Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 22(4): 209-214, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29436758

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity and reliability of the Job Factors Questionnaire, and the influence of gender, academic level and pain/discomfort on dental students' perception regarding risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: One hundred forty-five dental students from Stony Brook School of Dental Medicine participated voluntarily in this study. The survey was organised in two sections: (i) Job Factors Questionnaire with 15 items that evaluated students' perceptions about job/study environmental risk factors and their potential contribution to musculoskeletal disorders. The tri-factorial structure (repetitiveness, work posture and external factors) was used; (ii) Part of the Nordic Questionnaire with questions referring to 9 body areas: Neck, shoulders, upper back, elbows, lower back, wrists/hands, hips, knees and ankles/feet. Students answered if they have had a job-related pain/discomfort in any of these body areas in the previous 12 months. The data were evaluated statistically by confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validities, internal consistency and Z-test (α = .05). RESULTS: The tri-factorial structure was considered valid and reliable for the sample after excluding item 8 and inserting correlations between items 11 and 12, and between 14 and 15. The academic level presented a significant effect on the factors "Work Posture" (P = .02) and "External Factors" (P = .01). Most of the students reported pain in their neck (73.79%), lower back (62.06%) and shoulders (53.10%) in the previous 12 months. CONCLUSION: The Work Posture and External Factors were influenced only by academic level. The lower the students' academic level, the higher their perception for both factors of musculoskeletal disorders.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Perception , Students, Dental/psychology , Work , Academic Performance , Environment , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Posture , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 21(3): 175-179, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26998591

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to qualitatively evaluate the experiences of students enrolled in the last year of dentistry school with ergonomic practice. METHODS: This is a qualitative, observational and cross-sectional study, with a non-probabilistic sample design. The sample comprised students enrolled in the last year of dentistry in Araraquara-UNESP (n = 29). The data were collected by means of open semi-structured and individual interviews, captured by a digital voice recorder. The students were interviewed in their own university at a time that was previously scheduled, and care was taken to provide a private and welcoming environment to carry out the interviews. A script containing questions related to practices in ergonomics was prepared at the university. Data analysis was carried out using the qualitative-quantitative Collective Subject Discourse technique with the aid of Qualiquantisoft® software program. RESULTS: It was found that more than half of the students (58.6%) believe that adopting an ergonomic posture is important to prevent future problems, pain and occupational diseases, and 62.1% of the students confirm having difficulties in adopting ergonomic postures due to the types of treatment required and the regions of the mouth being treated. The main reasons stated for the fact that their colleagues do not adopt ergonomic postures are lack of attention, practice and forgetfulness (44.8%) and difficulty in visualising the operatory field or the procedure performed (27.6%). CONCLUSION: It is possible to conclude that the students interviewed know ergonomic principles and their importance in occupational health. However, they found it difficult to put these principles into practice.


Subject(s)
Dentistry/methods , Ergonomics , Students, Dental , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Qualitative Research
3.
J Oral Rehabil ; 42(7): 512-20, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25754792

ABSTRACT

To perform a validation of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) for complete denture wearers and present a proposal for estimation of perceived oral health. This is a cross-sectional study with non-probabilistic sampling. A total of 211 subjects with a mean age of 62·5 (s.d. = 11·4) years participated, being 169 female. The GOHAI was applied in a personal interview. The construct/convergent/discriminant validity was tested using structural equation modelling. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the fit of three proposals of the GOHAI: three-factor, one-factor and second-order hierarchical models. The stability of the models was evaluated in independent samples. The three-factor model presented an inadequate fit, and items 3, 4 and 9 were removed. The new structure presented an acceptable fit and strong invariance in independent samples. The convergent, discriminant validity and internal consistency were below adequate. The one-factor model presented an adequate fit to the sample. Convergent validity was compromised. A strong invariance of the one-factor model was observed. To calculate the overall scores of the GOHAI factors (three-factor model) or of the oral health perception (one-factor model), a matrix of regression weights for each item in the model was presented as a suggestion. We found an adequate fit of the both structures of the GOHAI for denture wearers, but the three-factor structure was more parsimonious. We suggested considering the weights of the regression model to calculate the overall score of perceived oral health or of its factors in different samples.


