Synthesis, photophysical properties, tumor uptake, and preliminary in vivo photosensitizing efficacy of a homologous series of 3-(1'-alkyloxy)ethyl-3-devinylpurpurin-18-N-alkylimides with variable lipophilicity.

Starting from methylpheophorbide-a, a homologous series of purpurinimides containing alkyl substituents at two different positions [as 3-(1(1)-O-alkyl) and 13(2)-N-alkyl] were synthesized. These compounds with variable lipophilicity (log P 5.32-16.44) exhibit long wavelength absorption near lambda(max)700 nm (epsilon: 45 000 in dichloromethane) with singlet oxygen ((1)O2) production in the range of 57-60%. The shifts in in vivo absorptions and tumor/skin uptake of these compounds were determined in C3H mice bearing RIF tumors by in vivo reflectance spectroscopy. The results obtained from a set of photosensitizers with similar lipophilicity (log P 10.68-10.88) indicate that besides the overall lipophilicity, the presence and position of the alkyl groups (O-alkyl vs N-alkyl) in a molecule play an important role in tumor uptake, tumor selectivity, and in vivo PDT efficacy. At present, all purpurinimide analogues are being evaluated at various doses, and experiments are underway to establish a quantitative structure-activity relationship on a limited set of compounds. The 1D and 2D NMR and mass spectrometry analyses confirmed the structures of the desired purpurinimides and the byproducts formed during various reaction conditions. The mechanisms of the formation of the unexpected 12-formyl- and 12-(hydroxymethyl)purpurinimides under certain reaction conditions are also discussed.

pH-dependent chalcogenopyrylium dyes as potential sensitizers for photodynamic therapy: selective retention in tumors by exploiting pH differences between tumor and normal tissue.

Ideal photosensitizers have long-wavelength absorption and strong tumor selectivity with rapid clearance from normal tissues. The telluroselenopyrylium dye 1 that absorbs light at 795 nm (epsilon = 285,000 M-1 cm-1) has a novel property that enhances the tumor specificity and normal tissue clearance. After intralesional injection to both tumors and surrounding skin, it disappeared from the normal skin of BALB/c mice faster than it did from subcutaneously implanted Colon 26 tumors, which resulted in therapeutic selectivity. In vivo reflectance spectroscopy showed that the half-life in tumor was about 50 min while in skin it was around 12 min. This phenomenon appears to be related to the pH differences in normal skin versus tumor, because the rates of drug hydrolysis in solution were shown to be sensitive to changes in pH. Inhibition of tumor regrowth following intratumoral photosensitizer administration depended on both light dose and drug dose, as well as the time interval between dye injection and irradiation; selectivity depended on the time interval. Although treatment parameters were not optimized efficacy was superior to systemic Photofrin under our standard conditions. We discuss how new, more optimal, photosensitizers can be designed that use rates of hydrolysis to exploit the differences in pH between normal tissue and tumor.

The anatomic site of photodynamic therapy is a determinant for immunosuppression in a murine model.

The role of the irradiation site in the induction of suppression of the contact hypersensitivity (CHS) response following photodynamic therapy (PDT) was examined in a murine model. Laser irradiation on the flanks of nontumor-bearing Photofrin-injected mice caused suppression of the CHS response. If the irradiation was conducted on a subcutaneously implanted foil disc on the flank no immunosuppression occurred, indicating that no suppressive factor(s) of sufficient quantity to cause suppression was released from the skin, but rather irradiation of internal organs was the cause. Irradiation of tumors implanted on the flanks of mice reduced the suppression, suggesting an immunopotentiating effect of PDT. Irradiation on the thigh in the presence or absence of a tumor gave no immunosuppression. These results suggest that the anatomic site of irradiation is one determinant for the elicitation of suppression of the CHS response.