ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Use of the colonoscope magnetic imaging device (ScopeGuide, Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) is currently contraindicated by the manufacturer for patients with implantable cardiac devices, a group of patients that is increasing annually along with the number of colonoscopies performed in the era of colorectal cancer screening. This is the first study to examine the safety of ScopeGuide in patients with permanent pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nonimplanted cardiac devices were exposed to the electromagnetic field of ScopeGuide ex vivo and assessed for evidence of interference or change in device settings. Following this, consecutive patients attending device check clinics were prospectively recruited and exposed to the ScopeGuide electromagnetic field. After an initial device check, patients underwent continuous external cardiac monitoring and device interrogation while a colonoscope was placed on the abdomen over clothing and connected to ScopeGuide to simulate colonoscopy. Patients were monitored for 2 minutes to assess for any interference. ScopeGuide was then disconnected and devices were checked for any change in settings. RESULTS: A total of 230 patients were invited to participate and 100 were recruited to the study. There was no evidence of interference on device leads or change in programming following exposure to the electromagnetic field generated by ScopeGuide. CONCLUSION: ScopeGuide does not appear to cause interference or change in settings and is therefore likely to be safe for use in patients with implantable cardiac devices.
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy/instrumentation , Defibrillators, Implantable , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Pacemaker, Artificial , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Electrocardiography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesSubject(s)
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency/etiology , Carcinoma/secondary , Intestinal Neoplasms/secondary , Intestine, Small , Carcinoma/complications , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Heart Transplantation , Humans , Intestinal Neoplasms/complications , Intestinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Helicobacter pylori infection causes a number of gastrointestinal diseases and its current treatment is based on multidrug regimes including acid suppression and antimicrobials. The success of these regimes is determined by a number of factors including antibiotic resistance, which varies widely but is an increasing problem. Local data are important in establishing the most cost-effective eradication regime. Data have been collected prospectively on antibiotic resistance at Ipswich Hospital (Suffolk, UK) in all consecutive isolates of H. pylori from 1991 to 2001. The success of regimes consisting of a proton pump inhibitor, amoxycillin and metronidazole (PPI/A/M) has also been evaluated in patients found positive on serological testing in primary care using urea breath testing. Overall, metronidazole resistance was found in 31.7 % of isolates and clarithromycin resistance in 5.3 %. A significant increase in metronidazole resistance from 29.1 to 37.0 % (P = 0.022) and a decrease in clarithromycin resistance from 10.3 to 3.8 % (P = 0.014) was seen over the study period. Metronidazole resistance was significantly more common in women (P < 0.001) and young patients (P < 0.001). Eradication with PPI/A/M was successful in 89.9 % of patients and did not change significantly over the study period. Eradication rates were lower in young patients (P < 0.001). Whilst metronidazole resistance is increasing in Suffolk, this does not seem to have a significant effect on eradication rates. Metronidazole-based regimes are still effective first-line treatments in most patients.
