Prognostic factors in neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional study by the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prognostic factors associated with survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant treatment [chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or chemotherapy] followed by surgery (CRTS) in patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of 118 patients diagnosed with stage T1-T3N2M0 NSCLC and treated with CRTS at 14 hospitals in Spain between January 2005 and December 2014. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: Surgery consisted of lobectomy (74.5% of cases), pneumectomy (17.8%), or bilobectomy (7.6%). Neoadjuvant treatment was CRT in 62 patients (52.5%) and chemotherapy alone in 56 patients (47.5%). Median follow-up was 42.5 months (5-128 months). 5-year OS and PFS were 51.1% and 49.4%, respectively. The following variables were independently associated with worse OS and PFS: pneumonectomy (vs. lobectomy); advanced pathologic T stage (pT3 vs. pT0-pT2); and presence of persistent N2 disease (vs. ypN0-1) in the surgical specimen. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients with stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treated with CRTS, 5-year survival (both OS and PFS) was approximately 50%. After CRTS, the patients with the best prognosis were those whose primary tumour and/or mediastinal nodal metastases were downstaged after induction therapy and those who underwent lobectomy. These findings provide further support for neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery in selected patients.

Neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery versus definitive chemoradiation in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: A multi-institutional study by the oncologic group for the study of lung cancer (Spanish Radiation Oncology Society).

OBJECTIVES: The role of surgery in stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is an actively debated in oncology. To evaluate the value of surgery in this patient population, we conducted a multi-institutional retrospective study comparing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy plus surgery (CRTS) to definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 247 patients with potentially resectable stage T1-T3N2M0 NSCLC treated with either CRTS or dCRT between January 2005 and December 2014 at 15 hospitals in Spain were identified. A centralized review was performed to ensure resectability. A propensity score matched analysis was carried out to balance patient and tumor characteristics (n = 78 per group). RESULTS: Of the 247 patients, 118 were treated with CRTS and 129 with dCRT. In the CRTS group, 62 patients (52.5%) received neoadjuvant CRT and 56 (47.4%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery consisted of either lobectomy (97 patients; 82.2%) or pneumonectomy (21 patients; 17.8%). In the matched samples, median overall survival (OS; 56 vs 29 months, log-rank p = .002) and progression-free survival (PFS; 46 vs 15 months, log-rank p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the CRTS group. This survival advantage for CRTS was maintained in the subset comparison between the lobectomy subgroup versus dCRT (OS: 57 vs 29 months, p < 0.001; PFS: 46 vs 15 months, p < 0.001), but not in the comparison between the pneumonectomy subgroup and dCRT. CONCLUSION: The findings reported here indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery (preferably lobectomy) yields better OS and PFS than definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC.

Dolor irruptivo oncológico inducido por radioterapia: ¿es posible optimizar su tratamiento? / Radiotherapy-induced breakthrough cancer pain: is it possible to optimize its treatment?

Introducción: en el contexto de la radioterapia, el control del dolor irruptivo oncológico (DIO) supone un reto especial. El DIO ha sido definido por la Sociedad Española del Dolor (SED), la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) y la Sociedad Española de Cuidados Paliativos (SECPAL) como una exacerbación del dolor súbita y transitoria, de gran intensidad (EVA > 7) y de corta duración (inferior a 20-30 minutos), que aparece sobre la base de un dolor persistente estable cuando este se encuentra reducido a un nivel tolerable (EVA < 5) mediante el uso de opioides mayores. Objetivos: el objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar la intensidad del DIO inducido por tratamientos oncológicos que incluyeran radioterapia (RT), tanto exclusiva como asociada a quimioterapia (RT/QT). Secundariamente, se evaluó la eficacia del tratamiento con fentanilo sublingual pautado para el control del DIO. Material y métodos: estudio observacional retrospectivo realizado en 110 pacientes reclutados en 19 Servicios de Radioterapia españoles. Los pacientes debían presentar DIO inducido por RT o RT/QT, con o sin medicación pautada y cuya intensidad fuera de una EVA > 6 en las últimas 24-48 h. Se establecieron controles en el momento basal, y a los 3, 7, 15 y 30 días. Resultados: se apreció un descenso en la media de los valores en la escala EVA según avanzó el estudio (EVA = 6 en el control 0 a EVA = 3 en el control 3), y las diferencias fueron significativas (p < 0,0001). La satisfacción con el tratamiento fue calificada como buena o excelente por el 85,3% de los pacientes y por el 92,7% de los investigadores. Conclusiones: los resultados de este estudio demuestran la eficacia del tratamiento del DIO con fentanilo sublingual en el contexto del tratamiento oncológico radioterápico, con un descenso significativo en los valores EVA frente al valor basal. La elevada satisfacción de los médicos y pacientes con este tratamiento refleja la eficacia y la comodidad del fentanilo sublingual en el control del DIO (AU)

Introduction: In the context of radiotherapy, control of breakthrough cancer pain (BTPc) is particularly challenging. BTPc has been defined by the Spanish Society of Pain (SED), the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society for Palliative Care (SECPAL) as a sudden and transient exacerbation of pain of great intensity (VAS > 7) and short (less than 20-30 minutes), which appears on the basis of a stable persistent pain when it is reduced to a tolerable level (VAS < 5) by using major opioids. Objectives: The main objective of this study was to assess the intensity of BTPc induced by cancer treatments that included radiotherapy (RT), both exclusive and associated with chemotherapy (RT/CT). Secondly, the efficacy of treatment was evaluated with fentanyl sublingual scheduled for BTPc control. Material and methods: Retrospective, observational study in 110 patients recruited in 19 Spanish Radiotherapy Services. Patients must have BTPc induced by RT or RT/CT, with or without medication prescribed and with an intensity outside a VAS > 6 in the last 24-48 h. Controls were established at baseline and at 3, 7, 15 and 30 days. Results: There was a decrease in mean values on the VAS scale as the study progressed (VAS = 6 in the control 0 to VAS = 3 in the control 3) and the differences were significant (p < 0.0001). Treatment satisfaction was rated as good or excellent by 85.3% of patients and 92.7% of researches. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the efficacy of BTPc treatment with sublingual fentanyl in the context of the radiotherapy cancer treatment, with a significant decrease in VAS from baseline values . The high satisfaction among physicians and patients with this treatment reflects the efficacy and convenience of sublingual fentanyl in controlling BTPc (AU)