[Home enteral nutrition in Spain: NADYA registry in 2010]. / Nutrición enteral domiciliaria en España: registro NADYA del año 2010.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results of the home enteral nutrition (HEN) registry of the NADYA-SENPE group in 2010. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrieved the data of the patients recorded from January 1st to December 31st 2010. RESULTS: We registered 6,591 patients (51% males) with 6,688 episodes of HEN, from 32 hospitals. Mean age in those younger than 14 yr (4%) was 1 ± 2 yrs (m ± SD) and 69,9 ± 17,8 yrs in those older than 14 yr. The length of HEN was longer than 2 yrs in 76% of the patients. The most frequent underlying disease was neurological disorders 42%, followed by cancer 28% (mostly head and neck cancer 18%). We had information related to the enteral access route in only 626 cases (9,4%), 51% of them used nasogastric tubes, 27% gastrostomies, 10% oral route and 3% jejunostomies. Only 251 episodes were closed during the year, mostly due to patient death 57% and progress to oral diet 14%. The activity level was limited in 29% of the patients and 39% of them were bed- or chairridden. Total or partial help was needed by 68% of the patients. The hospitals and the private pharmacies delivered the enteral formula in 63% and 34% of the cases, respectively. The hospitals and the primary care centres delivered the disposables in 83% and 16% of the cases, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the 2010 HEN registry are similar to those published in previous years regarding the number and characteristics of the patients. We continue finding problems in the entrance of data referred to the enteral access route and the closing of the episodes.

Nutrición enteral domiciliaria en España: registro NADYA del año 2010 / Home enteral nutrition in spain: NADYA registry in 2010

Objetivos: Describir los resultados del registro de nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED) del grupo NADYASENPE del año 2010.Material y métodos: Se recopilaron los datos introducidos en el registro desde el 1 de enero al 31 de diciembre de2010.Resultados: Se registraron 6.591 pacientes (51% varones) con 6.688 episodios de NED, procedentes de 32 hospitales. La edad media en los menores de 14 años (4%) fue de 1 ± 2 años (m ± DS) y de 69,9 ± 17,8 en los mayores de14 años. El 76% de los pacientes recibieron la NED por un tiempo superior a 2 años. La patología más prevalente fue la neurológica 42%, seguida de la neoplasia 28% (en su mayoría cáncer de cabeza y cuello 18%). La información referente a la vía de acceso sólo se recogió en 626 casos(9,4%), el 51% de los pacientes utilizaron sonda nasogástrica, 27% gastrostomías, 10% vía oral y 3% yeyunostomías. Sólo 251 episodios finalizaron a lo largo del año, siendo el motivo más frecuente el fallecimiento del paciente en el 57% de los casos y el paso a la alimentación oral en el 14%. El 29% de los pacientes presentaban una actividad limitada y el 39% estaba confinado en cama/sillón. El 68% de los adultos requerían ayuda total o parcial. El suministro del producto se realizó desde el hospital o la farmacia de referencia en el 63% y 34%, respectivamente. El suministro del material fungible se realizó desde el hospital o atención primaria en el 83% y 16%,respectivamente.Conclusiones: Los resultados obtenidos en el registro de NED del año 2010 muestran características muy similares a las recogidas en los años previos en cuanto al número y características de los pacientes registrados. Seguimos encontrando problemas en la recogida de datos relativos a la vía de acceso y finalización de los episodios (AU)

Objective: To describe the results of the home enteralnutrition (HEN) registry of the NADYA-SENPE group in2010.Material and methods: We retrieved the data of the patients recorded from January 1st to December 31st2010.Results:We registered 6,591 patients (51% males) with6,688 episodes of HEN, from 32 hospitals. Mean age in those younger than 14 yr (4%) was 1 ± 2 yrs (m ± SD) and69,9 ± 17,8 yrs in those older than 14 yr. The length of HEN was longer than 2 yrs in 76% of the patients. The most frequent underlying disease was neurological disorders 42%, followed by cancer 28% (mostly head and neck cancer 18%). We had information related to the enteral access route in only 626 cases (9,4%), 51% of them used nasogastric tubes, 27% gastrostomies, 10% oral route and 3% jejunostomies. Only 251 episodes were closed during the year, mostly due to patient death 57% and progress to oral diet 14%. The activity level was limited in29% of the patients and 39% of them were bed- or chair ridden. Total or partial help was needed by 68% of the patients. The hospitals and the private pharmacies delivered the enteral formula in 63% and 34% of the cases, respectively. The hospitals and the primary care centres delivered the disposables in 83% and16% of the cases, respectively. Conclusions: The results of the 2010 HEN registry are similar to those published in previous years regarding the number and characteristics of the patients. We continue finding problems in the entrance of data referred to the enteral access route and the closing of the episodes (AU)

[Spanish home enteral nutrition (HEN) registry of the year 2008 from the NADYA-SENPE group]. / Registro del Grupo NADYA-SENPE de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria en España en el año 2008.

AIM: To present the results of the Spanish home enteral nutrition (HEN) registry of the year 2008 from the NADYA-SENPE group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We recorded the HEN registry data from January 1st to December 31st 2008. RESULTS: The number of patients registered in this period was 6206 (51% male) with up to 6,279 episodes of HEN, from 31 Spanish hospitals. Most of the patients (95%) were older than 14 yr. Mean age was 4.83±3.29 yr in the children group, and 70.75±18.14 yr in the adult group (older than 14 yr). Neurological disorders (39%) and cancer (27%) were the two most prevalent diagnoses. The oral route was the most frequently used (43,4%), followed by nasogastric tube (40,4%), and gastrostomy tube (14,7%). Mean length of treatment was 305,36 days (10 months). The principal reasons for discontinuing treatment were death (43%) and progress to oral diet (40%). Only 33% of the patients had a normal activity level, being limited in different grades in the rest of the patients. Most of the patients required partial (25%) or total help (38%). The enteral formula was provided by the hospital in 65% of the cases and by private pharmacies in 32%. The disposables were provided by the hospital (82,4%) and primary care services (17,2%). CONCLUSIONS: The number and the age of the patients registered have increased comparing to previous years, with little variations in the rest of analyzed variables. The increase in the length of treatment could reflect misreporting of the weaning process in the registry.

