Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Open Rheumatol J ; 7: 75-80, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24115967

ABSTRACT

The use of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists (infliximab [IFN], etanercept [ETN], adalimumab [ADA]) has changed the course of many rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, some questions concerning their safety have emerged since their approval because they can trigger immunisation, induce rare type I and III hypersensitivity, and cause acute and delayed reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between hypersensitivity reactions to biological agents, disease activity and the development of class-specific IgA and IgM antibodies against the three anti-TNF agents in patients with RA. This longitudinal observational study involved consecutive outpatients with active RA who started treatment with IFN (n=30), ETN (n=41) or ADA (n=28). Clinical data and systemic and local side effects were collected prospectively at baseline and after six months of anti-TNF treatment. Serum samples were taken at the same time points in order to measure antibodies against the TNF blockers, anti-nuclear (ANA) and anti-dsDNA antibodies. The IgA and IgM antibodies specific to all three anti-TNF-α agents were analysed using ImmunoCaP Phadia- Thermofisher especially developed in collaboration with the laboratory of Immunology and Allergy, San Giovanni di Dio, Florence. The mean age of the 99 patients (86% females) was 54.6±12.4 years, and the median disease duration was 11.2±.3.2 years (range 3-14.3). The three treatment groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody positivity, and baseline C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, 28-joint disease activity scores, and concomitant medications. Twelve patients treated with INF (40%) had anti-IFN IgM, and two (6%) anti-IFN IgA; 19 patients treated with ADA (68%) had anti-ADA IgM, and four (6%) anti-ADA IgA; and 27 patients treated with ETN (66%) had anti-ETN IgM, and 24 (58%) anti-ETN IgA. There were five systemic reactions in the IFN group, and seven adverse local reactions in both the ADA and the ETN group. There was no correlation between drug-specific IgA and IgM antibodies (p=0.65). There was also no correlation between the antibodies and disease activity after six months of treatment (r=0.189;p=0.32). Our findings show that the development of antibodies against IFN, ADA or ETN of IgA and IgM class are not related to any decrease in efficacy or early discontinuation of anti-TNF treatment in RA patients, nor to systemic and local reactions. Further studies of larger series of RA patients are needed to confirm the relationships between the development of drug-specific antibodies, serum TNF blocker levels, and disease activity.

2.
PLoS One ; 8(5): e63233, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23700415

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment failure during venom immunotherapy (VIT) may be associated with a variety of risk factors. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC) and of other parameters with the frequency of VIT failure during the maintenance phase. METHODS: In this observational prospective multicenter study, we followed 357 patients with established honey bee or vespid venom allergy after the maintenance dose of VIT had been reached. In all patients, VIT effectiveness was either verified by sting challenge (n = 154) or patient self-reporting of the outcome of a field sting (n = 203). Data were collected on BTC, age, gender, preventive use of anti-allergic drugs (oral antihistamines and/or corticosteroids) right after a field sting, venom dose, antihypertensive medication, type of venom, side effects during VIT, severity of index sting reaction preceding VIT, and duration of VIT. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models. RESULTS: 22 patients (6.2%) developed generalized symptoms during sting challenge or after a field sting. A strong association between the frequency of VIT failure and BTC could be excluded. Due to wide confidence bands, however, weaker effects (odds ratios <3) of BTC were still possible, and were also suggested by a selective analysis of patients who had a sting challenge. The most important factor associated with VIT failure was a honey bee venom allergy. Preventive use of anti-allergic drugs may be associated with a higher protection rate. INTERPRETATION: It is unlikely that an elevated BTC has a strong negative effect on the rate of treatment failures. The magnitude of the latter, however, may depend on the method of effectiveness assessment. Failure rate is higher in patients suffering from bee venom allergy.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/prevention & control , Bee Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Wasp Venoms/immunology , Adult , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Animals , Bees , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Treatment Failure , Wasps
3.
J Med Case Rep ; 5: 155, 2011 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21504597

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of adalimumab, a fully human anti-tumor necrosis factor α recombinant antibody, has dramatically improved the quality of life of patients with rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis and Crohn's disease. Because it is fully human, one should not expect immune reactions to this molecule. Adverse reactions to adalimumab are limited mainly to injection site reactions and are very common. Immediate systemic reactions are rarely reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 61-year-old Caucasian woman who was treated with adalimumab for spondylarthritis and developed injection site reactions after the sixth dose. After a two-month suspension, she recommenced therapy and experienced two systemic reactions. The first occurred after one hour with itching of the palms and soles and angioedema of the tongue and lips. Thirty minutes after the next dose the patient had itching of the palms and soles with diffusion to her whole body, angioedema of the lips, dizziness and visual disturbances. A skin-prick test and intra-dermal tests with adalimumab gave strong positive results at the immediate reading. However, serum-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) to adalimumab were not detectable by using Phadia solid phase, especially harvested for this case, in collaboration with our Immunology and Allergy Laboratory Unit. Her total IgE concentration was 6.4 kU/L. CONCLUSION: We describe what is, to the best of our knowledge, the first reported case of immediate systemic reaction to adalimumab studied with a skin test giving positive results and a serum-specific IgE assay giving negative results. The mechanism of the reaction must be immunologic but not IgE-mediated.

