ABSTRACT
Introducción La pancreatitis aguda constituye uno de los principales motivos de ingreso por causa digestiva. En su manejo resulta crucial un adecuado tratamiento del dolor. Pero apenas existen descripciones sobre las pautas analgésicas empleadas en nuestro medio. Métodos Encuesta on-line sobre el manejo de analgésicos en la pancreatitis aguda, dirigida a médicos adjuntos y residentes con ejercicio en España. Resultados Un total de 209 facultativos de 88 centros respondieron la encuesta. El 90% eran especialistas en Aparato Digestivo y el 69% trabajaba en un centro terciario. La mayoría (64,4%) no utilizan habitualmente escalas para medir el dolor. Al elegir un fármaco se valora sobre todo la experiencia en su uso. Los tratamientos más prescritos inicialmente son: combinación de paracetamol y metamizol (53,5%), paracetamol solo (19,1%) y metamizol solo (17,4%). Como rescate: meperidina (54,8%), tramadol (17,8%), cloruro mórfico (17,8%) y metamizol (11,5%). Se utiliza perfusión continua en el 8,2% de los tratamientos iniciales. Los médicos con >10años de servicio utilizan más metamizol en monoterapia (50%), mientras que médicos residentes y adjuntos con <10años de servicio lo prescriben asociado a paracetamol (85%). Si se necesita progresar, se usan fundamentalmente cloruro mórfico y meperidina. La especialidad del encuestado, el tamaño del centro de trabajo y la unidad/servicio donde ingresaban los pacientes no influyeron sobre la analgesia pautada. El grado de satisfacción con el tratamiento del dolor alcanzó el 7,8/10 (DE 0,98). Conclusión En nuestro medio, el metamizol y el paracetamol son los analgésicos más empleados como tratamiento inicial del dolor en la pancreatitis aguda, y la meperidina, el analgésico de rescate más utilizado (AU)
Introduction Acute pancreatitis is one of the main reasons for digestive admissions. Adequate pain treatment is crucial in its management. However, there are hardly any descriptions of the analgesic guidelines used in our setting. Methods On-line survey on analgesic management in acute pancreatitis, aimed at attending physicians and residents practising in Spain. Results Two hundred and nine physicians from 88 centres responded to the survey. Ninety percent were specialists in gastrointestinal medicine and 69% worked in a tertiary centre. The majority (64.4%) do not routinely use scales to measure pain. When choosing a drug, experience in its use was the most important factor. The most commonly prescribed initial treatments are: combination of paracetamol and metamizole (53.5%), paracetamol alone (19.1%) and metamizole alone (17.4%). As rescue: meperidine (54.8%), tramadol (17.8%), morphine chloride (17.8%) and metamizole (11.5%). Continuous perfusion is used in 8.2% of initial treatments. Physicians with >10 years of service use more metamizole as monotherapy (50%), while residents and attending physicians with <10 years of service prescribe it in combination with paracetamol (85%). If progression is needed, morphine chloride and meperidine are mainly used. The speciality of the respondent, the size of the work centre and the unit/service where the patients were admitted did not influence the analgesia prescribed. Satisfaction with pain management reached 7.8/10 (SD 0.98). Conclusion In our setting, metamizole and paracetamol are the most commonly used analgesics as initial pain treatment in acute pancreatitis, and meperidine is the most commonly used rescue analgesic. (AU)
Subject(s)
Pancreatitis/drug therapy , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Analgesia , Surveys and Questionnaires , SpainABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Acute pancreatitis is one of the main reasons for digestive admissions. Adequate pain treatment is crucial in its management. However, there are hardly any descriptions of the analgesic guidelines used in our setting. METHODS: On-line survey on analgesic management in acute pancreatitis, aimed at attending physicians and residents practising in Spain. RESULTS: Two hundred and nine physicians from 88 centres responded to the survey. Ninety percent were specialists in gastrointestinal medicine and 69% worked in a tertiary centre. The majority (64.4%) do not routinely use scales to measure pain. When choosing a drug, experience in its use was the most important factor. The most commonly prescribed initial treatments are: combination of paracetamol and metamizole (53.5%), paracetamol alone (19.1%) and metamizole alone (17.4%). As rescue: meperidine (54.8%), tramadol (17.8%), morphine chloride (17.8%) and metamizole (11.5%). Continuous perfusion is used in 8.2% of initial treatments. Physicians with >10 years of service use more metamizole as monotherapy (50%), while residents and attending physicians with <10 years of service prescribe it in combination with paracetamol (85%). If progression is needed, morphine chloride and meperidine are mainly used. The speciality of the respondent, the size of the work centre and the unit/service where the patients were admitted did not influence the analgesia prescribed. Satisfaction with pain management reached 7.8/10 (SD 0.98). CONCLUSION: In our setting, metamizole and paracetamol are the most commonly used analgesics as initial pain treatment in acute pancreatitis, and meperidine is the most commonly used rescue analgesic.
Subject(s)
Analgesia , Pancreatitis , Humans , Pain Management , Acetaminophen/therapeutic use , Dipyrone/therapeutic use , Morphine , Acute Disease , Pancreatitis/drug therapy , Pain , Meperidine/therapeutic use , Analgesics/therapeutic useABSTRACT
En el año 2017, el Gobierno de Navarra diseñó y presentó la Estrategia de Humanización delSistema Sanitario Público, con el objetivo de conseguir un nuevo modelo de atención quecontemplara a cada persona como centro de atención, y no a la enfermedad o el proceso porel que es atendida. La Estrategia vigente hoy día considera que la nueva orientación de los servicios hacia una atención personal, humana, respetando la dignidad y los valores de las personas atendidas es más satisfactoria profesional y humanamente para el conjunto de profesionales del sistema sanitario y, por tanto, tiene un valor motivador y de desarrollo profesional. Esta orientación se vio interrumpida por los cambios organizativos y asistenciales imprescindibles para abordar la situación provocada por la pandemia de COVID-19. Es ahora nuestra responsabilidad contar el impacto de la pandemia en la humanización de laatención, un impacto que nos lleva a ser críticas con nosotras mismas, a considerar leccionesaprendidas de cara al futuro, y también a poner en valor cuestiones aprendidas que han venido para quedarse, siempre con el objetivo de construir.(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Pandemics , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Humanization of Assistance , Quality of Health Care , Patient Care , Spain/epidemiology , Health Systems , Public HealthABSTRACT
A 54-year-old male with a medical history of diabetes mellitus type 2 and tonsil cancer treated with radiochemotherapy years previously was admitted to hospital due to one-month progressive diarrhea, epigastric pain and 14-kg weight loss. Laboratory tests revealed mild anemia (Hb 10.8 g/dl). Upper endoscopy (UE) showed multiple ulcerated lesions with raised edges and a hard consistency on biopsy, being more evident at the duodenum and with a lower frequency and smaller diameter in the stomach.