[The Spanish Home Enteral Nutrition registry of the year 2009: from the NADYA-SENPE group]. / Registro español de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria del año 2009: Grupo NADYA-SENPE.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the Home Enteral Nutrition Characteristics (HEN) recorded by the group NADYA-SENPE during 2009. MATERIAL AND METHOD: collection and analysis of the data voluntary recorded in the HEN registry from the NADYA-SENPE group from January 1st to December 31st. RESULTS: 6.540 HEN patients were registered, 5.11% more than the previous year and 6,649 episodes (3,135 in women, 47,93%) from 32 different hospitals. 6,238 of them (95,38%) were over 14 years. The mean age of the patients under 14 yr was 3,67 ± 2,86 and it was 72,10 ± 16,89 in those over 14 yr group. The base illness registered more frequently was the neurological disorders in 2,732 (41,77%) patients, followed by cancer patients in 1,838; 28,10%. The enteral access route was registered in 1,123 (17,17%) of the episodes, being more frequent the administration by nasogastric tube 562 (50,04%). The mean length of nutritional treatment by episode was 323 days (10,77 months). 606 episodes of HEN ended, being the principal reasons for discontinuing treatment the patient death in 295 (48,68%) occasions. The transition to oral feeding occurred in 219 (36,14%) cases. Patients maintained normal activity in 2162 (32,55%) HEN episodes and 2,468 (37,13%) cases were living "bed-couch". The level of dependence was "total" in 2,598 (39,07%) of the episodes recorded. The nutritional formula was provided by the hospital in 4,183 (62,91%) cases and by the reference pharmacy in 2,262 (el 34,02%). Consumables were provided by the hospital in 3,531 (53,11%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The number of HEN patients recorded increased from the year 2008, continuing the gradual growth increase since the start of registration. The characteristics of the patients remain in the same profile as in previous years.

Registro de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria en España en el año 2007 / National registry of home enteral nutrition in Spain 2007

Objetivo: Comunicar los datos del registro nacional de nutrición enteral domiciliaria del grupo NADYA-SENPE de 2007. Material y métodos: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con nutrición enteral domiciliaria del registro del grupo NADYA entre el 1 de enero y el 31 de diciembre de 2007. Resultados: El número de pacientes con nutrición enteral domiciliaria durante 2007 fue de 5107 (52% varones) de 28 centros hospitalarios. El 95,4% tenían más de 14 años, con una edad media de 67,96 ± 18,12 años mientras en los menores de 15 años fue de 4,2 ± 3,38 años. Las patologías más prevalentes entre ellos fueron las neurológicas (37,8%) y las neoplásicas (29,3%). La vía de administración más empleada fue la oral (63,5%), seguida de sonda nasogástrica (25,9%), mientras la gastrostomía sólo se empleó en el 9,2%. La duración media de la nutrición enteral fue de 9,4 meses y las causas de finalización más frecuentes fueron el fallecimiento (58,77%) y el paso a ingesta oral (26,57%). La actividad estaba limitada en el 31,4% de los pacientes y realizaban vida cama-sillón el 36,01% y la mayoría de los pacientes precisaban ayuda parcial (26,51%) o total (37,68%). El suministro de la fórmula se hacía desde el hospital en el 69,14% de los casos y en las farmacias de referencia en el 30,17%, mientras que el material fungible se suministraba desde el hospital en el 81,63% y desde Atención Primaria en el resto. Conclusiones: Durante 2007, ha habido un incremento de más del 30% de pacientes con nutrición enteral domiciliaria registrados respecto a 2006, sin que esto haya supuesto grandes diferencias en el resto de datos, salvo el mayor aumento de los casos de nutrición enteral-oral (AU)

Objective: To communicate the results from the registry of Home-Based Enteral Nutrition of the NADYASENPE group in 2007. Material and methods: We included every patient in the registry with home enteral nutrition any time from January 1st to December 31st of 2007. Results: The number of patients with home enteral nutrition in 2007 was 5,107 (52% male) from 28 different hospitals. 95.4% of them were 15 yr or older, with a mean age of 67.96 ± 18.12, and 4.2 ± 3.38 among patients aged 14 yr or less. The most common underlying diseases were neurological (37.8%) and neoplastic diseases (29.3%). Enteral nutrition was administered p.o. in most patients (63.5%), followed by nasogastric tube (25.9%), while gastrostomy was only used in 9.2%. The mean time in enteral nutrition support was 9.4 months and the most common reasons for withdrawal were death (58.7%) and switching to oral intake (32%). Activity was limited in 31.4% of patients and 36.01% were house-bound. Most patients needed partial (26.51%) or total (37.68%) care assistance. Enteral formula was provided by hospitals to 69.14% of patients and by pharmacies to 30.17% of them, while disposable material was provided by hospitals to 81.63% and by Primary Care to the remaining patients. Conclusions: In 2007, there has been an increase of more than 30% of patients registered with home enteral nutrition comparing with 2006, without any big difference in other data, but a higher proportion of patients with enteral nutrition p.o (AU)

[National registry of home enteral nutrition in Spain 2007]. / Registro de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria en España en el año 2007.

