An exploration of the relationships between patient application of CBT skills and therapeutic outcomes during a two-week CBT treatment.

The application of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) skills are believed to be a mechanism of therapeutic change in treatment. Research has shown that the application of CBT skills affects outcomes, however, the way these relationships may change during treatment has not been explored. In this study, a naturalistic observational approach is used to examine the relationships between patients' wellbeing, symptoms, and the application of CBT skills throughout treatment. It is hypothesized that the application of CBT skills would lead to an increase in patients reported wellbeing, and a decrease in symptoms. Additionally, it was hypothesized that the application of CBT skills affects wellbeing and symptoms at different points in therapy. A sample of 584 patients in a two-week CBT treatment completed session-to-session measures of wellbeing, symptoms, and their application of CBT skills. Results of an autoregressive cross-lagged path analysis indicated that in the early stages of treatment the application of CBT skills predicted patient wellbeing but not symptoms. At the later stages of therapy, the application of CBT skills predicted both patient wellbeing and symptoms. At no point in treatment did patient wellbeing or symptoms predict the later application of CBT skills. Implications and future directions for research are discussed.

Self-harm and self-regulation in urban ethnic minority youth: a pilot application of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Difficulties in coping with stress and regulating emotions are transdiagnostic risk factors for self-harming behavior. Due to sociocultural stressors, ethnic minority adolescents may be at greater risk for self-regulation difficulties and self-harm. Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) frames adaptive skill acquisition as a mechanism of change, but few studies have investigated its impact on ethnic minority adolescents' self-regulation (i.e. coping, emotion regulation). Therefore, this pilot study examined relations between self-regulation and self-harm among ethnic minority adolescents and investigated changes in their self-regulation upon completing DBT-A. METHODS: A clinically referred sample of 101 ethnic minority adolescents (Mage  = 14.77; female = 69.3%) completed questionnaires about a history of self-harm, coping (DBT Ways of Coping Checklist), and emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale). Of the initial sample, 51 adolescents (Mage  = 14.73; female = 80.4%) entered a 20-week DBT-A program due to self-harm and/or Borderline Personality features. RESULTS: In a pretreatment sample, the frequency of dysfunctional coping, but not of adaptive coping, differentiated self-injurers from non-self-injurers. Full information maximum likelihood estimation was used to address high attrition (60.8%) from DBT-A. Those who completed DBT-A (n = 20) reported significantly improved emotion regulation. Adaptive coping at pretreatment predicted increased DBT skills use at post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This non-randomized pilot study highlights dysfunctional coping and emotion dysregulation as risk factors for self-harm and suggests that 20-week DBT-A may help improve emotion regulation. Future research should employ a randomized design to further examine the effect of DBT-A on these transdiagnostic processes of psychopathology. KEY PRACTITIONER MESSAGE: Due to cultural and environmental stressors, ethnic minority adolescents may be at greater risk for developing self-regulatory difficulties - transdiagnostic mechanisms known to underly self-harming behaviors; however, we know little about whether empirically supported treatments for self-harm will improve youth's coping and emotion regulation. In a clinically referred, pretreatment sample of ethnic minority youth, levels of BPD symptomatology, emotion dysregulation, and dysfunctional coping, but not of adaptive coping, differentiated teens who self-harmed from those who did not. Self-harming ethnic minority youth who participated in an uncontrolled, pilot trial of dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) at an urban mental health clinic reported improved emotion regulation at post-treatment. Baseline emotion regulation skills were not predictive of treatment-related changes, suggesting that other factors, such as DBT-A, may have played a decisive role in improving teens' emotion regulation. In contrast, adaptive coping skills at pretreatment were linked to increased DBT skills use at post-treatment, indicating that patients' baseline coping skills may play a predictive role in psychotherapy outcomes. Future research should employ a randomized control trial to examine the effect of DBT-A on vulnerable ethnic minority youth's development of self-regulation. It should also investigate the hypothesized mediating role of self-regulation in effecting lasting clinical gains.

Delivering cognitive behaviour therapy informed by a contemporary framework of psychotherapy treatment selection and adaptation.

Research into cognitive behaviour therapy can be viewed through a contemporary framework of psychotherapy delivery. This model divides psychotherapy decision-making into two phases: selection and adaptation. In the first, selection phase, clinicians consider the evidence-base of therapies for a clinical presentation and choose which to implement first. The second element of the contemporary framework of psychotherapy delivery is adaptation. Thus, psychotherapy research needs to go beyond a demonstration of the effectiveness of CBT to understanding the processes of psychotherapy.

Exposure to intimate partner violence, peer relations, and risk for internalizing behaviors: a prospective longitudinal study.

The present study examines the quality of peer relations as a mediator between exposure to IPV (intimate partner violence) and internalizing behaviors in a sample of 129 preadolescents and adolescents (ages 10-18), who were interviewed via telephone as part of a multigenerational, prospective, longitudinal study. Relational victimization is also examined as a moderator of IPV exposure on internalizing behaviors. Results demonstrate a significant association of exposure to severe IPV and internalizing behaviors. Relational victimization is found to moderate the effects of exposure to severe IPV on internalizing behaviors. The present findings suggest that the effects of exposure to IPV had a particularly important effect on the risk for internalizing problems if the adolescent also experienced relational victimization. Conversely, the receipt of prosocial behaviors buffer against the effects of IPV exposure on internalizing symptoms in teen girls.