Whole breast radiotherapy in the lateral isocentric lateral decubitus position: Long-term efficacy and toxicity results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate previously published whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) using ILD (isocentring lateral decubitus) technique in terms of toxicity and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2006 to 2010, 832 female patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC) treated by conservative surgery underwent 3D-conformal WBRT-ILD at Institut Curie. The acute toxicity of treatment was evaluated weekly and the late toxicity (6months and later after the treatment) was evaluated every 6months till the 5th year after the end of the radiotherapy using NCI CTC v3.0 scale. Dosimetric study was performed to analyse the mean cardiac dose and the mean homolateral and contralateral lung doses. RESULTS: The median follow up was 6.4years. The median age was 61.5years (range, 29-90), and median body mass index (BMI) was 26.3. Fifty one percent of the patients presented left sided BC and 49% right sided. Different type of fractions were used: 46.5% of pts.: 50 (breast)+16Gy (boost) in 33fractions (fr), in 17.9%-50Gy/25fr, in 26.1%-40/15fr or 41.6Gy/13fr and in 9.5%: 30Gy/5fr. Acute dermatitis was present in 93% with a median of apparition of 4weeks, and only 2,8% grade 3. In multivariate analysis, the cup size had significant influence (p=0.0004) and the fractionation had a significative influence (p=0.0001). In the all patients' population, 94.1% of cases had no skin toxicity at 1year. No cardiac or pulmonary toxicity was reported. The median overall survival had not been reached at the end of follow-up. We observed 36 (3.6%) recurrences, as following: 30 local (breast) recurrences, 4 lymph node (LN), and 2pts experiencing both. CONCLUSION: Whole breast radiotherapy in the lateral decubitus position provides excellent results in terms of local control and survival. ILD is well tolerated with very good acute toxicity profile. No cardiac or pulmonary toxicity were observed in this study. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.

Long-Term Results of a Highly Performing Conformal Electron Therapy Technique for Chest Wall Irradiation After Mastectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate locoregional control and survival after mastectomy, as well as toxicity, in patients irradiated by a previously described postmastectomy highly conformal electron beam radiation therapy technique (PMERT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We included all women irradiated by postmastectomy electron beam radiation therapy for nonmetastatic breast cancer between 2007 and 2011 in our department. Acute and late toxicities were retrospectively assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 criteria. RESULTS: Among the 796 women included, 10.1% were triple-negative, 18.8% HER2-positive, and 24.6% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT). Multifocal lesions were observed in 51.3% of women, and 64.6% had at least 1 involved lymph node (LN). Internal mammary chain, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary LNs were treated in 85.6%, 88.3%, 77.9%, and 14.9% of cases, respectively. With a median follow-up of 64 months (range, 6-102 months), 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 90% (95% confidence interval 88.1%-92.4%) and 90.9% (95% confidence interval 88.9%-93%), respectively. Early skin toxicity was scored as grade 1 in 58.5% of patients, grade 2 in 35.9%, and grade 3 in 4.5%. Concomitant CT was associated with increased grade 3 toxicity (P<.001). At long-term follow-up, 29.8% of patients presented temporary or permanent hyperpigmentation or telangiectasia or fibrosis (grade 1: 23.6%; grade 2: 5.2%; grade 3: 1%), with higher rates among smokers (P=.06); 274 patients (34.4%) underwent breast reconstruction. Only 24 patients (3%) had early esophagitis of grade 1. Only 3 patients developed ischemic heart disease: all had been treated by anthracycline-based CT with or without trastuzumab, all had been irradiated to the left chest wall and LN, and all presented numerous cardiovascular risk factors (2-4 factors). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the good efficacy of this technique in terms of locoregional control and survival, and good short-term and long-term safety. Longer follow-up is required to analyze chronic cardiac events.

Medico-economic impact of MSKCC non-sentinel node prediction nomogram for ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancers.