OBJECTIVE: To communicate the results from the registry of Home-Based Enteral Nutrition of the NADYASENPE group in 2007. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included every patient in the registry with home enteral nutrition any time from January 1st to December 31st of 2007. RESULTS: The number of patients with home enteral nutrition in 2007 was 5,107 (52% male) from 28 different hospitals. 95.4% of them were 15 yr or older, with a mean age of 67.96 +/- 18.12, and 4.2 +/- 3.38 among patients aged 14 yr or less. The most common underlying diseases were neurological (37.8%) and neoplastic diseases (29.3%). Enteral nutrition was administered p.o. in most patients (63.5%), followed by nasogastric tube (25.9%), while gastrostomy was only used in 9.2%. The mean time in enteral nutrition support was 9.4 months and the most common reasons for withdrawal were death (58.7%) and switching to oral intake (32%). Activity was limited in 31.4% of patients and 36.01% were house-bound. Most patients needed partial (26.51%) or total (37.68%) care assistance. Enteral formula was provided by hospitals to 69.14% of patients and by pharmacies to 30.17% of them, while disposable material was provided by hospitals to 81.63% and by Primary Care to the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: In 2007, there has been an increase of more than 30% of patients registered with home enteral nutrition comparing with 2006, without any big difference in other data, but a higher proportion of patients with enteral nutrition p.o.

[Registry of home-based enteral nutrition in Spain for the year 2006 (NADYA-SENPE Group)]. / Registro de la Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria en España en el año 2006 (Grupo NADYA-SENPE).

OBJECTIVE: To communicate the results obtained from the registry of Home-Based Enteral Nutrition (HBEN) of the NADYA-SENPE group for the year 2006. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Recompilation of the data from the HBEN registry of the NADYA-SENPE group from January 1st to December 31st of 2006. RESULTS: During the year 2006, 3,921 patients (51% men) from 27 hospital centers were registered. Ninety-seven percent were older than 14 years. The mean age for those < 14 years was 4.9 +/- 3.9 (m +/- SD) and in those > or = 14 years, it was 68.5 +/- 18.2 years. The most common underlying disease was neurological pathology (42%), followed by cancer (28%). Enteral nutrition was administered p.o. in 44% of the patients, through nasogastric tube in 40%, gastrostomy in 14%, and jejunostomy in 1%. The average time of nutritional support was 8.8 months. The most common reasons for ending the therapy were patient's death (54%) and switching to oral feeding (32%). Thirty-one percent of the patients presented a limited activity and 40% were confined to bed/coach. Most of the patients required partial (25%) or total (43%) care assistance. The nutritional formula was provided by the hospital in 62% of the cases and from the reference pharmacy in 27%. The fungible material was provided by the hospital in 80% of the cases and by primary care in the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the number of registered patients is slightly higher than that from the last years, there are no important changes in the patients characteristics, or way of administration and duration of enteral nutrition.

[National registry of Home Enteral Nutrition in 2003]. / Registro nacional de la Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria del año 2003.

GOAL: To communicate the information available by the NADYA-SENPE Working Group from patients on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country during the year 2003. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included in the web site of the Working Group (www.nadya-senpe.com) available only by the authorized users. Variable included were: epidemiological information, the indication to prescribe this treatment, the access path, the specific nutritional formula used, the treatment duration, the complications and hospital readmission related to the nutritional treatment, the follow-up and the quality of life. RESULTS: We register 3,858 patients that belong to twenty-one hospitals. Mean age from those adults 66.2 +/- 18.9 years, and from those younger than 14, 6.0 +/- 4.3 years. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the diagnostics more frequents (38.9% and 37.4%, respectively). Oral nutrition was the preferential rout used for the enteral nutrition (54.7%) followed by naso-enteral tube (26.6%), and only in 17.6% we used ostomy tubes. Polymeric was the enteral formula mainly utilized (80.1%). The mean time on HEN was 6.6 +/- 4.3 months; the 28.8% of patients stayed in the treatment for less than 3 months, 21.2 % between 3 and 6 months, and 50.0% more than 6 months. Patients were followed mainly by Nutritional Support Unit from the reference hospital (73.1%). While the reference hospital supplies the material (62.4%), reference hospital pharmacy (46.8%) and public pharmacies (32.0%) provides the enteral formula. Complications related to enteral nutrition included change of enteral tube (44.5%), gastrointestinal complications (30.5%), mechanical complications (21.7%), and the metabolic one (3.3%). These complications were followed by 0.02 hospitalizations/patient. At the end of the year, 54.7% of patients were in the HEN programme, and in 35.2 % HEN was finish due to accept oral conventional alimentation (49.2%) or by deceased of patients (40.9%). While 26.6% of the patients were confined to bed or armchair, 19.7 % no or light discapacity degree was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found a persistence of these treatment in our country. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the more frequent diagnosis in patients analysed. The high prevalence of cancer patients could be the main cause of oral access for enteral nutrition. Change of enteral tube was the more frequent complication observed during this treatment.

Registro Nacional de la Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria del año 2003 / National registry of home enteral nutrition in 2003

