ABSTRACT
Cholinergic muscarinic systems have been shown to influence dopaminergic function in the central nervous system. In addition, previous studies of benztropine analogs that inhibit dopamine uptake and show antagonism at muscarinic receptors show these drugs to be less effective than cocaine in producing its various prototypic effects such as locomotor stimulation. Because previous pharmacological studies on these topics have used nonselective M1 antagonists, we examined the interactions of preferential M1 muscarinic antagonists and cocaine. Dose-dependent increases in extracellular levels of dopamine in selected brain areas, the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell and core, and the prefrontal cortex, were produced by cocaine but not by the preferential M1 antagonists telenzepine and trihexyphenidyl. When administered with cocaine, however, both M1 antagonists dose-dependently increased the effects of cocaine on dopamine in the NAc shell, and these effects were selective in that they were not obtained in the NAc core or in the prefrontal cortex. Telenzepine also increased locomotor activity, although the effect was small compared with that of cocaine. The locomotor stimulant effects of trihexyphenidyl, in contrast, approached those of cocaine. Telenzepine attenuated, whereas trihexyphenidyl enhanced the locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine, with neither drug facilitating cocaine-induced stereotypy. The present results indicate that preferential antagonist effects at muscarinic M1 receptors do not uniformly alter all of the effects of cocaine, nor do they explain the differences in effects of cocaine and benztropine analogs, and that the alterations in dopamine levels in the NAc shell do not predict the behavioral effects of the interactions with cocaine.
Subject(s)
Brain Chemistry/drug effects , Cocaine/pharmacology , Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors/pharmacology , Dopamine/metabolism , Motor Activity/drug effects , Muscarinic Antagonists/pharmacology , Receptor, Muscarinic M1/drug effects , Animals , Benztropine/pharmacology , Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins/metabolism , Male , Microdialysis , Nucleus Accumbens/drug effects , Nucleus Accumbens/metabolism , Prefrontal Cortex/drug effects , Prefrontal Cortex/metabolism , Protein Binding , Rats , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Stereotyped Behavior/drug effects , Synaptic Transmission/drug effectsABSTRACT
Several dopamine (DA) indirect agonists have been proposed as potential medications for treating cocaine abuse. The objective of the present study was to quantify the interactions among cocaine and DA uptake inhibitors or DA releasers to better understand how these drugs may be working when administered in combination. The DA uptake inhibitors GBR 12909 [1-{2-[bis-(4-fluorophenyl)methoxy]-ethyl}-4-(3-phenylpropyl)piperazine], WIN 35,428 [2beta-carbomethoxy-3beta-(4-fluorophenyl)tropane], methylphenidate, indatraline, nomifensine, and mazindol and DA releasers methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, methcathinone, cathinone, fencamfamine, and phentermine were examined alone and in combination with cocaine in rats trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.) from saline injections. All of the DA indirect agonists dose-dependently substituted for cocaine and shifted the cocaine dose-effect curve leftward. Isobolographic analysis indicated the interactions were generally additive, although both methamphetamine and d-amphetamine were quantitatively determined to be more potent than DA uptake inhibitors in shifting the cocaine dose-effect function to the left. The potential of d-amphetamine as an effective treatment for cocaine abuse and negative clinical results with dopamine uptake inhibitors suggest that differences in shifts in dose-effect curves should be further examined with emerging clinical data as a predictive index of potential treatments for cocaine abuse.
