Impact of CYP2D6 and CYP2B6 phenotypes on the response to tramadol in patients with acute post-surgical pain.

Tramadol is an important minor opioid prescribed for pain management. In this study, we analyzed the well-known impact of CYP2D6 genetic variation and 60 additional variants in eight candidate genes (i.e., ABCG2, SLCO1B1, CYP2D6, CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, CYP3A5, and CYP3A4) on tramadol efficacy and safety. Some 108 patients with pain after surgery admitted to a post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) and prescribed tramadol were recruited. They were genotyped, and tramadol M1/M2 metabolite concentrations were determined by a newly validated HPLC-MS/MS method. CYP2D6 intermediate (IM) and poor (PM) metabolizers showed lower M1 concentrations adjusted for dose/weight at 30 and 120 min compared to ultrarapid (UM) and normal (NM) metabolizers (univariate p < 0.001 and 0.020, multivariate p < 0.001 and 0.001, unstandardized ß coefficients = 0.386 and 0.346, R2 = 0.146 and 0.120, respectively). CYP2B6 PMs (n = 10) were significantly related to a higher reduction in pain 30 min after tramadol intake (univariate p = 0.038, multivariate p = 0.016, unstandardized ß coefficient = 0.224, R2 = 0.178), to lower PACU admission time (p = 0.007), and to lower incidence of adverse drug reactions (p = 0.038) compared to the other phenotypes. CYP3A4 IMs and PMs showed a higher prevalence of drowsiness and dizziness (p = 0.028 and 0.005, respectively). Our results suggest that the interaction of CYP2B6 and CYP2D6 phenotypes may be clinically relevant, pending validation of these results in large, independent cohorts. Additional research is required to clarify the impact of CYP3A4 genetic variation on tramadol response.

The Need for the Closer Monitoring of Novel Drugs in MS: A Siponimod Retrospective Cohort Study (Realhes Study).

BACKGROUND: Severe cases of lymphopenia have been reported during siponimod clinical trials, which may negatively impact its benefit/risk profile. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the incidence of lymphopenia following the initiation of siponimod treatment in clinical practice. The secondary objectives included the analysis of factors predisposing to and the clinical relevance of lymphopenia events. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, information collected from the medical records of 129 patients with MS from 15 tertiary hospitals in Spain who initiated treatment with Siponimod were followed-up for at least 3 months, including at least one lymphocyte count evaluation per patient. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients, 121 (93.6%) reported lymphopenia events, including 110 (85.3%) with grade ≤ 3 and 11 (8.5%) with grade 4 lymphopenia, higher than those reported in the pivotal clinical trial (73.3% and 3.3% for grade ≤ 3 and grade 4 lymphopenia, respectively). The study included an unexpectedly high proportion of male subjects (72.9%), which might have led to an underestimation of the actual magnitude of the risk. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the incidence and severity of lymphopenia after starting siponimod treatment were higher than those reported in previous clinical trials. Therefore, our results reinforce the need for the closer monitoring of novel MS drugs in clinical practice, as well as larger and longer follow-up studies to properly characterize this risk.

Preemptive TPMT Genotyping and Adherence to Genotype-Based Therapeutic Recommendations Reduces the Healthcare Cost in Patients Receiving Azathioprine or 6-Mercaptopurine for Autoimmune Diseases.

A cost analysis of thiopurine treatment was carried out in 257 patients, with 153 preemptively genotyped for TPMT and 104 retrospectively genotyped in a Spanish setting. The healthcare cost was significantly higher in patients retrospectively genotyped compared to those who were preemptively genotyped (p < 0.001). TPMT intermediate metabolizers (IMs) (n = 23) showed a 3.3-fold higher healthcare cost when compared to normal metabolizers (NMs) (p < 0.001). The healthcare cost in patients with a TPMT IM phenotype whose physician adhered to the genotype-informed recommendation was similar than the cost in TPMT NMs and was significantly lower than IMs whose physician did not adhere to the therapeutic recommendation (3.8-fold, p = 0.016). Myelotoxicity occurrence was significantly lower in patients preemptively vs. retrospectively genotyped (2.0% and 21.2%, respectively, p < 0.001). Patients who developed myelotoxicity showed a significantly higher healthcare cost than those who did not (4.10-fold, p < 0.001). Overall, 87% of patients whose dose was not adjusted despite being TPMT IMs suffered myelotoxicity, while only one of the eight patients (13%) whose dose was adjusted suffered myelotoxicity (p < 0.001). In conclusion, TPMT preemptive genotyping and physician adherence to genotype-informed therapeutic recommendations prevents myelotoxicity and significantly reduces the healthcare cost, and it is therefore essential for the sustainability of the Spanish healthcare system.

