ABSTRACT
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the comorbidity between psychotic disorders and substance use, one of them being the capacity of some to induce psychotic symptoms, although the transition from psychotic episodes induced by substances to schizophrenia has been less studied. In this study, differential variables between patients with induced and non-induced psychosis are determined, and the evolution and change of diagnosis of those induced to schizophrenia in the follow-up is analyzed. This is an observational case-control study with 238 patients admitted to the acute care unit for psychotic episodes between December 2003 and September 2011. The group of non-substance-induced psychotic disorders (NSIPD) included 127 patients, with 111 in the substance-induced (SIPD) group, according to the International Classification of Diseases. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, personal and family history, substance use, diagnostic stability and progression were compared. The NSIPD group showed higher scores in severity and in negative symptoms and more family history of psychosis. The SIPD group presented more personal history of personality disorder and family history of addictions and more positive symptoms At 6 years of follow-up, 40.9% of ISDP changed to a diagnosis of schizophrenia, presenting more family history of psychotic disorders and worse progression with more visits to the emergency department and readmissions, than subjects who maintained diagnostic stability. Therefore, special attention should be paid to this group of patients because of the potential severity and the increased risk of developing a chronic psychotic disorder.
Se han propuesto distintas hipótesis para explicar la comorbilidad entre trastornos psicóticos y por consumo de sustancias, siendo una de ellas la capacidad de algunas de inducir cuadros psicóticos, aunque la transición de episodios psicóticos inducidos por sustancias a esquizofrenia ha sido menos estudiada. En este trabajo se determinan variables diferenciales entre individuos con psicosis inducidas y no inducidas, y se analiza la evolución y el cambio de diagnóstico de las inducidas a esquizofrenia en el seguimiento. Es un estudio observacional de casos y controles con 238 pacientes ingresados en la unidad de agudos de un Hospital General de Madrid (España) por episodios psicóticos entre diciembre de 2003 y septiembre de 2011. Se incluyeron 127 en el grupo de trastornos psicóticos no inducidos por sustancias (TPNIS) y 111 en el de inducidos por sustancias (TPIS), según la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades. Se compararon características sociodemográficas, clínicas, antecedentes personales y familiares, de consumo de sustancias, estabilidad diagnóstica y evolución. El grupo de TPNIS presentó mayores puntuaciones en gravedad y sintomatología negativa mientras que el de TPIS tuvo más antecedentes personales de trastorno de personalidad y familiares de adicciones, y más sintomatología positiva. A los seis años un 40,9% de TPIS cambió a diagnóstico de esquizofrenia, presentando más antecedentes familiares de trastornos psicóticos y de adicciones, y una peor evolución con más visitas a urgencias y reingresos que los sujetos con estabilidad diagnóstica. Por tanto, habrá que prestar especial atención a este grupo de sujetos por su potencial gravedad y por el mayor riesgo de desarrollar un trastorno psicótico crónico.
