Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Pediatrics ; 129(2): e486-93, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22232303

ABSTRACT

This article describes a multistate population-based surveillance system for monitoring sudden unexpected infant deaths (SUIDs) known as the SUID Case Registry pilot program. The pilot program represents collaboration between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Center for Child Death Review (NCCDR), which is funded by the Health Resources and Services Administration. The SUID Case Registry builds on existing child death review system activities and protocols. The objectives of the SUID Case Registry are to collect accurate and consistent population-based data about the circumstances and events associated with SUID cases, to improve the completeness and quality of SUID case investigations, and to use a decision-making algorithm with standardized definitions to categorize SUID cases. States who participate in the pilot program commit to review all SUID cases in their state by using their multidisciplinary state and local child death review teams. These teams request and review data from death scene investigators, medical examiners and coroners, law enforcement, social services, pediatric and obstetric providers, and public health per usual, but as part of the pilot program, supplement their SUID case reviews by discussing additional medical, environmental, and behavioral factors, and entering this data using the NCCDR Web-based Case Reporting System. This new surveillance system aims to improve knowledge of factors surrounding SUID events and improve investigation practices. The surveillance system will allow researchers and program planners to create prevention strategies and interventions, ultimately reducing SUIDs and injury-related infant deaths.


Subject(s)
Population Surveillance , Registries , Sudden Infant Death/epidemiology , Sudden Infant Death/prevention & control , Cause of Death , Cooperative Behavior , Health Plan Implementation , Health Planning , Health Policy , Humans , Infant , Interdisciplinary Communication , Patient Care Team , Pilot Projects , Risk Factors , Sudden Infant Death/etiology , United States , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/prevention & control
2.
J Forensic Sci ; 57(2): 364-9, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21981558

ABSTRACT

We compared written text on infant death certificates for deaths coded as sudden infant death syndrome (R95), unknown cause (R99), and accidental suffocation (W75). Using US mortality files supplemented with the death certifiers' written text for all infant deaths with International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 assigned codes R95, R99, and W75, we formed cause-of-death subcategories from common themes identified from the written text. Among all infant deaths in 2003-2004, the underlying cause of death was listed as R99 for 2128 deaths, R95 for 4408 deaths, and W75 for 931 deaths. Among the postneonatal deaths, the differences in subcategories varied between assigned ICD-10 codes: for R99-coded deaths, 45.8% were categorized as "Unknown" and 48.6% as "Pending"; for R95-coded deaths, 67.7% were categorized as "sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)"; and for W75-coded deaths, 76.4% were categorized as "Suffocation." Examination of the written text on the death certificates demonstrates variability in the assigned ICD-10 codes which could have an important effect on the estimates of SIDS cases in the United States.


Subject(s)
Accidents/classification , Asphyxia/classification , Death Certificates , Sudden Infant Death/classification , Terminology as Topic , Accidents/mortality , Asphyxia/mortality , Cause of Death , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , International Classification of Diseases , Sudden Infant Death/epidemiology , United States
3.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol ; 33(3): 197-201, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21030849

ABSTRACT

Using a 2004 population-based survey of all US medical examiner and coroner offices, we examined the characteristics of offices accepting an infant death case and calculated the percentage of offices that had death scene investigation or autopsy policies for the investigation of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID). We also calculated the percentage of offices that used and did not use sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) as a cause of death, and we compared differences in characteristics among those offices.Of medical examiner and coroner offices, 52% did not report an infant death in 2004. Of the 7957 infant deaths reported, 43% occurred in jurisdictions that experienced 1 or 2 infant deaths. Of the offices that used SIDS as a classification, 34% did not have policies for conducting death scene investigations and autopsies for SUID. At least 5% of offices that reported an infant death did not use SIDS as a cause of death classification. These findings have important implications for understanding recent trends in SIDS and SUID. Supporting the implementation of national standards for investigating and certifying infant deaths could provide guidelines for consistent practices in medical examiner and coroner offices.


Subject(s)
Coroners and Medical Examiners/standards , Organizational Policy , Sudden Infant Death/epidemiology , Autopsy/standards , Cause of Death , Forensic Medicine/standards , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...