NAT2 phenotype alters pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in healthy volunteers.

Rivaroxaban is a direct inhibitor of factor Xa, a member of direct oral anticoagulant group of drugs (DOACs). Despite being a widely extended alternative to vitamin K antagonists (i.e., acenocoumarol, warfarin) the interindividual variability of DOACs is significant, and may be related to adverse drug reaction occurrence or drug inefficacy, namely hemorrhagic or thromboembolic events. Since there is not a consistent analytic practice to monitor the anticoagulant activity of DOACs, previously reported polymorphisms in genes coding for proteins responsible for the activation, transport, or metabolism of DOACs were studied. The study population comprised 60 healthy volunteers, who completed two randomized, crossover bioequivalence clinical trials between two different rivaroxaban formulations. The effect of food, sex, biogeographical origin and 55 variants (8 phenotypes and 47 single nucleotide polymorphisms) in drug metabolizing enzyme genes (such as CYP2D6, CYP2C9, NAT2) and transporters (namely, ABCB1, ABCG2) on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics was tested. Individuals dosed under fasting conditions presented lower tmax (2.21 h vs 2.88 h, ß = 1.19, R2 =0.342, p = 0.012) compared to fed volunteers. NAT2 slow acetylators presented higher AUC∞ corrected by dose/weight (AUC∞/DW; 8243.90 vs 7698.20 and 7161.25 h*ng*mg /ml*kg, ß = 0.154, R2 =0.250, p = 0.044), higher Cmax/DW (1070.99 vs 834.81 and 803.36 ng*mg /ml*kg, ß = 0.245, R2 =0.320, p = 0.002), and lower tmax (2.63 vs 3.19 and 4.15 h, ß = -0.346, R2 =0.282, p = 0.047) than NAT2 rapid and intermediate acetylators. No other association was statistically significant. Thus, slow NAT2 appear to have altered rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics, increasing AUC∞ and Cmax. Nonetheless, further research should be conducted to verify NAT2 involvement on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and to determine its clinical significance.

CYP2C8*3 and *4 define CYP2C8 phenotype: An approach with the substrate cinitapride.

Cinitapride is a gastrointestinal prokinetic drug, prescribed for the treatment of functional dyspepsia, and as an adjuvant therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of relevant variants in CYP3A4 and CYP2C8 and other pharmacogenes, along with demographic characteristics, on cinitapride pharmacokinetics and safety; and to evaluate the impact of CYP2C8 alleles on the enzyme's function. Twenty-five healthy volunteers participating in a bioequivalence clinical trial consented to participate in the study. Participants were genotyped for 56 variants in 19 genes, including cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (e.g., CYP2C8 or CYP3A4) or transporters (e.g., SLC or ABC), among others. CYP2C8*3 carriers showed a reduction in AUC of 42% and Cmax of 35% compared to *1/*1 subjects (p = 0.003 and p = 0.011, respectively). *4 allele carriers showed a 45% increase in AUC and 63% in Cmax compared to *1/*1 subjects, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. CYP2C8*3 and *4 alleles may be used to infer the following pharmacogenetic phenotypes: ultrarapid (UM) (*3/*3), rapid (RM) (*1/*3), normal (NM) (*1/*1), intermediate (IM) (*1/*4), and poor (PM) metabolizers (*4/*4). In this study, we properly characterized RMs, NMs, and IMs; however, additional studies are required to properly characterize UMs and PMs. These findings should be relevant with respect to cinitapride, but also to numerous CYP2C8 substrates such as imatinib, loperamide, montelukast, ibuprofen, paclitaxel, pioglitazone, repaglinide, or rosiglitazone.

Utility of a Laboratory Alert System for Detecting Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospitalised Patients: Hyponatremia and Rhabdomyolysis.