Subject(s)
Denture, Complete/psychology , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Mouth Rehabilitation/psychology , Oral Health , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Dent Res ; 93(7): 645-50, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24782438

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the validity, reliability, and factorial invariance of the complete Portuguese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and its short version (OHIP-14). METHODS: A total of 1,162 adults enrolled in the Faculty of Dentistry of Araraquara/UNESP participated in the study; 73.1% were women; and the mean age was 40.7 ± 16.3 yr. We conducted a confirmatory factor analysis, where χ(2)/df, comparative fit index, goodness of fit index, and root mean square error of approximation were used as indices of goodness of fit. The convergent validity was judged from the average variance extracted and the composite reliability, and the internal consistency was estimated by Cronbach standardized alpha. The stability of the models was evaluated by multigroup analysis in independent samples (test and validation) and between users and nonusers of dental prosthesis. RESULTS: We found best-fitting models for the OHIP-14 and among dental prosthesis users. The convergent validity was below adequate values for the factors "functional limitation" and "physical pain" for the complete version and for the factors "functional limitation" and "psychological discomfort" for the OHIP-14. Values of composite reliability and internal consistency were below adequate in the OHIP-14 for the factors "functional limitation" and "psychological discomfort." We detected strong invariance between test and validation samples of the full version and weak invariance for OHIP-14. The models for users and nonusers of dental prosthesis were not invariant for both versions. CONCLUSION: The reduced version of the OHIP was parsimonious, reliable, and valid to capture the construct "impact of oral health on quality of life," which was more pronounced in prosthesis users.


Subject(s)
Oral Health/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life , Activities of Daily Living , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dental Prosthesis/psychology , Dentition , Denture, Complete/psychology , Denture, Partial/psychology , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Income , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/psychology , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Mouth, Edentulous/psychology , Mouth, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Pain/psychology , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Social Class , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Young Adult
5.
Eur J Dent Educ ; 18(3): 142-6, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24266890

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of development of musculoskeletal disorders in the upper limbs of undergraduate dentistry students during the execution of pre-clinical laboratory activities based on gender, type of dental procedure and area of the mouth under treatment. METHODS: Male and female undergraduate students in the second year of the Araraquara Dental School, UNESP, were enrolled in this study. Digital photographs were obtained whilst the subjects performed laboratory activities. The working postures adopted by each student were evaluated using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA). The photos were analysed by a calibrated researcher (k = 0.89), and a final risk score was attributed to each analysed procedure (n = 354). Descriptive statistical analyses were performed, and the associations of interest were analysed by the chi-square test (P = 0.05). RESULTS: During most of the laboratory procedures performed, the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders was high (64.7%; - IC95% : 59.7-69.7%), with no significant association between the RULA final score and gender (χ(2)  = 1.100; P = 0.577), type of dental procedure (χ(2)  = 5.447, P = 0.244) and mouth area treated (χ(2) =4.150; P = 0.126). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders was high in undergraduate dentistry students; this risk was not related to gender, type of dental procedure and region of the mouth being treated.


Subject(s)
Dental Restoration, Permanent , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Posture , Students, Dental , Brazil , Ergonomics , Female , Humans , Male , Photography , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
6.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 42(1): 70-6, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23349059

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of early fetoscopic tracheal occlusion (FETO) (22-24 weeks' gestation) on pulmonary response and neonatal survival in cases of extremely severe isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: This was a multicenter study involving fetuses with extremely severe CDH (lung-to-head ratio < 0.70, liver herniation into the thoracic cavity and no other detectable anomalies). Between August 2010 and December 2011, eight fetuses underwent early FETO. Data were compared with nine fetuses that underwent standard FETO and 10 without fetoscopic procedure from January 2006 to July 2010. FETO was performed under maternal epidural anesthesia, supplemented with fetal intramuscular anesthesia. Fetal lung size and vascularity were evaluated by ultrasound before and every 2 weeks after FETO. Postnatal therapy was equivalent for both treated fetuses and controls. Primary outcome was infant survival to 180 days and secondary outcome was fetal pulmonary response. RESULTS: Maternal and fetal demographic characteristics and obstetric complications were similar in the three groups (P > 0.05). Infant survival rate was significantly higher in the early FETO group (62.5%) compared with the standard group (11.1%) and with controls (0%) (P < 0.01). Early FETO resulted in a significant improvement in fetal lung size and pulmonary vascularity when compared with standard FETO (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early FETO may improve infant survival by further increases of lung size and pulmonary vascularity in cases with extremely severe pulmonary hypoplasia in isolated CDH. This study supports formal testing of the hypothesis with a randomized controlled trial.


Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple/surgery , Balloon Occlusion , Fetoscopy , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Lung Diseases/surgery , Lung/abnormalities , Abnormalities, Multiple/metabolism , Abnormalities, Multiple/mortality , Abnormalities, Multiple/physiopathology , Balloon Occlusion/methods , Female , Fetoscopy/methods , Fetoscopy/mortality , Gestational Age , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/metabolism , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/mortality , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/physiopathology , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/surgery , Humans , Lung/metabolism , Lung/physiopathology , Lung/surgery , Lung Diseases/metabolism , Lung Diseases/mortality , Lung Diseases/physiopathology , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Pregnancy , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate , Trachea/embryology , Trachea/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonography, Doppler, Color , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
7.
J Oral Rehabil ; 39(5): 377-83, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22251134

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ) (Portuguese version). Face and content validity of the Portuguese version were performed. To assess reproducibility of the data gathered with MFIQ, it was applied to 62 individuals who completed the questionnaire on two occasions. Validity and reliability of the data gathered with MFIQ were evaluated in a sample of 249 patients. Construct-related validity was assessed through factorial validity (by means of a confirmatory factor analysis), and convergent and discriminant validities were assessed, respectively, by the average variance extracted (AVE), composite reliability (CC) and bivariate correlations between factors. The internal consistency was estimated by the standardised Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and reproducibility by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). All the items of MFIQ showed content validity. Reproducibility was excellent in both the 'functional capacity' dimension (D1) (ICC(D1) =0·895, 95% CI=0·832 to 0·935) and the 'feeding' dimension (D2) (ICC(D2) =0·825, 95% CI= 0·726 to 0·891). Items 1, 2, 6 and 7 of D1 had factor weights below the desired cut-off (0·5), and overall fit of the original bifactorial structure of the MFIQ was poor [(confirmatory fit index) CFI= 0·850, (goodness of fit index) GFI= 0·781, (root mean square error of approximation) RMSEA= 0·118]. Thus, these items were excluded, and the new, reduced version of the MFIQ showed good fit (CFI=0·933, GFI=0·879, RMSEA=0·099). The convergent validity was adequate (AVE≥0·5, CC≥0·7) for both factors. However, their discriminant validity was low (AVE(D1) = 0·51 and AVE(D2) = 0·66 <ρ(2) (D1D2) =0·70). The internal consistency was excellent (α(D1) =0·874; α(D2) =0·918). The Portuguese version of the reduced MFIQ produced data with good validity and reliability.


Subject(s)
Mandible/physiopathology , Psychometrics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Portugal , Reproducibility of Results
8.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 39(1): 42-9, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21898639

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and probabilities of different fetal ultrasound parameters to predict neonatal outcome in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2010, we evaluated prospectively 108 fetuses with isolated CDH (82 left-sided and 26 right-sided). The following parameters were evaluated: gestational age at diagnosis, side of the diaphragmatic defect, presence of polyhydramnios, presence of liver herniated into the fetal thorax (liver-up), lung-to-head ratio (LHR) and observed/expected LHR (o/e-LHR), observed/expected contralateral and total fetal lung volume (o/e-ContFLV and o/e-TotFLV) ratios, ultrasonographic fetal lung volume/fetal weight ratio (US-FLW), observed/expected contralateral and main pulmonary artery diameter (o/e-ContPA and o/e-MPA) ratios and the contralateral vascularization index (Cont-VI). The outcomes were neonatal death and severe postnatal pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). RESULTS: Neonatal mortality was 64.8% (70/108). Severe PAH was diagnosed in 68 (63.0%) cases, of which 63 died neonatally (92.6%) (P < 0.001). Gestational age at diagnosis, side of the defect and polyhydramnios were not associated with poor outcome (P > 0.05). LHR, o/e-LHR, liver-up, o/e-ContFLV, o/e-TotFLV, US-FLW, o/e-ContPA, o/e-MPA and Cont-VI were associated with both neonatal death and severe postnatal PAH (P < 0.001). Receiver-operating characteristics curves indicated that measuring total lung volumes (o/e-TotFLV and US-FLW) was more accurate than was considering only the contralateral lung sizes (LHR, o/e-LHR and o/e-ContFLV; P < 0.05), and Cont-VI was the most accurate ultrasound parameter to predict neonatal death and severe PAH (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating total lung volumes is more accurate than is measuring only the contralateral lung size. Evaluating pulmonary vascularization (Cont-VI) is the most accurate predictor of neonatal outcome. Estimating the probability of survival and severe PAH allows classification of cases according to prognosis.


