ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the local and systemic expression of the factors linked to the interferon alpha (IFN-α) activation pathway in different degrees of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. METHODS: A total of 128 patients with CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and cervical cancer was evaluated. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique was used to evaluate the gene expression of IFNR1, IFNR2, IFN-α, oligoadenylate synthase (2'5'OAS), cytokine signal suppressor 1 (SOCS) 1, SOCS3, signal transducer and transcription activator 1 (STAT1), and IRF9 from 128 biopsies. A total of 46 out of 128 samples were evaluated by flow cytometry for IFNAR1, IFNAR2, STAT1, IRF7 and IFN-α in peripheral blood cells. RESULTS: Patients with CIN II and III (63 samples) had a low local expression of IFNR1, but not IFNR2. Patients with some degree of injury showed high expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3. Systemically, patients with CIN II and III (20 samples) had a significant increase in IFNR1, IFNR2, STAT1, IRF7, and IFN-α in helper, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and in monocytes. CONCLUSION: Patients with high-grade lesions have increased systemic expression of IFN-α and its activation pathways in helper and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, as well as in monocytes due to an exacerbation of the immune response in these patients. This phenomenon is not accompanied by resolution of the lesion due to a defect in the IFN-α activation pathway that revealed by low local IFNAR1 expression and high local expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3.
OBJETIVO: O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar a expressão local e sistêmica dos fatores ligados à via de ativação do interferon alfa (IFN-α) em diferentes graus de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC) e câncer cervical (CA) MéTODOS: Foram avaliados 128 pacientes com NIC I, NIC II, NIC III e CA. A técnica de reação de cadeia de polimerase em tempo real (RT-PCR, na sigla em inglês) foi realizada para avaliar a expressão gênica do receptor de interferon (IFNR) 1, IFNR2, IFN-α, 2'-5'-oligoadenilato sintetase (2'5'OAS), supressor de sinalização de citocina (SOCS)1, SOCS3, transdutor de sinal e ativador de transcrição 1 (STAT1) e fator regulador de interferon 9 (IRF9) das 128 biópsias. Das 128 amostras, 46 foram avaliadas por citometria de fluxo para IFNAR1, IFNAR2, STAT1, IRF7 e IFN-α em células de sangue periférico. RESULTADOS: Pacientes com NIC II e III (63 amostras) tiveram baixa expressão local de IFNR1 mas não de IFNR2. Pacientes com algum grau de lesão apresentaram alta expressão de SOCS1 e SOCS3. Sistemicamente, os pacientes com NIC II e III (20 amostras) tiveram um aumento significativo de IFNR1, IFNR2, STAT1, IRF7 e IFN-α em linfócitos T auxiliares, citotóxicos e monócitos. CONCLUSãO: Pacientes com lesões de alto grau apresentam expressão sistêmica aumentada de IFN-α e suas vias de ativação em linfócitos T auxiliares e citotóxicos, bem como em monócitos, devido à exacerbação da resposta imune nesses pacientes. Este fenômeno não é acompanhado pela resolução da lesão devido a um defeito na via de ativação do IFN-α que é revelado pela baixa expressão local de IFNR1 e alta expressão local de SOCS1 e SOCS3.
Subject(s)
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Interferon-alpha , Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins/metabolism , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/geneticsABSTRACT
Abstract Objective The aim of the present study was to compare the local and systemic expression of the factors linked to the interferon alpha (IFN-α) activation pathway in different degrees of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer. Methods A total of 128 patients with CIN I, CIN II, CIN III and cervical cancer was evaluated. The real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technique was used to evaluate the gene expression of IFNR1, IFNR2, IFN-α, oligoadenylate synthase (2'5′OAS), cytokine signal suppressor 1 (SOCS) 1, SOCS3, signal transducer and transcription activator 1 (STAT1), and IRF9 from 128 biopsies. A total of 46 out of 128 samples were evaluated by flow cytometry for IFNAR1, IFNAR2, STAT1, IRF7 and IFN-α in peripheral blood cells. Results Patients with CIN II and III (63 samples) had a low local expression of IFNR1, but not IFNR2. Patients with some degree of injury showed high expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3. Systemically, patients with CIN II and III (20 samples) had a significant increase in IFNR1, IFNR2, STAT1, IRF7, and IFN-α in helper, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and in monocytes. Conclusion Patients with high-grade lesions have increased systemic expression of IFN-α and its activation pathways in helper and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, as well as in monocytes due to an exacerbation of the immune response in these patients. This phenomenon is not accompanied by resolution of the lesion due to a defect in the IFN-α activation pathway that revealed by low local IFNAR1 expression and high local expression of SOCS1 and SOCS3.
