The dynamics of the general practitioner-nephrologist collaboration for the management of patients with chronic kidney disease before and after dialysis initiation: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Effective collaboration between general practitioners (GP) and nephrologists is crucial in CKD care. We aimed to analyse GPs' and nephrologists' presence and involvement in CKD care and assess how they intertwine to shape patients' trajectories. Methods: We conducted a mixed-methods study that included all patients with CKD who started dialysis in France in 2015 (the REIN registry) and a sample of nephrologists and GPs. We quantified professionals' presence through patients' reimbursed healthcare from the French National Health Data System, 2 years before and 1 year after dialysis start. Involvement in CKD care was derived from the nephrologists' and GPs' interviews. Results: Among 8856 patients included, nephrologists' presence progressively increased from 29% to 67% of patients with a contact during the 2 years before dialysis start. However, this was partly dependent on the GPs' referral practices. Interviews revealed that GPs initially controlled the therapeutic strategy on their own. Although unease grew with CKD's management complexity, reducing their involvement in favour of nephrologists, GPs' presence remained frequent throughout the pre-dialysis period. Upon dialysis start, nephrologists' presence and involvement became total, while GPs' greatly decreased (48% of patients with a contact at month 12 after dialysis start). Collaboration was smooth when GPs maintained contact with patients and could contribute to their care through aspects of their specialty they valued. Conclusions: This mixed-methods study shows presences and forms of involvement of GPs and nephrologists in CKD care adjusting along the course of CKD and unveils the mechanisms at play in their collaboration.

Women's Access to Kidney Transplantation in France: A Mixed Methods Research Protocol.

Kidney transplantation is the best renal replacement therapy (medically and economically) for eligible patients with end-stage kidney disease. Studies in some French regions and in other countries suggest a lower access to the kidney transplant waiting listing and also to kidney transplantation, once waitlisted, for women. Using a mixed methods approach, this study aims to precisely understand these potential sex disparities and their causes. The quantitative study will explore the geographic disparities, compare the determinants of access to the waiting list and to kidney transplantation, and compare the reasons and duration of inactive status on the waiting list in women and men at different scales (national, regional, departmental, and census-block). The qualitative study will allow describing and comparing women's and men's views about their disease and transplantation, as well as nephrologists' practices relative to the French national guidelines on waiting list registration. This type of study is important in the current societal context in which the reduction of sex/gender-based inequalities is a major social expectation.

The Pre-Dialysis Care Trajectory of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients and the Start of Dialysis in Emergency: A Mixed Method Study Protocol.

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is an important public health issue that requires early and close medical monitoring to start Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) in the best conditions. However, in France, about 1/3 of patients start dialysis in emergency, despite the existence of CKD management guidelines. Using both quantitative and qualitative methods, we wanted to analyze the pre-dialysis care trajectory of patients with CKD and document the causes of Emergency dialysis Start (ES). To this aim, we designed a convergent mixed-method study. The quantitative component will analyze individual healthcare consumption and clinical data to identify the risk factors of ES by comparing the trajectories of patients who started dialysis in emergency in 2015 in France with those of patients who started in a planned manner and with the national recommendations. The qualitative component will explore the patients' trajectories and identify barriers to a planned start using semi-structured interviews with patients who started dialysis in emergency and with their general practitioners and nephrologists. Using the strengths of a mixed methodology, this study will bring robust and valuable findings to improve the care of CKD patients.

Implementation of an Occupational Therapy Program for Alzheimer's Disease Patients in France: Patients' and Caregivers' Perspectives.

BACKGROUND: The French National Alzheimer Plan 2008-2012 created specialized Alzheimer teams, which provide up to 15 sessions of cognitive rehabilitation in the patient's home for 3 months. Sessions are conducted by an occupational therapist and a gerontological nursing assistant. OBJECTIVES: As the patient's experience is one determinant of successful implementation, we explored the usefulness of these teams as viewed by the patient and his or her main caregiver. METHODS: Thirteen patients and their caregiver, previously assisted by a specialized Alzheimer team, were individually given semi-structured interviews (n = 26, duration 20 to 180 minutes). RESULTS: Our study showed that although patients and caregiver had no initial expectations, most of them appreciated the support provided by the specialized Alzheimer teams. Patients valued the "human" component, and favored interventions that improved quality of life over those intended to maintain functional capacities. Caregivers observed improved mood and behavior in patients. Those involved in sessions felt empowered by contact with a specialized Alzheimer team. We discuss how patients' and caregivers' feedback influenced the implementation process through comprehensive use of the five dimensions of the RE-AIM framework. CONCLUSION: Whereas intervention by specialized Alzheimer teams was largely accepted by health care professionals, patients, and caregivers, its effectiveness is questioned in view of its deviation from the evidence-based model. Interviews with patients and caregivers shed light on some reasons for this deviation, as what they value in the intervention differs from the functional focus of the model.

[What role for the family carers of elderly people losing their autonomy?]. / Quel rôle pour les aidants familiaux de personnes âgées en perte d'autonomie ?

The qualitative analysis of the role of family carers shows that supporting a family member losing their autonomy not only involves providing physical assistance and care but also, increasingly, adopting a role of coordinator. These activities can be a source of stress or they can be rewarding, depending on the shared history of the carer-patient relationship.

[Workplace's evolution and mental burn-out in the agricultural sector]. / Evolution de l'environnement de travail et usure mentale en milieu agricole.

The article describes the evolution of working conditions in the agricultural sector in Brittany and its repercussions on agricultural workers' health. Based on personal accounts of local rural workers' experiences, the authors demonstrate that it is not necessarily the introduction of new working methods and means, but rather the speed at which they are introduced and implemented that is responsible for the emergence of mental health problems and psychological vulnerability. Furthermore, this process contributed to the identity crisis of those farmers who did not identify with the new professional schema in order to incorporate the new techniques. Recent observations of farmers' conditions show that this phenomenon is perpetuating and evolving.