Subject(s)
Balloon Occlusion/methods , Fetal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnostic imaging , Lung/physiopathology , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Algorithms , Female , Fetal Diseases/mortality , Fetal Diseases/therapy , Gestational Age , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/diagnostic imaging , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/embryology , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/mortality , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Volume Measurements , Male , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Probability , Prospective Studies , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Survival Analysis , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Ultrasonography, Prenatal/methods
9.
Rev. ciênc. farm. básica apl ; 31(2)maio-ago. 2010.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-570147

ABSTRACT

O objetivo deste estudo foi verificar a atitude de discentes e docentes da Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas de Araraquara (UNESP) em relação à Bioestatística. Como instrumento de medida, utilizou-se a Escala de Atitudes em Relação à Estatística (EAE). A reprodutibilidade da Escala foi estimada pela estatística Kappa (κ) com ponderação linear e sua consistência interna pelo Coeficiente alfa-Cronbach (α). Os indivíduos foram agrupados segundo sua atitude em relação à Estatística em positiva e negativa; posteriormente, estudou-se sua associação com as variáveis de interesse pelo teste de quiquadrado (x2) ao nível de significância de 5%. A amostra foi composta por 272 alunos de graduação, 83 de pósgraduação e 24 docentes, sendo predominantemente feminina (78,2%). Entre os estudantes, 67,5% participaram do programa de iniciação científica. A reprodutibilidade e a consistência interna da Escala foram adequadas (κ=0,7093; α=0,9334). A maior parte da amostra (74,4%) apresentou atitude positiva frente à Estatística. Houve associação entre a atitude e a atividade funcional (p=0,0204), série cursada (p=0,0316) e desempenho (p=0,0002). Assim, concluise que a maioria dos participantes apresentou atitude positiva em relação à Bioestatística, sendo que os estudantes de graduação e aqueles que relataram bom desempenho em Bioestatística apresentaram proporção significativamente maior de atitude positiva em relação aos demais.


In this study, the attitudes of students and teachers at the Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Araraquara (UNESP University) towards Biostatistics were assessed. The Survey of Attitudes Toward Statistics (SATS) scale was used as the measuring instrument. The reproducibility of the scale was estimated by Cohen's Kappa (k) coefficient with linear weighting and its internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α). The individuals were first placed in two groups, according to their positive or negative attitude toward Statistics; then, the association of their attitude with the variables of interest was tested by the chi-squared (χ2) test at a significance level of 5%. The sample consisted of 272 undergraduate students, 83 graduate students and 24 teachers, predominantly female (78.2%). Among the students, 67.5% participated in the scientific research initial training program. Reproducibility and internal consistency of the scale were adequate ((κ=0.7093; α=0.9334). Most of the subjects (74.4%) had a positive attitude toward Statistics. Significant association was found between attitude and functional activity (p=0.0204), the course taken (p=0.0316) and effort (p=0.0002). Thus, it was concluded that the great majority of the participants had a positiveattitude towards Biostatistics and that undergraduate students and those who reported good performance in Biostatistics showed a significantly higher proportion of positive attitude than the other students.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Biomedical Research , Professional Practice
10.
Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) ; 13(1): 38-43, jan.-fev. 2009. tab
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-508837