BACKGROUND: Avoiding axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for invasive breast cancers with isolated tumor cells or micrometastatic sentinel node biopsy (SNB) could decrease morbidity with minimal clinical significance. PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to simulate the medico-economic impact of the routine use of the MSKCC non-sentinel node (NSN) prediction nomogram for ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients. METHODS: We studied 1036 ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients with a metastatic SNB. All had a complementary ALND. For each patient, we calculated the probability of the NSN positivity using the MSKCC nomogram. After validation of this nomogram in the population, we described how the patients' characteristics spread as the threshold value changed. Then, we performed an economic simulation study to estimate the total cost of caring for patients treated according to the MSKCC predictive nomogram results. RESULTS: A 0.3 threshold discriminate the type of sentinel node (SN) metastases: 98.8% of patients with pN0(i+) and 91.6% of patients with pN1(mic) had a MSKCC score under 0.3 (false negative rate = 6.4%). If we use the 0.3 threshold for economic simulation, 43% of ALND could be avoided, reducing the costs of caring by 1 051 980 EUROS among the 1036 patients. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of using the MSKCC NSN prediction nomogram by avoiding ALND for the pN0(i+) or pN1(mic) ER+ HER2- breast cancer patients with a MSKCC score of less than or equal to 0.3.

Helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy: New therapeutic arms in the breast cancer radiotherapy.

AIM: To analyse clinical and dosimetric results of helical tomotherapy (HT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in complex adjuvant breast and nodes irradiation. METHODS: Seventy-three patients were included (31 HT and 42 VMAT). Dose were 63.8 Gy (HT) and 63.2 Gy (VMAT) in the tumour bed, 52.2 Gy in the breast, 50.4 Gy in supraclavicular nodes (SCN) and internal mammary chain (IMC) with HT and 52.2 Gy and 49.3 Gy in IMC and SCN with VMAT in 29 fractions. Margins to particle tracking velocimetry were greater in the VMAT cohort (7 mm vs 5 mm). RESULTS: For the HT cohort, the coverage of clinical target volumes was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.4% ± 2.4%; breast: 98.4% ± 4.3%; SCN: 99.5% ± 1.2%; IMC: 96.5% ± 13.9%. For the VMAT cohort, the coverage was as follows: Tumour bed: 99.7% ± 0.5%, breast: 99.3% ± 0.7%; SCN: 99.6% ± 1.4%; IMC: 99.3% ± 3%. For ipsilateral lung, Dmean and V20 were 13.6 ± 1.2 Gy, 21.1% ± 5% (HT) and 13.6 ± 1.4 Gy, 20.1% ± 3.2% (VMAT). Dmean and V30 of the heart were 7.4 ± 1.4 Gy, 1% ± 1% (HT) and 10.3 ± 4.2 Gy, 2.5% ± 3.9% (VMAT). For controlateral breast Dmean was 3.6 ± 0.2 Gy (HT) and 4.6 ± 0.9 Gy (VMAT). Acute skin toxicity grade 3 was 5% in the two cohorts. CONCLUSION: HT and VMAT in complex adjuvant breast irradiation allow a good coverage of target volumes with an acceptable acute tolerance. A longer follow-up is needed to assess the impact of low doses to healthy tissues.

Radiotherapy associated with concurrent bevacizumab in patients with non-metastatic breast cancer.

The purpose of this multicenter prospective and descriptive study was to determine late toxicities and outcomes among patients with non-metastatic breast cancer receiving concurrent bevacizumab (BV) and radiation therapy (RT) in the clinical trials. Early and late toxicities were assessed and evaluation was available for 63 patients (pts) at 12 months. Acute radiation dermatitis was observed in 48 (76%): grade 1 for 27, grade 2 for 17 and grade 3 for 4 pts. Grade 2 acute oesophagitis was observed in one patient (2%). Little toxicity was described 1 year after the completion of RT: 7 pts (12%): grade 1-2 pain, 3 (5%) presented grade 1 fibrosis, and 2 pts (4%) - telangiectasia. One patient (2%) experienced grade 1 dyspnoea. Five grade 1-2 lymphoedema occurred. Only one patient experienced a LEVF value less than 50% one year after the end of RT. In conclusion, the concurrent BV with locoregional RT provides acceptable toxicities.