OBJETIVO: Comunicar los resultados, correspondientes al año 2003, obtenidos del registro que sobre Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria (NED) realiza el grupo de Trabajo NADYA de la Sociedad Española de Nutrición Parenteral y Enteral (SENPE). MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Todos los datos del registro, introducidos por los miembros del grupo NADYA de las Unidades de Nutrición responsables de la atención de los pacientes con NED, se han recopilado y analizado. El registro "on-line" estaba disponible en la página web del grupo (www.nadya-senpe.com) para todos los usuarios autorizados. En él se han recogido los siguientes datos: epidemiológicos, de diagnóstico, vía de acceso, complicaciones, ingresos hospitalarios, grado de incapacidad y evolución al final del año en estudio. RESULTADOS: Se han registrado datos de 3.858 pacientes (53,1% varones y 46.9% hembras) pertenecientes a 21 centros hospitalarios. La edad media de los pacientes adultos fue de 66,2 ± 18,9 años; mientras que la de los pacientes menores de 14 años fue de 6,0 ± 4,3 años. Los diagnósticos que motivaron la indicación de NED fueron las enfermedades neurológicas (38,9%) y las enfermedades neoplásicas (37,4%), seguidas de un amplio abanico de otras enfermedades (enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, malnutrición, SIDA, etc). La vía oral fue la más utilizada (54,7%) seguida de la sonda nasoenteral (26,6%) y, en sólo el 17,6% de los casos se utilizó ostomía como vía de alimentación. La fórmula polimérica fue la más utilizada (80,1%). La duración media del tratamiento fue de 6,6 ± 4,3 meses; el 28,8% de los pacientes habían permanecido con NED por un periodo inferior a 3 meses; el 21,2% por un periodo entre 3 y 6 meses; el 50,0% más de 6 meses. El seguimiento del paciente fue mayoritariamente realizado desde el hospital de referencia (73,1%). El suministro de material fue proporcionado por el hospital de referencia en el 62,4% de los casos, mientras el suministro de la fórmula se repartió entre la farmacia del hospital de referencia (46,8%) y la farmacia no hospitalaria (32,0%). Se presentaron complicaciones relacionadas con el tratamiento nutritivo en 2.437 ocasiones. De ellas, el cambio de sonda, en el 44,5% fue la más frecuente, seguida de las complicaciones gastrointestinales (30,5%), las mecánicas (21,7%) y las metabólicas (3,3%). Estas complicaciones significaron 0,02 hospitalizaciones por paciente. Al finalizar el año, observamos que seguían en activo en el programa el 54,7% de los pacientes; mientras que en el 35,2% se había suspendido la NED y se dejaron de seguir por diversos motivos el 10,.1% de los pacientes. Las principales causas de retirada fueron por paso a dieta oral convencional (49,2%) y por éxitus en relación a la enfermedad de base (40,9%). En cuanto al grado de incapacidad, el 26,6% estaban confinados en silla o cama y el 19,7% no presentaba ningún grado de incapacidad o sólo una leve incapacidad social CONCLUSIONES: Observamos un mantenimiento en la tasa de registro de NED en España. Las causas principales de empleo de este tratamiento fueron la enfermedad neurológica y la enfermedad neoplásica muy distanciadas del resto de patologías. Persiste el elevado uso de la vía oral y el escaso empleo de las ostomías. De las complicaciones asociadas al tratamiento nutricional el cambio de sonda sigue siendo la complicación más frecuentemente observada (AU)

GOAL. To communicate the information available by the NADYA-SENPE Working Group from patients on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country during the year 2003. 
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included in the web site of the Working Group (www.nadya-senpe.com) available only by the authorized users. Variable included were: epidemiological information, the indication to prescribe this treatment, the access path, the specific nutritional formula used, the treatment duration, the complications and hospital readmission related to the nutritional treatment, the follow-up and the quality of life. RESULTS: We register 3,858 patients that belong to twenty-one hospitals. Mean age from those adults 66.2 ± 18.9 years, and from those younger than 14, 6.0 ± 4.3 years. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the diagnostics more frequents (38.9% and 37.4%, respectively). Oral nutrition was the preferential rout used for the enteral nutrition (54.7%) followed by naso-enteral tube (26.6%), and only in 17.6% we used ostomy tubes. Polymeric was the enteral formula mainly utilized (80.1%). The mean time on HEN was 6.6 ± 4.3 months; the 28.8% of patients stayed in the treatment for less than 3 months, 21.2 % between 3 and 6 months, and 50.0% more than 6 months. Patients were followed mainly by Nutritional Support Unit from the reference hospital (73.1%). While the reference hospital supplies the material (62.4%), reference hospital pharmacy (46.8%) and public pharmacies (32.0%) provides the enteral formula. Complications related to enteral nutrition included change of enteral tube (44.5%), gastrointestinal complications (30.5%), mechanical complications (21.7%), and the metabolic one (3.3%).These complications were followed by 0.02 hospitalizations/patient. At the end of the year, 54.7% of patients were in the HEN programme, and in 35.2% HEN was finish due to accept oral conventional alimentation (49.2%) or by deceased of patients (40.9%). While 26.6% of the patients were confined to bed o armchair, 19.7% no o light discapacity degree was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found a persistence of these treatment in our country. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the more frequent diagnosis in patients analysed. The high prevalence of cancer patients could be the main cause of oral access for enteral nutrition. Change of enteral tube was the more frequent complication observed during this treatment (AU)

[The year 2002 national registry on home-based enteral nutrition]. / Registro nacional de la nutrición enteral domiciliaria del año 2002.

GOAL: To communicate the information available by the NADYA-SENPE Working Group from patients on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country during the year 2002. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included in the web site of the Working Group (www.nadya-senpe.com) available only by the authorized users. Variable included were: epidemiological information, the indication to prescribe this treatment, the access path, the specific nutritional formula used, the treatment duration, the complications and hospital readmission related to the nutritional treatment, the follow-up and the quality of life. RESULTS: We register 3967 patients that belong to twenty-one hospitals. Mean age from those adults 69.2 +/- 19.2 years, and from those younger than 14, 5.6 +/- 4.1 years. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the diagnostics more frequents (39.2% and 34.6%, respectively). Oral nutrition was the preferential rout used for the enteral nutrition (53.6%) followed by naso-enteral tube (30.6%), and only in 15.8% we used ostomy tubes. Polymeric was the enteral formula mainly utilized (81.5%). The mean time on HEN was 5.8 +/- 4.4 months; the 35.7% of patients stayed in the treatment for less than 3 months, 22.4% between 3 and 6 months, and 41.6% more than 6 months. Patients were followed mainly by Nutritional Support Unit from the reference hospital (75.3%). While the reference hospital supplies the material (65.7%), reference hospital pharmacy (43%) and public pharmacies (37.3%) provides the enteral formula. Complications related to enteral nutrition included change of enteral tube (29.7%), mechanical complications (22.9%), gastrointestinal complications (22.9%), and the metabolic one (9.2%). These complications were followed by 0.02 hospitalizations/patient. At the end of the year, 49.3% of patients were in the HEN programme, and in 41.5% HEN was finish due to accept oral conventional alimentation (47.3%) or by deceased of patients. While 31.8% of the patients were confined to bed o armchair, 17.8% no o light discapacity degree was observed. CONCLUSIONS: We found a persistence of these treatment in our country (96.5 patients/million inhabitants. Neurological and neoplasic diseases were the more frequent diagnosis in patients analysed. The high prevalence of cancer patients could be the main cause of oral access for enteral nutrition. Change of enteral tube was the more frequent complication observed during this treatment.

