A rapid recovery protocol for hip and knee replacement surgery: a report of the outcomes in a referral center.

OBJECTIVE: The number of joint replacements is expected to dramatically increase, and the optimization of the available resources is fundamental to maintain high clinical standards while providing an efficient treatment to an increasing number of patients. The present study describes the outcomes of the application of a rapid recovery (RR) protocol in a referral center for hip and knee replacement surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of every patient undergoing primary hip or knee replacement in 2019 were identified and all the relevant data were retrospectively extracted and compared to those of year 2016 (the last year before the onset of the rapid recovery protocol). The following outcomes were considered: 1) length of stay (LOS); 2) total number of TKR and THR; 3) pre- and post-operative subjective questionnaires; 4) NRS for pain at day 1 following surgery; 5) mean hemoglobin value at discharge; 6) number of blood transfusion performed; 7) complications following surgery. RESULTS: The mean LOS was significantly lower for patients managed through the rapid recovery protocol: 5.1 ± 1.4 days vs. 10.4 ± 2.3 days (p < 0.0001). The earlier discharge of patients promoted an overall increase in the total number of joint replacement procedures performed (2,806 in year 2019 vs. 2,236 in year 2016; p < 0.0001). Higher hemoglobin values at discharge were found in the RR group (10.6 ± 1.4 g/dl vs. 9.6 ± 1.2 g/dl, p = 0.049). No difference was observed in terms of clinical scores and overall complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a multimodal RR protocol for THR and TKR patients was able to reduce the length of stay and optimize the use of blood products, without increasing the risk of complications or jeopardizing the functional recovery.

Stem cells application in meniscal tears: a systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Conservative and surgical treatments for meniscal lesions are various and this field of orthopedic surgery is in continuous development. Stem cells represent one of the current options to stimulate meniscal healing. The present systematic review aimed at summarizing the state of art in the application of stem cells for the treatment of meniscal damage both at pre-clinical and clinical level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review. A systematic search was performed using the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. All the studies dealing with the application of stem cells as a treatment for meniscal tears were pooled, data were extracted and analyzed. The studies were divided into two groups (pre-clinical and clinical), and then, discussed independently. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies were included. Thirteen were classified as "pre-clinical" and five as "clinical". The most commonly used cells were mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), derived from bone marrow (BMMSC), synovial tissue (SMSC), or adipose tissue (ADSC). Follow-ups ranged from 2 to 16 weeks for the pre-clinical studies and from 3 to 24 months for the clinical studies. All studies documented good results in terms of laboratory markers/scores, clinical and radiologic evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the currently available data, it is not possible to establish the best cell source or delivery method for the treatment of meniscal injuries. Bone Marrow derived stem cells delivered through injection represent the most studied approach, with the most promising results. However, the full impact of these therapies through their different sub-type of stem cells and implantation techniques still needs to be critically analyzed through larger randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up.