ABSTRACT

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: Disfunção temporomandibular (DTM) é um termo coletivo que engloba vários problemas clínicos envolvendo a musculatura da mastigação, as articulações temporomandibulares (ATM) e suas estruturas associadas, com alta prevalência nas populações. OBJETIVOS: Sabendo-se que estudos brasileiros vêm utilizando o instrumento proposto por Da Fonseca et al. (1994) para diagnóstico da severidade desta disfunção, realizou-se este estudo com o objetivo de verificar e estimar a consistência interna e a reprodutibilidade do mesmo. MÉTODOS: O delineamento amostral adotado foi o probabilístico, e participaram 1230 indivíduos moradores da cidade de Ribeirão Preto (SP), maiores de 18 anos de idade. As entrevistas foram realizadas por um único entrevistador por meio de ligações telefônicas. Para estudo da consistência interna, calculou-se o Coeficiente de Kuder-Richardson (kr-20) e para estimar a reprodutibilidade, utilizou-se a estatística Kappa (κ). RESULTADOS: A consistência interna do formulário foi de 0,5594, apontando para uma validação abaixo do desejado. Observou-se maior contribuição das questões 1, 2, 3, 6 e 7 para o coeficiente kr-20 total e maior consistência do instrumento quando composto apenas pelas mesmas (0,7044). Observou-se reprodutibilidade "Boa" e "Ótima" para as questões. CONCLUSÕES: Frente ao exposto, sugere-se que o formulário proposto por Da Fonseca et al. (1994) seja adaptado, ficando composto apenas pelas questões 1, 2, 3, 6 e 7 da versão inicial, colaborando, assim, para aumento da confiabilidade do instrumento. Deve-se ressaltar ainda a necessidade da realização de estudos de validade para assegurar adequadas características psicométricas à nova versão do instrumento.


BACKGROUND: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a collective term that encompasses many clinical problems involving the masticatory muscles, temporomandibular joints (TMJ) and associated structures and it has high prevalence among populations. OBJECTIVES: Because Brazilian studies have used the instrument proposed by Da Fonseca et al. (1994) to diagnose the severity of TMD, this study was conducted to investigate and estimate the internal consistency and reproducibility of this method. METHODS: We used a probability sampling design to select 1230 participants over the age of 18 years who were living in the city of Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. The interviews were conducted by a single interviewer over the phone. The internal consistency was analyzed by calculating the Kuder-Richardson coefficient (kr-20), and kappa statistics (κ) were used to estimate the reproducibility. RESULTS: The internal consistency of the questionnaire was 0.5594, thus indicating that validation was lower than desired. Questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 had greater contribution towards the total kr-20 coefficient, and the consistency of the instrument was higher when it was composed only of these questions (0.7044). "Good" and "Excellent" reproducibility was observed for these same questions. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these data, it is suggested that the questionnaire proposed by Da Fonseca et al. (1994) should be adapted to include only questions 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 of the initial version. This would help improve the reliability of the instrument. The need for validation studies must also be emphasized to ensure that the new version of the instrument has adequate psychometric characteristics.

11.
Placenta ; 30(2): 142-8, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19073343

ABSTRACT

Evaluate the distribution and variation of placental vascular indices according to gestational age and placental volume. From March to November 2007, three-dimensional (3D)-power Doppler ultrasound was performed in 295 normal pregnancies from 12 to 40 weeks of gestation. Using the same preestablished settings for all patients, power Doppler was applied to the placenta and placental volume was obtained by the rotational technique (VOCAL). The 3D-power histogram was used to determine the placental vascular indices: vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization-flow index (VFI). The placental vascular indices were then plotted against gestational age and placental volume. All placental vascular indices showed constant distribution throughout gestation. A tendency for a reduction in placental vascular indices with increased placental volume was observed, but was only statistically significant when placental FI was considered (p<0.05). All placental vascular indices estimated by 3D-power Doppler ultrasonography presented constant distribution throughout gestation, despite the increase in placental volume according to gestational age.


Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Placenta/blood supply , Placenta/diagnostic imaging , Placental Circulation/physiology , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Adult , Blood Flow Velocity , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Placenta/anatomy & histology , Pregnancy , Young Adult
12.
Braz. j. phys. ther. (Impr.) ; 11(6): 451-459, nov.-dez. 2007. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-472105