[Home Enteral Nutrition: National Registry 2001]. / Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria (NED): registro nacional 2001.

GOAL: The NADYA-SENPE Working Group analyzed the registered data of patients on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country, during year 2001. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included on our web site (www.nadya-senpe.com). Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the indication to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, patient's quality of life and progress. All data were processed and analyzed by the coordinating team. RESULTS: Twenty two hospitals participated and 3,458 patients, aged 5.6 +/- 4.0 y for those younger than 14 y, and 67.1 +/- 19.5 y for those older than 14 y, were enrolled. Of these patients, 43.4% were diagnosed with neurological diseases and 33.5% with cancer. The mean time on HEN was 6.5 +/- 4.5 months. Oral nutrition was the preferential route (54.5%), followed by nasoenteral tube (32.3%), and in 13.3% ostomy tubes were placed. Polymeric was the formula composition mainly used (85.9%). Patients were followed (71.1%) by the hospital reference Nutritional Support Unit. The complications related to nutrition included mainly the gastrointestinal (0.16 complications/patient), and the mechanical one (0.15 complications/patient). At the end for the year, 48.3% of the patients were in the HEN program, and in 33.3% HEN was finish due to different reasons. In 22.9% of the patients no, o light, discapacity degree was found. CONCLUSIONS: Neurological diseases and cancer were the more frequent diagnoses in HEN patients. Oral access was the higher feeding route due, probably, to the high prevalence of cancer patients. In spite of the elevated prevalence of neurological diseases, a few number of patients, as previous years, were feed with ostomy tube. Due to the few complications observed, HEN is a safe treatment in our country.

Nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED): registro nacional 2001 / Home enteral nutrition (HEN) in our country, during the year 2001

Introducción y objetivos: Análisis del registro de los pacientes en programa de Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria (NED) en nuestro país durante el año 2001. Material y métodos: Estudio analítico realizado mediante una base de datos incluida en la web del Grupo NADYA (www.nadya-senpe.com) con los pacientes en NED el año 2001. Han participado 22 hospitales. Se aportan datos epidemiológicos, diagnósticos, vía de acceso, pautas de administración, fórmulas, duración, complicaciones, evolución y grado de incapacidad. Resultados: Incidencia: Se han comunicado 3.458 pacientes, 1.818 varones (53,7 por ciento) y 1.567 hembras (46,3 por ciento). Edad media 5,6 ñ 4,0 años en los menores de 14 años, y 67,1 ñ 19,5 en los mayores de 14 años. Patologías: Predominio de la patología neurológica (43,4 por ciento), seguida de la neoplásica (33,5 por ciento) sobre las demás. Duración: Tiempo medio en NED de 6,5 ñ 4,5 meses. Vías de administración: La vía oral es la más frecuente (54,5 por ciento), seguida de la sonda naso gástrica (SNG) (32,2 por ciento) y de las ostomías (13,3 por ciento). Formas de administración: Predominio de la forma discontinua (66,1 por ciento), mediante goteo (43,4 por ciento) o bolus (22,7 por ciento). Fórmula: La fórmula polimérica fue la más utilizada (85,9 por ciento). Seguimiento: Los pacientes fueron mayoritariamente controlados por la unidad de nutrición de su hospital de referencia (69,3 por ciento). Hospitalizaciones: Se han registrado 7,3 por ciento hospitalizaciones asociadas a la nutrición [0,02 hospitalizaciones / paciente (c / p)]. Complicaciones: Las más frecuentes relacionadas con la nutrición fueron las gastrointestinales (25,9 por ciento; 0,16 c / p) y las mecánicas (24,2 por ciento, 0,15 c / p). Las diarreas han sido las complicaciones gastrointestinales más frecuentes (11,5 por ciento, 0,07 c / p). Evolución: Al finalizar el año el 48,3 por ciento de los pacientes continuaban en activo, mientras que en un 33,3 por ciento se suspendió la NE y en 18,4 por ciento no hubo continuidad de seguimiento. La causa más común de suspensión fue el paso a nutrición oral convencional (47,3 por ciento), seguido de la muerte relacionada con la enfermedad de base (43,5 por ciento). Un 29,7 por ciento de los pacientes estaban confinados en cama o silla, mientras que un 22,9 por ciento no presentaba prácticamente ningún grado de incapacidad. Conclusiones: Persiste la vía de administración oral como la más prevalente frente a la sonda y ostomía. Predominio de la patología neurológica. El bajo número de complicaciones e ingresos comportan que la NED sea un tratamiento seguro en nuestro medio (AU)

Goal: The NADYA-SENPE Working Group analyzed the registered data of patients on Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country, during year 2001. Material and methods: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included on our web site (www.nadya-senpe.com). Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the indication to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and read-mission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, patient's quality of life and progress. All data were precessed and analyzed by the coordinating team. Results: Twenty two hospitals participated and 3,458 patients, aged 5.6 ± 4.0 y for those younger than 14 y, and 67.1 ± 19.5 y for those older than 14 y, were enrolled. Of these patients, 43.4% were diagnosed with neurological diseases and 33.5% with cancer. The mean time on HEN was 6.5 ± 4.5 months. Oral nutrition was the preferential route (54.5%), followed by nasoenteral tube (32.3%), and in 13.3% ostomy tubes were placed. Polymeric was the formula composition mainly used(85.9%). Patients were followed (71.1%) by the hospital reference Nutritional Support Unit. The complications related to nutrition included mainly the gastrointestinal (0.16 complications/patient), and the mechanical one (0.15 complications/patient). At the end for the year, 48.3% of the patients were in the HEN program, and in 33.3% HEN was finish due to different reasons. In 22.9% of the patients no, o light, discapacity degree was found. Conclusions: Neurological diseases and cancer were the more frequent diagnoses in HEN patients. Oral access was the higher feeding route due, probably, to the high prevalence of cancer patients. In spite of the elevated prevalence of neurological diseases, a few number of patients, as previous years, were feed with ostomy tube. Due to the few complications observed, HEN is a safe treatment in our country (AU)

Necesidades y recomendaciones dietéticas en el paciente oncológico

No disponible

[Complications of enteral nutrition at home. Results of a multicentre trial]. / Complicaciones de la nutrición enteral domiciliaria. Resultados de un estudio multicéntrico.