Resumo Objetivo O objetivo do presente estudo foi comparar a expressão local e sistêmica dos fatores ligados à via de ativação do interferon alfa (IFN-α) em diferentes graus de neoplasia intraepitelial cervical (NIC) e câncer cervical (CA) Métodos Foram avaliados 128 pacientes com NIC I, NIC II, NIC III e CA. A técnica de reação de cadeia de polimerase em tempo real (RT-PCR, na sigla em inglês) foi realizada para avaliar a expressão gênica do receptor de interferon (IFNR) 1, IFNR2, IFN-α, 2′-5′- oligoadenilato sintetase (2′5′OAS), supressor de sinalização de citocina (SOCS)1, SOCS3, transdutor de sinal e ativador de transcrição 1 (STAT1) e fator regulador de interferon 9 (IRF9) das 128 biópsias. Das 128 amostras, 46 foram avaliadas por citometria de fluxo para IFNAR1, IFNAR2, STAT1, IRF7 e IFN-α em células de sangue periférico. Resultados Pacientes com NIC II e III (63 amostras) tiveram baixa expressão local de IFNR1 mas não de IFNR2. Pacientes com algum grau de lesão apresentaram alta expressão de SOCS1 e SOCS3. Sistemicamente, os pacientes com NIC II e III (20 amostras) tiveram um aumento significativo de IFNR1, IFNR2, STAT1, IRF7 e IFN-α em linfócitos T auxiliares, citotóxicos e monócitos. Conclusão Pacientes com lesões de alto grau apresentam expressão sistêmica aumentada de IFN-α e suas vias de ativação em linfócitos T auxiliares e citotóxicos, bem como em monócitos, devido à exacerbação da resposta imune nesses pacientes. Este fenômeno não é acompanhado pela resolução da lesão devido a um defeito na via de ativação do IFN-α que é revelado pela baixa expressão local de IFNR1 e alta expressão local de SOCS1 e SOCS3.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/genetics , /genetics , Interferon-alpha , Suppressor of Cytokine Signaling Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Pre-eclampsia is a multifactorial hypertensive disorder that is triggered by placental insufficiency and that accounts for up to 15% of maternal deaths. In normal pregnancies, this process depends on the balance between the expression of angiogenic factors and antiangiogenic factors, which are responsible for remodeling the spiral arteries, as well as for neoangiogenesis and fetal development. PURPOSE: The aim of this review is to discuss the main scientific findings regarding the role of angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors in the etiopathogenesis of preeclampsia. METHODS: An extensive research was conducted in the Pubmed database in search of scientific manuscripts discussing potential associations between angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors and preeclampsia. Ninety-one papers were included in this review. RESULTS: There is an increased expression of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor and soluble endoglin in pre-eclampsia, as well as reduced placental expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and placental growth factor. Systemic hypertension, proteinuria and kidney injury - such as enlargement and glomerular fibrin deposit, capillary occlusion due to edema, and hypertrophy of endocapillary cells - are some of these changes. The complex etiopathogenesis of preeclampsia instigates research of different biomarkers that allow for the early diagnosis of this entity, such as vascular endothelial growth factor, placental growth factor, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor, soluble endoglin, placental glycoprotein pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A and protein 13. CONCLUSION: Even though it is possible to establish an efficient and effective diagnostic tool, three key principles must be observed in the management of preeclampsia: prevention, early screening and treatment.