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: Estudar a confiabilidade, da versão em português, do questionário para o diagnóstico psicológico e psicossocial dos indivíduos com desordens temporomandibulares (RDC/TMD). MÉTODOS: Foram entrevistados 109 indivíduos, de ambos sexos, que demandaram atendimento junto à Clínica de Fisioterapia do Centro Universitário de Araraquara, de janeiro a julho de 2006. Os questionários foram aplicados por um único examinador. Após duas semanas, o mesmo foi reaplicado em 36 indivíduos. Para avaliação da consistência interna do método, utilizou-se o Coeficiente Alfa de Cronbach; para análise da reprodutibilidade intra-examinador, o Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (ro) e a estatística Kappa (kapa), respectivamente às variáveis de natureza quantitativa e qualitativa. RESULTADOS: A consistência interna para as dimensões intensidade da dor crônica e incapacidade; limitação da função mandibular; sintomas físicos não-específicos, incluindo os itens de dor; sintomas físicos não-específicos, excluindo os itens de dor e depressão foi de 0,8479, 0,8971, 0,8673, 0,8080 e 0,9270 respectivamente, atestando ao método excelente validade interna. Obteve-se "excelente" concordância intra-examinador para as questões referentes ao tempo de presença da dor e sua gradação, e "boa" para a questão referente à dor presente. Os menores valores de kapa relacionaram-se aos itens de sintomas físicos e depressão. A percepção de estalos ou rangidos pelos indivíduos apresentou concordância "regular" bem como a questão referente à procura de profissional para tratamento da dor. As demais questões apresentaram reprodutibilidade "boa" e "ótima", sendo que a maioria dessas apresentou nível máximo de concordância. CONCLUSÃO: A versão adaptada para o português mostrou-se confiável para detecção das alterações psicológicas e psicossociais associadas às desordens temporomandibulares.


OBJECTIVE: To study the reliability of the Portuguese version of a questionnaire for psychologically and psychosocially diagnosing individuals with temporomandibular disorders (RDC/TMD). METHOD: Interviews were held with 109 individuals of both sexes who required care at the physical therapy clinic of the Araraquara University Center (UNIARA) from January to July 2006. The questionnaires were applied by a single examiner. Two weeks later, the same questionnaire was reapplied to 36 individuals. To evaluate the internal consistency of the method, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used. The intra-examiner reproducibility was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (rho) for quantitative variables and Kappa (kappa) statistics for qualitative variables. RESULTS: The internal consistency for the dimensions of chronic pain intensity, disability, limitations relating to mandibular function, nonspecific physical symptoms with pain items included, and nonspecific physical symptoms with pain items and depression excluded, were 0.8479, 0.8971, 0.8673, 0.8080 and 0.9270 respectively, thus confirming the excellent internal validity of the method. The intra-observer agreement was found to be "excellent" for questions relating to pain duration and intensity and "good" for the question relating to current pain. The lowest kappa values were associated with items relating to physical symptoms and depression. The subjects' perception of clicking and creaking also had "satisfactory" agreement, as did the question on seeking professionals for pain treatment. The remaining questions showed "good" and "very good" reproducibility and most of them presented the maximum agreement. CONCLUSION: The Portuguese adaptation of the questionnaire was shown to be reliable for detecting psychological and psychosocial abnormalities relating to temporomandibular disorders.

13.
Rev. ciênc. farm. básica apl ; 27(2): 133-138, 2006. graf, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-466192

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to analyse the oral cancer mortality trends in Brazil by geographic region, age and sex, from 1996 to 2001. The Brazilian Ministry of Health database DATASUS and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics were used as the source of data. Oral cancer mortality rates per 100,000 population were estimated. Statistical analyses comprised estimates of oral cancer mortality rates, grouped according to the study variables, in 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001; also, the three-year periods 1996-1998 and 1999-2001 were analysed, allowing the oral cancer mortality trends between these two periods to be calculated. For comparison, in each geographical region, the ratio between two death rates (related to period or sex) was calculated. In the period 1996-2001, a total of 25,972 deaths due to oral cancer were reported, giving a mortality rate of 2.67. The rates for the periods 1996-1998 and 1999-2001 were 2.53 and 2.73, respectively, showing a slight increase in the rate. There was a predominance of oral cancer in males with a male/female ratio of approximately 4. All regions exhibited an increase in mortality rates, with the exception of the Southeast region. From 1996 to 2001, the average mortality rates were 3.55 and 3.58 for the Southeast and South regions, and 1.94, 1.41, and 0.86 for the Mid-West, Northeast, and North regions, respectively. Over the age of 40, oral cancer mortality rates were seen to increase rapidly with age. Oral cancer mortality increased in all regions, exceptin the Southeast, and was considerably higher among males and older individuals.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/mortality
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...