5.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 126(1): 105-11.e5, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20542320

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe side effects during venom immunotherapy (VIT) are associated with a variety of risk factors. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentration (BTC) and of other parameters, which are routinely recorded during patient evaluation, with the frequency of severe reactions requiring an emergency intervention during the buildup phase of VIT. METHODS: In this observational prospective multicenter study, we enrolled 680 patients with established honeybee or vespid venom allergy who underwent VIT. Data were collected on tryptase concentration, age, sex, culprit insect, cardiovascular medication, degree of preceding sting reaction, preventive antiallergic medication before therapy, time between last preceding sting reaction and VIT, venom specific IgE concentration, and type of buildup procedure. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (8.4%) required an emergency intervention during buildup because of a severe systemic reaction. The frequency of interventions increased significantly with higher BTC (log-linear association; adjusted odds ratio, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.15-2.11; P < .005). The predictive power of BTC was markedly greater when VIT was performed for vespid venom allergy than for bee venom (for bee VIT, no significant association; for vespid VIT, log-linear association; adjusted odds ratio, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.28-4.26; P = .005). The most important other factor significantly associated with severe reactions during the buildup phase of VIT was bee venom allergy. CONCLUSION: Before vespid VIT, measurement of baseline serum tryptase concentration should be used to identify patients with a high risk for side effects. Patients with bee venom allergy require a particularly high degree of surveillance during VIT.


Subject(s)
Arthropod Venoms/immunology , Desensitization, Immunologic/adverse effects , Hymenoptera/immunology , Hypersensitivity/therapy , Tryptases/blood , Adult , Aged , Animals , Emergencies , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
6.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 124(5): 1047-54, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19895993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe anaphylaxis to honeybee or vespid stings is associated with a variety of risk factors, which are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the association of baseline serum tryptase concentrations and other variables routinely recorded during patient evaluation with the frequency of past severe anaphylaxis after a field sting. METHODS: In this observational multicenter study, we enrolled 962 patients with established bee or vespid venom allergy who had a systemic reaction after a field sting. Data were collected on tryptase concentration, age, sex, culprit insect, cardiovascular medication, and the number of preceding minor systemic reactions before the index field sting. A severe reaction was defined as anaphylactic shock, loss of consciousness, or cardiopulmonary arrest. The index sting was defined as the hitherto first, most severe systemic field-sting reaction. Relative rates were calculated with generalized additive models. RESULTS: Two hundred six (21.4%) patients had a severe anaphylactic reaction after a field sting. The frequency of this event increased significantly with higher tryptase concentrations (nonlinear association). Other factors significantly associated with severe reactions after a field sting were vespid venom allergy, older age, male sex, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor medication, and 1 or more preceding field stings with a less severe systemic reaction. CONCLUSION: In patients with honeybee or vespid venom allergy, baseline serum tryptase concentrations are associated with the risk for severe anaphylactic reactions. Preventive measures should include substitution of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Bee Venoms/immunology , Hypersensitivity/immunology , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Tryptases/blood , Wasps/immunology , Adult , Anaphylaxis/blood , Anaphylaxis/enzymology , Animals , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
7.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 122(1): 44-8, 2008 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18468672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) proved effective and safe in respiratory allergy, and thus its use in hymenoptera allergy can be hypothesized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess, in a proof-of-concept study, whether SLIT might potentially be beneficial in hymenoptera allergy. The sting challenge in large local reactions (LLRs) was used to test this hypothesis. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study involving patients with LLRs who were monosensitized to honeybee. After the baseline sting challenge, they were randomized to either SLIT or placebo for 6 months. The treatment (Anallergo, Florence, Italy) involved a 6-week build-up period, followed by maintenance with 525 microg of venom monthly. The sting challenge was repeated after 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty patients (18 male patients; mean age, 44.5 years) were enrolled, and 26 completed the study, with 1 dropout in the active group and 3 dropouts in the placebo group. In the active group the median of the peak maximal diameter of the LLRs decreased from 20.5 to 8.5 cm (P = .014), whereas no change was seen in the placebo group (23.0 vs 20.5 cm, P = not significant). The diameter was reduced more than 50% in 57% of patients. One case of generalized urticaria occurred in a placebo-treated patient at sting challenge. No adverse event caused by SLIT was reported. CONCLUSION: Honeybee SLIT significantly reduced the extent of LLRs, and its safety profile was good. Although LLRs are not an indication for immunotherapy, this proof-of-concept study suggests that SLIT in hymenoptera allergy deserves further investigation. Trials involving systemic reactions and dose-ranging studies are needed.


