ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The highly metastatic nature of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and the difficulty to achieve favorable patient outcomes emphasize the need for novel therapeutic solutions. For preclinical evaluations, genetically engineered mouse models are often used to mimic human PDAC but frequently fail to replicate synchronous development and metastatic spread. This study aimed to develop a transplantation model to achieve synchronous and homogenous PDAC growth with controlled metastatic patterns in the liver. METHODS: To generate an orthotopic PDAC model, the DT6606 cell line was injected into the pancreas head of C57BL/6 mice, and their survival was monitored over time. To generate a heterotopic transplantation model, growing doses of three PDAC cell lines (DT6606, DT6606lm, and K8484) were injected into the portal vein of mice. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to monitor metastatic progression, and histologic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Orthotopically injected mice succumbed to the tumor within an 11-week period (average survival time, 78.2 ± 4.45 days). Post-mortem examinations failed to identify liver metastasis. In the intraportal model, 2 × 105 DT6606 cells resulted in an absence of liver metastases by day 21, whereas 5 × 104 DT6606lm cells and 7 × 104 K8484 cells resulted in steady metastatic growth. Higher doses caused significant metastatic liver involvement. The use of K8484 cells ensured the growth of tumors closely resembling the histopathologic characteristics of human PDAC. CONCLUSIONS: This report details the authors' efforts to establish an "optimal" murine model for inducing metastatic PDAC, which is critical for advancing our understanding of the disease and developing more effective treatments.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Very early recurrence after radical surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has been poorly investigated. This study was designed to evaluate this group of patients who developed recurrence, within 12 weeks after surgery, defined as "biological R2 resections (bR2)." METHODS: Data from patients who underwent surgical resection as upfront procedure or after neoadjuvant treatment for PDAC between 2015 and 2019 were analyzed. Disease-free, disease-specific survival, and independent predictors of early recurrence were examined. The same analysis was performed separately for upfront and neoadjuvant treated patients. RESULTS: Of the 573 patients included in the study, 63 (11%) were classified as bR2. The rate of neoadjuvant treatment was similar in bR2 and in the remaining patients (44 vs. 42%, p = 0.78). After a median follow-up of 27 months, median DFS and DSS for the entire cohort were 17 and 43 months, respectively. Median DSS of bR2 group was 13 months. The only preoperative identifiable independent predictor of very early recurrence was body-tail site lesion, whereas all other were pathological: higher pT (8th classification), G3 differentiation, and high lymph node ratio. These predictors were confirmed for patients undergoing upfront surgery, whereas in the neoadjuvant group the only independent predictor was pT. CONCLUSIONS: One of ten patients with "radical" resected PDAC relapses very early after surgery (bR2); hence, imaging must be routinely repeated within 12 weeks. Despite higher biological aggressiveness and worse pathology, this bR2 cluster eludes our preoperative examinations.
