Quality and Safety in Nursing: Recommendations From a Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: As a consistent 24-hour presence in hospitals, nurses play a pivotal role in ensuring the quality and safety (Q&S) of patient care. However, a comprehensive review of evidence-based recommendations to guide nursing interventions that enhance the Q&S of patient care is lacking. Therefore, the purpose of our systematic review was to create evidence-based recommendations for the Q&S component of a nursing professional practice model for military hospitals. To accomplish this, a triservice military nursing team used Covidence software to conduct a systematic review of the literature across five databases. Two hundred forty-nine articles met inclusion criteria. From these articles, we created 94 recommendations for practice and identified eight focus areas from the literature: (1) communication; (2) adverse events; (3) leadership; (4) patient experience; (5) quality improvement; (6) safety culture/committees; (7) staffing/workload/work environment; and (8) technology/electronic health record. These findings provide suggestions for implementing Q&S practices that could be adapted to many healthcare delivery systems.

Using item response theory to develop a shortened practice environment scale of the nursing work index.

The 31-item Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index (PES-NWI) has been frequently used globally to measure the nurse work environment. However, due to its length and subsequent respondent burden, a more parsimonious version of the PES-NWI may be desirable. Item response theory (IRT) is a statistical technique that assists in decreasing the number of items in an instrument without sacrificing reliability and validity. Two separate samples of nurses in the United States (one called the "internal data source" and the other called "external data source"; sample sizes = 843 and 722, respectively) were analyzed. The internal data source was randomly split into training (n = 531) and validating data sets (n = 312), while a separate whole external data source was used as the final validating data set. Using IRT with training data, we removed nine items; two additional items were removed based on recommendations from a previous study. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the validity of the measurement model with the 20-item of PES-NWI in both internal and external validation data sources. The correlations among subscales between 31- and 20-item versions were high magnitude for five subscales in both validation data sets (τ = 0.84-0.89). Ultimately, we identified a 20-item version of the PES-NWI which demonstrated adequate validity and reliability properties while decreasing data collection burden yet maintaining a similar factor structure to the original instrument. Additional research may be necessary to update the items themselves on the PES-NWI.

Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Survey of International Practice Among 555 Pediatric Intensivists.

Pediatric ventilation liberation has limited evidence, likely resulting in wide practice variation. To inform future work, practice patterns must first be described. OBJECTIVES: Describe international pediatric ventilation liberation practices and regional practice variation. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: International cross-sectional electronic survey. Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Practices focusing on spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) eligibility, SBT practice, non-SBT extubation readiness bundle elements, and post-extubation respiratory support. RESULTS: Five-hundred fifty-five responses representing 47 countries were analyzed. Most respondents reported weaning followed by an SBT (86.4%). The top SBT eligibility variables reported were positive end-expiratory pressure (95%), Fio2 (93.4%), and peak inspiratory pressure (73.9%). Most reported use of standardized pressure support regardless of endotracheal tube size (40.4%) with +10 cm H2O predominating (38.6%). SBT durations included less than or equal to 30 minutes (34.8%), 31 minutes to 1 hour (39.3%), and greater than 1 hours (26%). In assigning an SBT result, top variables were respiratory rate (94%), oxygen saturation (89.3%), and subjective work of breathing (79.8%). Most reported frequent consideration of endotracheal secretion burden (81.3%), standardized pain/sedation measurement (72.8%), fluid balance (83%), and the endotracheal air leak test as a part of extubation readiness bundles. Most reported using planned high flow nasal cannula in less than or equal to 50% of extubations (83.2%). Top subpopulations supported with planned HFNC were those with chronic lung disease (67.3%), exposed to invasive ventilation greater than 14 days (66.6%), and chronic critical illness (44.9%). Most reported using planned noninvasive ventilation (NIV) following less than or equal to 20% of extubations (79.9%). Top subpopulations supported with planned NIV were those with neuromuscular disease (72.8%), chronic lung disease (66.7%), and chronic NIV use for any reason (61.6%). Regional variation was high for most practices studied. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: International pediatric ventilation liberation practices are heterogeneous. Future study is needed to address key evidence gaps. Many practice differences were associated with respondent region, which must be considered in international study design.

Ventilation Liberation Practices Among 380 International PICUs.

1) Characterize the prevalence of ventilator liberation protocol use in international PICUs, 2) identify the most commonly used protocol elements, and 3) estimate an international extubation failure rate and use of postextubation noninvasive respiratory support modes. DESIGN: International cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS: Nontrainee pediatric medical and cardiac critical care physicians. SETTING: Electronic survey. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Responses represented 380 unique PICUs from 47 different countries. Protocols for Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) practice (50%) and endotracheal tube cuff management (55.8%) were the only protocols used by greater than or equal to 50% of PICUs. Among PICUs screening for SBT eligibility, physicians were most commonly screened (62.7%) with daily frequency (64.2%). Among those with an SBT practice protocol, SBTs were most commonly performed by respiratory therapists/physiotherapists (49.2%) and least commonly by nurses (4.9%). Postextubation respiratory support protocols were not prevalent (28.7%). International practice variation was significant for most practices surveyed. The estimated median international extubation failure was 5% (interquartile range, 2.3-10%). A majority of respondents self-reported use of planned high-flow nasal cannula in less than or equal to 50% (84.2%) and planned noninvasive ventilation in less than or equal to 20% of extubations (81.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Variability in international pediatric ventilation liberation practice is high, and prevalence of protocol implementation is generally low. There is a need to better understand elements that drive clinical outcomes and opportunity to work on standardizing pediatric ventilation liberation practices worldwide.

Measuring Knowledge of Fertility Preservation in Women With Cystic Fibrosis: Instrument Development and Psychometric Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, evaluation, and psychometric properties of a new instrument that measures fertility preservation (FP) knowledge in women with cystic fibrosis (CF) titled the Knowledge of FP in Women With CF Instrument (KFP-WCFI). DESIGN: The 10-item KFP-WCFI was developed and evaluated through a cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Participants were recruited nationally from CF Foundation-accredited CF clinics and via snowball sampling. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty women with CF ages 18 through 35 years completed the instrument. MEASUREMENTS: Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). In the CFA, the model fit was evaluated using standardized root mean square residual, root mean square error of approximation, and comparative fit index. Cronbach's alpha was used to examine internal consistency reliability. The criterion validity was assessed using inferential statistics. RESULTS: The CFA with two subscales, General Fertility Knowledge and Transplant-Related Fertility Knowledge, demonstrated good fit, with a standardized root mean square residual of 0.07, root mean square error of approximation of 0.06, and comparative fit index of 0.97, indicating good construct validity of the instrument. This instrument demonstrated internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of .91 for the General Fertility Knowledge subscale and .64 for the Transplant-Related Fertility Knowledge subscale. Women who reported a pregnancy scored higher than women who did not report a pregnancy (p = .02), suggesting criterion validity. CONCLUSION: The newly developed KFP-WCFI appears to be a valid and reliable instrument that can be used to measure self-assessed FP knowledge in women with CF.