PTE, a novel module to target Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 to the human cyclin D2 (CCND2) oncogene.

Polycomb group proteins are essential epigenetic repressors. They form multiple protein complexes of which two kinds, PRC1 and PRC2, are indispensable for repression. Although much is known about their biochemical properties, how mammalian PRC1 and PRC2 are targeted to specific genes is poorly understood. Here, we establish the cyclin D2 (CCND2) oncogene as a simple model to address this question. We provide the evidence that the targeting of PRC1 to CCND2 involves a dedicated PRC1-targeting element (PTE). The PTE appears to act in concert with an adjacent cytosine-phosphate-guanine (CpG) island to arrange for the robust binding of PRC1 and PRC2 to repressed CCND2 Our findings pave the way to identify sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins implicated in the targeting of mammalian PRC1 complexes and provide novel link between polycomb repression and cancer.

Loss of E2F7 expression is an early event in squamous differentiation and causes derepression of the key differentiation activator Sp1.

Squamous differentiation is controlled by key transcription factors such as Sp1 and E2F. We have previously shown that E2F1 can suppress transcription of the differentiation-specific gene, transglutaminase type 1 (TG1), by an indirect mechanism mediated by Sp1. Transient transfection of E2F1-E2F6 indicated that E2F-mediated reduction of Sp1 transcription was not responsible for E2F-mediated suppression of squamous differentiation. However, we found that E2F4 and E2F7, but not E2Fs 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6, could suppress the activation of the Sp1 promoter in differentiated keratinocytes (KCs). E2F4-mediated suppression could not be antagonized by E2Fs 1, 2, 3, 5, or 6 and was localized to a region of the human Sp1 promoter spanning -139 to + 35 bp. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis, as well as transient overexpression and short hairpin RNA knockdown experiments indicate that E2F7 binds to a unique binding site located between -139 and -119 bp of the Sp1 promoter, and knockdown of E2F7 in proliferating KCs leads to a derepression of Sp1 expression and the induction of TG1. In contrast, E2F4 knockdown in proliferating KCs did not alter Sp1 expression. These data indicate that loss of E2F7 during the initiation of differentiation leads to the derepression of Sp1 and subsequent transcription of differentiation-specific genes such as TG1.

Tumor-initiating activity and tumor morphology of HNSCC is modulated by interactions between clonal variants within the tumor.

Tumor initiation (TI) in xenotransplantation models of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is an inefficient process. Poor TI could be due to (1) posttransplant cell loss, (2) a rare sub-population of cancer stem cells or (3) a requirement for specific cellular interactions, which rely on cell number. By tracking GFP-expressing HNSCC cells, we conclude that the posttransplant loss of cancer cells is minimal in the xenotransplant model. Furthermore, an examination of putative cancer stem cell markers (such as CD133, CD44, SP and label retention) in HNSCC cell lines revealed no correlation between marker expression and tumorigenicity. In addition, single-cell clones randomly isolated from HNSCC cell lines and then transplanted into mice were all capable of initiating tumors with efficiencies varying almost 34-fold. As the observed variation in the clones was both more and less tumorigenic than the parental cells, a combination of two clones, at suboptimal cell numbers for TI, was implanted into mice and was found to modulate the tumor-initiating activity, thus indicating that TI is dependent on a 'critical' number of cells and, for the first time, that interactions between clonal variants within tumors can modulate the overall tumor-initiating activity. Put in context with previous literature on tumorigenic activity, we believe that interactions between clonal variants within a tumor as well as (1) stromal interactions, (2) angiogenic activity, (3) immunocompetence and (4) cancer stem cells may all contribute to tumorigenic potential and the propensity for tumor growth and recurrence.