Subject(s)
Bee Venoms/immunology , Bees , Desensitization, Immunologic/methods , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/therapy , Insect Bites and Stings/immunology , Administration, Sublingual , Adult , Animals , Bee Venoms/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , Male , Middle Aged , Placebos
8.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 7(5): 393-403, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17873578

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Several biological agents have been introduced into the drug market and more are emerging. Adverse reactions to these agents have recently been classified into five different subtypes. Some of these reactions are frequent but without consequences for the patients. Others are less frequent but potentially life-threatening, and they include allergic reactions. RECENT FINDINGS: Hypersensitivity reactions are well described adverse drug reactions, corresponding to the ss-type of the newly proposed classification of adverse reactions induced by biological agents. We focus our search on tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists, as they represent a dramatic improvement in the therapy of both rheumatic and inflammatory bowel diseases and because adverse reactions have been closely scrutinized. We also add cases from our own experience. We found very few properly documented allergic reactions. SUMMARY: Hypersensitivity reactions to tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists are not rare. Whether these manifestations have to be considered type beta or type gamma reactions is still a matter of debate. There is a need for allergological tests in vivo and in vitro.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity , Immunoglobulin G/adverse effects , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adalimumab , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/immunology , Antibodies/analysis , Antibodies, Monoclonal/immunology , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Biological Products/adverse effects , Biological Products/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Etanercept , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Infliximab , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/immunology
9.
Curr Pharm Des ; 12(26): 3313-26, 2006.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17017926

ABSTRACT

Quinolones are one of the most important classes of antimicrobial agents discovered in the recent years and one of the most widely used classes of antibiotics in clinical medicine. Their broad spectrum of activity and pharmacokinetic properties make them ideal agents for treating a variety of infections. Their clinical importance is further demonstrated by their activity against a wide range of diseases of public health importance such as anthrax, tuberculosis, bacterial pneumonia, and sexually transmitted diseases. Like other antibiotics, quinolones can cause various, sometimes dangerous hypersensitivity reactions. The underlying pathomechanisms are only poorly understood. Some are thought to be partly non-immune mediated reactions, others are considered to be IgE- or T cell-mediated reactions. This review gives an insight into the different immunological mechanisms leading to the diverse symptoms of quinolone-induced hypersensitivity reactions, with special emphasis on the role of T cells in such reactions.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Quinolones/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/metabolism , Humans , Quinolones/chemistry , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics
10.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 113(1): 155-60, 2004 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14713922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the last years, immediate reactions to quinolone antibiotics have been observed with increasing frequency, mainly urticaria, angioedema, and shock. No test was available because of the high incidence of false-positive results on skin tests. Thus the pathogenesis, value of diagnostic procedures, and cross-reactivity have not been evaluated in a systematic way. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess whether these reactions are IgE mediated and whether an in vitro test for quinolone-specific IgE is useful in the diagnosis and understanding of cross-reactivity. METHODS: We assayed specific serum IgE to quinolones using epoxy-activated sepharose 6B as the solid phase in 55 patients with immediate adverse reactions; specificity of IgE binding was demonstrated by inhibition tests. RESULTS: The test yielded positive results in 30 (54.5%) patients who were tested 1 to 48 months after the reaction had occurred. The quinolone-specific IgE seems to disappear more slowly in atopic patients. The cross-reactivity between various quinolones allowed us to identify a common structural motif within quinolones that might be responsible for clinical and serologic cross-reactivity. CONCLUSION: A substantial portion of immediate reactions to quinolones appear to be IgE mediated. Cross-reactivity of IgE among different quinolones is frequent and suggests that a common avoidance of quinolones should be attempted in all patients with respective symptoms.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/immunology , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Quinolones/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Cross Reactions , Drug Hypersensitivity/blood , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Female , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/blood , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Quinolones/adverse effects
11.
J Infect ; 47(4): 296-9, 2003 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14556753

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is a key regulator cytokine that modulates the proliferation and maturation of polymorphonuclear and mononuclear progenitors. This study was designed to investigate and clarify the role of GM-CSF in 52 critically ill patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). METHODS: Serum levels of GM-CSF were detected by an immunoenzyme assay. RESULTS: Our results clearly show that the serum concentrations of GM-CSF were significantly elevated in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS (33.2+/-45.7pg/ml, controls: 17.2+/-9.8pg/ml; p=0.0303). In addition, GM-CSF levels significantly decreased in patients with SIRS, particularly in patients with infectious SIRS, 5 and 7 days later. There was a clear tendency toward higher levels of GM-CSF in patients with poor, as compared with those having a good outcome of the disease. CONCLUSION: These results show that GM-CSF may play an important role in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS, and that GM-CSF levels progressively and significantly decrease in patients with infectious SIRS.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Analysis of Variance , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric
12.
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol ; 3(4): 275-81, 2003 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12865771