AIM: In spite of the increasing number of home enteral nutrition (HEN) patients, only few articles had reported the frequency of complications related to this treatment. Our multicentric study analyzes the HEN complications in relation to access device and time of treatment. METHOD: 92 HEN patients from 8 hospitals were randomly selected. Patients were distributed in relation to the time of treatment and access device (nasogastric tube and percutaneous or surgical gastrostomies). After an educational program, they were filled in an initial questionnaire and repeated it the days 15 and 30. They received a mean of 1650 Kcal of enteral solution. A total of 2760 HEN prospective days were analyzed. RESULTS: In prospective study 42% of patients had some complication (112 episodes). The most frequent were gastrointestinal (55%) and mechanical (29%); 0.16 complications of patient-year were registered. The most common complications were: extraction (15%), constipation (13%), vomiting (12%) and diarrhoea (10%). The gastrostomy group had more gastrointestinal complications. In retrospective evaluation, percutaneous gastrostomy group had the lowest ratio of complications and nasogastric tube group required more tube replacements (4 vs 2) and had 1.96 episodes/patient (percutaneous group 1.85 and surgical gastrostomy 3.1 episodes/patient). CONCLUSION: HEN is safe with low incidence of complications. An adequate educational program is very important and we expect, in the future, to establish an proper National Home Care System.

Complicaciones de la nutrición enteral domiciliaria. Resultados de un estudio multicéntrico / Complications of enteral nutrition at home. Results of a multi-centre trial

Objetivo: A pesar del número creciente de nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED), sólo algunos artículos recogen la frecuencia de sus complicaciones. Este estudio multicéntrico analiza estas complicaciones en relación a la vía de acceso y la duración del soporte nutricional. Método: Seleccionamos aleatoriamente 92 pacientes con NED de 8 hospitales y se distribuyeron en relación a la duración del soporte y a la vía de acceso: sonda nasogástrica (SNG) y gastrostomías percutánea o quirúrgica. Tras un programa educativo, los pacientes completaron un cuestionario inicial que se repitió en los días 15 y 30.Recibieron una media de 1.650 kcal de fórmula enteral. Se analizaron un total de 2.760 días prospectivos de NED. Resultados: En la fase prospectiva, el 42 por ciento de los pacientes tuvo alguna complicación (112 episodios). Los más frecuentes fueron digestivos (55 por ciento) y mecánicos (29 por ciento); se registraron 0,16 complicaciones por paciente-año. Las complicaciones más comunes fueron: extracción (15 por ciento), estreñimiento (13 por ciento), vómitos (12 por ciento) y diarrea (10 por ciento). El grupo de gastrostomía tuvo más complicaciones digestivas. En el análisis retrospectivo, el grupo de gastrostomía percutánea tuvo menos complicaciones y el de SNG requirió más recambios de sondas (4 frente a 2) y tuvieron 1,96 complicaciones/paciente (grupo de gastrostomía percutánea 1,85 y quirúrgica 3,1). Conclusión: La NED es segura y presenta una baja incidencia de complicaciones. Un programa educativo adecuado es muy útil y esperamos, en el futuro, contribuir a un mejor sistema de atención domiciliaria (AU)

Aim: In spite of the increasing number of home enteral nutrition (HEN) patients, only few articles had reported the frequency of complications related to this treatment. Our multicentric study analyzes the HEN complications in relation to access device and time of treatment. Method: 92 HEN patients from 8 hospitals were randomly selected. Patients were distributed in relation to the time of treatment and access device (nasogastric tube and percutaneous or surgical gastrostomies). After an educational program, they were filled in an initial questionnaire and repeated it the days 15 and 30. They received a mean of 1650 Kcal of enteral solution. A total of 2760 HEN prospective days were analyzed. Results: In prospective study 42% of patients had some complication (112 episodes). The most frequent were gastrointestinal (55%) and mechanical (29%); 0.16 complications of patient-year were registered. The most common complications were: extraction (15%), constipation (13%), vomiting (12%) and diarrhoea (10%). The gastrostomy group had more gastrointestinal complications. In retrospective evaluation, percutaneous gastrostomy group had the lowest ratio of complications and nasogastric tube group required more tube replacements (4 vs 2) and had 1.96 episodes/patient (percutaneous group 1.85 and surgical gastrostomy 3.1 episodes/patient). Conclusion: HEN is safe with low incidence of complications. An adequate educational program is very important and we expect, in the future, to establish an proper National Home Care System (AU)

[Parenteral nutrition at home: NADYA register for the year 2000]. / Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD): registro NADYA. Año 2000.