Whole breast radiotherapy in the lateral decubitus position: a dosimetric and clinical solution to decrease the doses to the organs at risk (OAR).

PURPOSE: To evaluate whole breast 3D-conformal radiotherapy (RT) delivered in the lateral decubitus position (isocentric lateral decubitus [ILD]) and to report the acute toxicity of a series of consecutive patients treated with ILD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to December 2010, 56 consecutive patients with large breasts and early-stage breast cancer treated by breast conserving surgery underwent 3D-conformal whole breast RT in the lateral decubitus position. A dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions via two opposed isocentric beams was prescribed to whole breast, with or without a 16 Gy photon tumor bed boost. Dosimetry of all patients was reviewed, and the acute toxicity of treatment, evaluated weekly using the NCI CTC v3.0 scale, was analyzed. RESULTS: Median age was 57 years (range: 33-71). 85% of patients had a breast circumference of at least 95 cm and 80% had at least a C cup size. Average breast volume was 991 cm(3) (range: 225-2791 cm(3)). Median dose to the breast was 50 Gy, while median dose to the tumor bed was 16 Gy. Grade 1, 2 and 3 dermatitis developed in 37.5%, 58.9% and 1.8% of patients, respectively. From a dosimetric point of view, doses to the ipsilateral lung were extremely low: average V(1Gy), V(2Gy) and V(5Gy) were 26.6%, 9.3% and 0.7%, respectively. Average mean lung dose was 0.96 Gy. For the 26 patients with left-sided tumors, heart doses were also extremely low: average V(1Gy), V(2Gy) and V(5Gy) were 58.8%, 14.2% and 0.7%, respectively. Average mean heart dose was 1.35 Gy. CONCLUSION: Whole breast radiotherapy in the lateral decubitus position for patients with large breasts and early-stage breast cancer provides an excellent dosimetric profile, with low doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung. It is also very well tolerated, with a good acute toxicity profile.

Helical tomotherapy for inoperable breast cancer: a new promising tool.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the feasibility of helical tomotherapy (HT) for inoperable large breast tumors, after failing to achieve adequate treatment planning with conformal radiation techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five consecutive patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were treated by preoperative HT. All patients received up-front chemotherapy before HT. Irradiated volumes included breast and nodal areas (45-50 Gy) in 4 patients. One patient received a simultaneous integrated boost (55 Gy) to gross tumor volume (GTV) without lymph node irradiation. Acute toxicity was assessed with Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v.4. Patients were evaluated for surgery at the end of treatment. RESULTS: Patients were staged IIB to IIIC (according to the AJCC staging system 2010). HT was associated in 4 patients with concomitant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and vinorelbine). Two patients were scored with grade 3 skin toxicity (had not completed HT) and one with grade 3 febrile neutropenia. One patient stopped HT with grade 2 skin toxicity. All patients were able to undergo mastectomy at a median interval of 43 days (31-52) from HT. Pathological partial response was seen in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: HT is feasible with acceptable toxicity profiles, potentially increased by chemotherapy. These preliminary results prompt us to consider a phase II study.

Prospective and comparative evaluation of the toxicity of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The lack of pathologic breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), a negative prognostic factor, has prompted the addition of chemotherapy to adjuvant radiotherapy. This study aims to investigate prospectively the toxicities of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two groups of patients treated for breast cancer between 1997 and 2002 by NCT, surgery, and radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy, were matched on age, body mass index (BMI), treatment period, treated side, and surgery type. Late toxicity was prospectively evaluated according to the CTCAE v3.0. Acute toxicity was derived from the medical charts. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were matched. Median follow-up was 10 years. Acute toxicity was higher in the chemoradiotherapy group compared with the radiotherapy alone group: 37% patients versus 10% experienced a grade 2/3 epithelitis (P=0.002); 48% versus 8% experienced a grade ≥1 mucositis (P=0.00001). Late toxicity was not significantly different in both univariate (51% vs. 49%; P=0.79) and multivariate analyses adjusted on the BMI (P=0.08). In univariate analysis, only the BMI tended to be predictive of toxicity (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy after NCT and surgery was associated with increased acute toxicity but not long-term toxicity. The efficacy of this therapeutic strategy should be evaluated to better define its indications.

