"If You Plant That Seed, It Will Grow": A Qualitative Study to Improve Linkage to Care among Patients with Methamphetamine Use Disorder in Emergency Department Settings.

OBJECTIVES: Methamphetamine addiction is a serious and difficult-to-treat disorder. Existing treatment options are limited, and patient perspectives on effective strategies are lacking. Emergency departments (EDs) may be a critical entry point for individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) to be identified and linked to treatment. We aimed to understand patients' perspectives regarding their methamphetamine use and related ED experiences and how to improve linkage to substance treatment. METHODS: Between July and November 2022, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted with adult patients with MUD in an urban safety-net healthcare setting in Denver, Colorado. Interviews were recorded, summarized, and analyzed using the Rapid Assessment Process. RESULTS: During the interviews, 18 patients shared their experiences. Participants described feeling stigmatized and experiencing a lack of communication from ED staff during their visit. Additionally, participants shared the perception that ED staff often did not take their health concerns seriously once substance use was identified. Participants were uncertain about overdose risk and felt that their psychiatric symptoms complicated treatment. Referrals to treatment were lacking, and participants supported a care navigation intervention that incorporates elements of contingency management. Participants also shared the importance of ED staff recognizing their social needs and being empathetic, trauma-informed, and flexible to meet patients where they are regardless of their readiness to seek treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment options and entry points for individuals with MUD are currently limited. The patient perspectives described here are helpful in developing services to support, engage, and link individuals to MUD services after discharge from ED services.

Diagnosis of methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder: Findings of an expert consensus panel.

AIM: We define criteria for methamphetamine-induced psychotic disorder (MIPD) to aid in accurate and reliable diagnosis. METHOD: An expert panel was recruited and engaged in an iterative consensus process. A literature search supported this work. The a priori level for consensus was considered ≥80% of voting panellists. RESULTS: The final expert panel included 22 physicians from different backgrounds and practice environments. The panel produced two consensus diagnoses: (1) acute MIPD and (2) persisting MIPD, which is further separated into subacute and chronic timeframes. Although certain characteristics differentiate methamphetamine-induced psychosis shortly after use, identification of persisting MIPD depends largely on a history of symptom onset. All respondents voted in the final round, and both criteria were fully endorsed by 91% (20/22) of respondents. Panellists further recommended next steps in validation and research on this topic. CONCLUSION: These diagnostic criteria aid clinicians in differentiating methamphetamine-induced psychotic symptoms from psychosis because of other psychiatric disorders and can guide future studies. Future research might examine these criteria's prognostic significance, interrater reliability and acceptability including among persons in recovery. This work is a necessary and vital step in advancing the science of methamphetamine addiction treatment.

Evaluation of the BEAT Meth Intervention for Emergency Department Patients with Methamphetamine Psychosis.

OBJECTIVES: Methamphetamine is the second leading cause of overdose death in America and a leading cause of emergency department (ED) visits. Methamphetamine-induced psychosis is a dangerous and difficult-to-treat consequence of methamphetamine use. We describe the pilot implementation and outcomes of a multimodal treatment intervention for ED patients with methamphetamine psychosis, Beginning Early and Assertive Treatment for Methamphetamine Psychosis (BEAT Meth). METHODS: BEAT Meth was implemented in an urban safety net health system. The protocol includes early identification and treatment of methamphetamine psychosis, a protocolized hospitalization, and support for transitioning patients to specialty addiction treatment. Patients receiving BEAT Meth were compared with ED patients with methamphetamine psychosis who were discharged. Implementation fidelity was measured to assess feasibility. RESULTS: BEAT Meth patients were nearly 3 times more likely to attend an outpatient specialty addiction appointment in the 30 days after discharge than comparison patients (32% vs 11%, P < 0.01). Subsequent ED utilization was common among all patients, and there was no significant difference in 30-day ED return rates between BEAT Meth and comparison patients (28% vs 37%, P = 0.10). Exploratory analyses suggested that increased attendance at outpatient treatment reduced ED utilization. CONCLUSIONS: BEAT Meth is an intervention framework to support identification, management, and treatment engagement of ED patients with methamphetamine psychosis. Treatment strategies like BEAT Meth are necessary to manage the unique challenges of methamphetamine addiction. These findings will guide clinical care, program development, and research.

Pharmacological Management of Anxiety Disorders in the Elderly.

Anxiety disorders are common in the elderly. Additionally, anxiety symptoms often accompany co-morbid psychiatric, medical, as well as neurodegenerative diseases in the older population. Anxiety in the elderly, often accompanied by depression, can lead to worsening physical, cognitive and functional impairments in this vulnerable population. Antidepressants are considered first line treatment. Both SSRIs and SNRIs are efficacious and well-tolerated in the elderly. Some SSRIs are strong inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 hepatic pathway whereas others have less potential for drug interaction. Those antidepressants with more favorable pharmacokinetic profiles should be considered first-line in the treatment of anxiety. Mirtazapine and vortioxetine are also considered safe treatment options. Buspirone may have benefit, but lacks studies in elderly populations. Although tricyclic/tetracyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) may be effective in the elderly, their side effect and safety profiles are suboptimal and thus are not recommended in late-life. Benzodiazepines and beta blockers should generally be avoided when treating anxiety in the elderly. There is not enough evidence to support the use of antipsychotics or mood stabilizers given their risk of problems in both the long and short term. In addition, antipsychotics have a black box warning for increased mortality in elderly patients with dementia.