AIM: We analyze the registered data of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in our country during the year 2000. METHOD: The data were collected through a previously designed questionnaire. Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the disease to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, and progress. All data were processed and analysed by the co-ordinating team. RESULTS: Fourteen hospitals participated, and 67 patients were enrolled. Middle age was 5 +/- 4 years for patients < 14 years old, and 48 +/- 15 years for those > or = 14 years old. The more prevalent diagnosis were: ischemic bowel (28.4%), neoplasm (16.4%), radiation enteritis (13.4%), motility disorders (7.5%), Crohn's disease (2.9%), and other. The mean time on HPN was 7.5 +/- 4.4 months. Tunelized catheter was the preferential route (77.6%), followed by the implantated one (20.9%). The intermittent method (nocturnal) was preferential (91.0%). Patients receive the formula from hospital pharmacy more frequently than from Nutriservice (71.5% versus 19.4%). The complications related to nutrition (0.32/100 days of HPN) included the infections (0.12 catheter sepsis/100 d of HPN), metabolic (0.06/100 d of HPN), mechanic (0.03/100 d of HPN) and electrolitic disorders (0.03/100 d of HPN). The readmission rate, for nutritional problems, was 0.3 hospitalizations/100 d of HPN. At the end of the year, 61.2% of the patients remained in the HPN program, 37.3% abandoned the treatment (due to death (40%), to progress to oral feeding (48%), and to progress to enteral nutrition (4%); and 1.5% of the patients were not follow up. CONCLUSIONS: This review illustrates that there is an increment in the registration of HPN patients in our country (1997: 0.7 patients/10(6) habitants, 2000: 1.9 patients/10(6) habitants), that vascular pathology is the more frequent diagnoses in HPN patients, and the rate of readmission and complications and the behaviour is similar to other series making this as a safe treatment in our place.

[Enteral nutrition at home: National register for the year 2000]. / Nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED): Registro Nacional del año 2000.

GOAL: Once again, the NADYA-SENPE Working Group analysed the registered data of Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country, during the year 2000. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included on our web site (www.nadya-senpe.com). Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the indication to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, patient's quality of life and progress. All data were processed and analysed by the co-ordinating team. RESULTS: Twenty two hospital participated and 2,986 patients, aged 65.1 +/- 19.7 years, were enrolled. Of these patients, 41.2% were diagnosed with neurological diseases and 33.3% with cancer. The mean time on HEN was 6.3 +/- 4.4 months. Oral nutrition was the preferential route (50.8%), followed by nasoenteral tube (30.5%), and in 17.4% ostomy tubes were placed. Polymeric was the formula composition mainly used (83.2%). Patients were followed (70.1%) by the hospital reference Nutritional Support Unit. The complications related to nutrition included the gastrointestinal (0.25 complications/patient), the mechanical one (0.19 complications/patient), and the metabolic (0.007 complications/patient). Feeding tube need to be replaced 0.3 times/patient/year. The readmission rate, for nutritional problems, was observed in 0.03 patients. At the end of the year, 54.9% of the patients were in the HEN program, and in 30.3% HEN was finish due to different reasons. In 21.9% of the patients no, o light, discapacity degree was found. CONCLUSIONS: Related to previous years, there is an increment in the number of enrolled patients. Neurological diseases and cancer were the more frequent diagnoses in HEN patients. Oral access was the higher feeding route due, probably, to the high prevalence of cancer patients. In spite of the elevated prevalence of neurological diseases, a few number of patients were feed with ostomy tube. Finally, due to the few readmission rate and complications, HEN is a safe treatment in our country.

Nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD): registro NADYA. Año 2000 / Parenteral nutrition at home: NADYA register for 2000

Objetivo: Análisis descriptivo y valoración de los datos registrados por el Grupo de Trabajo NADYA-SENPE de pacientes que han recibido nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD) en nuestro país durante el año 2000.Material y métodos: Se han recopilado datos (epidemiológicos, diagnóstico, vía de acceso, complicaciones, reingresos hospitalarios, duración del tratamiento y evolución) a partir de un cuestionario previamente diseñado para ello. Los datos obtenidos del cuestionario se introdujeron en una base de datos para la ulterior gestión de los mismos. Resultados: Los datos correspondían a 67 pacientes (edad media de 5 ñ 4 años para pacientes < 14 años y 48 ñ 15 años para 14 años) controlados por 14 centros hospitalarios. Las patologías que con más frecuencia han comportado este tratamiento fueron: isquemia mesentérica (28,4 per cent), seguida de enfermedad neoplásica (16,4 per cent), enteritis rádica (13,4 per cent), alteraciones de la motilidad (7,5 per cent) y enfermedad de Crohn (2,9 per cent), entre otras. Se observó un predominio de los catéteres tunelizados (77,6 per cent) sobre los implantados (20,9 per cent), y de la administración cíclica (nocturna) de la nutrición parenteral (NP) (91,0 per cent). Las farmacias hospitalarias suministraron las fórmulas de NPD con más frecuencia que el Nutriservice (71,5 per cent frente a 19,4 per cent).La duración media del tratamiento fue de 7,48 ñ 4,39 meses. Se presentaron 0,32 complicaciones/100 días de NPD relacionadas con el tratamiento nutritivo con predominio de las infecciosas (0,12 sepsis por catéter/100 d de NPD), seguidas de las metabólicas (0,06/100 d de NPD), y de las mecánicas (0,03/100 d de NPD) e hidroelectrolíticas (0,03/100 días de NPD). Estas complicaciones comportaron 0,3 hospitalizaciones/100 días de NPD. Al finalizar el año, seguían en activo 61,2 per cent de los pacientes; 37,3 per cent habían abandonado el tratamiento (exitus 40 per cent, nutrición oral 48 per cent y nutrición enteral 4 per cent), y 1,5 per cent pacientes habían dejado de ser controlados por el equipo inicialmente responsable. Conclusiones: Podemos concluir que existe un incremento del registro de la NPD en nuestro país (1997: 0,7 pacientes/106 habitantes, 2000: 1,9 pacientes/106 habitantes), que hay un predominio de patología vascular y que la incidencia de complicaciones, retirada del tratamiento e ingresos hospitalarios son semejantes a otras series lo que avala la calidad del tratamiento (AU)

Aim: We analyze the registered data of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in our country during the year 2000. Method: The data were collected through a previously designed questionnaire. Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the disease to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, and progress. All data were processed and analysed by the co-ordinating team. Results: Fourten hospitals participated, and 67 pacientes were enrolled. Middle age was 5 ± 4 years for patients < 14 years old, and 48 ± 15 years for those ≥ 14 years old. The more prevalent diagnosis were: ischemic bowel (28.4%), neoplasm (16.4%), radiation enteritis (13.4%), motility disorders (7.5%), Crohn’s disease (2.9%), and other. The mean time on HPN was 7.5 ± 4.4 months. Tunelized catheter was the preferential route (77.6%), followed by the implantated one (20.9%). The intermittent method (nocturnal) was preferential (91.0%). Patients receive the formula from hospital pharmacy more frequently than from Nutriservice (71.5% versus 19.4%). The complications related to nutrition (0.32/100 days of HPN) included the infections (0,12 catheter sepsis/100 d of HPN), metabolic (0.06/100 d of HPN), mechanic (0.03/100 d of HPN) and electrolitic disorders (0.03/100 d of HPN). The readmission rate, for nutritional problems, was 0,3 hospitalizations /100 d of HPN. At the end of the year, 61.2% of the patients remained in the HPN program, 37.3% abandoned the treatment (due to death (40%), to progress to oral feeding (48%), and to progress to enteral nutrition (4%); and 1.5% of the patients were not follow up. Conclusions: This review illustrates that there is an increment in the registration of HPN patients in our country (1997: 0.7 pacients/106habitants, 2000: 1.9 pacients/ 106 habitants), that vascular pathology is the more frequent diagnoses in HPN patients, and the rate of readmission and complications and the behaviour is similar to other series making this as a safe treatment in our place (AU)

Nutrición enteral domiciliaria (NED): Registro Nacional del año 2000 / Enteral nutrition at home. National Register for 2000

Objetivo: Un año más, el Grupo de Trabajo NADYASENPE, presenta el análisis del registro de los pacientes con Nutrición Enteral Domiciliaria (NED) de nuestro país correspondiente al año 2000.Material y métodos: La información se ha recogido en un cuestionario cerrado incluido en nuestra página web (www.nadya-senpe.com). Este formulario incluye datos epidemiológicos, indicación del motivo de este tratamiento, pauta de tratamiento y vía de acceso, complicaciones y hospitalizaciones, seguimiento de los pacientes, calidad de vida y evolución. Los datos son procesados y analizados por el equipo coordinador. Resultados: Se han registrado datos de 22 hospitales que representan un total de 2.986 pacientes analizados, con una edad media de 65,1 ñ 19,7 años. Predominio de pacientes con alteraciones neurológicas (41,2 per cent), seguidos de los neoplásicos (33,3 per cent). El tiempo medio de NED fue 6,3 ñ 4,4 meses. Se observó una elevada prevalencia de la vía oral (50,8 per cent), seguido de la administración a través de sonda nasogástrica (SNG) (30,5 per cent), siendo el porcentaje de ostomías de un 17,4 per cent. La fórmula polimérica fue la más utilizada en un 83,2 per cent. Los pacientes fueron controlados, mayoritariamente, por la unidad de nutrición de su hospital de referencia (70,1 per cent). Las complicaciones, relacionadas con la nutrición, más frecuentemente observadas fueron las gastrointestinales (0,25 complicaciones/paciente), seguidas de las mecánicas (0,19 complicaciones/paciente), y de las metabólicas (0,007 complicaciones/pacientes). Se realizaron 0,3 cambios de sonda/paciente/año. Se registraron 0,03 hospitalizaciones/paciente, asociadas a la nutrición. Al finalizar el año, el 54,9 per cent de los pacientes continuaban en activo, mientras que en un 30,3 per cent se suspendió la NED por diversos motivos. El 21,9 per cent no presentaba incapacidad o el grado de la misma era ligero. Conclusiones: Existe un incremento, en relación a años previos en el número de pacientes con NED registrados. Persiste el gran peso de las patologías neurológicas y oncológicas en este tratamiento a domicilio. Probablemente, por existir un elevado número de pacientes oncológicos, la administración de la NED por boca es elevada. A destacar que hay pocos pacientes con ostomías. Finalmente, la NED en nuestro país es un tratamiento seguro con bajo número de complicaciones (AU)

Goal: Once again, the NADYA-SENPE Working Group analysed the registered data of Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) in our country, during the year 2000. Material and methods: The data were collected through a closed questionnaire included on our web site (www.nadya-senpe.com). Apart from epidemiological information, the form includes the indication to prescribe this treatment, the specific nutritional treatment used and its duration, access path, complications and readmission rate in hospital, follow-up of the treatment, patient’s quality of life and progress. All data were processed and analysed by the co-ordinating team. Results: Twenty two hospital participated and 2,986 patients, aged 65.1 ± 19.7 years, were enrolled. Of these patients, 41.2% were diagnosed with neurological diseases and 33.3% with cancer. The mean time on HEN was 6.3 ± 4.4 months. Oral nutrition was the preferential route (50.8%), followed by nasoenteral tube (30.5%), and in 17.4% ostomy tubes were placed. Polymeric was the formula composition mainly used (83.2%). Patients were followed (70.1 %) by the hospital reference Nutritional Support Unit. The complications related to nutrition included the gastrointestinal (0.25 complications/ patient), the mechanical one (0.19 complications/patient), and the metabolic (0.007 complications/ patient). Feeding tube need to be replaced 0.3 times/ patient/year. The readmission rate, for nutritional problems, was observed in 0.03 patients. At the end of the year, 54.9% of the patients were in the HEN program, and in 30.3% HEN was finish due to different reasons. In 21,9% of the patients no, o light, discapacity degree was found. Conclusions: Related to previous years, there is an increment in the number of enrolled patients. Neurological diseases and cancer were the more frequent diagnoses in HEN patients. Oral access was the higher feeding route due, probably, to the high prevalence of cancer patients. In spite of the elevated prevalence of neurological diseases, a few number of patients were feed with ostomy tube. Finally, due to the few readmission rate and complications, HEN is a safe treatment in our country (AU)