Concurrent use of aromatase inhibitors and hypofractionated radiation therapy.

AIM: To retrospectively assess the acute and long-term toxicity using aromatase inhibitors (AI) therapy concurrently with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in breast cancer patients. METHODS: From November 1999 to October 2007, 66 patients were treated with breast HFRT and concurrent AI. In 63 patients (95.5%), HFRT delivered a total dose of 32.5 Gy to the whole breast within 5 wk (five fractions, one fraction per week). Other fractionations were chosen in three patients for the patients' personal convenience. A subsequent boost to the tumor bed was delivered in 35 patients (53.0%). Acute toxicities were scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events v3. Late toxicity was defined as any toxicity occurring more than 6 mo after completion of HFRT and was scored according to the Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force-Subjective, Objective, Management and Analytic scale. RESULTS: At the end of the HFRT course, 19 patients (28.8%) had no irradiation-related toxicity. Acute grade 1-2 epithelitis was observed in 46 patients (69.7%). One grade 3 toxicity (1.5%) was observed. With a median follow-up of 34 mo (range: 12-94 mo), 31 patients (47%) had no toxicity, and 35 patients (53%) presented with grade 1-2 fibrosis. No grade 3 or greater delayed toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: We found that AI was well tolerated when given concurrently with HFRT. All toxicities were mild to moderate, and no treatment disruption was necessary. Further prospective assessment is warranted.

Implant breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: can helical tomotherapy become a standard irradiation treatment?

To evaluate the benefits and limitations of helical tomotherapy (HT) for loco-regional irradiation of patients after a mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction. Ten breast cancer patients with retropectoral implants were randomly selected for this comparative study. Planning target volumes (PTVs) 1 (the volume between the skin and the implant, plus margin) and 2 (supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and internal mammary nodes, plus margin) were 50 Gy in 25 fractions using a standard technique and HT. The extracted dosimetric data were compared using a 2-tailed Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test. Doses for PTV1 and PTV2 were significantly higher with HT (V95 of 98.91 and 97.91%, respectively) compared with the standard technique (77.46 and 72.91%, respectively). Similarly, the indexes of homogeneity were significantly greater with HT (p = 0.002). HT reduced ipsilateral lung volume that received ≥20 Gy (16.7 vs. 35%), and bilateral lungs (p = 0.01) and neighboring organs received doses that remained well below tolerance levels. The heart volume, which received 25 Gy, was negligible with both techniques. HT can achieve full target coverage while decreasing high doses to the heart and ipsilateral lung. However, the low doses to normal tissue volumes need to be reduced in future studies.

Locoregional treatment for breast carcinoma after Hodgkin's lymphoma: the breast conservation option.

PURPOSE: To report clinical and pathologic characteristics and outcome of breast cancer (BC) after irradiation for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) in women treated at the Institut Curie, with a special focus on the breast-conserving option. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records of 72 women who developed either ductal carcinoma in situ or Stage I-III invasive carcinoma of the breast after HL between 1978 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Median age at HL diagnosis was 23 years (range, 14-53 years). Median total dose received by the mediastinum was 40 Gy, mostly by a mantle-field technique. Breast cancers occurred after a median interval of 21 years (range, 5-40 years). Ductal invasive carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ represented, respectively, 51 cases (71%) and 14 cases (19%). Invasive BCs consisted of 47 cT0-2 tumors (82%), 5 cN1-3 tumors (9%), and 20 Grade 3 tumors (35%). Locoregional treatment for BCs consisted of mastectomy with (3) or without (36) radiotherapy in 39 patients and lumpectomy with (30) or without (2) adjuvant radiotherapy in 32 patients. The isocentric lateral decubitus radiation technique was used in 17 patients after breast-conserving surgery (57%). With a median follow-up of 7 years, 5-year overall survival rate and locoregional control rate were, respectively, 74.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 64-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 72-93%) for invasive carcinoma and 100% (95% CI, 100 -100%) and 92% (95% CI, 79-100%) for in situ carcinoma. In patients with invasive tumors, the 5-year distant disease-free survival rate was 79% (95% CI, 69-91%), and 13 patients died of progressive BC. Contralateral BC was diagnosed in 10 patients (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Breast-conserving treatment can be an option for BCs that occur after HL, despite prior thoracic irradiation. It should consist of lumpectomy and adjuvant breast radiotherapy with use of adequate techniques, such as the lateral decubitus isocentric position, to protect the underlying heart and lung.