Background-Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are a public health issue, due to their great impact on morbidity, mortality, and economic cost. The use of automatized laboratory alerts could simplify greatly its detection. Objectives-We aimed to evaluate the performance of a laboratory alerts system as a method for detecting ADRs, using hyponatremia and rhabdomyolysis as case studies. Methods-This is a retrospective observational study conducted in 2019 during a 6-month period, including patients hospitalized at the Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. Patients were identified using altered laboratory parameters corresponding to the two signals: "rhabdomyolysis" (creatine phosphokinase >5 times the upper limit of normality (ULN): >1000 U/L for men and >900 U/L for women) and "hyponatremia" (<116 mEq/L) were detected. In cases where ADR was suspected, causality assessment was performed using the algorithm of the Spanish Pharmacovigilance System (SEFV). Results-During the study period, 180 patients were studied for the "rhabdomyolysis" signal, 6 of them were found to have an ADR (3.3%). The sensitivity of the test was 60%, specificity 97%, and positive predictive value 41%. 28 patients were studied for the "hyponatremia" signal, and 11 patients were found to have an ADR (39.3%), with a sensitivity of 76.9%, a specificity of 93.3%, and a positive predictive value of 88.2%. We found no relationship between altered laboratory values and risk of ADR in any of the cases studied. Conclusion-A pharmacovigilance program based on automatized laboratory signals could be an effective method to detect ADR. The study of the "hyponatremia" laboratory alert is more efficient than "rhabdomyolysis". The evaluation of the hyponatremia alert allows the identification of 12 times more ADRs than the rhabdomyolysis alert, which means less time spent per alert evaluated to identify an ADR.

Genotype-Guided Prescription of Azathioprine Reduces the Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in TPMT Intermediate Metabolizers to a Similar Incidence as Normal Metabolizers.

INTRODUCTION: Thiopurine drugs are purine nucleoside analogues used for treatment of different immune-related conditions. To date, different studies highlighted the importance of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping in patients who initiate treatment with thiopurines to make an adequate dose adjustment. We aimed to investigate the influence of TPMT phenotype, concomitant treatments, and demographic characteristics on the incidence of adverse reactions (ADRs) in patients who start treatment with azathioprine (AZA). METHODS: This was an observational and retrospective study. The study population comprised 109 patients who started treatment with AZA following routine TPMT genotyping before June 2019 and who were routinely followed up at Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. The incidence of ADRs and treatment duration were evaluated according to TPMT phenotype. RESULTS: Forty-five men and 64 women were recruited, with a mean age of 67.6 ± 18.5. The medical specialty with the most requests was dermatology (45.9%) and the most frequent disease for which genotyping was requested was bullous pemphigoid (27.5%). All patients were normal metabolizers (NM), except for eight intermediate metabolizers (IM) (7.3%); no poor metabolizers (PM) were found. The initial azathioprine dose was subtherapeutic in both groups (103.2 ± 45.4 mg in NMs and 75 ± 32.3 mg in IMs), increasing during the first months of treatment, especially in NMs (120.3 ± 41.3 vs. 78.6 ± 30.4 mg in IMs, p = 0.011). Most patients (73.4%) received corticosteroids to keep the disease under control; and for 41.2% of NMs, physicians were able to reduce the dose at 6 months post treatment. No IMs completed 6 months of treatment. Hepatotoxicity, gastric intolerance, and blood disorders were the most common ADRs. The incidence of ADRs in the sample was 28.4% (n = 31) with a similar trend between IMs (37.5%) and NMs (27.8%). Patients undergoing concomitant treatment with allopurinol were associated with a higher incidence of ADRs (n = 4, 100% vs. n = 105, 20%; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: TPMT genotyping before AZA prescription reduces ADR incidence in IMs to a similar level as NMs in the Spanish population. However, it is important to note no IMs completed 6 months of treatment, suggesting that there may be some differences in drug tolerability according to phenotype. In addition, most NMs are treated with subtherapeutic doses, are poorly followed up, and thus suffer avoidable ADRs. Finally, concomitant therapies that inhibit the xanthine oxidase enzyme (XDH), such as allopurinol, predispose to ADRs. Therefore, pharmacogenetic testing should be integrated as an additional clinical tool, in such a way that each patient receives personalized, precision treatment, where all factors influencing drug response are considered.