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Quinolones are potent antibacterial agents that can cause drug hypersensitivity reactions affecting different organs. A better understanding of the underlying mechanism and the level of crossreactivity within different quinolones is needed to handle and prevent these diseases. RECENT FINDINGS: The adverse side-effects caused by quinolones are the result of different immunological mechanisms and cause quite different diseases. The development of an assay detecting quinolone-specific IgE revealed specific antibodies in more than 50% of patients with immediate-type reactions, and the majority of sera also reacted with related compounds. In maculopapular drug exanthemas caused by ciprofloxacin, specific T cells could be detected and cloned. They reacted with ciprofloxacin directly, and crossreactivity to related compounds was detected in approximately 50% of the clones. SUMMARY: Quinolones can cause drug hypersensitivity reactions by different immunological mechanisms. In-vitro analysis suggests that crossreactivity is common.


Subject(s)
Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Quinolones/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Disorders/chemically induced , Cross Reactions , Dermatitis, Photoallergic , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/mortality , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Delayed/chemically induced , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/chemically induced
13.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 45(4): 233-6, 2003 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12729991

ABSTRACT

Resolution of inflammation/infection involves removal of neutrophils and other inflammatory cells by the induction of apoptosis. Fas/Apo-1 is a widely occurring apoptotic signal receptor molecule expressed by almost any type of cell, which is also released in a soluble circulating form. In this study we investigated the role of circulating Fas/Apo-1 in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We evaluated 57 critically ill patients, 34 with infectious SIRS (sepsis and septic shock), and 23 patients with noninfectious SIRS. Circulating Fas/Apo-1 was determined by a commercially available immunoassay. Our results clearly show that levels of Fas/Apo-1 were significantly elevated in patients with infectious and noninfectious SIRS (10.4 +/- 8.1 pg/mL, controls: 5.0 +/- 0.7 pg/mL; p < 0.0001). In addition, Fas/Apo-1 levels were not able in predicting in predicting poor outcome of patients with SIRS. In conclusion, these results show that increased levels of Fas/Apo-1 from patients with SIRS is a mechanism which contribute to inflammatory response through accumulation of neutrophils at sites of inflammation/infection.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/physiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Membrane Glycoproteins/blood , Multiple Organ Failure/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/blood , Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome/diagnosis , fas Receptor/blood , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/blood , Case-Control Studies , Fas Ligand Protein , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Organ Failure/physiopathology , Probability , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Reference Values , Risk Assessment , Sensitivity and Specificity , Shock, Septic/blood , Shock, Septic/diagnosis , Survival Rate
14.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 111(2): 380-8, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12589360

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In experimental models, imidazoquinolines exhibit several immunomodulatory activities via Toll-like receptor signaling on cells of the innate immunity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate whether R-848 (Resiquimod), a small-molecular-weight synthetic compound belonging to the imidazoquinoline family and known for its ability to substantially delay the onset of recurrent genital herpes lesions in both animals and human beings, could influence, at least in vitro, the cytokine production profile of human hapten- or allergen-specific T cells. METHODS: Ampicillin- and Der p 1-specific T-cell lines were derived from peripheral blood of allergic donors in the absence or presence of R-848 and assessed by flow cytometry at the single-cell level for their ability to produce IL-4 and/or IFN-gamma. RESULTS: R-848 induced both hapten- and allergen-specific circulating T cells, including T(H)2 effectors, to produce IFN-gamma and even to lose the ability to produce IL-4, thus shifting their phenotype of cytokine production to a type 0 (T(H)0) or even T(H)1 profile. This effect was associated with an increase in the production of IL-12, IFN-alpha, IL-18, TNF-alpha, IL-10, and IL-15 by CD14(+) cells, as well as an increase in the proportions of IFN-gamma-producing CD3(-)CD16(+) (natural killer) cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that R-848, and probably other imidazoquinolines, might be used as adjuvants in view of novel allergen-specific immunotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of allergic disorders.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Interferon-gamma/biosynthesis , Th2 Cells/drug effects , Th2 Cells/immunology , Adult , Allergens , Ampicillin/adverse effects , Ampicillin/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Dermatophagoides/immunology , Arthropod Proteins , Cell Line , Cysteine Endopeptidases , Cytokines/biosynthesis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Hypersensitivity, Immediate/immunology , In Vitro Techniques , Models, Immunological , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/drug effects , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , Th1 Cells/drug effects , Th1 Cells/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...