Simplified field-in-field technique for a large-scale implementation in breast radiation treatment.

We wanted to evaluate a simplified "field-in-field" technique (SFF) that was implemented in our department of Radiation Oncology for breast treatment. This study evaluated 15 consecutive patients treated with a simplified field in field technique after breast-conserving surgery for early-stage breast cancer. Radiotherapy consisted of whole-breast irradiation to the total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, and a boost of 16 Gy in 8 fractions to the tumor bed. We compared dosimetric outcomes of SFF to state-of-the-art electronic surface compensation (ESC) with dynamic leaves. An analysis of early skin toxicity of a population of 15 patients was performed. The median volume receiving at least 95% of the prescribed dose was 763 mL (range, 347-1472) for SFF vs. 779 mL (range, 349-1494) for ESC. The median residual 107% isodose was 0.1 mL (range, 0-63) for SFF and 1.9 mL (range, 0-57) for ESC. Monitor units were on average 25% higher in ESC plans compared with SFF. No patient treated with SFF had acute side effects superior to grade 1-NCI scale. SFF created homogenous 3D dose distributions equivalent to electronic surface compensation with dynamic leaves. It allowed the integration of a forward planned concomitant tumor bed boost as an additional multileaf collimator subfield of the tangential fields. Compared with electronic surface compensation with dynamic leaves, shorter treatment times allowed better radiation protection to the patient. Low-grade acute toxicity evaluated weekly during treatment and 2 months after treatment completion justified the pursuit of this technique for all breast patients in our department.

Preoperative radio-chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: long-term results of a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radio- (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in the preoperative setting for operable, non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) not amenable to initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2001 to 2003, 59 women were included. CT consisted of four cycles of 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2)/d, continuous infusion (d1-d5) and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) (d1 and d6). Starting concurrently with the second cycle, RT delivered 50 Gy to the breast and 46 Gy to the internal mammary and supra/infra-clavicular areas. Breast surgery and lymph node dissection were then performed. Adjuvant treatment consisted of a 16 Gy boost to the tumor bed after BCS, FEC (four cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), and epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), d1; d21) for pN1-3 and hormone-therapy for positive hormone receptors BC. RESULTS: The in-breast pathological complete response rate was 27%. BCS was performed in 41 (69%) pts. Overall and distant-disease free survivals at 5 years were respectively 88% [95% CI 80-98] and 83% [95% CI 74-93] whereas locoregional and local controls were 90% [95% CI 82-97] and 97% [95% CI 92-100]. Late toxicity (CTCAE-V3) was assessed in 51 pts (86%) with a median follow-up of 7 years [5-8]. Four (8%) experienced at least one grade III toxicities (one telangectasia and three fibroses). Cosmetic results, assessed in 35 of the 41 pts (85%) who retained their breasts, were poor in four pts (11%). CONCLUSION: Preoperative concurrent administration of RT and CT is an effective regimen. Long-term toxicity is moderate. This association deserves further evaluations in prospective trials.

Two-year clinical experience with tomotherapy: the French national cancer institute project on implementing new technology.

The pooled 2-year clinical experience using three tomotherapy units installed in France in 2007 is presented. Treatment indications and protocols were devised for each disease site and were the result of a consensus. A total of 642 patients were treated for central nervous system, head and neck, thoracic, abdominal, and pelvic tumors. Overall, grade 3, 4, and 5 acute toxicity was 10.7%, 0.3%, and 0.2%, respectively. Grade 3 chronic toxicity was 1.2%. There was no grade 4 or 5 chronic toxicity. The use of tomotherapy in a broad clinical practice is safe, and acute and chronic toxicity both are acceptable for all anatomical locations.