Subject(s)
Psychoses, Substance-Induced , Psychotic Disorders , Schizophrenia , Substance-Related Disorders , Humans , Case-Control Studies , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/diagnosis , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/etiology , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychotic Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/complications , Substance-Related Disorders/diagnosis , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/diagnosis , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/complicationsABSTRACT
Se han propuesto distintas hipótesis para explicar la comorbilidad entre trastornos psicóticos y por consumo de sustancias, siendo una de ellas la capacidad de algunas de inducir cuadros psicóticos, aunque la transición de episodios psicóticos inducidos por sustancias a esquizofrenia ha sido menos estudiada. En este trabajo se determinan variables diferenciales entre individuos con psicosis inducidas y no inducidas, y se analiza la evolución y el cambio de diagnóstico de las inducidas a esquizofrenia en el seguimiento. Es un estudio observacional de casos y controles con 238pacientes ingresados en la unidad de agudos de un Hospital General de Madrid (España) por episodios psicóticos entre diciembre de 2003 y septiembre de 2011. Se incluyeron 127 en el grupo de trastornos psicóticos no inducidos por sustancias (TPNIS) y 111 en el de inducidos por sustancias (TPIS), según la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades. Se compararon características sociodemográficas, clínicas, antecedentes personales y familiares, de consumo de sustancias, estabilidad diagnóstica y evolución. El grupo de TPNIS presentó mayores puntuaciones en gravedad y sintomatología negativa mientras que el de TPIS tuvo más antecedentes personales de trastorno de personalidad y familiares de adicciones, y más sintomatología positiva. A los seis años un 40,9% de TPIS cambió a diagnóstico de esquizofrenia, presentando más antecedentes familiares de trastornos psicóticos y de adicciones, y una peor evolución con más visitas a urgencias y reingresos que los sujetos con estabilidad diagnóstica. Por tanto, habrá que prestar especial atención a este grupo de sujetos por su potencial gravedad y por el mayor riesgo de desarrollar un trastorno psicótico crónico. (AU)
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the comorbidity betweenpsychotic disorders and substance use, one of them being the capacity ofsome to induce psychotic symptoms, although the transition from psychoticepisodes induced by substances to schizophrenia has been less studied. In thisstudy, differential variables between patients with induced and non-induced psychosis are determined, and the evolution and change of diagnosis of those induced to schizophrenia in the follow-up is analyzed. This is an observational case-control study with 238 patients admitted to the acute care unit for psychotic episodes between December 2003 and September 2011.The group of non-substance-induced psychotic disorders (NSIPD) included127 patients, with 111 in the substance-induced (SIPD) group, according to the International Classification of Diseases. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, personal and family history, substance use, diagnostic stability and progression were compared. The NSIPD group showed higherscores in severity and in negative symptoms and more family history ofpsychosis. The SIPD group presented more personal history of personality disorder and family history of addictions and more positive symptoms At 6years of follow-up, 40.9% of ISDP changed to a diagnosis of schizophrenia, presenting more family history of psychotic disorders and worse progression with more visits to the emergency department and readmissions, than subjects who maintained diagnostic stability. Therefore, special attention should be paid to this group of patients because of the potential severity and the increased risk of developing a chronic psychotic disorder. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Young Adult , Adult , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychoses, Substance-Induced/diagnosis , Schizophrenia , SpainABSTRACT
A randomized, 1-year follow-up study comparing LAI aripiprazole with LAI paliperidone in patients with psychosis, mostly schizophrenia, and SUD reported a large effect of the change from baseline in the CGI severity score, from 5.9 to 2.4 for LAI aripiprazole and from 5.7 to 2.6 for LAI risperidone [29].
ABSTRACT
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and impact of long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia with a coexisting substance use disorder (SUD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in patients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia who had a coexisting SUD and were treated with LAI-aripiprazole. Disease severity was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale for schizophrenia, daily functioning and disability were evaluated with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS-2.0), and the severity of the addiction was evaluated with the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). RESULTS: The sample included 40 patients. Overall, after 6 months of treatment with LAI-aripiprazole at a dose of 400 mg/4 weeks in 77.5% of the patients, we observed significant improvement in the psychopathological symptoms, with a reduction of over 30% in the scores of the five CGI-severity scales. The WHODAS-2.0 mean (standard deviation) score was also significantly reduced from 57.6 (8.2) to 42.3 (4.3) points (p < 0.001). Regarding SUDs, after 6 months of treatment, substance use was stopped in 5 of the 9 patients with cocaine use disorder and in 3 of the 16 patients with alcohol abuse disorder. A significant reduction in the severity of the dependence was observed only in the subgroups of participants with cocaine and alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that once-monthly LAI-aripiprazole retains its antipsychotic efficacy in patients with schizophrenia and a coexisting SUD and could be useful for the management of cocaine or alcohol use disorders in this population.
ABSTRACT
No disponible
