Plant protoplasts as genetic tool: selectable markers for developmental studies.

Protoplasts have usually been presented as a methodological tool. Even as such, they make possible an impressive array of applications in plant biology. Here we report on the use of protoplast-derived selectable markers in the study of several disturbed genetic systems with obvious effects on plant development: (1) auxotrophic mutants and the control of amino acid biosynthesis and transport in vegetative and reproductive tissues; (2) introgression of alien genetic information across phylogenetic boundaries by protoplast fusion, a consequence of controlled dedifferentiation-redifferentiation processes and attenuated incompatibility reactions in cultured cells; (3) expression (in)stability of foreign genes in transgenic plants during successive meiotic generations and in crosses between independent transformants.

A study of the role of glutamate dehydrogenase in the nitrogen metabolism of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Glutamate-dehydrogenase (GDH, EC 1.4.1.2) activity and isoenzyme patterns were investigated in Arabidopsis thaliana plantlets, and parallel studies were carried out on glutamine synthetase (GS, EC 6.3.1.2). Both NADH-GDH and NAD-GDH activities increased during plant development whereas GS activity declined. Leaves deprived of light showed a considerable enhancement of NADH-GDH activity. In roots, both GDH activities were induced by ammonia whereas in leaves nitrogen assimilation was less important. It was demonstrated that the increase in GDH activity was the result of de-novo protein synthesis. High nitrogen levels were first assimilated by NADH-GDH, while GS was actively involved in nitrogen metabolism only when the enzyme was stimulated by a supply of energy, generated by NAD-GDH or by feeding sucrose. When methionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of GS, was added to the feeding solution, NADH-GDH activity remained unaffected in leaves whereas NAD-GDH was induced. In roots, however, there was a marked activation of GDH and no inactivation of GS. It was concluded that NADH-GDH was involved in the detoxification of high nitrogen levels while NAD-GDH was mainly responsible for the supply of energy to the cell during active assimilation. Glutamine synthetase, on the other hand was involved in the assimilation of physiological amounts of nitrogen. A study of the isoenzyme pattern of GDH indicated that a good correlation existed between the relative activity of the isoenzymes and the ratio of aminating to deaminating enzyme activities. The NADH-GDH activity corresponded to the more anodal isoenzymes while the NAD-GDH activity corresponded to the cathodal ones. The results indicate that the two genes involved in the formation of GDH control the expression of enzymes with different metabolic functions.