Preliminary experience of whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases previously treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy.

We report our experience of bevacizumab-based chemotherapy (BBCT) followed by whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with inoperable brain metastases (BM) or who refused surgery. This is a retrospective study of seven metastatic BC pts treated at the Institut Curie with at least one course of BBCT before WBRT, with a delay of ≤ 12 months between the two treatments. Toxicity was scored according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events (v4. 2010). Median age was 56 years (41-65). Median follow-up was 5.9 months (0.4-24.6). The median dose of bevacizumab was 10 mg/kg. Median number of cycles BBCT was six (5-17). Different chemotherapy regimens were used, the most common combination was paclitaxel-bevacizumab. WBRT was delivered in ten fractions, five fractions/week, for two weeks, to a total of 30 Gy. One pt underwent stereotactic radio surgery (SRS) after WBRT. No pt received BBCT during RT. Most common reported side-effects were nausea (n = 4), headache (n = 3), vomiting (n = 1), and vertigo (n = 3). All pts had mild or moderate grade ≤ 2 neurologic toxicity. There were no radiological signs of necrosis or cerebral ischemia. BBCT before WBRT was not associated with severe brain toxicity. Because of the limited number of pts, the different BBCT regimens, and important delays between treatments, these results must be confirmed prospectively.

Can we decrease the skin reaction in breast cancer patients using hyaluronic acid during radiation therapy? Results of phase III randomised trial.

PURPOSE: Radio-induced early skin reactions still remain a clinical challenge. Preliminary results with Hyaluronic acid, one of the most recent topical products used in this indication are proving interesting. To evaluate the efficacy of Hyaluronic acid compared to placebo. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Breast cancer patients with grade 1-2 radio-induced dermatitis during postoperative radiotherapy were eligible. They were randomised to receive either hyaluronic acid (A) or a simple emollient (B). The primary endpoint was the clinical evaluation of the erythema (success versus failure). Secondary endpoints were the evaluation of skin colorimetry, pain, and quality of life. RESULTS: Two-hundred patients were enrolled (A=99, B=101). Ninety-five patients per treatment arm could be evaluated. Failures occurred in 23 patients (24%) in the hyaluronic acid arm, and 32 (34%) in the emollient arm (p=0.15). Seventy-three patients (36.5%) prematurely stopped the treatment without any ensuing difference between the two arms. Body mass index and the size of the epithelitis were both independently associated with the failure of the local treatment. The relative reduction of colorimetric levels was 20% in the hyaluronic acid group, and 13% in the emollient group (p=0.46). Concerning the quality of life assessment, there was a trend towards a lower level of pain in patients receiving hyaluronic acid (p=0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed no significant difference between hyaluronic acid and simple emollient in the treatment of acute radio-induced dermatitis. There was however a trend towards an improvement in both pain level and skin colorimetry.

[Concurrent whole-brain radiotherapy with trastuzumab for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients: questions and answers]. / Association concomitante d'une irradiation encéphalique en totalité avec trastuzumab concomitant pour des métastases cérébrales d'un cancer du sein : questions et réponses.

PURPOSE: We retrospectively assessed the use of trastuzumab concurrently with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From April 2001 to April 2007, 31 patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer were referred for WBRT with concurrent trastuzumab. In most cases, concurrent WBRT delivered 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. In six patients, other fractionations were chosen because of either poor performance status or patients' convenience. RESULTS: At time of brain progression, median age was 55 years (range: 38 to 73 years) and all patients had a performance status of 0 to 2. Median time to brain progression was 10.5 months. Following WBRT, radiological responses were observed in 23 patients (74.2%), including six patients (19.4%) with complete radiological responses and 17 patients (54.8%) with partial radiological response. Clinical responses were observed in 27 patients (87.1%). Median survival from the start of WBRT was 18 months (range: two to 65 months). No grade 2 or more acute toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that trastuzumab concurrently with WBRT may have a potential clinical impact with low toxicity. Although promising, these preliminary data warrant further validation of trastuzumab as radio sensitizer for WBRT in brain metastases from breast cancer in the setting of a clinical trial. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these results.

