Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Publication year range
1.
Quintessence Int ; 31(2): 133-6, 2000 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11203915

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The introduction of the current enamel-dentin adhesives has simplified the reattachment of fractured dentinal fragments. The objective of this study was to determine the strength needed to detach coronal fragments reattached with the most recent adhesives. METHOD AND MATERIALS: A complete coronal fracture was caused on the incisal one third of 40 noncarious maxillary and mandibular lateral and central incisors. Each fractured coronal fragment was reattached to its tooth with the enamel-dentin adhesive Scotchbond MP, All-Bond 2, Dentastic, or One-Step (10 specimens each). RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between 2 similar fourth-generation adhesives that use orthophosphoric acid as etchant (Dentastic and All-Bond 2) and a fourth-generation adhesive that uses maleic acid as etchant (Scotchbond MP). The values obtained with the fifth-generation adhesive (One-Step) were significantly inferior to those obtained with the other 3 enamel-dentin adhesives. CONCLUSION: In the reattachment of fractured tooth fragments, fourth-generation adhesives can guarantee a bonding force stronger than fifth-generation adhesives.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Incisor/injuries , Tooth Crown/injuries , Tooth Fractures/therapy , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Humans , Methacrylates , Resin Cements
3.
Bull Med Libr Assoc ; 67(2): 262-3, 1979 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-465841
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL