así como a las que se realizó mastectomía profiláctica. Las variables analizadas fueron: edad, tiempo quirúrgico, estancia hospitalaria, retraso en el inicio de quimioterapia, complicaciones, reintervenciones, características histopatológicas del tumor y afectación ganglionar, comparándose, mediante un estudio prospectivo no aleatorizado, con un grupo control, constituido por pacientes intervenidas mediante una cirugía conservadora o mastectomía sin reconstrucción. Resultados. Se incluyeron 69 pacientes en el grupo a estudio y 312 pacientes en el grupo control. El análisis comparativo entre el grupo a estudio y control no mostró diferencias significativas en las demoras asistenciales, el inicio del tratamiento adyuvante y las complicaciones postoperatorias, aunque sí en el tiempo quirúrgico y la estancia hospitalaria. Un total de 61 pacientes (88,4%) finalizaron la expansión y 53 (76,8%) acabaron con éxito su reconstrucción mamaria. El análisis por grupos de tratamiento demostró que el mayor éxito del procedimiento se consiguió en las pacientes sin tratamientos adyuvantes (100%), mientras que las pacientes con tratamiento quimioterápico y radioterápico presentaron la menor tasa de éxito (80%). Conclusión. La reconstrucción mamaria inmediata mediante expansor-prótesis es un procedimiento que precisa mayor tiempo quirúrgico y estancia hospitalaria respecto a otras técnicas oncológicas de la mama. La mayoría de las pacientes culminarán con éxito el proceso reconstructivo, aunque existirá una mayor tasa de fracaso en las pacientes irradiadas

Introduction. Immediate breast reconstruction with an expander-implant is an alternative in breast cancer surgery in patients requiring mastectomy. The objective of this study was to analyze the welfare impact of this procedure and its effectiveness in breast reconstruction. Patients and method. The study group consisted of patients treated for breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with an expander-implant. All patients were treated by a single surgeon between January 2009 and December 2012. We excluded all patients with delayed or autologous reconstruction and prophylactic mastectomy. The variables analyzed were age, operating time, length of hospital stay, delayed initiation of chemotherapy, complications, reoperations, histopathologic features of the tumor, and lymph node involvement. These variables were compared in a prospective non-randomized study with those in a control group consisting of patients who underwent conservative surgery or mastectomy without reconstruction. Results. There were 69 patients in the study group and 312 patients in the control group. Comparison between the study and the control group showed no significant differences in healthcare delays, the start of adjuvant therapy, or postoperative complications, but differences were found in operating time and length of hospital stay. Expansion was completed in 61 patients (88.4%) and breast reconstruction in 53 (76.8%). Analysis by treatment groups showed that greater procedural success was achieved in patients without adjuvant treatments (100%), while patients with chemotherapy and radiotherapy had the lowest success rate (80%). Conclusion. Immediate breast reconstruction with an expander-implant requires longer operating time and hospital stay than other techniques in breast oncology. Most patients will successfully complete the reconstructive process, but the failure rate will be higher in irradiated patients

Propuesta de una nueva estrategia terapéutica multidisciplinar en la mujer con cáncer de mama y afectación del ganglio centinela / Proposal for a new multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy in the breast cancer patient with sentinel lymph node metastasis

La biopsia de ganglio centinela (GC) es la técnica de elección para el estudio de extensión de la axila en la mujer con cáncer de mama sin afectación ganglionar. Por el contrario, la linfadenectomía axilar (LA) constituye el procedimiento idóneo para las pacientes con afectación metastásica del GC. Durante los últimos años diferentes estudios han sugerido que algunas pacientes con afectación del GC pueden ser tratadas sin LA. Este artículo expone la revisión bibliográfica realizada por nuestro grupo multidisciplinar y su estrategia para la supresión de la LA en mujeres con afectación metastásica del GC. En esta nueva estrategia la LA no se llevaría a cabo en mujeres con tumores T1, con afectación de 1-2 GC e intervenidas mediante una técnica quirúrgica conservadora. Por el contrario, se indicaría la LA en aquellas pacientes con tres o más GC afectados, invasión extracapsular del GC, mujeres mastectomizadas y tumores del subtipo triple negativo o HER2+ que no reciban tratamiento biológico con anticuerpos (AU)

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard of practice for assessing axillary spread inclinically node-negative breast cancer patients. On the other hand, axillary lymph no dedissection (ALND) is the ideal procedure for patients with SLN metastasis. Different studies over the last few years have suggested that some patients with positive SLN can be treated without ALND. This article presents a literature review carried out by our multidisciplinary group and its strategy for avoiding routine ALND in women with SLN metastases. In this new strategy ALND should not be performed on women with T1 tumours, with 1-2 positive SLN and undergoing breast conservative surgery. On the other hand, ALND would be indicated in those patients with three or more positive SLN, presence of extracapsular invasion, mastectomised women and triple negative subtype or HER2+ tumours that have not received biological treatment with antibodies (AU)

[Proposal for a new multidisciplinary therapeutic strategy in the breast cancer patient with sentinel lymph node metastasis]. / Propuesta de una nueva estrategia terapéutica multidisciplinar en la mujer con cáncer de mama y afectación del ganglio centinela.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is the standard of practice for assessing axillary spread in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. On the other hand, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is the ideal procedure for patients with SLN metastasis. Different studies over the last few years have suggested that some patients with positive SLN can be treated without ALND. This article presents a literature review carried out by our multidisciplinary group and its strategy for avoiding routine ALND in women with SLN metastases. In this new strategy ALND should not be performed on women with T1 tumours, with 1-2 positive SLN and undergoing breast conservative surgery. On the other hand, ALND would be indicated in those patients with three or more positive SLN, presence of extracapsular invasion, mastectomised women and triple negative subtype or HER2+ tumours that have not received biological treatment with antibodies.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer have a wide number of treatment options, including medical, surgical, and supportive care measures. Treatment decisions are based in predictive and prognostic factors and the informed choice of the patients. SEOM has elaborated these guidelines with evidence-based recommendations for the diagnostic work-up, treatment (chemotherapy, endocrine therapy and targeted therapies) and supportive care for the management of these patients.