Preliminary results of whole brain radiotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab for treatment of brain metastases in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of trastuzumab concurrently with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between April 2001 and April 2007, 31 patients with brain metastases from human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive breast cancer were referred for WBRT with concurrent trastuzumab. At brain progression, the median age was 55 years (range, 38-73), and all patients had a performance status of 0-2. The patients received trastuzumab 2 mg/kg weekly (n = 17) or 6 mg/kg repeated every 21 days (n = 14). In 26 patients, concurrent WBRT delivered 30 Gy in 10 daily fractions. In 6 patients, other fractionations were chosen because of either poor performance status or patient convenience. RESULTS: After WBRT, radiologic responses were observed in 23 patients (74.2%), including 6 (19.4%) with a complete radiologic response and 17 (54.8%) with a partial radiologic response. Clinical responses were observed in 27 patients (87.1%). The median survival time from the start of WBRT was 18 months (range, 2-65). The median interval to brain progression was 10.5 months (range, 2-27). No Grade 2 or greater acute toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: The low toxicity of trastuzumab concurrently with WBRT should probably not justify delays. Although promising, these preliminary data warrant additional validation of trastuzumab as a potential radiosensitizer for WBRT in brain metastases from breast cancer in the setting of a clinical trial.

The acute skin and heart toxicity of a concurrent association of trastuzumab and locoregional breast radiotherapy including internal mammary chain: a single-institution study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the skin and heart toxicity of a concurrent adjuvant trastuzumab-radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC), especially in the case of internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective study of 106 patients treated between 06/2003 and 03/2007 by concurrent trastuzumab-radiotherapy for non-metastatic BC. Left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) was assessed at baseline, before and after radiotherapy and then every 4-6 months. All toxicities were evaluated using CTCAEV3. RESULTS: Median age was 52 years (25-76). Chemotherapy with anthracycline was administered in 92% of patients. All patients received trastuzumab every three weeks (8 mg/kg followed by 6 mg/kg) for a median duration of 12 months (3-40). The IMC was irradiated in 83% of patients. There were: 87 grade 1, 14 grade 2 and 2 grade 3 skin reactions. There were 13 oesophagitis: 9 grade 1; 3 grade 2, and 1 grade 3. Out of 101 patients with assessments after 6 months, late telangiectasia grade 1 occurred in 5 patients, local pain grade 1 in 19 patients and grade 2 in 3 patients, fibrosis grade 1 in 16 patients. A reversible grade ≥2 left ventricular systolic dysfunction occurred in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-radiotherapy with, in most cases, anthracycline-based chemotherapy and IMC irradiation, both the rate of abnormal LVEF after concurrent trastuzumab-radiotherapy and the skin toxicity were deemed acceptable. Further follow-up is needed.

Management of inflammatory breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To assess the benefit of breast surgery for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective series was based on 232 patients treated for IBC. All patients received primary chemotherapy followed by either exclusive radiotherapy (118 patients; 51%) or surgery with or without radiotherapy (114 patients; 49%). The median follow-up was 11 years. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable apart from fewer tumors <70 mm (43% vs. 33%, p = 0.003), a higher rate of clinical stage N2 (15% vs. 5%, p = 0.04), and fewer histopathologic Grade 3 tumors (46% vs. 61%, p <0.05) in the no-surgery group. The addition of surgery was associated with a significant improvement in locoregional disease control (p = 0.04) at 10 years locoregional free interval 78% vs. 59% but with no significant difference in overall survival rates or disease-free intervals. Late toxicities were not significantly different between the two treatment groups except for a higher rate of fibrosis in the no-surgery group (p <0.0001) and more lymphedema in the surgery group (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest an improvement in locoregional control in patients treated by surgery, in conjunction with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, for IBC. Efforts must be made to improve overall survival.